Reinforcement Of An Old Topic

I plan to make this clear within a few days after collecting my thoughts. For now I know simply state recognition that this is old news. When I get repetitive I try to put a new spin on things to keep people who are repeat visitors interested. Bottom line, so they don't have to search for it, newcomers have this recent post.


Without the details until my future post, at times the claim is made, both openly and indicated by actions taken, that THE ENTIRE LANGUAGE IS CODED FOR GEMATRIA. It sounds too good to be true, because it is. It simply cannot be true. It's not a particularly deep concept and not difficult to debunk. All you need is understanding of everyday language we use all the time.


Since this blog is intended as a resource for fence sitters who just got interested in the topic of gematria, here's the scenario. Johnny got home from school and tells Mom and Dad that Billy mentioned his creepy older brother found proof through gematria that the raccoon that mauled the baby* was actually intended to be a Satanic, pedophilic sacrifice. Mom is skeptical and squeezes details out of the story from Johnny. Dad is fed up with Billy's family.


Enough background. Now choose any single elision (cipher) you want. Just one. It doesn't matter. Use your favorite method of calculating these sentences:


"Billy's brother thinks that baby maulings by raccoons are a sacrifice to the dark forces and the proof is in the details of the Resident Evil movies gematria, particularly the events of Raccoon City and Milla Jovovich's entire career. However, Dad thinks he is nuts and that it's just a made up story by the media to evoke sympathy so the family of the baby can get money to take a nice vacation in Wollongong."


It doesn't matter if the grammar is completely correct. It doesn't matter how much sense it makes. What you end up with is a single value that should be next to impossible to match except by something even more senseless.


Now switch Dad and Billy's brother. It's really just that easy. You've completely switched the meaning and it ends up with the exact same value in your single system. There's no arguing over "making up phrases" or substitution of synonyms, you're only switching the two names. With the length of the text it's impossible to tie the entire thing to something much smaller like "Donald Trump" short of using another numbering system. But the powers that shouldn't be chose to encode our language in that one system you picked at the start to make it be the same value? Hogwash.


*There actually was a baby attacked by a raccoon recently. With my use of a hobo being bitten by a weasel so frequently, I have to wonder... but coincidences are another day's subject.