So I guess it's me. The ever delayed gematria bible is still only a vision on the horizon.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/03/update-book-baby-will-not-publish.html
Now let's go over some things that we do know.
YouTube has made things difficult and there is no current Zachary Hubbard Channel that hasn't been struck for community violation guidelines reasons.
A Patreon fundraiser has been created. Perks are a copy of a .pdf version of the unedited book, promise of a hardcopy down the road (about two months away) and when there are 1000 subscribers daily podcasts.
Bookbaby will not publish the book for SOME REASON.
Now to some things that don't make sense.
The claim is censorship and violation of the Constitution. I've already covered this and more than I should trying to keep this blog on topic of why gematria cannot possibly work. So I must limit this for purposes of not coming off as a total hypocrite. In my defense, this is related to the gematria book and therefore on topic. This Tweet and accompanying video sent in response to Hubbard's tweet about signing a petition mirrors my own thoughts. It sucks, but it's not going to work.
https://mobile.twitter.com/c_chanter/status/969404170234204160?p=v
Curiously, the only Tweet from the relatively inactive Hubbard Twitter about 10 days before this was:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180308235524/https://mobile.twitter.com/freetofindtruth/status/966199386538733568?p=v
Explain to me how this is NOT harassment. And is typical of the sort of activity that leads to YouTube strikes. Even if Rubio is evil it seems like we're supposed to believe that a different set of rules apply. I would imagine the only reason the Twitter account hasn't been terminated is that it's likely Rubio never saw it. Some intern saw it and blew it off.
Let's add in that there's a loyal follower claiming legal expertise that hasn't said anything more than, "Yeah! Go get 'em!" to the censorship issue.
Patreon. My understanding is that they are a bookkeeping middleman between content creators and pledgers. There's no guarantee that anyone signing up is going to stay signed up. Based on the way the 2017 GoFundMe crashed and burned I have no reason to expect this will be a long term relationship. The claim is that videos will be made available on Patreon to the patrons. My understanding is that it doesn't work that way. They are not a rival of YouTube and don't host web services. It seems like the idea is to provide a short promotional video as advertisement to potential subscribers, not be the gathering spot for the actual content. I wish it worked that way because I have absolutely no problem with the content being confined to the sandalwood scented basement.
The Patreon page currently shows over 60 subscribers and pledges for now of over $600 per month. I would imagine that most of the diehard followers have already joined. Who knows what happens if and when the perk of a book is never more than a .pdf that you have to keep paying for monthly. What happens two months from now if there's another delay? Can you say, "track record"?
The Book. Part of the Patreon page is the book chapter index. Complete with the same grammatical error identified when the chapter list was first put in the FTFM blog. A grammatical error that shouldn't be made by someone claiming to have taught in public schools. And should have been caught by the loyal follower who works with editing that has admitted to having read the unedited book. The same material that supposedly was sent to Bookbaby in December, returned to Hubbard for final tweaks and we were told that he was sorry for the delay getting it back to Bookbaby for printing. That has the same grammatical error that absolutely no fucking way a professional book publishing editor would miss.
Did you EVER contact Bookbaby? Really? Because based on their website some other timing and date issues are questionable. The easiest way to avoid paying for publishing and editing services is to simply not have something published. Now we have not just a description of why this shouldn't happen in the Jenn Mariano comment to the blog post, but now Bookbaby is the baddie even if they know absolutely nothing about this.
Book publishers don't release client names. That way Stephen King can write about hot teenage lesbian vampires instead of worrying about being associated outside his genre. Or similar reasons for a pseudonym. It will be interesting to see what they say.* Until a time comes where I see proof that Bookbaby was ever involved I am sticking with the nonexistence of the book other than some slapdash quick cover up instead of nearly 800 pages. I'll settle for a review from any unbiased source instead of unsigned testimonials on a cover page.
* Yes. I said that. I predicted something like this and sent them an email in December. Just finished my follow up before this blog post.
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Friday, March 9, 2018
The Fallacy Of Relative Privation
Stacey Travis is still alive. The largest earthquake ever fairly close to Wollongong was a 5.5 in Oakdale about 45 years ago. Brisbane had tennis ball sized hailstones in 2014. Moving on.
________________________________________________
There's so much overlap in the pigeon chess defenses I'm not sure I have the right logical fallacy. I think I do, but if I describe it then merely the titling is wrong. This is going to gather together some of the more interesting tricks to number generation in the past few months. The difference at this point than, say, a year ago, is that they just kept chugging along unchallenged. Let's throw in this occasional weird trick to justify a number in the middle of a set of more conventionally derived values. Maybe it will become alternative mainstream. Maybe not. It will at least get a ❤ and a cookie.
The justification for insertion of these is much like the defense I have seen for the existence of 3,902,721,883 elisions. "Well, I only use four!". To me this seems like relative privation. "It's a good idea to elect Trump because he's not as bad as Hillary". It may or might not be true, but ignores electing Trump based on his or her own merits. If you don't like the lesser of two evils scenario the classic example is, "Well, Stalin wasn't as bad as Hitler".
Just because you don't use Septenary doesn't change that the gematria values others use are invalid. They still get thrown in to the stories.
There's been an alarming number of new additions to the number changing arsenal lately, as if being called out on the questionability of some things makes the desire to make more matches counter the fact that forced creation of new matches is the problem. So from a logical standpoint, they're just digging their own graves. So here we go.
____________________________________
1). All the additional cipher additions.
2). You can now spell out a number as a word at least twice.
3). You can parse, e.g. 1393 is 13, 93.
4). You can concatenate. 13, 93 is 1393.
5). You can parse and concatenate. 139 months 3 weeks is 139,3-->1393-->13,93
6). You can add days together. <Month> 27th and <Month> 29th=27+29=56.
7). You can add the values of separate elisions together.
8). You can reverse the digits of a gematriot and add them together, parse or manipulate in further ways.
9). Distances can be expressed as those between and the diameters of celestial bodies.
10). Date numerology can use multiplication.
11). You can eliminate any multiple digit - 1556-->156.
12). The digits of Euler's number.
13). Trig values.
14). Star numbers
15). Portions of a large prefixed number, e.g. 1 billion-->1,000 million. (Used in spelling out numbers as words.)
16). Date spans can be at least two days different instead of just the old fashioned one depending on inclusion of end date.
17). With Franc Baconis especially you don't need to capitalize the first letter like it almost always used to appear. computer vs. Computer.
18). Single initials count for names.
