Saturday, November 25, 2017

I Need An Angle For This Post

Quite literally. I need an angle.


Focus on not keeping stories straight (reference Twofer sniglet...as you will see extremely appropriate)? Save it for the factual mistake monthly award? Introduce how Stephen Colbert is the latest freemason shill as proven by loose interpretation of rules?


To ease my distress of not knowing what angle to begin the story with, it involves angles. Or actually not an angle, which is the problem. I have to give a little background before the angle, but I wouldn't have focused on this without its absence.


Two days ago we had flat earthers get an onslaught on their beliefs. I've long speculated that this is recognition of how you want to use GPS coordinates in numerology. In addition to being a rather pointless topic to bother defending, flat earth believers are apparently the low end of the food (fool) chain. Real Truthers-->Truthers that use gematria-->flat earthers. The higher predators regarding lower parts of the fool chain as just too weird to bother with.


So now we have one of these annoying lack of science knowledge posts from Hubbard come up. 235 dead people in the terror attack. This means several different things to the masons. Not surprisingly, none of them actually being the number 235. First, it's the three initial numbers on the list of primes. 2,3,5. Freemasonry homage to prime numbers complete, we move to the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. 23.5 degrees north and south latitude. Now, the opportunity to further engage the flat earthers is bypassed. It's not really the Tropic lines that are at 23.5 degrees, that's where they end up because that's the tilt of the earth (globe) on its axis. And it's actually 23.47 degrees for the record. And it's just a sideshow to the main event. Freemasonry love of rounding and arbitrary addition or deletion of decimal places appease........ <insert drum roll>


There's 23.5 degrees on each leg of the freemason compass.


No. No! No! No! You didn't just say that.


One dimensional lines don't have angles. An angle is created when lines intersect. You just durped in 23.5 by recognizing the freemasonry compass angle of 47 degrees divided by 2 is 23.5.


But it gets better. After further arbitrary decimal place fiddling, we get the overused phyllotaxis picture of 137.5 degrees equaling the 137 degrees of the freemasonry compass symbol. So now we have two, three and five and 23.5 and 235 and 137 and 137.5 all tied together in a festering conglomeration of number shaving and toying with decimal points. In sacred GEOMETRY, where one would tend to think that understanding the concept of an angle is important.


I know what you're thinking. It couldn't get any better. You are quite wrong.


Some chap by the screen name auracle chimes in on the comments of a new Hubbard video. All you people dissing Hubbard about the book are wrong, blah, blah, blah. I do my check on fake account activity. Thirteen subscribers. No original content, but at least he's been active for awhile. And he had subscribed to one of Hubbard's long ago deleted channels. Looking good for his credibility until I see....<more intense drum roll.....>


The flat earth video playlists.


So let me get this right. Your story is that you read the comments on videos, you know the flak Hubbard is getting for the book. And you somehow missed the comments about how fed up Hubbard is with "flat earth retards?" Is that right? You missed the comments in your own playlists about how your flat earth theory doesn't make sense? Including the one about how you conspiracy theorists can't get your stories straight? And you don't care about the use of the Tropics latitude in regards to the tilt of the Earth, and chose to ignore those and defend the book issue?


I already have your debate defense. Recent convert, right? Zach showed you the real truth about flat earth and you just haven't gotten around to it. Maintenance is an issue with your type. Broken links of deleted videos abound. Kinda lazy. But it still points to a lack of seriousness on your part. And if you don't take yourself seriously, why should I or anyone else.


Because these questions are going to come up. Like, maybe Stephen Colbert. Thought I forgot about him, eh? The Kelvinator suggested he was maybe The Master Bullshitter. Because STEPHEN TYRONE COLBERT = 1243. 11x113. 11 being a master number and bullshit being one of a zillion things equal to 113. He might just like to sit across a table from one of you and say, "Now, let me get this right...My name equals a number that is picked out of a bunch of numbers, but it's not that number, it's two other numbers and one of those numbers could be the same as 'bullshit' and tons of other things including direct antonyms and....etc....? Is that your story?" Because at least off camera there's a good chance that he'll sarcastically say, "Yeah, that makes ALL kinds of fucking sense."


Just like the idiot with the rocket, you succeeded in your plan. You get some attention. What kind of cookie do you want?



No comments:

Post a Comment