Tuesday, May 16, 2017

The PROS And CONS Of Using Multiple Numbering Systems In Gematria

I will take the time to make a more extensive list. I have a couple solid examples and some near antonyms to make the point now.


If this were to be a Nancy Drool Mystery I would drag it out to the solution. But I'm taking this opportunity now while there's a lull in the action....translation...the dog is not pestering me for attention. That won't last much longer.


The reason for the post title is that pro and con are very direct antonyms. And as their etymology as prefixes dictates are found at the beginning of words. My solid example for now is protract and contract (in the sense of getting smaller, not a legal document, of course). Direct antonyms. Pretty common. For now I also offer processional and concessional, or without the trailing -al if you prefer, and profound and confound. Not pure antonyms but the meanings as being opposite are apparent.


Now you idiots that proclaimed (anti-conclaimed?) that reverse ordinal was so great when you trotted it out months ago never realized that the more numbering systems you have to make it easier to generate your matches(your pro) also makes it easier to produce contradictions (your con). And you don't have the bullshit warning to fall back on here like with Jewish Reduction. You sold this out long ago as being soooooo important. And pro in ordinal and con in reverse both equal 32. Which means an other antonym pair I find with pro and con mathematically have to equal the same way.


It makes absolutely no sense that any super powerful organization or deity would ever let such a discrepancy slip through.


Hey Stuart, we got some Roman asshole that wants to create pro and con words and they have the same Gematria. Should we kill him? Awwww nah...we'll take care of it later. Me and the boys in section 14 are busy with the pro athlete selective breeding program and cover up.

No comments:

Post a Comment