19). Roman numeral letters can have their Arabic numeral value in place of the elision based value. E.g., AVA Gardener, AVA can be 1+22+1 or 1+5+1.
I'll have to add more later, I'm sure I missed some. Note that the list doesn't include the common tricks like primes and mirror images. The fallacious defense is, "I don't add two ciphers together, so mirror images make sense because I'm not so bad." You don't use the trick, but you certainly don't openly condemn it. At times it even gets a high five and a cookie.
I suspect that the current trend is to get away from the "entire language is encoded" stupidity by use of the brute force impossible not to find a match by infinite ways to manipulate stupidity. There's no way around both of them.
________________________________________________
There's so much overlap in the pigeon chess defenses I'm not sure I have the right logical fallacy. I think I do, but if I describe it then merely the titling is wrong. This is going to gather together some of the more interesting tricks to number generation in the past few months. The difference at this point than, say, a year ago, is that they just kept chugging along unchallenged. Let's throw in this occasional weird trick to justify a number in the middle of a set of more conventionally derived values. Maybe it will become alternative mainstream. Maybe not. It will at least get a ❤ and a cookie.
The justification for insertion of these is much like the defense I have seen for the existence of 3,902,721,883 elisions. "Well, I only use four!". To me this seems like relative privation. "It's a good idea to elect Trump because he's not as bad as Hillary". It may or might not be true, but ignores electing Trump based on his or her own merits. If you don't like the lesser of two evils scenario the classic example is, "Well, Stalin wasn't as bad as Hitler".
Just because you don't use Septenary doesn't change that the gematria values others use are invalid. They still get thrown in to the stories.
There's been an alarming number of new additions to the number changing arsenal lately, as if being called out on the questionability of some things makes the desire to make more matches counter the fact that forced creation of new matches is the problem. So from a logical standpoint, they're just digging their own graves. So here we go.
____________________________________
1). All the additional cipher additions.
2). You can now spell out a number as a word at least twice.
3). You can parse, e.g. 1393 is 13, 93.
4). You can concatenate. 13, 93 is 1393.
5). You can parse and concatenate. 139 months 3 weeks is 139,3-->1393-->13,93
6). You can add days together. <Month> 27th and <Month> 29th=27+29=56.
7). You can add the values of separate elisions together.
8). You can reverse the digits of a gematriot and add them together, parse or manipulate in further ways.
9). Distances can be expressed as those between and the diameters of celestial bodies.
10). Date numerology can use multiplication.
11). You can eliminate any multiple digit - 1556-->156.
12). The digits of Euler's number.
13). Trig values.
14). Star numbers
15). Portions of a large prefixed number, e.g. 1 billion-->1,000 million. (Used in spelling out numbers as words.)
16). Date spans can be at least two days different instead of just the old fashioned one depending on inclusion of end date.
17). With Franc Baconis especially you don't need to capitalize the first letter like it almost always used to appear. computer vs. Computer.
18). Single initials count for names.
19). Roman numeral letters can have their Arabic numeral value in place of the elision based value. E.g., AVA Gardener, AVA can be 1+22+1 or 1+5+1.
I'll have to add more later, I'm sure I missed some. Note that the list doesn't include the common tricks like primes and mirror images. The fallacious defense is, "I don't add two ciphers together, so mirror images make sense because I'm not so bad." You don't use the trick, but you certainly don't openly condemn it. At times it even gets a high five and a cookie.
I suspect that the current trend is to get away from the "entire language is encoded" stupidity by use of the brute force impossible not to find a match by infinite ways to manipulate stupidity. There's no way around both of them.
Thursday, March 8, 2018
Forty Minutes To Go
So far eclipse ritual deaths as shown by Wikipedia today are a Filipino actor, a Guyanese writer, a Canadian ice hockey player and an Irish biochemist. There's forty minutes to go until midnight Greenwich mean time. Doesn't seem too exciting. Maybe a porn star named something like Flamy Muffin will be found dead tomorrow morning and the coroner will figure she got sacrificed on March 8th.
Our field reporter stalking Stacey Travis has checked in and reports that she's still alive. Yes, let me repeat that. Stacey Travis is still alive, and currently at home watching a Flamy Muffin flick.
Our field reporter stalking Stacey Travis has checked in and reports that she's still alive. Yes, let me repeat that. Stacey Travis is still alive, and currently at home watching a Flamy Muffin flick.
Pigeon Chess/Hubbard's Book
As for the book, it seems to have been released, although things are somewhat vague on the actual details. I'll go through various inconsistencies, doubts and what makes the idea a good one in a couple of days. For now I'll simply note that there is a Patreon fundraising page set up. There's already information out there on the pluses and minuses of Patreon.
______________________________________
It took me a while to stumble on something in regards to "debating" gematria proponents and those with, let's call them offbeat ideas, in general. My original material was my own thoughts from personal experience. And as it turns out I was right. You can debate when the gauntlet is thrown, but it's a losing battle. The outcome, just like a tiny number in gematria, is predetermined. In gematria there's no room for PUPPIES=612 to have any meaning when there's a lovely little school children massacre that has that same value. In a debate, you've already lost before the debate has begun. It's called Pigeon Chess.
The idiots in this image can be substituted with any opponent that has a position with no logical basis. It doesn't matter how much actual evidence you have. Or how little evidence they have. You know they aren't going to change their mind so it's utterly pointless.
For example, I might start with how there is absolutely no empirical evidence that the Freemasons are involved. In a real debate that's game over, because there isn't. It's clearly shoehorned in. There's no logic to assume that 612 can't simply mean PUPPIES. I can then expect the counter argument of:
?????????
Knocking the chess pieces over. Unless you're fully prepared for every logical fallacy and every conceivable attempt to muddy the waters you can get tripped up. It becomes more about winning the debate than actually being right. Sir Sic (whom I incorrectly called Inequity Crusader, it's Inequality Crusader. Sorry.) has mentioned this in some video responses to flat earth hate mail. In the gematria world I can't tell if I'm about to be challenged on coincidences or quote mined passages or the ever lovable "you are a paid shill" argument or what ever else might pop up. The pigeon shit can get deep while trying to keep the conversation focused on shoehorning.
They have TONS of experience knocking the pieces over because they are completely wrong and have often encountered those that tried in vain to be nice about it. I haven't seen many good arguments lately. A memorable one from months ago was MOST HATED pointing out some things and eventually gave up. Gematria wins the debate by default. In addition to his comments being deleted the victory dance commentary from the gematria side remained. The pigeon flew home to the flock and they all bragged about how they won.
