https://www.thesportster.com/football/10-nfl-draft-picks-from-2016-who-already-look-like-busts-and-5-from-2017/
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/2018/04/scriptedfixed-2018-nfl-draft-baker.html?m=1
We finally got a rundown on what’s going on with the TV series 227! Just in case we needed a reminder that 227 means Pi more than 314 means Pi; it shows up far more frequently. Lazy, lazy NWO. This came at a time when I was about to remind them of topics that they should be interested in and haven’t talked about. I was considering dedicating a post to the 2018 NFL draft, and I was beaten to the punch. The draft is important. Now the 13th overall pick is obviously rigged. So Da Ron is feelin’ da Payne for da draft order. And the new crop of Manchurian candidates is announced, superhuman pseudo-deities that were to stupid to get with the NWO program of electromagnetic field technology. They actually have to work for a living.
The drafting of these demagnetized powerhouses leads to some curious problems, overcome by future ignorance of misses and pigeon chess gloating of the hits. The average NFL career is 3-4 years. And there are lots and lots of players drafted. One can never be sure what numbers like the 13th overall pick will be added to the list, but even the NWO seems to follow some semblance of concurring with a professional, non-rigged opinion and the better players are drafted with lower numbers. Finding that fifth round pick (or walk on) that blossoms into a Pro Bowl player is rare.
The 2017 draft, Kevin King selected 33rd overall. You might think a superhuman athlete, even though a rookie, with such a lofty gematria number of 33 attached to him would get you a better stat line than 26 tackles, 5 passes defended, 0 interceptions and 0 sacks. His name sounds important. KEVIN KING=102, so that’s about the right time for this magnet to polarize for the 102nd season of the NFL. Dammit. He’s not a QB. Odds of Super Bowl MVP (magnetically valuable player) are significantly reduced.
What you’re doing with the Manchurian candidate draft is making a huge set of false predictions. Here’s a large set of players. Here’s information gleaned strictly from the sports without gematria sphere of influence. Let’s get out the magnetic dartboard
and paint the target a couple of years later.
I could bust on any of the failed draft picks in the link. A bust bust. Making a joke about a statue of his head a bust bust bust. But since Saquon Barkley is as much of a slam dunk pick and has been actually earmarked as a Manchurian candidate (by Hubbard) let’s look at Trubisky. 7 tds, 7 ints, And 10 fumbles. Well he’s a number 2 overall pick and needs a lot of work with magnetic barbells. Unless....oh that’s right. He’s playing the role of the loser! Which means it doesn’t matter if he is super awesome or sucks ass! He’s a Manchurian candidate BECAUSE I SAID SO! Good thing magnets have ends with opposite charges. There’s always an escape hatch. Just pray it hasn’t been magnetized shut.
Yes I’ve been repeating the word “magnet” in some form. Now that the Cavs finished off the Pacers Denim Davis Dumbass Decodes has gloated about his Cavs pick, conveniently forgetting the chronology of his posts.
1). Predict Cavs as finals contender
2). Take down bracket and hint that Pacers might win
3). Reference original post with deleted bracket after Cavs win.
Which means that essentially you picked either the Cavs or Pacers and gloated about victory. All the while conveniently forgetting that others haven’t made up their minds about whether your spiel about NFL draft super atheleted or the electromagnetic hoops in the NBA is the right bullshit escape hatch story. It’s good you’ve learned to waffle, you’re going to need it since you already have OKC and Milwaukee wrong. The next series for the Cavs is much more troublesome than Indiana. You’re going to need to pick both teams to be safe. Which makes predictions kind of pointless. Like magnetic darts.
Dedicated to exposing the conspiracy grifters that practice the not even high enough on the crank food chain to qualify as "pseudoscience" of gematria. GEMATRIA DECODING =135 COGNITIVE BIAS = 135
Monday, April 30, 2018
Sunday, April 29, 2018
The Big Picture, Part 2
https://web.archive.org/web/20180429061900/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/05/illinois-village-bans-assault-weapons/
Back that train up a second there, whippersnapper. The Third Amendment has nothing to do with citizens declaring the government to be treasonous, just the other way around. It seems like if there’s any way for an article or amendment of the Constitution to be misinterpreted that the goal is to hit them all. That’s at least #1, #2 and #3 I’ve seen in print.
Free speech has been misinterpreted the same way where it only relates to the government not enacting laws to, say, make you take Scientology classes because they decided it was really cool.
When lawmakers screw up there might be a better solution than going right for the lethal injection. Like maybe the Supreme Court can review what’s going on. Booze is a great example. Oops! We screwed up! And who knows, maybe they’ll reverse the reversal. Guns are a good example, too. The key wording is about “the people” and “the militia” and hadn’t always been regarded unanimously, by the highest court in the land. Heller versus District of Columbia in 2008 was 5-4. Let me do the math....ummm... that’s about as close as you can get for a decision. I’m in the unpopular minority and think that the Second Amendment should be further amended. So I’m technically wrong, as far as the law goes. I really don’t think I should be put to death for it.
One only needs look at our current political situation to see that there’s a lot of Fail out there. Wanting change is all well and good.
But when you start manufacturing evidence through gematria to support your case you are only proving you are totally unqualified to have your opinion taken seriously. Listen to yourselves and your evidence, which is a crime to decency to even call evidence. Tranny spotting. Numbers that could mean anything MUST mean your interpretation. This perSON has an SON in their last name so they’re evil. An S looks like a 5. Rocky Road ice cream reminds me of Sylvester Stallone.
You’re dropping the “I think” part of these conjectures. I think he look like a girl. I think 113 means the mainstream media is dishonest. I think Woodrow Wilson is evil because he’s got the hoax -son code in his name. I think 3.142857 is close enough to Pi. Blah, blah, blah, blah.
And it’s not just “I think”. More properly it’s, “I think without any empirical evidence whatsoever that these things are true”. Believe it or not, and since you have taken some time to talk about Constitutional law I think you do, there are some honest people trying to make this country a better place that have gone through some process that qualifies them. Education, experience. Compared to “I can spot a tranny instantly!”
A straw man argument, yes, but go ahead and substitute what you think is your best argument here and I’m sure I’ve covered it previously.
Get a real argument and if it’s convincing I’ll be your BFF forever. Which is probably not the greatest argument for me to use, because like Hubbard’s 10,000 patrons I don’t see it happening. A false promise.
In the meantime I’m pretty sure the Supreme Court is going to agree with my interpretation of the ambiguous 113:
Back that train up a second there, whippersnapper. The Third Amendment has nothing to do with citizens declaring the government to be treasonous, just the other way around. It seems like if there’s any way for an article or amendment of the Constitution to be misinterpreted that the goal is to hit them all. That’s at least #1, #2 and #3 I’ve seen in print.
Free speech has been misinterpreted the same way where it only relates to the government not enacting laws to, say, make you take Scientology classes because they decided it was really cool.
When lawmakers screw up there might be a better solution than going right for the lethal injection. Like maybe the Supreme Court can review what’s going on. Booze is a great example. Oops! We screwed up! And who knows, maybe they’ll reverse the reversal. Guns are a good example, too. The key wording is about “the people” and “the militia” and hadn’t always been regarded unanimously, by the highest court in the land. Heller versus District of Columbia in 2008 was 5-4. Let me do the math....ummm... that’s about as close as you can get for a decision. I’m in the unpopular minority and think that the Second Amendment should be further amended. So I’m technically wrong, as far as the law goes. I really don’t think I should be put to death for it.
One only needs look at our current political situation to see that there’s a lot of Fail out there. Wanting change is all well and good.
But when you start manufacturing evidence through gematria to support your case you are only proving you are totally unqualified to have your opinion taken seriously. Listen to yourselves and your evidence, which is a crime to decency to even call evidence. Tranny spotting. Numbers that could mean anything MUST mean your interpretation. This perSON has an SON in their last name so they’re evil. An S looks like a 5. Rocky Road ice cream reminds me of Sylvester Stallone.
You’re dropping the “I think” part of these conjectures. I think he look like a girl. I think 113 means the mainstream media is dishonest. I think Woodrow Wilson is evil because he’s got the hoax -son code in his name. I think 3.142857 is close enough to Pi. Blah, blah, blah, blah.
And it’s not just “I think”. More properly it’s, “I think without any empirical evidence whatsoever that these things are true”. Believe it or not, and since you have taken some time to talk about Constitutional law I think you do, there are some honest people trying to make this country a better place that have gone through some process that qualifies them. Education, experience. Compared to “I can spot a tranny instantly!”
A straw man argument, yes, but go ahead and substitute what you think is your best argument here and I’m sure I’ve covered it previously.
Get a real argument and if it’s convincing I’ll be your BFF forever. Which is probably not the greatest argument for me to use, because like Hubbard’s 10,000 patrons I don’t see it happening. A false promise.
In the meantime I’m pretty sure the Supreme Court is going to agree with my interpretation of the ambiguous 113:
The Big Picture, Part 1
So this and the next would be good poss to skip. I’m about to get up on my whiny little soap box. For those that expecting sarcastic humor, not so much there today.
This is, in some ways, a preparation for a form of retirement. That can never happen in full, because I’ve had remarkable success in proving that I have the staying power to not be declared the loser of the argument by simply giving up. There is nothing larger collection of specific details on the internet about exactly what is wrong with gematria and why it doesn’t work than this blog. And since it’s in this format it isn’t going away.
I do have plans to organize things a bit better. Not rearranging the order, a lot of my material is reactionary lining up with events. But adding the keywords for searching as I mentioned. I will have to pop in occasionally and check for vandalism. I did finally add a blog email address. mfbadministrator524@gmail.com. I didn’t pick the 524, apparently 1-523 were already taken by the Illuminati or something. Any valid question will be answered. I will be keeping up with the current book situation. And don’t get too excited pro or con vis a vis moi. We’re talking being just as active as I have been for another three months or so before a re-evaluation.
Now, I expect that re-evaluation to be the same as my guess now, which is why I’m jumping the gun a bit. Doing the tried and true conspiracy theorist pigeon chess tactic, I’m declaring victory. My stats are dropping. And although it’s highly speculative, I’ve hinted at this often. There’s a lot of people that love the idea of one Zachary K. Hubbard crashing and burning, and there are a lot of signs the end is near.
The Patreon fundraiser is dead. It’s never topped 160 subscribers. In the last month and 2+ weeks there has been —> 1<— patron only video. And —> 1 <— patron only post. No YouTube videos, unless you count the mirror of the one subscribers only video. (That makes all kinds of sense. Not.) New patrons have been subscribing at $10 per month which makes no sense since for $1 more they could get the book. Etsy sales are now being threatened to buy now it's cheap, I’m going to more than double the price. Like a PBS TV fundraiser where you don’t even get a tote bag if you sign up. The FTFM blog is a dead zone compared to the past few years. Dan only has had time for two videos in the last month. The only gematrimook getting any significant video views is the Gematrinator, and those are way down. Hard to say how many blog views he gets. Looks like the comments are disabled.
In short, the Internet is already a happier place. There’s nothing new to report on, just variations of the same old mistakes.
But there has to be a point to all this other than my just being mean. So I’ve saved up an old blog post as an example for this occasion.
This is, in some ways, a preparation for a form of retirement. That can never happen in full, because I’ve had remarkable success in proving that I have the staying power to not be declared the loser of the argument by simply giving up. There is nothing larger collection of specific details on the internet about exactly what is wrong with gematria and why it doesn’t work than this blog. And since it’s in this format it isn’t going away.
I do have plans to organize things a bit better. Not rearranging the order, a lot of my material is reactionary lining up with events. But adding the keywords for searching as I mentioned. I will have to pop in occasionally and check for vandalism. I did finally add a blog email address. mfbadministrator524@gmail.com. I didn’t pick the 524, apparently 1-523 were already taken by the Illuminati or something. Any valid question will be answered. I will be keeping up with the current book situation. And don’t get too excited pro or con vis a vis moi. We’re talking being just as active as I have been for another three months or so before a re-evaluation.
Now, I expect that re-evaluation to be the same as my guess now, which is why I’m jumping the gun a bit. Doing the tried and true conspiracy theorist pigeon chess tactic, I’m declaring victory. My stats are dropping. And although it’s highly speculative, I’ve hinted at this often. There’s a lot of people that love the idea of one Zachary K. Hubbard crashing and burning, and there are a lot of signs the end is near.
The Patreon fundraiser is dead. It’s never topped 160 subscribers. In the last month and 2+ weeks there has been —> 1<— patron only video. And —> 1 <— patron only post. No YouTube videos, unless you count the mirror of the one subscribers only video. (That makes all kinds of sense. Not.) New patrons have been subscribing at $10 per month which makes no sense since for $1 more they could get the book. Etsy sales are now being threatened to buy now it's cheap, I’m going to more than double the price. Like a PBS TV fundraiser where you don’t even get a tote bag if you sign up. The FTFM blog is a dead zone compared to the past few years. Dan only has had time for two videos in the last month. The only gematrimook getting any significant video views is the Gematrinator, and those are way down. Hard to say how many blog views he gets. Looks like the comments are disabled.
In short, the Internet is already a happier place. There’s nothing new to report on, just variations of the same old mistakes.
But there has to be a point to all this other than my just being mean. So I’ve saved up an old blog post as an example for this occasion.
Saturday, April 28, 2018
Picking Up From Yesterday
https://web.archive.org/web/20180428063808/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/04/33-666-fox-anchor-brian-kilmeade.html?m=1
I didn’t want to give the impression that this facial recognition thing was brand new, so after a little checking I found an old 2015 post remarking on the odd looks of Brian Kilmeade’s eyebrows. If you don’t want to actually visit that post. He looks funny—>Check his name gematria—> Bingo (YAWNO!) Masonic! Which doesn’t address that by application of low standards everybody has a numerical connection to Masonry.
In its most primitive form the way gematria works is something like this template:
Insert Bizarre Event —————————> A
Throw around a bunch of numbers———-> B
Find connections ——————————> C
Insist the numbers are proof of the cause —> D
A. Lots of stuff happens
B. The numbers are there for ANYTHING
C. Logically follows from B although logically faulty
D. The big disconnect that some people just refuse to understand.
So, as I was watching Forensic Files as I started this post, let’s use that as an analogy.
