Sophists Of Fury

Oh Goody.  Two new numbers to play with, and fresh off the heels of the return of mentioning dipshitmatic immunity.

SOPHIST - a person who reasons with clever but fallacious arguments.

And that, my friends, describes gematrimooks better than any word except, of course, gematrimooks.  That is unless 106 becomes the “mainstream media number of sophistry “.  Which is going to be a problem in the long run.

The 106 value of SOPHIST also leads to the Reverse complementary number of 83; it stands to reason that the lorikeet loving bastards ruling the world with their iron fists of fury intended both those numbers to be equally representative.

Being served up a fresh number that seems to be leaning towards meaning something like 113=DISHONEST, I checked what our dipshitmatically immune friends have in regards to gematria of SOPHIST.

ZACH HUBBARD = 106 ALW Kabbalah.
Zach, not Zachary.  But you can’t argue that it’s not allowed as the sophists doing gematria do this all the time.  ALW Kabbalah is not the most common elision, yet the sophists have it available instead of declaring it unsound.

BEHRENDT= 106 KLW Kabbalah.  Pretty much the same boat.  The sophists love their last names only.

DEREK TIKKURI = 83 Reverse reduced.  I can’t picture them giving up on reductions anytime soon.  Maybe DEREK MICHAEL J. TIKKURI = 601 Primes will get scuttled or the use of mirror images, but he used the full name himself here:  https://web.archive.org/save/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2017/12/29/seems-like-destiny/

So which logically fallacious argument can cover all these?  How about 0.  Let’s try one out,

The mirror image of 106 doesn’t apply to the author of a cipher he made up last year since the mainstream media used it somewhere else.  Yeah, that sounds like a sophist’s reasoning.

There are other options for defense.  One that doesn’t work too well is that sophist can alternately mean simply “philosopher”.  But then Mfsyy’s Hubbard approved jab doesn’t work since words with more than one definition help shoot down the idea of the entire language being encoded.  Especially contronyms.

The easier defense, the more genuine.  The definition used in the comment on the screenshot doesn’t apply to gematrimooks, because they are not clever.  Not at all.