This does lead to some entertainment when both sides are wrong. Forgive me if I've gotten some of the details wrong. I think it played out this way.
A Call For An Uprising is a flat earther and a Christian.
He crossed paths and swords with Hubbard.
They had an argument, between two people allegedly on the same side.
Both put up hate videos.
Both knocked the pieces over. Hubbard put out a series of purely science related material and called "all Christians stupid".
ACFAU attacked Hubbard for being (obviously) an Israeli disinformation agent. I.e., disregarding whether gematria works or not.
Both sides declared victory.
At least this developed into enough harassment and bullying content that videos were struck by YouTube and deleted. As far as I know the feud hasn't been really resolved except both sides are confident that they won the pigeon chess game.
______________________________________
It took me a while to stumble on something in regards to "debating" gematria proponents and those with, let's call them offbeat ideas, in general. My original material was my own thoughts from personal experience. And as it turns out I was right. You can debate when the gauntlet is thrown, but it's a losing battle. The outcome, just like a tiny number in gematria, is predetermined. In gematria there's no room for PUPPIES=612 to have any meaning when there's a lovely little school children massacre that has that same value. In a debate, you've already lost before the debate has begun. It's called Pigeon Chess.
The idiots in this image can be substituted with any opponent that has a position with no logical basis. It doesn't matter how much actual evidence you have. Or how little evidence they have. You know they aren't going to change their mind so it's utterly pointless.
For example, I might start with how there is absolutely no empirical evidence that the Freemasons are involved. In a real debate that's game over, because there isn't. It's clearly shoehorned in. There's no logic to assume that 612 can't simply mean PUPPIES. I can then expect the counter argument of:
?????????
Knocking the chess pieces over. Unless you're fully prepared for every logical fallacy and every conceivable attempt to muddy the waters you can get tripped up. It becomes more about winning the debate than actually being right. Sir Sic (whom I incorrectly called Inequity Crusader, it's Inequality Crusader. Sorry.) has mentioned this in some video responses to flat earth hate mail. In the gematria world I can't tell if I'm about to be challenged on coincidences or quote mined passages or the ever lovable "you are a paid shill" argument or what ever else might pop up. The pigeon shit can get deep while trying to keep the conversation focused on shoehorning.
They have TONS of experience knocking the pieces over because they are completely wrong and have often encountered those that tried in vain to be nice about it. I haven't seen many good arguments lately. A memorable one from months ago was MOST HATED pointing out some things and eventually gave up. Gematria wins the debate by default. In addition to his comments being deleted the victory dance commentary from the gematria side remained. The pigeon flew home to the flock and they all bragged about how they won.
This does lead to some entertainment when both sides are wrong. Forgive me if I've gotten some of the details wrong. I think it played out this way.
A Call For An Uprising is a flat earther and a Christian.
He crossed paths and swords with Hubbard.
They had an argument, between two people allegedly on the same side.
Both put up hate videos.
Both knocked the pieces over. Hubbard put out a series of purely science related material and called "all Christians stupid".
ACFAU attacked Hubbard for being (obviously) an Israeli disinformation agent. I.e., disregarding whether gematria works or not.
Both sides declared victory.
At least this developed into enough harassment and bullying content that videos were struck by YouTube and deleted. As far as I know the feud hasn't been really resolved except both sides are confident that they won the pigeon chess game.
Wednesday, March 7, 2018
Flowchart Fun
The flowchart is probably too small to see here. It's exaggerated for the comedic effect so the details aren't terribly important. You get the idea. If you want to see the original in its full glory, try here:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3048/2983450505_34b4504302_o.png
I like it. If there was a desktop calendar that started with this my Christmas shopping for this year would already be finished. There's a lot of conspiracy memes out there and most of them are astoundingly unfunny. There are two often repeated templates, Conspiracy Keanu and someone wearing a tinfoil hat. So basically two punch lines over hundreds or thousands of different "jokes".
I believe the intent here is to not simply throw out as many different organizations that are allegedly responsible for the various hilarious heinous hijinks happening. I'm giving the author full credit for mocking the lack of consistency in exactly who is supposed to be behind the hijinks.
This can be seen in the comments on almost a daily basis. Somebody will throw in a comment about Taylor Swift being a robot clone, or Satanic pedophiles, or Hitler being a woman, or the Earth being flat, or fuck knows what will be thought up next. And yes, those are actual comments made in gematria content recently. The reactions range from a rare agreement, most often simply ignoring them and depending on the persistence of the purveyor of the oddity to outright hostility. Think zombie donuts, "Dude, shut up they're just DONUTS!" This can be summed up in what could be turned into a simplified flowchart.
STATEMENT
Do you agree with my point today?
IF YES --> Cool!
IF NO --> Piss off!
This might not seem to apply. Why Hitler being a woman or not may not have any value to the current conversation, but the mere fact that someone thinks it does should be an eye opener to figuring out exactly what it is your group believes. Because as with the pictured flowchart there isn't even close to a consensus.
There's been a big kerfuffle over the number 612 lately and the old "How do you explain this coincidence, smart ass? I've got you!" If I were asked I would start with, there are only two (I think) actual gematria values of 612. One is DUNBLANE MASSACRE=612. And maybe HEART for a shooting on Valentine's Day. Heart is not a direct substitution for Valentine. There are lots of Valentine's related words to pick from. Cupid, sweetheart, love, etc....History doesn't forget. There's been lots of mass shootings. Congratulations you've just used a bunch of date numerology which isn't really gematria for 12/6, 6/12 and spans of days including 6120 which isn't equal to 612. No, you tell me why every mass shooting doesn't happen on 6/12 or 12/6 if this is supposed to mean something. Otherwise I could look through Wikipedia and crunch all the date spans and probably make a big kerfluffle about BUNNY tying into a couple shootings and Easter. Likely you are proving that this is one of the more remarkable coincidences such as AARON RODGERS=558 and BROKEN COLLARBONE=558. Your database is huge and most injuries don't have the same quality of match. If I were a politician that you were attempting to convince I'd probably try and get you locked up if you kept pestering me. Mostly they just hope you'll go away if they ignore you.
If you're claiming this date numerology is gematria as additional evidence you're pretty much committed (and not the way you should be) to the MASONS on the flowchart. Which means all the other reptilian and corporation driven nonsense doesn't apply unless you are putting everything under the Punyfied Conspiracy Theory. So everybody on the planet that doesn't agree with you today is part of the conspiracy and you just told them to piss off. Good for you. You still haven't come close to showing a solution.
WAKE UP! ER...uh...er...or I'll make up more numbers and tell you to wake up again!