A. Someone was murdered
B. Forensics expert shows that bruising on the throat and petechial hemorrhaging is a sign of asphyxiation/strangulation. There isn’t ANYTHING that could have caused the victim’s death. He/she wasn’t shot with a .45.
C. Tie into murder weapon found in garage, a necklace that was matched to the neck bruises.
D. No disconnect because there’s actual evidence.
If the prosecution was inept there could be a hung jury. If they throw in an “expert” witness that gets cross examined imagine this conversation.
He was strangled.
How?
Asphyxiation is proof of strangulation.
Couldn’t he have choked to death?
No, strangulation is proof of asphyxiation.
That’s the kind of illogical argument this name and gender identity crisis dialogue in the gematria stories leads to. Although gematria is tailor made to make it as easy as possible to find numerical matches, the critics point out the flaws. So now, you have to find other proof to prove that gematria works. I decided Brian Kilmeade looks like a Freemason without any formal training on what a Freemason looks like. I ran the numbers, I proved it. I proved the gematria is right because he looks like a Freemason. I don’t have to prove he’s a Mason by finding actual lodge membership or him admitting it.
Again, if this is just trying to win a couple of bucks on a football game, that’s no big deal. If it’s Rita getting some comfort in her Bible verses that’s wonderful for her and her followers. If you want to play around and find interesting synchronicity in the dream you had about vampiric asparagus, weird but good for you. But when this gets twisted into the “big picture”, then we’ve got a problem.
This picture will be repeated tomorrow, but here’s an interesting result of gematria that just fell into my lap.
Second try. The first phrase I checked was BASELESS CLAIMS.
I suppose the legal system is supposed to be part of the MAINSTREAM=DISHONEST=113 story, too. But I don’t think they’d see it that way. And UNFOUNDED ACCUSATIONS is a “real phrase”, i.e, I didn’t make it up.
https://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/33ecd-difference-unfounded-accusations-false.html
And it perfectly sums up what gematria is all about.
I didn’t want to give the impression that this facial recognition thing was brand new, so after a little checking I found an old 2015 post remarking on the odd looks of Brian Kilmeade’s eyebrows. If you don’t want to actually visit that post. He looks funny—>Check his name gematria—> Bingo (YAWNO!) Masonic! Which doesn’t address that by application of low standards everybody has a numerical connection to Masonry.
In its most primitive form the way gematria works is something like this template:
Insert Bizarre Event —————————> A
Throw around a bunch of numbers———-> B
Find connections ——————————> C
Insist the numbers are proof of the cause —> D
A. Lots of stuff happens
B. The numbers are there for ANYTHING
C. Logically follows from B although logically faulty
D. The big disconnect that some people just refuse to understand.
So, as I was watching Forensic Files as I started this post, let’s use that as an analogy.
A. Someone was murdered
B. Forensics expert shows that bruising on the throat and petechial hemorrhaging is a sign of asphyxiation/strangulation. There isn’t ANYTHING that could have caused the victim’s death. He/she wasn’t shot with a .45.
C. Tie into murder weapon found in garage, a necklace that was matched to the neck bruises.
D. No disconnect because there’s actual evidence.
If the prosecution was inept there could be a hung jury. If they throw in an “expert” witness that gets cross examined imagine this conversation.
He was strangled.
How?
Asphyxiation is proof of strangulation.
Couldn’t he have choked to death?
No, strangulation is proof of asphyxiation.
That’s the kind of illogical argument this name and gender identity crisis dialogue in the gematria stories leads to. Although gematria is tailor made to make it as easy as possible to find numerical matches, the critics point out the flaws. So now, you have to find other proof to prove that gematria works. I decided Brian Kilmeade looks like a Freemason without any formal training on what a Freemason looks like. I ran the numbers, I proved it. I proved the gematria is right because he looks like a Freemason. I don’t have to prove he’s a Mason by finding actual lodge membership or him admitting it.
Again, if this is just trying to win a couple of bucks on a football game, that’s no big deal. If it’s Rita getting some comfort in her Bible verses that’s wonderful for her and her followers. If you want to play around and find interesting synchronicity in the dream you had about vampiric asparagus, weird but good for you. But when this gets twisted into the “big picture”, then we’ve got a problem.
This picture will be repeated tomorrow, but here’s an interesting result of gematria that just fell into my lap.
Second try. The first phrase I checked was BASELESS CLAIMS.
I suppose the legal system is supposed to be part of the MAINSTREAM=DISHONEST=113 story, too. But I don’t think they’d see it that way. And UNFOUNDED ACCUSATIONS is a “real phrase”, i.e, I didn’t make it up.
https://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/33ecd-difference-unfounded-accusations-false.html
And it perfectly sums up what gematria is all about.
Friday, April 27, 2018
Gematria Face And Name Recognition Training
As covered here, https://mindelessfreeks.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-interesting-people-you-meet-in.html?m=1, there continues to be a remarkable ability to spot a tranny from a single photograph. No details about there person’s life are necessary. No mention of it in the news article. Any evidence could be some similarities in facial structure or more likely just missing. And then you blurt out:
Oh yeah , she is really a he or he is really a she or it is really an it. The only option not available is that whatever the proclaimed gender identification of the person involved in the story is, that one is strictly off limits.
Well, not all the time. Gleaned from thousands of comments reviewed we’ve got a couple tips. Pretty sure we can save you the tuition on Gematria recognition training, both face and hoax names. Then we’ll teach you how to apply this information instead of just whining about stuff.
First, the basic qualifications to take the course. The standards are excruciatingly low. If you’re already doing gematria you probably meet these two criteria.
1). If you believe that 6 and 9 are virtually interchangeable because they are flippy-floppies of each other and E’s are 3’s you qualify.
2). You must under no circumstances ever come close to any measuring device with any degree of precision during your schooling, including especially the cliptractor™️.
The course has two main parts. Part 1, names. As a test run to get the juices flowing you NEED to turn someone’s name into something else. The first phase is practice on variations of saying something that says, “XXXXX reminds me of YYYYY”. Some common ways are:
Reminds me of....
XXXXX, like YYYYY....
Sounds like...
XXXXX is a form of YYYYY
Could be...
And DON’T get too creative. Sounding like a lorikeet parroting the same verbiage endlessly is important. The numbers are tiny and endlessly repeated and your phrasing should match.
Next up, plagiarizing. Not punishable, but not encouraged. Extra points are scored on tests for the more creative associations you come up with. And this is important. The more juvenile the better. Example: The psycho’s (hoax) name is MINASSIAN. You get an F grade for using MINASSIAN. D for an ASIAN reference. C for MANASSAS. B for MINI VAN ASSASSIN. A for (if properly phrased), “ Note that I am doing the world a huge favor by pointing out the sexual innuendo of the word ASS in this obviously hoax name, and one must assume that if it’s MINI there must be a TIGHT ASS here, other than my own constipated rectum.” Naturally any male names (who are not actually men, but that’s later in the course) of PETER and RICHARD are ready made, no need to embellish. In fact, you should try to turn other names into those names. Easy example. Admiral Hyman Rickover. If you can’t get a HYMEN DICKOVER out of that for a tranny name to go with your tranny face, you’re not going to make it.
Now faces. The ban on precision equipment extends to abstaining from any facial recognition software being employed. You need to do this on your own. And it turns out to be surprisingly easy once you understand how the knowledge is applied in modern times.
Who is a different gender or looks like someone else? It’s the crisis actors in the news stories. Barbara Bush looks like Aleister Crowley because a BUSH name is not going to get you an A grade. Notably, this is important.
Sports figures are recyclable. A lot of effort is spent to create the these guys and gals and whatever they identify as-es in secret labs or something. But James Harden is never to be called HARDON. Gregg Popovich’s wife is not to be referred to as Gregg POPABITCH. Facial recognition is not to be done on sports figures, only the dead. Maybe wait until the athlete croaks, but hands off while they’re still active.
Now who looks like someone and might not be who they actually are?
EVERYONE else.
It’s that simple, because this is gematria and we report in hindsight in gematria. The addition of the face and name recognition data is hardly ever done with actual word=number gematria. It gives people something different to say other than the endless succession of two digit numbers the gematria yields. Isn’t that fun!?!
If there was some value added to the story, like proof that heterosexuals are more likely to drive minivans than homosexuals as proven by this study... I could buy into it. But the inclusion is at best additional unfounded claims or at worst just petty and mean, usually the latter. There’s no value because instead of using the remarkable name and face recognition techniques to identify the actors before the event, more waiting then whining after the fact, when you could apparently look at a list of school student names TODAY and identify all the joke names. You could look at the yearbooks TODAY and find the actors about to be shipped off to other schools.
<sigh>
Because it’s easier to try and shift the burden of proof when you don’t have any evidence.
Oh yeah , she is really a he or he is really a she or it is really an it. The only option not available is that whatever the proclaimed gender identification of the person involved in the story is, that one is strictly off limits.
Well, not all the time. Gleaned from thousands of comments reviewed we’ve got a couple tips. Pretty sure we can save you the tuition on Gematria recognition training, both face and hoax names. Then we’ll teach you how to apply this information instead of just whining about stuff.
First, the basic qualifications to take the course. The standards are excruciatingly low. If you’re already doing gematria you probably meet these two criteria.
1). If you believe that 6 and 9 are virtually interchangeable because they are flippy-floppies of each other and E’s are 3’s you qualify.
2). You must under no circumstances ever come close to any measuring device with any degree of precision during your schooling, including especially the cliptractor™️.
The course has two main parts. Part 1, names. As a test run to get the juices flowing you NEED to turn someone’s name into something else. The first phase is practice on variations of saying something that says, “XXXXX reminds me of YYYYY”. Some common ways are:
Reminds me of....
XXXXX, like YYYYY....
Sounds like...
XXXXX is a form of YYYYY
Could be...
And DON’T get too creative. Sounding like a lorikeet parroting the same verbiage endlessly is important. The numbers are tiny and endlessly repeated and your phrasing should match.
Next up, plagiarizing. Not punishable, but not encouraged. Extra points are scored on tests for the more creative associations you come up with. And this is important. The more juvenile the better. Example: The psycho’s (hoax) name is MINASSIAN. You get an F grade for using MINASSIAN. D for an ASIAN reference. C for MANASSAS. B for MINI VAN ASSASSIN. A for (if properly phrased), “ Note that I am doing the world a huge favor by pointing out the sexual innuendo of the word ASS in this obviously hoax name, and one must assume that if it’s MINI there must be a TIGHT ASS here, other than my own constipated rectum.” Naturally any male names (who are not actually men, but that’s later in the course) of PETER and RICHARD are ready made, no need to embellish. In fact, you should try to turn other names into those names. Easy example. Admiral Hyman Rickover. If you can’t get a HYMEN DICKOVER out of that for a tranny name to go with your tranny face, you’re not going to make it.
Now faces. The ban on precision equipment extends to abstaining from any facial recognition software being employed. You need to do this on your own. And it turns out to be surprisingly easy once you understand how the knowledge is applied in modern times.
Who is a different gender or looks like someone else? It’s the crisis actors in the news stories. Barbara Bush looks like Aleister Crowley because a BUSH name is not going to get you an A grade. Notably, this is important.
Sports figures are recyclable. A lot of effort is spent to create the these guys and gals and whatever they identify as-es in secret labs or something. But James Harden is never to be called HARDON. Gregg Popovich’s wife is not to be referred to as Gregg POPABITCH. Facial recognition is not to be done on sports figures, only the dead. Maybe wait until the athlete croaks, but hands off while they’re still active.
Now who looks like someone and might not be who they actually are?
EVERYONE else.
It’s that simple, because this is gematria and we report in hindsight in gematria. The addition of the face and name recognition data is hardly ever done with actual word=number gematria. It gives people something different to say other than the endless succession of two digit numbers the gematria yields. Isn’t that fun!?!
If there was some value added to the story, like proof that heterosexuals are more likely to drive minivans than homosexuals as proven by this study... I could buy into it. But the inclusion is at best additional unfounded claims or at worst just petty and mean, usually the latter. There’s no value because instead of using the remarkable name and face recognition techniques to identify the actors before the event, more waiting then whining after the fact, when you could apparently look at a list of school student names TODAY and identify all the joke names. You could look at the yearbooks TODAY and find the actors about to be shipped off to other schools.
<sigh>
Because it’s easier to try and shift the burden of proof when you don’t have any evidence.
Thursday, April 26, 2018
The Lorikeet, NWO Bird Of Terror
http://aussiebirds.proboards.com/thread/10742/why-rainbow-lorikeet-trying-attack
Lorikeets planning an attack:
Lori Keats. In MARyville.. The Ram code confirmed!
https://www.thedailytimes.com/news/maryville-couple-arrested-after-altercation-involving-handgun/article_d57845e9-ae90-5341-a389-3cbcdc955289.html
Update:
Previous lorikeet picture is probably a copyright violation. This one isn’t:
And gives me the opportunity to warn that the lorikeet references will certainly be beaten to death, now.
Lorikeets planning an attack:
Lori Keats. In MARyville.. The Ram code confirmed!
https://www.thedailytimes.com/news/maryville-couple-arrested-after-altercation-involving-handgun/article_d57845e9-ae90-5341-a389-3cbcdc955289.html
Update:
Previous lorikeet picture is probably a copyright violation. This one isn’t:
And gives me the opportunity to warn that the lorikeet references will certainly be beaten to death, now.
The Sons Of Gematria
Whoa! The -Ram- hoax name code. Super scary.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180426055920/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/23/ram-hoax-code-confirmed/
I suppose if one got head butted by a ram it would hurt a hell of a lot, but wouldn’t some sort of carnivore be more appropriate? The Scary Animal Committee of the NWO had a vote and although lions, tigers, bears and even lorikeets* topped rams for bone chilling, meat eating terror they decided that the ram was their boy. Or man.
