“And the gematria of <first name> <last name> equals <one of a multitude of different options> while this is the <multitude of different date numerologies, or other random ‘connections’>!”
“What are the odds?”
Yes, an extremely good question detective douche rocket. What exactly are the odds? You really gonna just throw out that last line without telling us what you think the odds are? When you associate with sports betting gematria accounts that especially when point spreads are factored in they can’t even get better than 50ish percent right?
When the gematria grifter throws out the, “What are the odds?” comment what they are saying is that this is not a coincidence at all. That this event is 100% an example of the evil empire doing something very naughty, and getting caught red handed in their naughtiness. The kind of people that don’t mind having statistically clueless jurors putting Sally Clark in jail.
A big part of the Sally Clark story that needs emphasized and is a tough nut to crack in real life is the irrelevance of the expert witness’s statistic. Reporting after the fact on what the odds were supposedly deemed to be has no bearing when at the time of the trial both of the children were dead - a 100% chance of them being dead. Guilt or innocence is never going to change that fact. It’s the journey of how the deaths happened that’s important, not the destination that we already now. If it weren’t so tragic it would be a Disney movie plot.
The 100% correct reporting after the fact should sound awfully familiar to you if you’ve been paying attention. You don’t get a nickname like “After the Fact Zach” without overusing this as a keystone of your business model. But it doesn’t end at the top of the multilevel marketing scheme. It’s purposefully force fed to the lower parts of the pyramid, where What Are The Odds? is the end of the investigation. WATO is the golden hammer and ultimate debate winner. Gematria of whatever other gibberish you associate with reality is what makes you a self perceived expert witness.
And in an election year we really don’t need a lot of expert witnesses that aren’t so expert. Because thanks to Alex Jones and his ilk there’s a lot of people that fancy themselves constitutional experts based on self perceived expert witness testimony.
There is still significant Qanon gematria spreading around. And this is an entirely different beast than the straight up Team A vs. Team B sports gematria world. The sports is easier to spot when the so called master consistently lies to cover up clearly being wrong. Qanon gematria and all the homogeneous crank and grift magnetism associated with it is all about the predicted end of the game. Where the game is political or social outcomes. And the end of the game is nowhere in near sight. The expert witnesses have been trained, psychological damaged, to invest themselves into offering their testimony to a sparkling outcome that has zero percent chance of happening, while expecting a 100% chance. The expectations of being able to gloat with an, “I told you so”, far outweigh actually behaving in a manner expected from their ex friends and family members that abandoned them. Because their expert testimony and their gloating and their system that got them there is only effective when reported after the fact.
Delving into the sidelines of the Weird Shit in the Sky crowd is a real eye opener. There’s no doubt that the majority of the grift is pro Trump or at best playing both sides. Just like gematria can take both sides or force the narrative to be whatever they want, they’re expert witnesses, people possibly affecting the outcome of this year’s upcoming U.S. election, includes:
- Dreams, especially Rapture related dreams
- Something just occurred to me...(voices in my head message)
- That's not a cloud it's a... [no, actually it's really just a cloud]
- Dark energy, vibrations
- Astrology
- Extreme weather
And somehow this expert witness testimony is conflated to constitutional expertise.
The goal for the conspiracy grifter is to invest in development of experts that aren’t actually experts, weaning their confirmation bias to equate reporting after the fact with predictions of future outcomes that never come true.
No comments:
Post a Comment