Edit: Valentine=612. And for the record, PUPPIES=612. The damn dogs are taking over.
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
NOVA - Prediction By The Numbers
I just watched this yesterday. I probably would have anyway, but since predictions, whether real genuine predictions or not and other predictive subjects have been a theme lately it certainly caught my eye. Note that this came on my radar screen after worrying about if I murdered Stacey Travis by mentioning her. I would be tempted to think that this television event was somewhat of a prediction. However, based on the content and pre-existing good common sense it's a fairly remarkable coincidence
NOVA, the long running science show, has been a project of the NWO masquerading as the government funded PBS television. Regularly the budget has been threatened with trimming all funding for PBS and so I have to say it.
THEY'RE TRYIN' TO TAKE OUR SKOOLS!
Generally the PBS funding stays in the budget and Capitol Hill ignores Trump by choosing its highly variable competency level to remain at a high level for production of things that make gematria look bad, like this documentary.
The doc is aimed at giving a rough understanding to the basics of statistics and probability to a beginner in its approximate one hour running time. Clearly lots of gematria advocates do not have a clue about this, most notably evidenced by the repetition of two or three digit numbers. First by the actual numbers and then more amusingly to the outside world the laughable gyrations taken to turn larger numbers into two or three digit numbers.
The traditional example of a coin flip is used. Guess it once, 50-50%. Guess it ten times in a row, you might be on to something. This is the rule of large numbers and sample sizes. Vegas has at least a small edge in every single game and it's not even 50% for the player.
In line with my suggested prediction test of "tell me if the porn star's parent is dead or not based on their name" is a nice bit that fits to a tea. Science says that if you pour milk into tea or you pour tea into milk if the proportions are the same there's no difference. Some people might claim the only proper tea is to pour the tea into the milk. Fine. It can be tested with a blind taste test. There's no Earl Grey area, you're right or you're wrong.
Statistics and probability indicate that gematria picking a porn star's dead parents based on name only is no better than some random schlub guessing. Probability suggests based on track record that offering a genuine prediction and somebody actually undergoing a random test are so unlikely. It's much easier to wait until someone dies and paint the target after the shooting.
This is part of stacking the deck to increase the odds of apparent success. Then, top it off by refusing to ever admit defeat and finding different ways to force a proclaimed victory. Pick your favorite. Try convincing a blackjack dealer you didn't bust taking a hit on 19 because you considered it to be the eighth prime number.
If someone who is genuinely open minded and thinks gematria works but is willing to listen to reason there's some value to getting them to watch this. A truly legitimate system would have only one cipher. So every single gematria story is instantly wrong just based on that. Point out how many different numbers can be generated just by a single word. Don't forget to point out that in a gematria story 19, 91, 16, 61, 109, and 67 are virtually identical. And you can dig through here for more tricks exposed. If they don't get it even on material that was not specifically created to counter the gematria argument it might be time to cut their funding.
NOVA, the long running science show, has been a project of the NWO masquerading as the government funded PBS television. Regularly the budget has been threatened with trimming all funding for PBS and so I have to say it.
THEY'RE TRYIN' TO TAKE OUR SKOOLS!
Generally the PBS funding stays in the budget and Capitol Hill ignores Trump by choosing its highly variable competency level to remain at a high level for production of things that make gematria look bad, like this documentary.
The doc is aimed at giving a rough understanding to the basics of statistics and probability to a beginner in its approximate one hour running time. Clearly lots of gematria advocates do not have a clue about this, most notably evidenced by the repetition of two or three digit numbers. First by the actual numbers and then more amusingly to the outside world the laughable gyrations taken to turn larger numbers into two or three digit numbers.
The traditional example of a coin flip is used. Guess it once, 50-50%. Guess it ten times in a row, you might be on to something. This is the rule of large numbers and sample sizes. Vegas has at least a small edge in every single game and it's not even 50% for the player.
In line with my suggested prediction test of "tell me if the porn star's parent is dead or not based on their name" is a nice bit that fits to a tea. Science says that if you pour milk into tea or you pour tea into milk if the proportions are the same there's no difference. Some people might claim the only proper tea is to pour the tea into the milk. Fine. It can be tested with a blind taste test. There's no Earl Grey area, you're right or you're wrong.
Statistics and probability indicate that gematria picking a porn star's dead parents based on name only is no better than some random schlub guessing. Probability suggests based on track record that offering a genuine prediction and somebody actually undergoing a random test are so unlikely. It's much easier to wait until someone dies and paint the target after the shooting.
This is part of stacking the deck to increase the odds of apparent success. Then, top it off by refusing to ever admit defeat and finding different ways to force a proclaimed victory. Pick your favorite. Try convincing a blackjack dealer you didn't bust taking a hit on 19 because you considered it to be the eighth prime number.
If someone who is genuinely open minded and thinks gematria works but is willing to listen to reason there's some value to getting them to watch this. A truly legitimate system would have only one cipher. So every single gematria story is instantly wrong just based on that. Point out how many different numbers can be generated just by a single word. Don't forget to point out that in a gematria story 19, 91, 16, 61, 109, and 67 are virtually identical. And you can dig through here for more tricks exposed. If they don't get it even on material that was not specifically created to counter the gematria argument it might be time to cut their funding.
Monday, March 5, 2018
Stacey Travis, A Celebration of Life
Semi-randomly picked hot babe who can kick ass, Stacey Travis, is the star of the movie Hardware. Hardware is a personal favorite of mine, because of the most important cinematic reason. A hot chick. With a nude scene. Cinematography obscures it, but a nude scene nonetheless. It also has an enormous scientific mistake in it which reminds me of gematria. She figures out the robot is tracking her with infrared sensors and hides in the fridge.
Oops. It doesn't work that way. Infrared picks up differences in heat and cold. If anything she would have been more noticeable instead of invisible like in the film. The plot is about post apocalypse survival. Without zombies. Or donuts. The robot was purposefully manufactured as population control. There's a scene where Stacey, character name Jill if you must know, falls from a window and other than the predictably of movies assumed to possibly have expired leaving Dermott Mulroney to battle the killer not. Good triumphs over evil and the theme of life surviving is upheld.
TRAVIS=89
STACEY=89
LIFE CELEBRATION=89
LIVING=89
The movie is set in a desert wasteland. Australia has lots of desert. Wollongong is the most important city in New South Wales
NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA =89
March 8th would be a good day for a life celebration ritual, 3+8+2+0+1+8=22. LIFE=22.