Which is really why someone with -ram- in their name is part of the hoax. See, it’s not just -ram-, Martinez counts with a backwards ram. No word yet if rearrangement so ARMSTRONG counts, but considering history and the source the answer to that question is likely a yes. Although I expect that the letters at least have to be consecutive. But I’m not the one making shit up on the fly, so Lucy’s friend, Tamara (<——- shameless bad movie/hot babe plug), is safe. For now. Despite being obviously misogynistic and age discriminatory, LAMB has four letters and thus harder to match, EWE rearranged is WEE, which has other uses for the Weeble Wempire, and just in general as surnames go a -ram- is a lot more common in surnames.
And there’s your problem. Just like suddenly 3 and 13 are hoax numbers, now special significance has been given to surnames with particular letter combinations. And under the operating standards of not having to do actual research and making things far too easy to match those combinations are RAM, MAN, and SON.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180426064712/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/25/the-2016-slaying-of-five-dallas-police-officers/
Son. My how generous of you to limit the evil pool by including some of the most common surnames in the English language. And damn you for making me be the one to do actual research in your place. Although I do take great delight in busting on stupidity.
From the Mongabay website** here’s the list of just -son surnames in the top 100 and their percentage of total US population.
Johnson 0.81
Wilson 0.339
Anderson 0.311
Jackson 0.31
Thompson 0.269
Robinson 0.233
Nelson 0.162
Richardson 0.112
Peterson 0.107
Watson 0.103
Henderson 0.095
Patterson 0.092
This being a total of 2.133%. Just from the top 100 names. Without including -man, -mar, or foreign surnames that translate to -son. Which based on a population size of 325 million prople is 6,930,000 people that are a Son Of Gematria. If you’re in a room of 50 people odds are that at least one of them is just a fictional character working for the NWO as a Son Of Gematria. It would be nice if they wore uniforms to make it easier or at least had eyepatches and lorikeets like pirates to be able to tell them apart, but the Selective Incompetence Committee of the NWO has made a lot of them easy to spot.
Now proclaiming Martinez a hoax name based on RAMming it down our throats is another unfortunate, totally unresearched, not well thought out inclusion. It turns out that the Scary Animal Committee and Selective Incompetence Committee came to an agreement on this one. Normally they bicker over who gets to lay claim to the remaining bagels and donuts after the weekly Friday meeting. Any animal that contains a letter in the alphabet Z or earlier in ordinal position is scary. And it was EZ to include Martinez as the Hispanic equivalent of -son is -ez. So Lopez, Hernandez, Martinez, etc... are all Sons Of Gematria.
My patience to go through the Mongabay list of 1000 names was tested for just sons, but I expect adding up all the -man, -ram, and -son names should top 5%. One in 20 people is a hoax character just based on those names, and of course there are some 33’s 3’s, 13’s and EE’s thrown in there, too. My challenge remains the same. List all the names that AREN'T a hoax name and we’ll go from there. Because it sure looks like there’s not many real people left by the time the conversion process of trivial information is finished.
*. This story comes from Australia, so it must be true.
**. Citing references. Astute researchers do that. You should learn it. More about this tomorrow.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180426055920/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/23/ram-hoax-code-confirmed/
I suppose if one got head butted by a ram it would hurt a hell of a lot, but wouldn’t some sort of carnivore be more appropriate? The Scary Animal Committee of the NWO had a vote and although lions, tigers, bears and even lorikeets* topped rams for bone chilling, meat eating terror they decided that the ram was their boy. Or man.
Which is really why someone with -ram- in their name is part of the hoax. See, it’s not just -ram-, Martinez counts with a backwards ram. No word yet if rearrangement so ARMSTRONG counts, but considering history and the source the answer to that question is likely a yes. Although I expect that the letters at least have to be consecutive. But I’m not the one making shit up on the fly, so Lucy’s friend, Tamara (<——- shameless bad movie/hot babe plug), is safe. For now. Despite being obviously misogynistic and age discriminatory, LAMB has four letters and thus harder to match, EWE rearranged is WEE, which has other uses for the Weeble Wempire, and just in general as surnames go a -ram- is a lot more common in surnames.
And there’s your problem. Just like suddenly 3 and 13 are hoax numbers, now special significance has been given to surnames with particular letter combinations. And under the operating standards of not having to do actual research and making things far too easy to match those combinations are RAM, MAN, and SON.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180426064712/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/25/the-2016-slaying-of-five-dallas-police-officers/
Son. My how generous of you to limit the evil pool by including some of the most common surnames in the English language. And damn you for making me be the one to do actual research in your place. Although I do take great delight in busting on stupidity.
From the Mongabay website** here’s the list of just -son surnames in the top 100 and their percentage of total US population.
Johnson 0.81
Wilson 0.339
Anderson 0.311
Jackson 0.31
Thompson 0.269
Robinson 0.233
Nelson 0.162
Richardson 0.112
Peterson 0.107
Watson 0.103
Henderson 0.095
Patterson 0.092
This being a total of 2.133%. Just from the top 100 names. Without including -man, -mar, or foreign surnames that translate to -son. Which based on a population size of 325 million prople is 6,930,000 people that are a Son Of Gematria. If you’re in a room of 50 people odds are that at least one of them is just a fictional character working for the NWO as a Son Of Gematria. It would be nice if they wore uniforms to make it easier or at least had eyepatches and lorikeets like pirates to be able to tell them apart, but the Selective Incompetence Committee of the NWO has made a lot of them easy to spot.
Now proclaiming Martinez a hoax name based on RAMming it down our throats is another unfortunate, totally unresearched, not well thought out inclusion. It turns out that the Scary Animal Committee and Selective Incompetence Committee came to an agreement on this one. Normally they bicker over who gets to lay claim to the remaining bagels and donuts after the weekly Friday meeting. Any animal that contains a letter in the alphabet Z or earlier in ordinal position is scary. And it was EZ to include Martinez as the Hispanic equivalent of -son is -ez. So Lopez, Hernandez, Martinez, etc... are all Sons Of Gematria.
My patience to go through the Mongabay list of 1000 names was tested for just sons, but I expect adding up all the -man, -ram, and -son names should top 5%. One in 20 people is a hoax character just based on those names, and of course there are some 33’s 3’s, 13’s and EE’s thrown in there, too. My challenge remains the same. List all the names that AREN'T a hoax name and we’ll go from there. Because it sure looks like there’s not many real people left by the time the conversion process of trivial information is finished.
*. This story comes from Australia, so it must be true.
**. Citing references. Astute researchers do that. You should learn it. More about this tomorrow.
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
Why Is That The Hoax Code?
If there’s a barbecue with a particularly aggressive horsefly, a picnic with some ants or any annoying insect someone is bound to mention that the offending bug should be dealt with in a manner that ultimately leads to the demise of the evildoers. And chances are that there’s someone who knows that ants and flies aren’t really bugs and feels the need to mention, “All bugs are insects, not all insects are bugs!!” As if expecting to be rewarded for that high quality information when everyone knows what was meant and providing the information does nothing to resolve the annoying horsefly/ant problem. I used to be guilty of this until I realized I was wasting my time with the information and it was a lot easier to just squash and spray and move on with life.
I could apply the same philosophy to 33 (and 13 and 3) being the HOAX code(s), but as I am the annoying insect with a bug up my ass, or bug with an insect up my ass, and since they’ve elevated these numbers to life and death (go free or get squished) status my team and I ran the data through our Calculatrix 3000 and it spat out the reply.
33 as the primary HOAX code makes no fucking sense.
Of all the available numbers directly attributed to HOAX, 33 is not one of them. One would tend to think that an evil empire that takes unholy delight in flaunting 113 means mainstream dishonesty would be a tad more forthcoming about something as important as HOAX being 33 or not.
A not in depth review from memory tells me that FALSE FLAG=33 and I can’t think of another. All false flags are hoaxes, but not all hoaxes are false flags. So if you want to claim that the death of a celebrity is proven by the False Flag code of 33 it sounds silly. MASONRY=33 doesn’t help much for renaming the 33 code. That’s a solar eclipse ritual, see the Masonry code buried in the story! Pffft.
Now look at the list of 113s. Not a single reduction mentioned. And based on math and average word length 113 is right around the useful range for a little longer than average word or a short two word phrase. FALSE FLAG and MASONRY are reductions. HOAX is just a tiny little four letter word. So a completely arbitrary decision with no historical precedent has been made to declare 33 to be the HOAX code, because 48 and 60 are just too hard to match. It’s a dead zone between low values basic ordinal elisions and high valued reduction elisions.
But of course it gets worse. Under the operating standard of making things more ridiculous now 3 and 13 are also HOAX codes while they also aren’t directly attributed to the word HOAX. There’s not even a prime number escape hatch since 48 and 60 aren’t prime. The Language Of Gematria Committee really screwed up big time on this one without having a really good word for HOAX to go with a 33 code.
Couldn’t you think of a better name? Just declare 33 to be the master hoax code without any explanation? You guys are REALLY good at arbitrary things without explanation. That’s what you’re doing now, I mean make it official like have a summit meeting and start putting that in the intro videos and web page descriptions. First line. Gematria- the practice of declaring 33 to be a hoax just because I said so. Get used to it because we do stuff like this all the time.
I’m feeling in a generous mood and I did a bit of work on my own. There aren’t really good options for a word that equals 33 in simple or reverse not reduced. Though I must say that I’m partial to the BANANA=33 code because declaring 33 to be a hoax seems fruity. (PEACH=33, too). Completely by accident WEEBLE works out. WEE=33. B AND L=33. The Weeble code. Which also leads to some nice “that reminds me of...” descriptions for your system, WEE WEE and We bull(shit).
I could apply the same philosophy to 33 (and 13 and 3) being the HOAX code(s), but as I am the annoying insect with a bug up my ass, or bug with an insect up my ass, and since they’ve elevated these numbers to life and death (go free or get squished) status my team and I ran the data through our Calculatrix 3000 and it spat out the reply.
33 as the primary HOAX code makes no fucking sense.
A not in depth review from memory tells me that FALSE FLAG=33 and I can’t think of another. All false flags are hoaxes, but not all hoaxes are false flags. So if you want to claim that the death of a celebrity is proven by the False Flag code of 33 it sounds silly. MASONRY=33 doesn’t help much for renaming the 33 code. That’s a solar eclipse ritual, see the Masonry code buried in the story! Pffft.
Now look at the list of 113s. Not a single reduction mentioned. And based on math and average word length 113 is right around the useful range for a little longer than average word or a short two word phrase. FALSE FLAG and MASONRY are reductions. HOAX is just a tiny little four letter word. So a completely arbitrary decision with no historical precedent has been made to declare 33 to be the HOAX code, because 48 and 60 are just too hard to match. It’s a dead zone between low values basic ordinal elisions and high valued reduction elisions.
But of course it gets worse. Under the operating standard of making things more ridiculous now 3 and 13 are also HOAX codes while they also aren’t directly attributed to the word HOAX. There’s not even a prime number escape hatch since 48 and 60 aren’t prime. The Language Of Gematria Committee really screwed up big time on this one without having a really good word for HOAX to go with a 33 code.
Couldn’t you think of a better name? Just declare 33 to be the master hoax code without any explanation? You guys are REALLY good at arbitrary things without explanation. That’s what you’re doing now, I mean make it official like have a summit meeting and start putting that in the intro videos and web page descriptions. First line. Gematria- the practice of declaring 33 to be a hoax just because I said so. Get used to it because we do stuff like this all the time.
I’m feeling in a generous mood and I did a bit of work on my own. There aren’t really good options for a word that equals 33 in simple or reverse not reduced. Though I must say that I’m partial to the BANANA=33 code because declaring 33 to be a hoax seems fruity. (PEACH=33, too). Completely by accident WEEBLE works out. WEE=33. B AND L=33. The Weeble code. Which also leads to some nice “that reminds me of...” descriptions for your system, WEE WEE and We bull(shit).
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
The Waffle House Shooting, An NBA Ritual
I was going to title this something clickbaity like “Sports Gematria Upgrade, $1.99 Through NBA Finals”. But I get enough cheap traffic off How to Predict a Sports Champion and that post really says it all.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner! The successor to the gematria sports predictions vacuum since Hubbard won’t pick anymore is here. (Or it is a Hubbard sock puppet, who knows. Think about it. Now would be a golden time to start fresh under an alias. Or at least get your fix since you’re addicted to useless predictions.)
The timing is perfect. We just had the hoax shooting at the Waffle House. “Waffling” is the inability to make up your mind. And addiction like binge conspiracy and drinking is inherited; it’s in your jeans, making Denim Davis Decoding the perfect moniker for our new champ. Note that the Davis Cup is a major tennis trophy and surely we’re due for lots of good tennis action. After all, tennis and basketball both have nets.
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/2018/04/scriptedrigged-nba-houston-rocketsflip.html?m=1
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/2018/04/scriptedrigged-nba-lebron-james-and.html?m=1
We’ve got a couple problems to address here to get going. I don’t like to bother with sports gematria. When things happen like pointing out that the Jazz scored 113 points and UTAH JAZZ=113 you’re not helping maintain your crown. If that had any meaning, the Jazz would score 113 points. Every. Single. Fucking. Game. Try to keep it to a minimum. I know everybody does it, but after some rather long, involved “decodes” you can do better than everyone else.
Now I also see you edited your NBA playoff bracket post within a day or two of my post about that bracket. Not a good idea. I really don’t want to have to babysit your blog and start archiving everything. I’m kind of lazy. Don’t get me wrong, I fully understand that to waffle properly there might be some damaging info in there. Plausible deniability is good, but trust me...I have a pretty good reputation for not making stuff up, so when I mention that this is your deleted playoff bracket, people will believe me.
Ok, one more time for the gematria impaired. Predictions don’t work. They never have. The entire original bracket is an exercise in futility. Now all of a sudden over the next two posts it’s been conveniently forgotten that it’s supposed to be OKC in the conference finals, with the Jazz now leading their series against OKC 3 games to 1.
More importantly is that with the looming threat of the lowly Pacers maybe surprising the Cavs now a whole post addressed the previously unrecognized numerology of the upset. Waffle much? Appropriate that waffles have lots of holes just like your system. The Pacers are the least of your problems although if it happens it blows your entire bracket out of the water. Better to just keep quiet about it than trying to cover it up. The problem is making predictions in the first place. Simply put, if there was any value to any method of prediction with esoteric knowledge the games would be pointless as we would already know the winners. Anything less than a perfect bracket leads to excuses. Oh the script is deep! They Flip Saundersed it on me!
