Wednesday, May 2, 2018

The Gematria Factual Error Of The Month, April 2018




Hard to say how that comment ever saw the light of day.  We’ve established that visual acuity is not a requirement for gematria.  We’ve established that saying anything as long as you indicate that you are operating under the standard of “agreeing in principal” wins a cookie, instead of being blasted for being just stupid.  So here’s your two seconds of fame.

No, LADY GAGA and AGADDA are certainly not anagrams and you, John Smith, are an idiot.  Here’s the reasons why you get elevated to a mention for the exalted error award.

The obvious first, the direct anagram is not even close.  With no L in AGADDA it sort of jumps out at you right away that this is not working.  I could almost forgive if you tried to slip it into a closer attempt.  If AGADALA was a real word for instance.  For crying in a bucket, AGADDA only has six letters and LADY GAGA has eight.  Are you really that desperate for attention?  Hey look!  My bad! JOHN SMITH is an anagram DUMBASS!  Guess we know why you picked The certainly fictitious name you did for this account.

Interesting that Denim Dumbass Decodes followed up after without pointing this out.  I suppose he’s been to busy covering his own shoddy work to notice.  Now in addition to removing his already failed bracket, his major most recent post from yesterday now calls gematria a secret numbers code instead of a language.  I don’t mind being used as a source for corrections; there’s so much corrupt about gematria that he can’t fix everything.  So reason number two, thank you for helping me expose how fraudulent he is.  Trying to fix mistakes hoping nobody will notice  is worse than making them in the first place.

Also, you just throw out AGADDA like we all are supposed to know what that means.  Other than In AGADDA Da Vida I don’t know.  Looking it up and it’s use in Jewish scripture I still have no idea what relevance this has.  You want to see an anagram with relevance?  I can do that.  Because the big reason, anagrams don’t prove gematria works.  They do the exact opposite.  If this is supposed to be some mystical system that numbers are hidden in, anagrams wouldn’t be so important, because when the letters get rearranged the words take on new meaning.  You’re trying to show that there’s
synchronicity between Lady G and Agadda with the same letters?  Um....Duh.  They have the same letters.  Greater minds than yours have played with anagrams and understand that letters just make up words with no regard for what numerology is supposedly buried in them.  Since I last addressed this topic, the record has been absolutely crushed.

The entire novel, Moby Dick, anagrammed

Nearly a million letters rearranged into an entirely new story that has good grammar and makes sense.  The exact same gematria value in simple ordinal over all those words.  Yet somehow these mystical Freemasons got a hold of Melville to get him to create this famous novel to contain special bits and pieces or the whole thing are hiding clues to their evil master plan.  A new novel created on purpose just using the exact same letters that now we are supposed to believe the Freemasons got to this author and forced out of him.  I’m sure if he can do Moby dick he can do other lengthy books given time.

No comments:

Post a Comment