I predict that Stacey will not die on March 8th. There's bound to be other celebrities that don't die on the 8th that are heavily coded with life celebration gematria. Check back here on the 8th. Silly, yes.
Here's the target post that has only slightly more predictive value:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180305094218/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/03/03/next-major-eclipse-sacrifice/
Some of this is fairly impressive. That's the way these things work. It wouldn't see the light of day if there wasn't something to it. But it's cheapened by stretching some things too far.
Good-Tying into 3/8 being between the two eclipses. Otherwise several dates could have the same numerology. Bad-multiplying date digits. Since when did we start doing that and how much stuff was different or wrong in past reports? Really bad - in addition to bringing up the reduced value of DEATH=20, the awkward dropping the 0 in 202 to tie to the date value of 22 it shows that LIFE=22 could be a reasonable conclusion for an open minded person to reach. Closed minded number fudgers opinions don't count.
The real objection is the WHO. Define "celebrity" in this context. Past experience has shown that if a major name doesn't croak off you'll settle for a porn star or obscure rugby player or something. A couple names were thrown out there, but like Bob Dylan stubbornly continuing to refuse to cooperate by dying as predicted it's not likely they'll cooperate on that given day. The playing the "close enough" game with the date can't be done here or March 8th is wrong. So the vague "other celebrity" wording opens up the database to a huge supply of potential croakers.
And once I see what numbers are the "eclipse numbers" encoded I can easily find a bigger list of celebrities that simply did not die. Until robots are programmed for population control more people stay alive every day than die off, it's pretty simple math. It's just like trying to suggest that a football player with a certain two digit number gematria means something for that player's team while every team is going to have a player with that number. It looks like a prediction, but it's not.
I sure hope nothing happens to Stacey on the 8th. Last time I did something like this I killed Rose Marie.
Oops. It doesn't work that way. Infrared picks up differences in heat and cold. If anything she would have been more noticeable instead of invisible like in the film. The plot is about post apocalypse survival. Without zombies. Or donuts. The robot was purposefully manufactured as population control. There's a scene where Stacey, character name Jill if you must know, falls from a window and other than the predictably of movies assumed to possibly have expired leaving Dermott Mulroney to battle the killer not. Good triumphs over evil and the theme of life surviving is upheld.
TRAVIS=89
STACEY=89
LIFE CELEBRATION=89
LIVING=89
The movie is set in a desert wasteland. Australia has lots of desert. Wollongong is the most important city in New South Wales
NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA =89
March 8th would be a good day for a life celebration ritual, 3+8+2+0+1+8=22. LIFE=22.
I predict that Stacey will not die on March 8th. There's bound to be other celebrities that don't die on the 8th that are heavily coded with life celebration gematria. Check back here on the 8th. Silly, yes.
Here's the target post that has only slightly more predictive value:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180305094218/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/03/03/next-major-eclipse-sacrifice/
Some of this is fairly impressive. That's the way these things work. It wouldn't see the light of day if there wasn't something to it. But it's cheapened by stretching some things too far.
Good-Tying into 3/8 being between the two eclipses. Otherwise several dates could have the same numerology. Bad-multiplying date digits. Since when did we start doing that and how much stuff was different or wrong in past reports? Really bad - in addition to bringing up the reduced value of DEATH=20, the awkward dropping the 0 in 202 to tie to the date value of 22 it shows that LIFE=22 could be a reasonable conclusion for an open minded person to reach. Closed minded number fudgers opinions don't count.
The real objection is the WHO. Define "celebrity" in this context. Past experience has shown that if a major name doesn't croak off you'll settle for a porn star or obscure rugby player or something. A couple names were thrown out there, but like Bob Dylan stubbornly continuing to refuse to cooperate by dying as predicted it's not likely they'll cooperate on that given day. The playing the "close enough" game with the date can't be done here or March 8th is wrong. So the vague "other celebrity" wording opens up the database to a huge supply of potential croakers.
And once I see what numbers are the "eclipse numbers" encoded I can easily find a bigger list of celebrities that simply did not die. Until robots are programmed for population control more people stay alive every day than die off, it's pretty simple math. It's just like trying to suggest that a football player with a certain two digit number gematria means something for that player's team while every team is going to have a player with that number. It looks like a prediction, but it's not.
I sure hope nothing happens to Stacey on the 8th. Last time I did something like this I killed Rose Marie.
New And Improved Ill Advised Predictions
Time to be proactive here. Last year I made a thread about making predictions that shouldn't be made I basically just had screen shots. Since then I've advanced in technology and now can copy links to the source material without having to type it longhand. So we'll start with this that was made September last year. A lot can happen before Wimbledon starts.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180227221032/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2017/09/26-43-55-191-206-sloan-stephens-wins-us.html?m=1
The idea is that the Gematria authors and loyal minions seem to have real short memories when it comes to actual predictions being made. There are so many conflicting messages, so much vagueness and ambiguity. And if the actual genuine prediction is made, if it's not lost in the "I never said that" retort nonsense is left with the more nonsensical "They changed the script to make me look bad". If you know they are reading what you type there's absolutely zero reason to even bother trying to make an actual prediction. So just stop
I could have put up the Colts for Super Bowl 54 post, but there's already a vague, "Could this mean the Colts will be in Super Bowl 54?" conflicting post. As time goes on, if actual predictions are made I'll put them in a separate collection before the event. And I will not edit out whatever predictions actually are right, trusting that the past track record of essentially a coin flip will hold true.
The next post will examine a prediction that's worthless.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180227221032/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2017/09/26-43-55-191-206-sloan-stephens-wins-us.html?m=1
The idea is that the Gematria authors and loyal minions seem to have real short memories when it comes to actual predictions being made. There are so many conflicting messages, so much vagueness and ambiguity. And if the actual genuine prediction is made, if it's not lost in the "I never said that" retort nonsense is left with the more nonsensical "They changed the script to make me look bad". If you know they are reading what you type there's absolutely zero reason to even bother trying to make an actual prediction. So just stop
I could have put up the Colts for Super Bowl 54 post, but there's already a vague, "Could this mean the Colts will be in Super Bowl 54?" conflicting post. As time goes on, if actual predictions are made I'll put them in a separate collection before the event. And I will not edit out whatever predictions actually are right, trusting that the past track record of essentially a coin flip will hold true.
The next post will examine a prediction that's worthless.
Sunday, March 4, 2018
How Many Degrees In The Freemason Compass?
Based on the choice of topic you know what a certain number is supposed to mean. You don't even need to read the story beyond what the number of the day is. The email notification from YouTube came at 1:27. That couldn't mean anything but Bavarian Illuminati, because.....I said so!