Then we also reaffirm the numerous “rituals” that magically align with the team that every non gematria sports mind recognizes as having the best regular season record. Way to go out on a limb.
You have another option to public waffling. Hide the conversation.
Because nothing says waking up the sheep like locking your blog to private invitation only so all the contradictory information is hidden.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner! The successor to the gematria sports predictions vacuum since Hubbard won’t pick anymore is here. (Or it is a Hubbard sock puppet, who knows. Think about it. Now would be a golden time to start fresh under an alias. Or at least get your fix since you’re addicted to useless predictions.)
The timing is perfect. We just had the hoax shooting at the Waffle House. “Waffling” is the inability to make up your mind. And addiction like binge conspiracy and drinking is inherited; it’s in your jeans, making Denim Davis Decoding the perfect moniker for our new champ. Note that the Davis Cup is a major tennis trophy and surely we’re due for lots of good tennis action. After all, tennis and basketball both have nets.
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/2018/04/scriptedrigged-nba-houston-rocketsflip.html?m=1
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/2018/04/scriptedrigged-nba-lebron-james-and.html?m=1
We’ve got a couple problems to address here to get going. I don’t like to bother with sports gematria. When things happen like pointing out that the Jazz scored 113 points and UTAH JAZZ=113 you’re not helping maintain your crown. If that had any meaning, the Jazz would score 113 points. Every. Single. Fucking. Game. Try to keep it to a minimum. I know everybody does it, but after some rather long, involved “decodes” you can do better than everyone else.
Now I also see you edited your NBA playoff bracket post within a day or two of my post about that bracket. Not a good idea. I really don’t want to have to babysit your blog and start archiving everything. I’m kind of lazy. Don’t get me wrong, I fully understand that to waffle properly there might be some damaging info in there. Plausible deniability is good, but trust me...I have a pretty good reputation for not making stuff up, so when I mention that this is your deleted playoff bracket, people will believe me.
Ok, one more time for the gematria impaired. Predictions don’t work. They never have. The entire original bracket is an exercise in futility. Now all of a sudden over the next two posts it’s been conveniently forgotten that it’s supposed to be OKC in the conference finals, with the Jazz now leading their series against OKC 3 games to 1.
More importantly is that with the looming threat of the lowly Pacers maybe surprising the Cavs now a whole post addressed the previously unrecognized numerology of the upset. Waffle much? Appropriate that waffles have lots of holes just like your system. The Pacers are the least of your problems although if it happens it blows your entire bracket out of the water. Better to just keep quiet about it than trying to cover it up. The problem is making predictions in the first place. Simply put, if there was any value to any method of prediction with esoteric knowledge the games would be pointless as we would already know the winners. Anything less than a perfect bracket leads to excuses. Oh the script is deep! They Flip Saundersed it on me!
Then we also reaffirm the numerous “rituals” that magically align with the team that every non gematria sports mind recognizes as having the best regular season record. Way to go out on a limb.
You have another option to public waffling. Hide the conversation.
Because nothing says waking up the sheep like locking your blog to private invitation only so all the contradictory information is hidden.
Monday, April 23, 2018
Gematria Debunked By Lowbrow Choice Of Topics
Inspired by a free week of HBO I broke one of the golden rules of gematria research by actually doing research instead of just calling myself an astute researcher. Lucy Furcertain was happy this weekend.
This has been covered previously in the Gematria Debunked By series of posts here.
HBO is putting out a film based on Ray Bradbury’s classic novel, Fahrenheit 451, next month. And as far as I can tell no gematrimooks have ever mentioned it.
451 got one mention years ago, but it wasn’t about the book. https://web.archive.org/web/20180421114051/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/12/451-514-reporting-on-chicago-police.html?m=1
Nothing says scary evil empire like wasting a tailor made for firemen number like 451 on a story about policemen.
And there’s not really any good reason that it’s not mentioned. By all rights in addition to several offhand references here and there it sounds like a perfect fit for an entire post
Let’s see, Orwell’s 1984 which is referenced:
Considered to be a classic novel. Science Fiction. Number in the title. Dystopian future. Censorship.
Fanhrenheit 451, which isn’t referenced:
Considered to be a classic novel. Science Fiction. Number in the title. Dystopian future. Censorship.
So I guess it must be the number that’s the problem. 1984 doesn’t have a lot of utility on its own except as date numerology which isn’t really gematria. But our record keeping is a lot better these days and we know a helluva lot more about the year 1984 than we do about 451. Repeating that search for Orwell you get a buttload of hits for references to 1984.
Or actually as you scan through the key numbers listed in the post titles it’s not 1984, it’s ‘84.
Try to act surprised that a larger number of 1984 has no useful value, but when you shave off the leading 19 now the Weeble Wempire has been busy. Because in gematria, you don’t just get to drop zeroes, you get to add heavy doses of date numerology that isn’t really gematria and shave off portions of the number until you get one you like. And you get to use the mirror image of 48, too!
So are we supposed to believe that nothing important happened in 1784 or 1884, or do you just suck at research? Probably just that you’re making up bullshit. Turning back to 451, something is available to work with. Attula, sorry, Attila the Hun was busy ripping Gaul a new butthole. Some Irish saint name Brigid could give Dan some great new, never seen before Bridge material. And we know that you’re allowed to drop the 4 and make it a nice, tidy, little teensy weensy 51. Here I’ll give you a head start. 451 is 11x41. 11, the master number. SUPER BOWL=41. Something going on with the City of Bridges, Pittsburgh for Super Bowl 51, that nobody mentioned.
Well yeah for ya’ll for mentioning a famous book with 1984, but it looks like your standards of research in regards to using gematria for what it’s supposed to be used for stinks. Instead of actually reading books and comparing the phrases within those books we get endless pop culture and current events off the Internet. What happened yesterday is the most important thing aimingever, until tomorrow comes around and then out of sight, out of mind unless it’s a number that your short attention span remembers from a few days ago. The thought of Dan ever breaking open a copy of either 1984 or Fahrenheit 451 and doing gematria on it is rather amusing. Maybe South Park will do an episode about it to give him a clue.
I have read both those classic novels, and to be honest I didn’t really like them that much. They were OK, but I prefer my reading to be a bit lighter like Fred Saberhagen’s Berserker series. But I’m not the one claiming I’m using this system to wake up the world to the Weeble Wempire. I’m all for watching a movie about the most mindless thing like killer donuts as an escape. But if I were astutely researching I think I’d expect the Weeble Wempire to hide their clues in Fahrenheit 451 instead of The Simpsons.
Based on non-sports activity let’s see what the biggest topics are lately. All three of my regular targets did bits on R. Lee Ermey and Verne Troyer. That’s some astutely researched intellectual content for you.
I suppose it’s not a coincidence that the only gematria user that actually reports on book passages is Rita 511, like 51x1=51. Must be a disinformation agent.
This has been covered previously in the Gematria Debunked By series of posts here.
HBO is putting out a film based on Ray Bradbury’s classic novel, Fahrenheit 451, next month. And as far as I can tell no gematrimooks have ever mentioned it.
451 got one mention years ago, but it wasn’t about the book. https://web.archive.org/web/20180421114051/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/12/451-514-reporting-on-chicago-police.html?m=1
Nothing says scary evil empire like wasting a tailor made for firemen number like 451 on a story about policemen.
And there’s not really any good reason that it’s not mentioned. By all rights in addition to several offhand references here and there it sounds like a perfect fit for an entire post
Let’s see, Orwell’s 1984 which is referenced:
Considered to be a classic novel. Science Fiction. Number in the title. Dystopian future. Censorship.
Fanhrenheit 451, which isn’t referenced:
Considered to be a classic novel. Science Fiction. Number in the title. Dystopian future. Censorship.
So I guess it must be the number that’s the problem. 1984 doesn’t have a lot of utility on its own except as date numerology which isn’t really gematria. But our record keeping is a lot better these days and we know a helluva lot more about the year 1984 than we do about 451. Repeating that search for Orwell you get a buttload of hits for references to 1984.
Or actually as you scan through the key numbers listed in the post titles it’s not 1984, it’s ‘84.
Try to act surprised that a larger number of 1984 has no useful value, but when you shave off the leading 19 now the Weeble Wempire has been busy. Because in gematria, you don’t just get to drop zeroes, you get to add heavy doses of date numerology that isn’t really gematria and shave off portions of the number until you get one you like. And you get to use the mirror image of 48, too!
So are we supposed to believe that nothing important happened in 1784 or 1884, or do you just suck at research? Probably just that you’re making up bullshit. Turning back to 451, something is available to work with. Attula, sorry, Attila the Hun was busy ripping Gaul a new butthole. Some Irish saint name Brigid could give Dan some great new, never seen before Bridge material. And we know that you’re allowed to drop the 4 and make it a nice, tidy, little teensy weensy 51. Here I’ll give you a head start. 451 is 11x41. 11, the master number. SUPER BOWL=41. Something going on with the City of Bridges, Pittsburgh for Super Bowl 51, that nobody mentioned.
Well yeah for ya’ll for mentioning a famous book with 1984, but it looks like your standards of research in regards to using gematria for what it’s supposed to be used for stinks. Instead of actually reading books and comparing the phrases within those books we get endless pop culture and current events off the Internet. What happened yesterday is the most important thing aimingever, until tomorrow comes around and then out of sight, out of mind unless it’s a number that your short attention span remembers from a few days ago. The thought of Dan ever breaking open a copy of either 1984 or Fahrenheit 451 and doing gematria on it is rather amusing. Maybe South Park will do an episode about it to give him a clue.
I have read both those classic novels, and to be honest I didn’t really like them that much. They were OK, but I prefer my reading to be a bit lighter like Fred Saberhagen’s Berserker series. But I’m not the one claiming I’m using this system to wake up the world to the Weeble Wempire. I’m all for watching a movie about the most mindless thing like killer donuts as an escape. But if I were astutely researching I think I’d expect the Weeble Wempire to hide their clues in Fahrenheit 451 instead of The Simpsons.
Based on non-sports activity let’s see what the biggest topics are lately. All three of my regular targets did bits on R. Lee Ermey and Verne Troyer. That’s some astutely researched intellectual content for you.
I suppose it’s not a coincidence that the only gematria user that actually reports on book passages is Rita 511, like 51x1=51. Must be a disinformation agent.
Sunday, April 22, 2018
The Weeble Wempire
Wondering why Weebles were not included in the gematria toy hall of fame?
It’s because Weebles are the evil empire personified, not just a toy.
Now think about it. Weeble sounds like evil. The Girl Scouts are proven advocates of avocado conspiracy and their male arm in the NWO flowchart is the Webelos. Anyone not familiar with the viciousness of a Webelo has not encountered one trying to earn his bayonet sharpening merit badge. They make wonderful cookie cutters and bayonets can substitute for some functions of the cliptractor ™️ in a pinch (again, earwax cleaning not recommended). The name Webelo and then later Weeble has its etymology from “We Below”, the very denizens of hell and parts of New Haven, Connecticut.
And they might wobble, but they never fall down. They’re like Jason in Friday the 13th. They just keep getting back up, over and over and over and over. Yet, the real proof is how the Weeble Wempire manufactures their hoaxes with single digit numbers and individual letters of the alphabet.
In this post https://web.archive.org/web/20180422080708/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/21/fake-news-is-local-too/ we see that the letter W is also a 3.
Nothing says scary like the denizens from hell turning W’s sideways, then unstacking them to make a 33.
Now we definitely have W, E, and M for single letter = 3 hoax coding. A has three lines. That should be a three. But we’ll wait to decode more toy representations of the Weeble Wempire after these letters get officially declared to be 3’s. Other than B as proven below which contains a 3. B as in bayonet. Bad bayoneting bastard boys.
Now break down the word WEEBLE.
W. That’s a 3. The soft hoax code. EE. That’s 33. The master hoax code. B is a line to the left of a 3. That’s a 13. The other nasty hoax number. L-E. A lower case l is a 1, another 13. 3,33,13,13. Hoax, hoax, hoax, hoax and Bob the Hitman’s gym locker combination.
WEEBLE = 52, 25.
That’s EXACTLY why the bastards don’t fall down. They’re re perfectly balanced. Who needs the force of gravity when the powers of darkness are on your side!
It’s because Weebles are the evil empire personified, not just a toy.
Now think about it. Weeble sounds like evil. The Girl Scouts are proven advocates of avocado conspiracy and their male arm in the NWO flowchart is the Webelos. Anyone not familiar with the viciousness of a Webelo has not encountered one trying to earn his bayonet sharpening merit badge. They make wonderful cookie cutters and bayonets can substitute for some functions of the cliptractor ™️ in a pinch (again, earwax cleaning not recommended). The name Webelo and then later Weeble has its etymology from “We Below”, the very denizens of hell and parts of New Haven, Connecticut.
And they might wobble, but they never fall down. They’re like Jason in Friday the 13th. They just keep getting back up, over and over and over and over. Yet, the real proof is how the Weeble Wempire manufactures their hoaxes with single digit numbers and individual letters of the alphabet.
In this post https://web.archive.org/web/20180422080708/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/21/fake-news-is-local-too/ we see that the letter W is also a 3.
Nothing says scary like the denizens from hell turning W’s sideways, then unstacking them to make a 33.
Now we definitely have W, E, and M for single letter = 3 hoax coding. A has three lines. That should be a three. But we’ll wait to decode more toy representations of the Weeble Wempire after these letters get officially declared to be 3’s. Other than B as proven below which contains a 3. B as in bayonet. Bad bayoneting bastard boys.
Now break down the word WEEBLE.
W. That’s a 3. The soft hoax code. EE. That’s 33. The master hoax code. B is a line to the left of a 3. That’s a 13. The other nasty hoax number. L-E. A lower case l is a 1, another 13. 3,33,13,13. Hoax, hoax, hoax, hoax and Bob the Hitman’s gym locker combination.
