Gematria “Employees”

Yet again, a video with an old tired Hubbard claim.  The old story of hiring someone to help him with the burden of the <sarcasm font>super awesome glorious work he’s doing</sarcasm font>.

Fringe internet ideas that operate outside the law, but shouldn’t, rely on being internet things.  Namely

1). Section 230 regarding internet sites not being responsible for the content.  And the highly associated lack of ability (part because they’re uncaring, part because too many grifters abuse the systems that are in place) to effectively moderate content.

2). Free speech protections.  That’s like the age old gun control debate but a different amendment.  Criminals would love a totally unregulated arena.  Anything close to moderation or regulation is attacked and emotional arguments hold a lot of sway in the court of public approval.

And the unholy matrimony of these two.  The topics are well practiced, well rehearsed, force fed on the newly cognitively biased members to be part of the system of political roadblocks and pitfalls.

Now for example, this guy:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna146215

It’s an entirely different story if you’re just trash talking about being a bad ass sovereign citizen trying to wake people up to their rights on the internet, and directly going against established laws and acting out on it.  It’s one of those things you really should be sure about before you take the plunge.  There is a substantial mass of law surrounding sovereign citizens pretty much acting in the same manner.  The rules apply to others, not me.  Instead of the stated “everyone has this misunderstood set of rights.”

Actually having somebody as a gematria guru officially hiring somebody is pretty hilarious.  Sure we get that the astroturfing and cheap talk makes you look like a legit business to the newbies.  That’s part of the cult leader facade.  Not everyone does it, some just rely on their charisma to keep a small but dedicated group on line.  But if you continue to look towards growth and replacing lost flock members then you’re going to want to separate yourself from the pack of other decoders some way.  So it makes sense to give the appearance of being on top of the food chain.

But actual employment isn’t so easy.  The basic idea is a quid pro quo - a fair exchange of time and talent for a fair compensation.  We could be surprised by finding a fairly realistic employment contract with terms listed.  But if the king of sucking money out of casinos can’t even provide a copy of a legit betting slip before the games are played, somehow the idea of a legit contract being shown with the proud announcement of the new VP seems… far fetched.  Which leaves us with implied contract terms as what courts would look at.  The same courts that were not amused by sovereign citizen outlandish claims.

One of the very first things to look at in employee and employer kerfluffles without a contract and trying to decide if there’s a breach of implied terms is the nature of the business.

Is it legal?

It doesn’t matter who said what, if the whole idea is illegal there’s no enforceability.  Any gematria employee or gematria employer is now and will forever be deemed a non enforceable contract situation.  There’s too much supporting documentation to show that the entire idea is to obtain $ without any valid exchange of compensation in return.  And there’s a nice little Alex Jones judgment to provide a precedent on what’s going on.  The only difference is the scale.  Alex made his schtick widely appealing.  The gematria jumped on the coattails because it was convenient for a time.  The Catch 22 is that the more successful a gematria guru might become, the more that an employee or two would help, the more likely it is that there’s a chance that you are no longer flying under the radar.  At least megachurches have the tax exempt part to fall back on.  Gematria, not so much.

The biggest use for continued announcements of hiring is the lure of somebody who has a pretty good idea that it’s a scam and wants to impress the clique leader for a piece of the action.  There’s that Catch 22 again and the lack of contract breach enforcement.  There’s no honor among thieves.  The best wins, all the others lose.  What we are seeing in these SportsGematria recap videos is the backlash of people who have been wronged, without an outlet to directly take effective action.  Blowing off steam.  Because somehow the courts aren’t going to be thrilled with a case that amounts to, “Zach called me a shitty decoder”.