Bullshit.
The overused reason for freemasonry shoehorning for 47 is this image:
Which is doubly bullshit because now if 235 pops up, even though straight lines don't have angles it's declared that half of 47 is 23.5, each leg of the compass is 1/2. To hell with being off by a factor of 10. Triply bullshit because phyllotaxis at 137.5 is close enough. Quadruply bullshit because the Google search for "47 degree freemason compass" that brings up this image only comes from the Free To Find Misinformation blog.
So while checking out those images from the Google search of "47 degree freemason compass", do you notice that it's kind of odd that they don't mention exactly what the compass angle is? And that some representations are visibly different angles?
Exactly who decided this always was supposed to be 47 degrees? Some actual freemasons have some thoughts out there about this as well as inquiring minds.
Put a check mark in the column of "it doesn't say, I don't know". But some guess 60 degrees.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread444679/pg1
Here's 47 degrees, but apparently just the French Frees do that (until they ketchup)
http://www.masonic-lodge-of-education.com/square-and-compasses.html
Here's some more "I don't know" with a dose of 60 degrees.
http://staffs.proboards.com/thread/7246/angle-compasses
Sacred 60 degrees sounds pretty authoritative.
http://theeducator.ca/symbolism/an-angle-of-60-degrees-why/
Those are the top hits for "degrees in freemason compass" and just looking at the other site names it's pretty clear that it's not an absolute that it's supposed to be 47 degrees. If anything, probably 60 degrees. It seems the angle isn't so important to the masons as is the symbolism of the compass itself. There's lots of info about the G meaning Great Builder, Geometry, or both. How the degrees of masonry might relate to the compass. Nothing about it unequivocally being 47 degrees.
Stop overusing the same excuse and it wont be so obvious that you didn't do any actual research. What did you do? Have a leak in the boat of 47 and 74 not having any nice freemason words to shoehorn in and you just latched on to the first thing that came by? What are you going to make up next, the distance to the moon?
Ooops.
Bullshit.
The overused reason for freemasonry shoehorning for 47 is this image:
Which is doubly bullshit because now if 235 pops up, even though straight lines don't have angles it's declared that half of 47 is 23.5, each leg of the compass is 1/2. To hell with being off by a factor of 10. Triply bullshit because phyllotaxis at 137.5 is close enough. Quadruply bullshit because the Google search for "47 degree freemason compass" that brings up this image only comes from the Free To Find Misinformation blog.
So while checking out those images from the Google search of "47 degree freemason compass", do you notice that it's kind of odd that they don't mention exactly what the compass angle is? And that some representations are visibly different angles?
Exactly who decided this always was supposed to be 47 degrees? Some actual freemasons have some thoughts out there about this as well as inquiring minds.
Put a check mark in the column of "it doesn't say, I don't know". But some guess 60 degrees.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread444679/pg1
Here's 47 degrees, but apparently just the French Frees do that (until they ketchup)
http://www.masonic-lodge-of-education.com/square-and-compasses.html
Here's some more "I don't know" with a dose of 60 degrees.
http://staffs.proboards.com/thread/7246/angle-compasses
Sacred 60 degrees sounds pretty authoritative.
http://theeducator.ca/symbolism/an-angle-of-60-degrees-why/
Those are the top hits for "degrees in freemason compass" and just looking at the other site names it's pretty clear that it's not an absolute that it's supposed to be 47 degrees. If anything, probably 60 degrees. It seems the angle isn't so important to the masons as is the symbolism of the compass itself. There's lots of info about the G meaning Great Builder, Geometry, or both. How the degrees of masonry might relate to the compass. Nothing about it unequivocally being 47 degrees.
Stop overusing the same excuse and it wont be so obvious that you didn't do any actual research. What did you do? Have a leak in the boat of 47 and 74 not having any nice freemason words to shoehorn in and you just latched on to the first thing that came by? What are you going to make up next, the distance to the moon?
Ooops.
Saturday, March 3, 2018
They're Tryin' To Take Our Skools!!
https://web.archive.org/web/20180303082619/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/03/01/ghanaian-teacher-uses-blackboard-for-ms-word-class/
In the good old days a false flag was not a football penalty called on any defensive player that approached the zip code that Tom Brady was located in. It started off in naval warfare. Ships looked like, well, ships. And naval superiority was really important until World War II proved that planes were a lot faster way to murder each other. (Note that Pearl Harbor has been claimed to be a false flag operation.) So, the way you proudly displayed which mighty naval empire you represented was the flag you flew.
I think, and I'm not going to look it up right now so please don't nitpick if I'm wrong, that pirates have a lot to do with this. Some of them may have proudly displayed the Jolly Roger. But these are, after all, despite Hollywood glamorization (I'm looking at you Johnny Depp. No, not THAT way. Not that there's anything wrong with that.) criminals. You don't get ahead without breaking some rules. So fly the same flag as your booty call. Gain their trust. At least get the first salvo in before the jib is up. That's not a typo. Jib is a type of sail. In addition to a little naval humor, for the record jib sails are triangular. Even if the pirate thing is wrong, the trick used to be that Country A would fly the flag of Country B, then trying to salvage some credibility MIGHT switch back to their true colors just before opening fire. Star Trek explained this away by having it impossible for the Romulans to be able to fire their main weapon without shutting off the cloaking device. Regardless, you do at some time want the prey to see the source of their imminent doom.
As with other sneaky tricks that worked this got reapplied to other armed conflicts. You could dress your army up in the entire uniform of the enemy side to gain their trust. A tactic that doesn't work to well with ranged weaponry to back you up. Unless like Longshanks you simply don't care about slaughtering your own Irish conscripts in the process. The idea has been applied throughout history and in modern conspiracy parlance has taken on the meaning of a sneaky trick to discredit someone.
9/11 is a false flag because they want totrade Jolly Roger Clemens to the Pirates take our guns! Las Vegas shooting, hey nobody died! It's a hoax! They want an excuse to take our guns! I love my guns! I sleep with my guns! I named my AR-15 Johnny Depp! And yes, sleeping with Johnny Depp in this sense is wrong, especially if the gun is below the age of consent.
I'm not so petty as to suggest that the link about a school teacher using a chalkboard to teach computer class is a pretty lame fit for predicting a major false flag for March 1st. In fact, considering the source is an avowed proponent of home schooling, it makes perfect sense.