WEEBLE = 52, 25.
That’s EXACTLY why the bastards don’t fall down. They’re re perfectly balanced. Who needs the force of gravity when the powers of darkness are on your side!
How Soon They Forget, Part 2
The Cover Story
Starring N.D. Sided and Others (to be named later)
There’s a lot of contradictory information out there. Like this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=150s&v=D0C0OXH4ZBc
Which is part one of a six video set which essentially claims that the English language exists because of a gematria. Hubbard declares gematria to be the basis for English. There’s a screenshot of the definition of gematria showing it to be a method or system. Now, how this went from a Greek/Babylonian/Assyrian system to the basis of the English language then a language by itself....who knows? Currently there’s at least one video out there that after being rightfully shot out of the water for the outlandish suggestion that English only exists for the magic numbers, “Oh, I(we) never said that”. Yes you did. That was your cover story at one time. But even the loyal minions don’t check around or even understand that old info and new info don’t jibe since there’s zero application of critical thinking skills.
They also don’t notice something like this:
10,000 patrons??????? What the fuck? This used to be 1,000. They even give you the handy little slide bar to show your % progress towards the goal. When I first saw this at a goal of 1,000 I thought it was extremely unlikely that it would ever get close to the goal. Now at 159 patrons out of 10,000 (it’s actually less than 159 today) after a month and a half this screams out, “I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF EVER PRODUCING THE REWARDS LISTED, SO JUST SEND ME THE MONEY!” 100 subscribers per month, that’s over eight years. Perhaps fearful that he was in danger of actually putting effort into the collection of money it was altered to make it impossible to achieve the goal. Good luck to all the saps that haven’t dropped out yet, dem dere perks ain’t gonna happen. Unless the goal gets changed to something even lower than 1,000.
Like the How to Gematria videos this goal can disappear or be changed, and the cover story altered to be fit, relying on nobody ever noticing. The only people smart enough to notice aren’t looking at introductory info on learning gematria or not interested in forking over money for no good reason. I can buy three cliptractor™️s for the price of a monthly Patreon subscription, thank you very much.
The list goes on and on. Gematria is done on people’s initials regularly, conveniently forgetting that it was indicated that this was unacceptable. The Freemason image of square and compass not at 47 degrees is used, forgetting that it’s always supposed to be 47 degrees. Three all of a sudden means hoax, conveniently ignoring that something else was said earlier. The cover story changes on a daily basis just so what matches today matches, even if you have to manufacture it regardless of prior application of anything that should be considered a rule. I’d like my evil empire to be a little more consistent before I take them seriously.
All this leads back to yesterday’s image which I put here again because I wasn’t finished with this bad boy.
I’m not convinced that there really is a degree in Accountancy here. As an accountant (yes, I have two degrees, one in science and Business Admin focused on accounting) he doesn’t act or sound like an accountant. It’s a wonderful story. Numerology=numbers. Accounting=numbers. I also thought he was supposed to be an English teacher. That’s wonderful, too. Gematria= words. We’ve got all the bases covered. Let’s assume I’m wrong about the English teaching, or I’m right and it will conveniently disappear from the Internet.
The cover story is, regardless of education, that he was a teacher in a public school. A comment made often enough for the final proof of credibility to being THE expert who cracked the code.
There’s absolutely no way a degree in accountancy qualifies one to be a public school teacher. You need a degree in EDUCATION. You need a teaching certificate. You need to take ongoing education credits to retain your certificate. And there’s no PUBLIC record of one Zachary Keefe Hubbard being a teacher. How you list your Google profile education and not mention a degree in education is something that never should have happened.
Something doesn’t add up here. Something is wrong. And what it looks like is compulsive lying not being able to remember what’s been said or printed when because the focus is just to make the cover story believable today.
This is where I get some disagreement with some of my readers. Lots of people think this is an example of the conspiracy paranoid mind and they don’t know what they believe themselves, so crank magnetism takes over. Some are like that. Here we have a more deliberate attempt to present a cover story that has a history of turning the conversation towards money and doing every thing possible to cover the tracks when exposed.
Starring N.D. Sided and Others (to be named later)
There’s a lot of contradictory information out there. Like this video:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=150s&v=D0C0OXH4ZBc
Which is part one of a six video set which essentially claims that the English language exists because of a gematria. Hubbard declares gematria to be the basis for English. There’s a screenshot of the definition of gematria showing it to be a method or system. Now, how this went from a Greek/Babylonian/Assyrian system to the basis of the English language then a language by itself....who knows? Currently there’s at least one video out there that after being rightfully shot out of the water for the outlandish suggestion that English only exists for the magic numbers, “Oh, I(we) never said that”. Yes you did. That was your cover story at one time. But even the loyal minions don’t check around or even understand that old info and new info don’t jibe since there’s zero application of critical thinking skills.
They also don’t notice something like this:
10,000 patrons??????? What the fuck? This used to be 1,000. They even give you the handy little slide bar to show your % progress towards the goal. When I first saw this at a goal of 1,000 I thought it was extremely unlikely that it would ever get close to the goal. Now at 159 patrons out of 10,000 (it’s actually less than 159 today) after a month and a half this screams out, “I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF EVER PRODUCING THE REWARDS LISTED, SO JUST SEND ME THE MONEY!” 100 subscribers per month, that’s over eight years. Perhaps fearful that he was in danger of actually putting effort into the collection of money it was altered to make it impossible to achieve the goal. Good luck to all the saps that haven’t dropped out yet, dem dere perks ain’t gonna happen. Unless the goal gets changed to something even lower than 1,000.
Like the How to Gematria videos this goal can disappear or be changed, and the cover story altered to be fit, relying on nobody ever noticing. The only people smart enough to notice aren’t looking at introductory info on learning gematria or not interested in forking over money for no good reason. I can buy three cliptractor™️s for the price of a monthly Patreon subscription, thank you very much.
The list goes on and on. Gematria is done on people’s initials regularly, conveniently forgetting that it was indicated that this was unacceptable. The Freemason image of square and compass not at 47 degrees is used, forgetting that it’s always supposed to be 47 degrees. Three all of a sudden means hoax, conveniently ignoring that something else was said earlier. The cover story changes on a daily basis just so what matches today matches, even if you have to manufacture it regardless of prior application of anything that should be considered a rule. I’d like my evil empire to be a little more consistent before I take them seriously.
All this leads back to yesterday’s image which I put here again because I wasn’t finished with this bad boy.
I’m not convinced that there really is a degree in Accountancy here. As an accountant (yes, I have two degrees, one in science and Business Admin focused on accounting) he doesn’t act or sound like an accountant. It’s a wonderful story. Numerology=numbers. Accounting=numbers. I also thought he was supposed to be an English teacher. That’s wonderful, too. Gematria= words. We’ve got all the bases covered. Let’s assume I’m wrong about the English teaching, or I’m right and it will conveniently disappear from the Internet.
The cover story is, regardless of education, that he was a teacher in a public school. A comment made often enough for the final proof of credibility to being THE expert who cracked the code.
There’s absolutely no way a degree in accountancy qualifies one to be a public school teacher. You need a degree in EDUCATION. You need a teaching certificate. You need to take ongoing education credits to retain your certificate. And there’s no PUBLIC record of one Zachary Keefe Hubbard being a teacher. How you list your Google profile education and not mention a degree in education is something that never should have happened.
Something doesn’t add up here. Something is wrong. And what it looks like is compulsive lying not being able to remember what’s been said or printed when because the focus is just to make the cover story believable today.
This is where I get some disagreement with some of my readers. Lots of people think this is an example of the conspiracy paranoid mind and they don’t know what they believe themselves, so crank magnetism takes over. Some are like that. Here we have a more deliberate attempt to present a cover story that has a history of turning the conversation towards money and doing every thing possible to cover the tracks when exposed.
Saturday, April 21, 2018
How Soon They Forget
Having established that all of a sudden and totally out of the blue that single digit numbers are suddenly important again, it was time to look back at a historical precedent. Not much of a precedent as this comes amidst completely unfounded and uncited claims like Pythagoras being the father of Freemasonry.
This blog post is the rough draft of the first two chapters of Hubbard’s book from 2015.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180421044359/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2016/04/chapter-1-2-drafts-introduction-to.html?m=0
There’s a lot of material to digest there and more may be said about it in the future. For time and space reasons I’m only concerned now with Chapter 2 and the introductory run down of all the single digit numbers. And the timing of the actual pseudo release date of the book with the not terribly well thought out idea of lowering the standards to include single digit numbers.
Somebody with a degree in accounting should know about math enough to know that if you’re examining a set of single digit numbers it’s far more likely to find direct matches than a set of two digit or larger numbers. There are 9 single digit numbers since zero doesn’t count and there are 90 two digit numbers. Having forgotten entirely about his schooling at ASU in accounting about the need for some accuracy in record keeping and high school learning on even the most basic mathematical concepts like the size of numbers, there’s a pretty lengthy description of each digit’s deep philosophical gematria meaning.
Where pretty much immediately numbers get changed into other numbers or entire years are significant because, for example 2014=2+1+4=7. Try and find something that happened in 2014 that has a seven in it. Because with the new low standards it sure looks like anything with a three in it can now be declared a hoax. Now I suppose, if EE in THREE looks like 33, that 77 could be arranged to look like a square or hourglass, or who knows what other vacuous, insipid, moronic assertions will come, but a seven does look like an L. So any word with an L in it now has by default the meanings listed in that blog post.
Or not since even though there’s a friendly relationship between the claimant of 3 being a “soft hoax code” and the list maker we’re treated to another use of the operating standard of, “You agree with me today? Cool!” In the meantime big numbers get changed into small numbers, small numbers get changed into big numbers. It’s that simple and brutally obvious.
There’s no mention of 3 being any way involved in hoaxes. The single digit list is pretty friendly sounding ideals. In theory somebody could have, or more accurately SHOULD have challenged the very idea that all of a sudden now 3 by itself is a hoax. Or before the claim was made should have been researched on what somebody else thought about the idea.
And I can already hear the actually used defense of the “duality” of numbers. It doesn’t mean that it’s either this or that, in actual use it means “This number means what I told you it means without any actual evidence because it’s what I want it to mean today and I told you so”. Let’s hold off on three meaning the Holy Trinity until I have a use for it later when I find out that I don’t want to insult the spiritual folks, for now it’s a lot more fun and cool to make it petty and mean spirited.
Accounting doesn’t work this way. Try declaring whatever number you want on your tax return and see what happens. At least the IRS will follow one gematria rule correctly; declaring zero income doesn’t count.
So let’s do a current and up to date tax calculation.
Patreon currently at $1571 per month, billed once a month starting March 9th. (This will change up or down over time, but the number of patrons has been steady at just below 160 for some time). Let’s call it 9 months x $1,500 per month = $13,500. Etsy book sales 282 x $5=$1,410. $13,500+$1,400=$14,900. Guessing that Uber driving income puts this all in the 15% tax bracket $14,900 x 15%=$2,235
Try writing down TWO THOUSAND TWOHUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE=XXX on your tax return. I dare you.
This blog post is the rough draft of the first two chapters of Hubbard’s book from 2015.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180421044359/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2016/04/chapter-1-2-drafts-introduction-to.html?m=0
There’s a lot of material to digest there and more may be said about it in the future. For time and space reasons I’m only concerned now with Chapter 2 and the introductory run down of all the single digit numbers. And the timing of the actual pseudo release date of the book with the not terribly well thought out idea of lowering the standards to include single digit numbers.
Somebody with a degree in accounting should know about math enough to know that if you’re examining a set of single digit numbers it’s far more likely to find direct matches than a set of two digit or larger numbers. There are 9 single digit numbers since zero doesn’t count and there are 90 two digit numbers. Having forgotten entirely about his schooling at ASU in accounting about the need for some accuracy in record keeping and high school learning on even the most basic mathematical concepts like the size of numbers, there’s a pretty lengthy description of each digit’s deep philosophical gematria meaning.
Where pretty much immediately numbers get changed into other numbers or entire years are significant because, for example 2014=2+1+4=7. Try and find something that happened in 2014 that has a seven in it. Because with the new low standards it sure looks like anything with a three in it can now be declared a hoax. Now I suppose, if EE in THREE looks like 33, that 77 could be arranged to look like a square or hourglass, or who knows what other vacuous, insipid, moronic assertions will come, but a seven does look like an L. So any word with an L in it now has by default the meanings listed in that blog post.
Or not since even though there’s a friendly relationship between the claimant of 3 being a “soft hoax code” and the list maker we’re treated to another use of the operating standard of, “You agree with me today? Cool!” In the meantime big numbers get changed into small numbers, small numbers get changed into big numbers. It’s that simple and brutally obvious.
There’s no mention of 3 being any way involved in hoaxes. The single digit list is pretty friendly sounding ideals. In theory somebody could have, or more accurately SHOULD have challenged the very idea that all of a sudden now 3 by itself is a hoax. Or before the claim was made should have been researched on what somebody else thought about the idea.
And I can already hear the actually used defense of the “duality” of numbers. It doesn’t mean that it’s either this or that, in actual use it means “This number means what I told you it means without any actual evidence because it’s what I want it to mean today and I told you so”. Let’s hold off on three meaning the Holy Trinity until I have a use for it later when I find out that I don’t want to insult the spiritual folks, for now it’s a lot more fun and cool to make it petty and mean spirited.
Accounting doesn’t work this way. Try declaring whatever number you want on your tax return and see what happens. At least the IRS will follow one gematria rule correctly; declaring zero income doesn’t count.
So let’s do a current and up to date tax calculation.
Patreon currently at $1571 per month, billed once a month starting March 9th. (This will change up or down over time, but the number of patrons has been steady at just below 160 for some time). Let’s call it 9 months x $1,500 per month = $13,500. Etsy book sales 282 x $5=$1,410. $13,500+$1,400=$14,900. Guessing that Uber driving income puts this all in the 15% tax bracket $14,900 x 15%=$2,235
Try writing down TWO THOUSAND TWOHUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE=XXX on your tax return. I dare you.
Friday, April 20, 2018
Wandering Thoughts
There’s a case, a very good case, that the “that reminds me of” game is getting worse. The significance of the number four on the porch, three has two E’s which look like threes, Barbara Bush looks like Aleister Crowley (which in addition to the inevitable tranny comments also ballooned into Barbara being the witch spawn of Crowley), Carl KASSELL/Howard COSELL, etc... These being used as justification of numerology on topics not directly attributed to the story at hand.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180420075431/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/weird-happenings-at-work-today-bay-area.html?m=1
As I peruse Dan’s latest documentation of wandering thoughts, mostly in regards to the huge importance of ON and NO, my thoughts also wander. To what it would be like if he actually read more books and shared gematria on words more. You know, like using gematria for a correlation between letters and numbers like it’s supposed to be. Because the NO/ON story has little actual gematria and just records the riddles and clues for future reference.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180420075431/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/weird-happenings-at-work-today-bay-area.html?m=1
As the word WANDER crossed my path, I thought it might look something like this:
*I WANDERED LONELY AS A CLOUD
Wandered? Wondered? Wonder Woman was just released. One is the loneliest number. Could be Wonder Woman movie will be #1? C-LOUD. See. Loud. Sight and hearing. Don’t know what this means that I’m supposed to see or hear.
*by William Wordsworth
Is that even his real last name? Words are worthy. Like gematria being worthwhile. That’s why I was drawn to this poem
*I wandered lonely as a cloud
I just remembered about the clown scares with the movie IT being released. Cloud-Clown. People are scared of clowns and they could be lonely even if they aren’t killers. I’ll have to check this and Wonder Woman out.
*That floats on high o’er vales and hills
This could be really high, like high-er instead of high o’er. Or oar instead of o’er. But you wouldn’t use an oar on land. There’s water in the sewers with IT. Vales reminds techme of Vicky Vale - a Batman/Wonder Woman connection.
*When all at once I saw a crowd
Once-Wonder-One_Der there’s a 1 theme here. Crowd, crow. This is probably Hawkman, but could be Robin or Nightwing. But not Marvel comics.
*A host, of golden daffodils
Sinestro is Green Lantern’s enemy and he uses yellow or gold powered technology. Enemy makes me think of enema which makes me think of sewers. Now that I think about IT that stands for Information Technolgy which is Brainiac.
*Beside the lake, beneath the trees
Trees/Threes this could be the hoax code about fake plants. With all the DC comic characters could be the Justice League movie. There’s water in a lake, too.
*Fluttering and dancing in the breeze
Superman has super breath that has a strong breeze.
———————
I’ll spare you more. You’re welcome.
Trivial and silly? I hope so. Because often the original material reads like this. Not as exaggerated, but rather meaningless. I picked this poem because it was my first thought to go with WANDER. The It and DC comics just was what flowed afterwards. Somebody else critical would probably have gone a completely different direction for a parody. Somebody else pro gematria would come up with different idea of what Wordsworth was syncing up to. Isolate a set of them and have them work independently on the numerology of this poem, you’ll get some agreement. The big issues like his name and daffodils. But as soon as it turns into the “that reminds me of” game it all turns to shit filled sewers. This is because of the operating standard of community acceptance for anything blurred out as long as you agree with me today. Notice the friendly comment to the original post? Bridges need to be tied into Onions. That makes all kinds of sense, better document that connection. While I, as my rightfully earned position as the troll from hell, don’t count. Anything I come up with is outlawed because I’m the source, no matter how reasonable it might sound. Like THEOREMS=truth=113.
What a wonderful system to throw out into the world. It’s supposed to be guiding everyone’s life but if you point out the flaws you are wrong.
As a companion to yesterday’s post, well. Document to your hearts content. You aren’t going to find any new numbers. You aren’t going to find larger numbers because of the way the math works. Keep on lowering your standards now that we’re starting to dip into single digit numbers, probably because everyone’s tired of the overused two digit numbers and forcing larger numbers to be smaller numbers looks stupid. Just keep documenting until your head explodes and starts wandering lonely as a clown.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180420075431/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/weird-happenings-at-work-today-bay-area.html?m=1
As I peruse Dan’s latest documentation of wandering thoughts, mostly in regards to the huge importance of ON and NO, my thoughts also wander. To what it would be like if he actually read more books and shared gematria on words more. You know, like using gematria for a correlation between letters and numbers like it’s supposed to be. Because the NO/ON story has little actual gematria and just records the riddles and clues for future reference.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180420075431/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/weird-happenings-at-work-today-bay-area.html?m=1
As the word WANDER crossed my path, I thought it might look something like this:
*I WANDERED LONELY AS A CLOUD
Wandered? Wondered? Wonder Woman was just released. One is the loneliest number. Could be Wonder Woman movie will be #1? C-LOUD. See. Loud. Sight and hearing. Don’t know what this means that I’m supposed to see or hear.
*by William Wordsworth
Is that even his real last name? Words are worthy. Like gematria being worthwhile. That’s why I was drawn to this poem
*I wandered lonely as a cloud
I just remembered about the clown scares with the movie IT being released. Cloud-Clown. People are scared of clowns and they could be lonely even if they aren’t killers. I’ll have to check this and Wonder Woman out.
*That floats on high o’er vales and hills
This could be really high, like high-er instead of high o’er. Or oar instead of o’er. But you wouldn’t use an oar on land. There’s water in the sewers with IT. Vales reminds techme of Vicky Vale - a Batman/Wonder Woman connection.
*When all at once I saw a crowd
Once-Wonder-One_Der there’s a 1 theme here. Crowd, crow. This is probably Hawkman, but could be Robin or Nightwing. But not Marvel comics.
*A host, of golden daffodils
Sinestro is Green Lantern’s enemy and he uses yellow or gold powered technology. Enemy makes me think of enema which makes me think of sewers. Now that I think about IT that stands for Information Technolgy which is Brainiac.
*Beside the lake, beneath the trees
Trees/Threes this could be the hoax code about fake plants. With all the DC comic characters could be the Justice League movie. There’s water in a lake, too.
*Fluttering and dancing in the breeze
Superman has super breath that has a strong breeze.
———————
I’ll spare you more. You’re welcome.
Trivial and silly? I hope so. Because often the original material reads like this. Not as exaggerated, but rather meaningless. I picked this poem because it was my first thought to go with WANDER. The It and DC comics just was what flowed afterwards. Somebody else critical would probably have gone a completely different direction for a parody. Somebody else pro gematria would come up with different idea of what Wordsworth was syncing up to. Isolate a set of them and have them work independently on the numerology of this poem, you’ll get some agreement. The big issues like his name and daffodils. But as soon as it turns into the “that reminds me of” game it all turns to shit filled sewers. This is because of the operating standard of community acceptance for anything blurred out as long as you agree with me today. Notice the friendly comment to the original post? Bridges need to be tied into Onions. That makes all kinds of sense, better document that connection. While I, as my rightfully earned position as the troll from hell, don’t count. Anything I come up with is outlawed because I’m the source, no matter how reasonable it might sound. Like THEOREMS=truth=113.
What a wonderful system to throw out into the world. It’s supposed to be guiding everyone’s life but if you point out the flaws you are wrong.
As a companion to yesterday’s post, well. Document to your hearts content. You aren’t going to find any new numbers. You aren’t going to find larger numbers because of the way the math works. Keep on lowering your standards now that we’re starting to dip into single digit numbers, probably because everyone’s tired of the overused two digit numbers and forcing larger numbers to be smaller numbers looks stupid. Just keep documenting until your head explodes and starts wandering lonely as a clown.
Thursday, April 19, 2018
Clue Vs. Tribute
I wonder if there’s any comprehensive listing of what certain numbers mean. It’s not likely. Kon5spiracy gave it some time here http://kon5piracy.blogspot.com/2017/05/word-gematria-research-chart.html?m=1. Hasn’t had any updates since December 2017. There’s two reasons for my curiosity. No surprise that Dan has something odd that occurred which compelled him to document the incident for future reference.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180419050201/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/pink-number-4-appeared-on-railing-of-my.html?m=1
So what if there was an archive that documented what 4 represented? And every other number? Every number would not mean just one thing. Now some of the mystery of 33 is clearer. It’s a primary hoax code AND a primary sacrifice code. Although loading up the calculator screen with every prefabricated elision neither of the words HOAX or SACRIFICE equals 33. MASONRY = 33 so I suppose that’s evil enough. An abbreviated chart would look like this:
1-10 Evil
11 Master builder #
12-21 Evil
22 MB #
23-32 Evil
33 Especially evil
34-92 Evil
93 Sun, Time, Evil
94-112 Evil
113 Dishonest, Mainstream media, Evil
114-222 Evil
223 Especially evil (Synagogue of Satan)
224-226 Evil
227 Pi
228-313 Evil
314 Pi
666 Especially evil
Three digit repeating digits Not evil necessarily, but really cool
There are others I didn’t list like 119, 911, 47 which are probably especially evil.
This is important because of the awkward shotgun marriage of dates and events.
1). Every number that appears in a gematria story is evil, by default. Or at least means something important, even if it doesn’t seem evil. Here’s a mass shooting, oh by the way, I noticed that XXXXXX=227. The mere mention of the number number makes it so.
2). Every date is signifcant, because of the operating definitions of these words in the narratives
A). Tribute/Sacrifice//Ritual - A synchronous number with a past event, or rarely a known future event like the date Hong Kong was scheduled for independence from Britain. (So I don’t have to use the overused actual abuse of that sub defined part).
B). Clue/Riddle/Documentation - A synchronous number that you don’t know what it means now, but you hold in reserve for the future until that number pops up again.
It’s really that simple. Every number means something today because it meant something earlier or will mean something later. That’s exactly the conspiracy mindset in a nutshell. A pink 4 showing up on your doorstep can’t possibly just be a random event, it has to have some deep cosmic significance. It doesn’t matter what the number was. It doesn’t matter what color. It doesn’t even matter if it’s a number. It’s likely the next time you look at the clock and see a 4 you’re going to read deep meaning into what you were doing at the time because a 4 can’t possibly be some kind of accident.
The sports fans don’t seem to care too much for anything other than making predictions of game results. Less obnoxious gematria users do what Zom referred to as from the time when “gematria was still gematria”. So if you might need some deprogramming from thinking about the source of the numerology (organic matrix, New World Order, aliens, Poppy Montgomery*, etc...) we can turn to open minded little Johnny.
Johnny has been hanging out with his conspiracy friends. He finds a turtle on the front walkway. Wondering what it means, (because it has to mean something, right?) he confronts his parents with this astounding information.
The parents suggest this.
Johnny, open the door now. Before you do that, describe to me EXACTLY what in regards to the turtle would NOT mean anything important. It might be in the grass. Gone entirely. Dead. In the same spot. It was there in the past, that’s a given, for whatever reason. After opening the door, review the new facts. Go to your computer and compare the numerology between the past, current and future turtle status. Don’t forget that turtles remind you of Gamera and Attu the Wonder Turtle. Don’t forget to crunch the numbers on everything you remember about turtles. Treat it the same way you would for celebrity deaths. If you don’t find “matches” are you going to forget about the turtle, or wait until those same numbers show up and say, “AHA! Turtle #!”?
Now EXACTLY when are these numbers going to stop being turtle numbers? Go to your room and watch a Gamera movie for the sake of entertainment instead of reading too much into stuff.
* Star of the Australian Tv show....dang. I can’t remember the name.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180419050201/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/04/pink-number-4-appeared-on-railing-of-my.html?m=1
So what if there was an archive that documented what 4 represented? And every other number? Every number would not mean just one thing. Now some of the mystery of 33 is clearer. It’s a primary hoax code AND a primary sacrifice code. Although loading up the calculator screen with every prefabricated elision neither of the words HOAX or SACRIFICE equals 33. MASONRY = 33 so I suppose that’s evil enough. An abbreviated chart would look like this:
1-10 Evil
11 Master builder #
12-21 Evil
22 MB #
23-32 Evil
33 Especially evil
34-92 Evil
93 Sun, Time, Evil
94-112 Evil
113 Dishonest, Mainstream media, Evil
114-222 Evil
223 Especially evil (Synagogue of Satan)
224-226 Evil
227 Pi
228-313 Evil
314 Pi
666 Especially evil
Three digit repeating digits Not evil necessarily, but really cool
There are others I didn’t list like 119, 911, 47 which are probably especially evil.
This is important because of the awkward shotgun marriage of dates and events.
1). Every number that appears in a gematria story is evil, by default. Or at least means something important, even if it doesn’t seem evil. Here’s a mass shooting, oh by the way, I noticed that XXXXXX=227. The mere mention of the number number makes it so.
2). Every date is signifcant, because of the operating definitions of these words in the narratives
A). Tribute/Sacrifice//Ritual - A synchronous number with a past event, or rarely a known future event like the date Hong Kong was scheduled for independence from Britain. (So I don’t have to use the overused actual abuse of that sub defined part).
B). Clue/Riddle/Documentation - A synchronous number that you don’t know what it means now, but you hold in reserve for the future until that number pops up again.
It’s really that simple. Every number means something today because it meant something earlier or will mean something later. That’s exactly the conspiracy mindset in a nutshell. A pink 4 showing up on your doorstep can’t possibly just be a random event, it has to have some deep cosmic significance. It doesn’t matter what the number was. It doesn’t matter what color. It doesn’t even matter if it’s a number. It’s likely the next time you look at the clock and see a 4 you’re going to read deep meaning into what you were doing at the time because a 4 can’t possibly be some kind of accident.
The sports fans don’t seem to care too much for anything other than making predictions of game results. Less obnoxious gematria users do what Zom referred to as from the time when “gematria was still gematria”. So if you might need some deprogramming from thinking about the source of the numerology (organic matrix, New World Order, aliens, Poppy Montgomery*, etc...) we can turn to open minded little Johnny.
Johnny has been hanging out with his conspiracy friends. He finds a turtle on the front walkway. Wondering what it means, (because it has to mean something, right?) he confronts his parents with this astounding information.
The parents suggest this.