The problem isn't the guns. We love our guns. There's probably a couple people reading this that have just now gathered their cherished favorite bullet launcher and started stroking it. Gun oil optional. The problem of keeping guns away from school children isn't taking the guns away. Take the schools away. Problem solved. Think about it, no schools, no easy targets gathered together. Except maybe like churches and movie theaters. And Attu knows that anyone that wants to watch Batman on opening night deserves to die. Churches have more adults who are more likely to shoot back these days. http://www.newsweek.com/hours-after-sutherland-springs-shooting-texas-official-says-more-guns-church-702351.
The Northeast US bomb cyclone. It's even got bomb in the name. Manufactured by weather warfare to close schools. They're trying to take our skools!
NCAA schools getting caught paying off agents, faculty and student athletes. They don't want to have to spend the effort rigging sports anymore. They're trying to take our skools!
If the schools aren't going to teach the right thing about Pearl Harbor being bombed by the U.S. as an excuse to declare war, shut 'em down. Start off with a false flag in Ghana, spend centuries making sure that it develops a population of a quarter of the people being so dirt poor they're more worried about trivialities like food and water, much less computers. Then slam them with a gematria proven major false flag!
Wake Up! They're trying to Take OUR SSKKKOOOOOOOOLLLLLSSSSS!
No, Trump is wrong about this one, too. (Is he right about anything?). Don't arm the teachers around our precious children. Take the schools away, take the targets away. Teach them gematria at home school and the world will be a better place.
In the good old days a false flag was not a football penalty called on any defensive player that approached the zip code that Tom Brady was located in. It started off in naval warfare. Ships looked like, well, ships. And naval superiority was really important until World War II proved that planes were a lot faster way to murder each other. (Note that Pearl Harbor has been claimed to be a false flag operation.) So, the way you proudly displayed which mighty naval empire you represented was the flag you flew.
I think, and I'm not going to look it up right now so please don't nitpick if I'm wrong, that pirates have a lot to do with this. Some of them may have proudly displayed the Jolly Roger. But these are, after all, despite Hollywood glamorization (I'm looking at you Johnny Depp. No, not THAT way. Not that there's anything wrong with that.) criminals. You don't get ahead without breaking some rules. So fly the same flag as your booty call. Gain their trust. At least get the first salvo in before the jib is up. That's not a typo. Jib is a type of sail. In addition to a little naval humor, for the record jib sails are triangular. Even if the pirate thing is wrong, the trick used to be that Country A would fly the flag of Country B, then trying to salvage some credibility MIGHT switch back to their true colors just before opening fire. Star Trek explained this away by having it impossible for the Romulans to be able to fire their main weapon without shutting off the cloaking device. Regardless, you do at some time want the prey to see the source of their imminent doom.
As with other sneaky tricks that worked this got reapplied to other armed conflicts. You could dress your army up in the entire uniform of the enemy side to gain their trust. A tactic that doesn't work to well with ranged weaponry to back you up. Unless like Longshanks you simply don't care about slaughtering your own Irish conscripts in the process. The idea has been applied throughout history and in modern conspiracy parlance has taken on the meaning of a sneaky trick to discredit someone.
9/11 is a false flag because they want to
I'm not so petty as to suggest that the link about a school teacher using a chalkboard to teach computer class is a pretty lame fit for predicting a major false flag for March 1st. In fact, considering the source is an avowed proponent of home schooling, it makes perfect sense.
The problem isn't the guns. We love our guns. There's probably a couple people reading this that have just now gathered their cherished favorite bullet launcher and started stroking it. Gun oil optional. The problem of keeping guns away from school children isn't taking the guns away. Take the schools away. Problem solved. Think about it, no schools, no easy targets gathered together. Except maybe like churches and movie theaters. And Attu knows that anyone that wants to watch Batman on opening night deserves to die. Churches have more adults who are more likely to shoot back these days. http://www.newsweek.com/hours-after-sutherland-springs-shooting-texas-official-says-more-guns-church-702351.
The Northeast US bomb cyclone. It's even got bomb in the name. Manufactured by weather warfare to close schools. They're trying to take our skools!
NCAA schools getting caught paying off agents, faculty and student athletes. They don't want to have to spend the effort rigging sports anymore. They're trying to take our skools!
If the schools aren't going to teach the right thing about Pearl Harbor being bombed by the U.S. as an excuse to declare war, shut 'em down. Start off with a false flag in Ghana, spend centuries making sure that it develops a population of a quarter of the people being so dirt poor they're more worried about trivialities like food and water, much less computers. Then slam them with a gematria proven major false flag!
Wake Up! They're trying to Take OUR SSKKKOOOOOOOOLLLLLSSSSS!
No, Trump is wrong about this one, too. (Is he right about anything?). Don't arm the teachers around our precious children. Take the schools away, take the targets away. Teach them gematria at home school and the world will be a better place.
Friday, March 2, 2018
February Was Death History Month
Glad that's over with. February might have the fewest number of days of all the months, but there sure is a lot of extra evil cabal activity in it. Or at least the B-team gets a chance to play while the veterans get a chance to relax. The decode is pretty easy.
DEATH=213, 218, 228.
Reported as the dates of 2/13 and 2/18 and 2/28. Not just these dates could be identified as somebody could be identified as dying on those dates, but every one actually was used in February. Somebody died on 2/18. That's never happened before! DEATH=218 must mean something. February 7th is the 38th day of the year and DEATH also equals 38. There's a fourth date. I'm not sure that was used but I'd hardly be surprised. Maybe the DEATH=118 value in Jewish could be considered a January spring training camp for death. I hesitate to point out that this could be considered a Jewish death camp. (I know that joke shouldn't be made, but trust me, I'm not the source of the problem.)
If barley gets its own month I think something more important like death should get an honorary month.
https://wholegrainscouncil.org/whole-grains-101/easy-ways-enjoy-whole-grains/grain-month-calendar/barley-%E2%80%93-february-grain-month
You can live without barley, but you can't live without de...wait...never mind.
There's not a lot of value in pointing out that death is part of the story. If it's a gematria story we already know that death is involved. It's as if the freemason coroner's report lists CAUSE OF DEATH = DEATH. For a group that can create hurricanes something a bit more spectacular is in order. I'm still partial to something totally unique happening like being ripped to shreds by a pack of rabid weasels. Surely something can be tied to this other than the gematria of DEATH.
Now, these dates have several partners throughout the year. The 213th day. The 152nd day since that leaves 213 days remaining in the year. 38 days left in the year. All these +/- a day for date spans. Tributes to past deaths on other days. If the media reports a day or two late, that date counts, too. February should get top billing, but do we really need to report that somebody died because somebody died?