Johnny, open the door now. Before you do that, describe to me EXACTLY what in regards to the turtle would NOT mean anything important. It might be in the grass. Gone entirely. Dead. In the same spot. It was there in the past, that’s a given, for whatever reason. After opening the door, review the new facts. Go to your computer and compare the numerology between the past, current and future turtle status. Don’t forget that turtles remind you of Gamera and Attu the Wonder Turtle. Don’t forget to crunch the numbers on everything you remember about turtles. Treat it the same way you would for celebrity deaths. If you don’t find “matches” are you going to forget about the turtle, or wait until those same numbers show up and say, “AHA! Turtle #!”?
Now EXACTLY when are these numbers going to stop being turtle numbers? Go to your room and watch a Gamera movie for the sake of entertainment instead of reading too much into stuff.
* Star of the Australian Tv show....dang. I can’t remember the name.
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
What’s A Sports Bettor To Do?
There are still the occasional visits from some ill advised Google searches, prolly (yes, actually a real word) from “gematria sports predictions” or similar phrases. If anything, there are more of these visits to “How To Predict A Sports Champion” than any playoffs in this blogs existence. I’d like to think that some of those where genuine searches for what’s wrong with gematria, but my faith in humanity has been shattered ever since I first started seeing the words ritual, tributeelse, clue, riddle and sacrifice on a regular basis. More likely, this is the result of a monster movie marathon running at the downtown Gematria Twin Bijou. It starts with Stephen King’s, The Dead Zone. The usual annoying running commentary on the FTFM blog is still there, but it’s volume is comparable to The Incredible Shrinking Man instead of the previous The Amazing Colossal Man volume. I understand the fun in comparing contradictory info but....who am I kidding? Why on Earth do these people not see that every team has a gematria plus and a gematria minus every game of the year? Even if they don’t make the playoffs there’s that “riddle” that was there, so deeply scripted they couldn’t figure it out.
So what’s a sports bettor to do? Where else do you turn for misinformation in this time of need? The playoffs are going on right NOW!! The good news is that the movie marathon includes every movie that ever had a variation of the line incorrectly attributed to Frankenstein. “Oh, no!!! I’ve created a monster!”
There still is, and sadly probably always will be, a market for people that love sharing contradictory information. And people really don’t seem to find the ability to muster giving a fuck about Freemasons and solar eclipses when there’s gambling to share misinformation about. So, here’s a relatively new blog catering to their fix:
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/?m=1
Every single post mentions sports, specifically the NBA. Not sure how that Trump Tower bit got in there since it’s sole purpose was to synchronize up with the NBA. You could have synched anything to it, but what the hell. Other than space limitations the blog should be named “Hello World! I got your useless sports predictions! Right! Here!” I’m assuming that since the major sports cover the whole calendar year that this vacuum will be filling the FTFM vacuum.
Let’s look at the NBA playoff bracket proudly displayed. There’s a great start for disingenuous predictions. Wait until the playoff teams are finalized. You don’t want your gematria to show the Phoenix Suns winning the championship. You don’t want to pick Boston who got off to a hot start for the regular season. Injuries, fake or not, are impossible to predict. And so on.
Amaaaazzziiiing how the gematria lines up for Houston beating the Cavs in the finals. It’s magic! According to the betting lines as the playoffs started this is the #2 money pick versus the #2 money pick, Golden State and Toronto being the #1s. You realize that you haven’t shown me anything I couldn’t have already guessed at just following sports in a conventional way? Did you think that the Sixers were going to finish the season that good months ago? You know, riddles and shtuff.
But more importantly, have you seen the way your glorious leader has been noticeably absent from doing this kind of thing? Do you really want his job?? Trust me, this would have worked out better for you a year ago. Your timing blows chunks, now is not a happy time for gematria truth seeking. Just imagine if I’m part of the evil cabal, I know you want to. The blog wasn’t that hard to find even though not overtly advertised. You know the cabal loves to mock, and so do I. I’m just more into mocking how silly the system is instead of the “in your face here’s a 33 suck on it sheep” type of mockery you attribute to the shadow forces. If you want to keep up the blog I’m more than happy to visit every once and awhile to ridicule it.
But I’d rather not. The sports aspect of gematria bores me a bit. It’s too easy to debunk. I’d much rather spend my time working out how the word MOOK is special or pointing out what’s stupid about trying to make a big deal out of 3. Or at least crazy science like magnetized golf balls. No, the numbers side of sports gematria is so trivial, not only I don’t want to be bothered with it, every indication is that there are those that consider themselves to be real truth seekers that rightfully think that this kind of thing cheapens their message. Because it does. You need to get a real argument instead of gematria or you’ll never be taken seriously.
Now I grit my teeth and wait until I may find that the blog has changed to exclude sports. Then I can say,
So what’s a sports bettor to do? Where else do you turn for misinformation in this time of need? The playoffs are going on right NOW!! The good news is that the movie marathon includes every movie that ever had a variation of the line incorrectly attributed to Frankenstein. “Oh, no!!! I’ve created a monster!”
There still is, and sadly probably always will be, a market for people that love sharing contradictory information. And people really don’t seem to find the ability to muster giving a fuck about Freemasons and solar eclipses when there’s gambling to share misinformation about. So, here’s a relatively new blog catering to their fix:
http://dddecodings.blogspot.com/?m=1
Every single post mentions sports, specifically the NBA. Not sure how that Trump Tower bit got in there since it’s sole purpose was to synchronize up with the NBA. You could have synched anything to it, but what the hell. Other than space limitations the blog should be named “Hello World! I got your useless sports predictions! Right! Here!” I’m assuming that since the major sports cover the whole calendar year that this vacuum will be filling the FTFM vacuum.
Let’s look at the NBA playoff bracket proudly displayed. There’s a great start for disingenuous predictions. Wait until the playoff teams are finalized. You don’t want your gematria to show the Phoenix Suns winning the championship. You don’t want to pick Boston who got off to a hot start for the regular season. Injuries, fake or not, are impossible to predict. And so on.
Amaaaazzziiiing how the gematria lines up for Houston beating the Cavs in the finals. It’s magic! According to the betting lines as the playoffs started this is the #2 money pick versus the #2 money pick, Golden State and Toronto being the #1s. You realize that you haven’t shown me anything I couldn’t have already guessed at just following sports in a conventional way? Did you think that the Sixers were going to finish the season that good months ago? You know, riddles and shtuff.
But more importantly, have you seen the way your glorious leader has been noticeably absent from doing this kind of thing? Do you really want his job?? Trust me, this would have worked out better for you a year ago. Your timing blows chunks, now is not a happy time for gematria truth seeking. Just imagine if I’m part of the evil cabal, I know you want to. The blog wasn’t that hard to find even though not overtly advertised. You know the cabal loves to mock, and so do I. I’m just more into mocking how silly the system is instead of the “in your face here’s a 33 suck on it sheep” type of mockery you attribute to the shadow forces. If you want to keep up the blog I’m more than happy to visit every once and awhile to ridicule it.
But I’d rather not. The sports aspect of gematria bores me a bit. It’s too easy to debunk. I’d much rather spend my time working out how the word MOOK is special or pointing out what’s stupid about trying to make a big deal out of 3. Or at least crazy science like magnetized golf balls. No, the numbers side of sports gematria is so trivial, not only I don’t want to be bothered with it, every indication is that there are those that consider themselves to be real truth seekers that rightfully think that this kind of thing cheapens their message. Because it does. You need to get a real argument instead of gematria or you’ll never be taken seriously.
Now I grit my teeth and wait until I may find that the blog has changed to exclude sports. Then I can say,
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Now Gematria Is A Language
I don’t have any blog screen grabs, since so far it’s not been included there. So to tide you over, just for the hell of it here’s the Lost in Space robot.
For as long as the trend lasts here is a video example.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r
Whether intentional or not these videos are made to stand alone. Although we’re kindly treated to proof of Freemasonry being founded on solar eclipses via a link to the same blog as the citation (rather silly, like citing Wikipedia on laser enhanced supplements for the reference to the article on laser enhanced supplements), each Gematrinator video has been starting with a quick overview of gematria. This in place of a separate training video to give a rough idea of what is going on.
Some great ideas for not having the separate video, well first of all if your channel gets deleted you don’t have to bother replacing that. Also, the intros never can cover all the waffling over what is a “rule” and what exactly counts as gematria. No sense in making the flying by the seat of your pants too obvious, you never know when you’ll want that 102 to stay as 102 instead of dropping the zero.
One such waffle that was housed in the narratives (yes, a Waffle House) is the old story that “the entire English language is coded just for gematria” which they finally was decided was too nuts to keep. Easier to argue that the vile shadow forces were picking and choosing their encryption. Well, it’s back. And now it’s not just back, it’s been promoted. The English language isn’t used just to hide tiny numbers, as in this and several recent videos this is “The language of gematria”.
Ok.
Do you know what the word “language” means?
In its most simple form, the refutation is probably just imagining what it would be like if everyone tried to communicate solely with numbers requiring further translation to mean anything. Written language developed as an expression of vocal language. Gematria isn’t even close.
More in depth, here’s an article frommy blog the Internet I found about the characteristics of language. https://www.google.com/amp/s/neoenglish.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/characteristics-and-features-of-language/amp/. This being the top search engine result and not the FTFM blog it should do.
Let’s go over them one by one. There’s overlaps in the main characteristics.
Arbitrary - No pass/no fail. Yes, gematria is too arbitrary not totally missing being arbitrary. Arbitrary explains why we might call that city in Australia, Wollongong,while aliens might think it’s Zqzmrfidxgong. Instead even people that don’t use Arabic numbers all are expected to think 33 is 33. But if 33 was created to mean hoax, there’s no connection directly. If we have to pick tally this as a passing grade.
Social - Big fail. Communicating solely with gematria ain’t gonna happen. People would never put up with the required further translation.
Symbolic - Fail. This is why it’s better to stick to the story of it being a code. Completely unintelligible by itself.
Systematic - Fail. Have I mentioned “lack of rules” before?
Vocal - Fail. They hijacked English to verbalize everything instead of creating new writing to match new vocals.
Non-Instinctive, Conventional - Pass. Try inheriting the ability to learn something so convoluted and unstructured. A pass, but hardly a major victory.
Productive, Creative - Fail. Gematria is a waste of time and if anything too creative for its own good. But that’s not really what the characteristic means. It means the language has the ability to adapt and grow. Like adding new words to the OED. Gematria is stuck in a dead end of reducing everything to the same two and three digit numbers over and over and over, purposefully disguised in some ways most of the time to force the result.
Calling gematria a language in and of itself is more ludicrous than saying the language was made to hide the numbers within it. There’s no way an isolated pack of people would ever develop something so cumbersome to try and communicate on a daily basis. If you use the phrase “language of gematria” you instantly lose any non pigeon chess debate.
For as long as the trend lasts here is a video example.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r
Whether intentional or not these videos are made to stand alone. Although we’re kindly treated to proof of Freemasonry being founded on solar eclipses via a link to the same blog as the citation (rather silly, like citing Wikipedia on laser enhanced supplements for the reference to the article on laser enhanced supplements), each Gematrinator video has been starting with a quick overview of gematria. This in place of a separate training video to give a rough idea of what is going on.
Some great ideas for not having the separate video, well first of all if your channel gets deleted you don’t have to bother replacing that. Also, the intros never can cover all the waffling over what is a “rule” and what exactly counts as gematria. No sense in making the flying by the seat of your pants too obvious, you never know when you’ll want that 102 to stay as 102 instead of dropping the zero.
One such waffle that was housed in the narratives (yes, a Waffle House) is the old story that “the entire English language is coded just for gematria” which they finally was decided was too nuts to keep. Easier to argue that the vile shadow forces were picking and choosing their encryption. Well, it’s back. And now it’s not just back, it’s been promoted. The English language isn’t used just to hide tiny numbers, as in this and several recent videos this is “The language of gematria”.
Ok.
Do you know what the word “language” means?
In its most simple form, the refutation is probably just imagining what it would be like if everyone tried to communicate solely with numbers requiring further translation to mean anything. Written language developed as an expression of vocal language. Gematria isn’t even close.
More in depth, here’s an article from
Let’s go over them one by one. There’s overlaps in the main characteristics.
Arbitrary - No pass/no fail. Yes, gematria is too arbitrary not totally missing being arbitrary. Arbitrary explains why we might call that city in Australia, Wollongong,while aliens might think it’s Zqzmrfidxgong. Instead even people that don’t use Arabic numbers all are expected to think 33 is 33. But if 33 was created to mean hoax, there’s no connection directly. If we have to pick tally this as a passing grade.
Social - Big fail. Communicating solely with gematria ain’t gonna happen. People would never put up with the required further translation.
Symbolic - Fail. This is why it’s better to stick to the story of it being a code. Completely unintelligible by itself.
Systematic - Fail. Have I mentioned “lack of rules” before?
Vocal - Fail. They hijacked English to verbalize everything instead of creating new writing to match new vocals.
Non-Instinctive, Conventional - Pass. Try inheriting the ability to learn something so convoluted and unstructured. A pass, but hardly a major victory.
Productive, Creative - Fail. Gematria is a waste of time and if anything too creative for its own good. But that’s not really what the characteristic means. It means the language has the ability to adapt and grow. Like adding new words to the OED. Gematria is stuck in a dead end of reducing everything to the same two and three digit numbers over and over and over, purposefully disguised in some ways most of the time to force the result.
Calling gematria a language in and of itself is more ludicrous than saying the language was made to hide the numbers within it. There’s no way an isolated pack of people would ever develop something so cumbersome to try and communicate on a daily basis. If you use the phrase “language of gematria” you instantly lose any non pigeon chess debate.
Monday, April 16, 2018
The Fibonacci Cipher
Nobody (important) asked for it, so you got it
Why, oh why did I actually watch several minutes of that when I knew it was going to just make me clench my teeth for holding back the gamma radiation spawned, green colored monster inside me I’ve been trying to keep in check.
Errghh. Argh. Growl. Snarl. Masticate. Grahrr.
So this isn’t even just called the Fibonacci cipher, it’s importanint (a mash up of important and impertinent) enough to be deemed Fibonatria. Thanks to the “that reminds me of” game, very appropriate that Fibonatria is a mash up of fib-and-gematria.