This same illogic extends to everything. Wait for March and we'll probably hear that BASEBALL=324 with the start of the season just around the corner. Something's bound to be going on in MLB then. That will now likely be changed to death, also as it will remind someone that baseball is just around the coroner.
DEATH=213, 218, 228.
Reported as the dates of 2/13 and 2/18 and 2/28. Not just these dates could be identified as somebody could be identified as dying on those dates, but every one actually was used in February. Somebody died on 2/18. That's never happened before! DEATH=218 must mean something. February 7th is the 38th day of the year and DEATH also equals 38. There's a fourth date. I'm not sure that was used but I'd hardly be surprised. Maybe the DEATH=118 value in Jewish could be considered a January spring training camp for death. I hesitate to point out that this could be considered a Jewish death camp. (I know that joke shouldn't be made, but trust me, I'm not the source of the problem.)
If barley gets its own month I think something more important like death should get an honorary month.
https://wholegrainscouncil.org/whole-grains-101/easy-ways-enjoy-whole-grains/grain-month-calendar/barley-%E2%80%93-february-grain-month
You can live without barley, but you can't live without de...wait...never mind.
There's not a lot of value in pointing out that death is part of the story. If it's a gematria story we already know that death is involved. It's as if the freemason coroner's report lists CAUSE OF DEATH = DEATH. For a group that can create hurricanes something a bit more spectacular is in order. I'm still partial to something totally unique happening like being ripped to shreds by a pack of rabid weasels. Surely something can be tied to this other than the gematria of DEATH.
Now, these dates have several partners throughout the year. The 213th day. The 152nd day since that leaves 213 days remaining in the year. 38 days left in the year. All these +/- a day for date spans. Tributes to past deaths on other days. If the media reports a day or two late, that date counts, too. February should get top billing, but do we really need to report that somebody died because somebody died?
This same illogic extends to everything. Wait for March and we'll probably hear that BASEBALL=324 with the start of the season just around the corner. Something's bound to be going on in MLB then. That will now likely be changed to death, also as it will remind someone that baseball is just around the coroner.
Thursday, March 1, 2018
Hubbard Announces Retirement
As of yesterday's second offering I hit 500 published posts on this blog. Some are pretty much worthless, just made for one joke or an update on earlier events of the day. Nevertheless, 500 published posts is a milestone of sorts.
I wanted to celebrate in a manner consistent with what would entertain me considering my near infinite selfishness. I was just going to throw together some more amusing bits collected over the past few months. Fate intervened and someone in the skeptic community mailed me a link to an interesting video. Humor is important to keep people interested instead of, oh, putting up the same two digit numbers every day and instantly crying hoax. But humor, however lame, can wait.
Before I put up the link I'll go over some of the important points with approximate times in the video. A gentleman named Carl Y. Stike, a 9/11 Truther, has supposedly uncovered proof that Google has been working on updating the search algorithm to make things more difficult for the hoax videos to get promoted. The release date of the new algorithm is scheduled for the 1st of next month.
Supposedly there is a list of the top names that the algorithm is intended to target. Carl, being in the top ten of that list, has taken it upon himself to contact some of the other big names. (Alex Jones being conspicuously absent from the contacts as he's apparently way too full of himself). Zachary Hubbard is also in the top ten.
So, there's an audio clip in the Sticke video that sounds like it could be Hubbard. Curious that there's no video accompanying this. The commentary is typically vague, but it does suggest without application of "wishful thinking" that Hubbard will at least take a long break and maybe give it up permanently.
The video is about 27 minutes long. If you want to bypass watching the entire thing I've recorded the times of some of the best parts here.
1:07 - Screenshot of news story of Google, Facebook and Twitter activity on search algorithms after Parkland shooting.
1:49 - Screenshot of email to Carl from the "mole" inside Google, screen name Ghastly, about the release of the new search algorithm.
3:29 - Carl shows the list of top targeted names. It's far too small to make out and could be a grocery list for all we know.
4:13 - Whine about Alex Jones being a sellout shill for disinterest in the cause.
5:00 - Carl drops his water bottle on his foot. Not important, but the overreaction is amusing.
5:14 - 17:32 - Rant
18:21 - Start of Hubbard audio clip.
18:59 - Hubbard quotes "I'm taking a break, but gematria, I'm never going to give you up."
21:07 - 26:32 Further rant; call to arms.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xfr64zoBTAQ?rel=0&autoplay=1
So there you have it.
I wanted to celebrate in a manner consistent with what would entertain me considering my near infinite selfishness. I was just going to throw together some more amusing bits collected over the past few months. Fate intervened and someone in the skeptic community mailed me a link to an interesting video. Humor is important to keep people interested instead of, oh, putting up the same two digit numbers every day and instantly crying hoax. But humor, however lame, can wait.
Before I put up the link I'll go over some of the important points with approximate times in the video. A gentleman named Carl Y. Stike, a 9/11 Truther, has supposedly uncovered proof that Google has been working on updating the search algorithm to make things more difficult for the hoax videos to get promoted. The release date of the new algorithm is scheduled for the 1st of next month.
Supposedly there is a list of the top names that the algorithm is intended to target. Carl, being in the top ten of that list, has taken it upon himself to contact some of the other big names. (Alex Jones being conspicuously absent from the contacts as he's apparently way too full of himself). Zachary Hubbard is also in the top ten.
So, there's an audio clip in the Sticke video that sounds like it could be Hubbard. Curious that there's no video accompanying this. The commentary is typically vague, but it does suggest without application of "wishful thinking" that Hubbard will at least take a long break and maybe give it up permanently.
The video is about 27 minutes long. If you want to bypass watching the entire thing I've recorded the times of some of the best parts here.
1:07 - Screenshot of news story of Google, Facebook and Twitter activity on search algorithms after Parkland shooting.
1:49 - Screenshot of email to Carl from the "mole" inside Google, screen name Ghastly, about the release of the new search algorithm.
3:29 - Carl shows the list of top targeted names. It's far too small to make out and could be a grocery list for all we know.
4:13 - Whine about Alex Jones being a sellout shill for disinterest in the cause.
5:00 - Carl drops his water bottle on his foot. Not important, but the overreaction is amusing.
5:14 - 17:32 - Rant
18:21 - Start of Hubbard audio clip.
18:59 - Hubbard quotes "I'm taking a break, but gematria, I'm never going to give you up."
21:07 - 26:32 Further rant; call to arms.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xfr64zoBTAQ?rel=0&autoplay=1
So there you have it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)