Giving the benefit of the doubt, the video author, eXiT TiMe, appears to be genuinely sold on the idea that some mystical elision was being used by a super powerful organization that sucks ass at hiding their hiding. Not realizing that he admits he created this instead of researching some dusty tome located in a Flemish crypt or some more genuine way of actually proving that this super powerful group of ass suckers ever used this. Completely unsurprisingly matches to small numbers validate the gematria and another unnecessary elision is born. But, benefit of the doubt. He’s not in your face with the “I’m so smart!” attitude. That is, he’s not hiding it, it’s completely absent.
The reason I made it as long as I did was to see how the gigantic numbers of the upper end of a 26 number sequence would be addressed. So as shown, if A=1,B=1, C=A+B=1+1=2, D=3, E=5 eventually the numbers get pretty big. A common example of increases in this format is the old story of folding a piece of paper. With the power of doubling, the 20th fold would make the paper higher than Mt. Everest, 42 folds reaches the Moon. Look it up. The answer is, there is no Fibonatria, per se. It’s Fibonatria Reduced. Everything is single digits or 10, the chart is in the video.m
Dude. You realize that makes absolutely no sense, right? You just increased the value of each letter, then immediately lowered it before comparison to other words in the same raised/lowered fashion. I can apply any manner of increasing I want then lower it in any manner I want and get any number I want and match any word I want, and I personally could make it sound reasonable. I’ve had lots of practice. And I’m better at math. Which is part of the problem.
I really don’t think you’re qualified to pass judgment on the soundness of a made up elision by acknowledging that the Fibonacci sequence is infinite. With an infinite array of options available and the wonders of actual quantum cryptography it’s pretty unlikely an evil empire would settle for 7 out of the available 10 single digits. The decision to leave 10 as 10 instead of 1 is completely arbitrary. And. Yes, 0 is in fact a number. No, really.
Still in benefit of the doubt instead of full sarcasm mode, and for the benefit of newcomers here, I offer two examples that should clear it up. I’m addressing this in case claiming “0 is not a number” is justification for this hypocritically applied dropping zeroes in gematria rule.
There is some argumentative commentary out there that zero is a concept, and not a number. If zero was not a number, then even gematria by definition wouldn’t work, because addition is the process of adding numbers together. Now, answer the question here:
What is 0+1?
If you said 1, you’re fine. You just added the two numbers together and got the resulting number. If you said in all sincerity, “I have no idea because that dang zero there is just a concept”, then you have a problem.
Example two, a variation of the first. Don’t start at 0 and count upwards. Start at -10 and count upwards by 1 to +10. Do you really think there’s some conceptual black hole in the middle of -1 and 1 or is there a 0 in there? Planar coordinates with 0 are used in GEOMETRY which is supposed to be part of GEMATRIA.
Indulging in some sarcasm to discourage further offerings from eXiT TiMe. Perhaps you’d like to spend some time working on capital letter based elisions? You do seem to have a knack for making questionable use of them. Francis Bacon would be proud.
Why, oh why did I actually watch several minutes of that when I knew it was going to just make me clench my teeth for holding back the gamma radiation spawned, green colored monster inside me I’ve been trying to keep in check.
Errghh. Argh. Growl. Snarl. Masticate. Grahrr.
So this isn’t even just called the Fibonacci cipher, it’s importanint (a mash up of important and impertinent) enough to be deemed Fibonatria. Thanks to the “that reminds me of” game, very appropriate that Fibonatria is a mash up of fib-and-gematria.
Giving the benefit of the doubt, the video author, eXiT TiMe, appears to be genuinely sold on the idea that some mystical elision was being used by a super powerful organization that sucks ass at hiding their hiding. Not realizing that he admits he created this instead of researching some dusty tome located in a Flemish crypt or some more genuine way of actually proving that this super powerful group of ass suckers ever used this. Completely unsurprisingly matches to small numbers validate the gematria and another unnecessary elision is born. But, benefit of the doubt. He’s not in your face with the “I’m so smart!” attitude. That is, he’s not hiding it, it’s completely absent.
The reason I made it as long as I did was to see how the gigantic numbers of the upper end of a 26 number sequence would be addressed. So as shown, if A=1,B=1, C=A+B=1+1=2, D=3, E=5 eventually the numbers get pretty big. A common example of increases in this format is the old story of folding a piece of paper. With the power of doubling, the 20th fold would make the paper higher than Mt. Everest, 42 folds reaches the Moon. Look it up. The answer is, there is no Fibonatria, per se. It’s Fibonatria Reduced. Everything is single digits or 10, the chart is in the video.m
Dude. You realize that makes absolutely no sense, right? You just increased the value of each letter, then immediately lowered it before comparison to other words in the same raised/lowered fashion. I can apply any manner of increasing I want then lower it in any manner I want and get any number I want and match any word I want, and I personally could make it sound reasonable. I’ve had lots of practice. And I’m better at math. Which is part of the problem.
I really don’t think you’re qualified to pass judgment on the soundness of a made up elision by acknowledging that the Fibonacci sequence is infinite. With an infinite array of options available and the wonders of actual quantum cryptography it’s pretty unlikely an evil empire would settle for 7 out of the available 10 single digits. The decision to leave 10 as 10 instead of 1 is completely arbitrary. And. Yes, 0 is in fact a number. No, really.
Still in benefit of the doubt instead of full sarcasm mode, and for the benefit of newcomers here, I offer two examples that should clear it up. I’m addressing this in case claiming “0 is not a number” is justification for this hypocritically applied dropping zeroes in gematria rule.
There is some argumentative commentary out there that zero is a concept, and not a number. If zero was not a number, then even gematria by definition wouldn’t work, because addition is the process of adding numbers together. Now, answer the question here:
What is 0+1?
If you said 1, you’re fine. You just added the two numbers together and got the resulting number. If you said in all sincerity, “I have no idea because that dang zero there is just a concept”, then you have a problem.
Example two, a variation of the first. Don’t start at 0 and count upwards. Start at -10 and count upwards by 1 to +10. Do you really think there’s some conceptual black hole in the middle of -1 and 1 or is there a 0 in there? Planar coordinates with 0 are used in GEOMETRY which is supposed to be part of GEMATRIA.
Indulging in some sarcasm to discourage further offerings from eXiT TiMe. Perhaps you’d like to spend some time working on capital letter based elisions? You do seem to have a knack for making questionable use of them. Francis Bacon would be proud.
Sunday, April 15, 2018
Build Your Own Cliff Notes Gematria Guide
Step #1
Get hooked on gematria. Throw out critical thinking and embrace confirmation bias.
Step #2
Wait for professionally manufractured (not a typo) book from noted expert in field to become available.
Step #3
Wait.
Step #4
Wait some more.
Step #5
Prod author of book for actual book.
Step #6
Wait a bit more.
Step #7
Buy unedited pdf version of that book.
Step #8
Wait more
Step #9
More waiting
Step #10
After author basically does this,🖕🏻, make your own book.
Or at least the Cliff Notes super abbreviated gematria guide.
In this post, Magnifying glass included?, Amanda’s book making skills are displayed. Guess she got tired of waiting, made her own book and shared the image which Hubbard proudly displays. Now this presents some questions. Is the print really, really, really, really tiny? Is the book really just an EXTREMELY abbreviated reference guide? Or can Amanda, like other gematria mooks seem capable of, allowed to bend the laws of physics? The math doesn’t work. Common sense doesn’t work. For those that don’t want to blemish their computer accessing the FTFM blog, here’s the image. Ask yourself, does this really look like a 773 page book??
When you show a book off you can make things more obvious than laying (lying?) it flat on a blanket or whatever the background is here. You can stand it up, prop something behind it so it doesn’t topple over, put it on a shelf, take more than one picture (how about one with some actual printed pages displayed??). Although, I expect all that’s too much to expect if there’s no hardcover spine to support a book like here: http://cleardisplays.com/book-display/ Pick your own display site, you have lots of time while waiting for the edited, bound, promised book.
The scale is hard to figure if you focus on trying to guess the thickness based on depth from the background. The damning part is the SPIRAL COIL, combined with the announcement of how many pages the book has ballooned into. So I got to do me some maths.
A ream of paper is 500 sheets. Approximately 52 millimeters. The largest commercially available spiral coil I found was listed at 60 millimeters. Here’s a chart showing offerings ending at 50 mm. https://spiralbinding.com/p/101412/Plastic-Coil/4-1-Pitch-Plastic-Coil-12-Length. Now if you’re getting ahead of me this technically works. Converting to inches, 52 millimeters is about 2 inches. 387 leafs or sheets, half the size of the book 773 pages is about 3/4ths the thickness of a ream of paper. We’re at 1.5 inches. That’s about 1/2 the length of a credit card or any wallet sized card. Here’s a nice photo of a comparison of some unnamed size spiral coil vs. a full ream.
Do you see where we are headed here?
A 60 mm spiral coil, which would be huge compared to what you are used to seeing, can hold a 1.5 inch book, but there’s not a lot of room to spare. Common retail notebooks are hardly ever, if ever at all, bigger than 200 pages. These are bound by machines. If you get too much book to free space ratio it gets too hard to turn the pages. This is mostly friction, which is useful for sexual enjoyment (or so I’ve been told) so we’re not going to outlaw friction anytime soon.
But the real questions, and these can be asked based on the original photo, how did you just happen to have some super gimongous spiral coil available and exactly how did you twirl it into place through nearly four hundred leafs of paper?? A spiral coil is a terrible idea for a large book. You can’t add pages one at a time, you have to feed the coil through the entire pack of paper. Offices, like the one I worked at, use a machine to prop the binding open so you can feed in a page at a time. Those coils don’t look like the one in this picture. If I had to guess including taking a shot at depth from book cover to blanket combined with estimate of practicality and people’s tolerance to put up with an unpleasant task- a couple dozen pages, maybe??
Of course, if I’m wrong about some of my assumptions and calcs,, well it doesn’t explain why Amanda’s super binding skills haven’t been utilized to avoid using a real publisher. Buy a lot of gimongous coil, teams of 4:1 pitch prepunched copy paper, find an all night copy shop and hire some part time help for Amanda to train on her super coiling secrets. Then the book could actually be sold to people that aren’t already into gematria, which I thought was kind of the point. Good luck not bending the coils stuffing it through the holes.
Get hooked on gematria. Throw out critical thinking and embrace confirmation bias.
Step #2
Wait for professionally manufractured (not a typo) book from noted expert in field to become available.
Step #3
Wait.
Step #4
Wait some more.
Step #5
Prod author of book for actual book.
Step #6
Wait a bit more.
Step #7
Buy unedited pdf version of that book.
Step #8
Wait more
Step #9
More waiting
Step #10
After author basically does this,🖕🏻, make your own book.
Or at least the Cliff Notes super abbreviated gematria guide.
In this post, Magnifying glass included?, Amanda’s book making skills are displayed. Guess she got tired of waiting, made her own book and shared the image which Hubbard proudly displays. Now this presents some questions. Is the print really, really, really, really tiny? Is the book really just an EXTREMELY abbreviated reference guide? Or can Amanda, like other gematria mooks seem capable of, allowed to bend the laws of physics? The math doesn’t work. Common sense doesn’t work. For those that don’t want to blemish their computer accessing the FTFM blog, here’s the image. Ask yourself, does this really look like a 773 page book??
When you show a book off you can make things more obvious than laying (lying?) it flat on a blanket or whatever the background is here. You can stand it up, prop something behind it so it doesn’t topple over, put it on a shelf, take more than one picture (how about one with some actual printed pages displayed??). Although, I expect all that’s too much to expect if there’s no hardcover spine to support a book like here: http://cleardisplays.com/book-display/ Pick your own display site, you have lots of time while waiting for the edited, bound, promised book.
The scale is hard to figure if you focus on trying to guess the thickness based on depth from the background. The damning part is the SPIRAL COIL, combined with the announcement of how many pages the book has ballooned into. So I got to do me some maths.
A ream of paper is 500 sheets. Approximately 52 millimeters. The largest commercially available spiral coil I found was listed at 60 millimeters. Here’s a chart showing offerings ending at 50 mm. https://spiralbinding.com/p/101412/Plastic-Coil/4-1-Pitch-Plastic-Coil-12-Length. Now if you’re getting ahead of me this technically works. Converting to inches, 52 millimeters is about 2 inches. 387 leafs or sheets, half the size of the book 773 pages is about 3/4ths the thickness of a ream of paper. We’re at 1.5 inches. That’s about 1/2 the length of a credit card or any wallet sized card. Here’s a nice photo of a comparison of some unnamed size spiral coil vs. a full ream.
Do you see where we are headed here?
A 60 mm spiral coil, which would be huge compared to what you are used to seeing, can hold a 1.5 inch book, but there’s not a lot of room to spare. Common retail notebooks are hardly ever, if ever at all, bigger than 200 pages. These are bound by machines. If you get too much book to free space ratio it gets too hard to turn the pages. This is mostly friction, which is useful for sexual enjoyment (or so I’ve been told) so we’re not going to outlaw friction anytime soon.
But the real questions, and these can be asked based on the original photo, how did you just happen to have some super gimongous spiral coil available and exactly how did you twirl it into place through nearly four hundred leafs of paper?? A spiral coil is a terrible idea for a large book. You can’t add pages one at a time, you have to feed the coil through the entire pack of paper. Offices, like the one I worked at, use a machine to prop the binding open so you can feed in a page at a time. Those coils don’t look like the one in this picture. If I had to guess including taking a shot at depth from book cover to blanket combined with estimate of practicality and people’s tolerance to put up with an unpleasant task- a couple dozen pages, maybe??
Of course, if I’m wrong about some of my assumptions and calcs,, well it doesn’t explain why Amanda’s super binding skills haven’t been utilized to avoid using a real publisher. Buy a lot of gimongous coil, teams of 4:1 pitch prepunched copy paper, find an all night copy shop and hire some part time help for Amanda to train on her super coiling secrets. Then the book could actually be sold to people that aren’t already into gematria, which I thought was kind of the point. Good luck not bending the coils stuffing it through the holes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)