The Sons Of Gematria

Whoa!  The -Ram- hoax name code.  Super scary.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180426055920/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/23/ram-hoax-code-confirmed/

I suppose if one got head butted by a ram it would hurt a hell of a lot, but wouldn’t some sort of carnivore be more appropriate?  The Scary Animal Committee of the NWO had a vote and although lions, tigers, bears and even lorikeets* topped rams for bone chilling, meat eating terror they decided that the ram was their boy.  Or man.

Which is really why someone with -ram- in their name is part of the hoax.  See, it’s not just -ram-, Martinez counts with a backwards ram.  No word yet if rearrangement so ARMSTRONG counts, but considering history and the source the answer to that question is likely a yes.  Although I expect that the letters at least have to be consecutive.  But I’m not the one making shit up on the fly, so Lucy’s friend, Tamara (<——- shameless bad movie/hot babe plug), is safe.  For now.  Despite being obviously misogynistic and age discriminatory, LAMB has four letters and thus harder to match, EWE rearranged is WEE, which has other uses for the Weeble Wempire,  and just in general as surnames go a -ram- is a lot more common in surnames.

And there’s your problem.  Just like suddenly 3 and 13 are hoax numbers, now special significance has been given to surnames with particular letter combinations.  And under the operating standards of  not having to do actual research and making things far too easy to match those combinations are RAM, MAN, and SON.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180426064712/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/04/25/the-2016-slaying-of-five-dallas-police-officers/

Son.  My how generous of you to limit the evil pool by including some of the most common surnames in the English language.  And damn you for making me be the one to do actual research in your place.  Although I do take great delight in busting on stupidity.

From the Mongabay website** here’s the list of just -son surnames in the top 100 and their percentage of total US population.

Johnson 0.81
Wilson 0.339
Anderson 0.311
Jackson 0.31
Thompson 0.269
Robinson 0.233
Nelson 0.162
Richardson 0.112
Peterson 0.107
Watson 0.103
Henderson 0.095
Patterson 0.092

This being a total of 2.133%.  Just from the top 100 names.  Without including -man, -mar, or foreign surnames that translate to -son. Which based on a population size of 325 million prople is 6,930,000 people that are a Son Of Gematria.  If you’re in a room of 50 people odds are that at least one of them is just a fictional character working for the NWO as a Son Of Gematria.  It would be nice if they wore uniforms to make it easier or at least had eyepatches and lorikeets like pirates to be able to tell them apart, but the Selective Incompetence Committee of the NWO has made a lot of them easy to spot.

Now proclaiming Martinez a hoax name based on RAMming it down our throats is another unfortunate, totally unresearched, not well thought out inclusion.  It turns out that the Scary Animal Committee and Selective Incompetence Committee came to an agreement on this one.  Normally they bicker over who gets to lay claim to the remaining bagels and donuts after the weekly Friday meeting.  Any animal that contains a letter in the alphabet Z or earlier in ordinal position is scary.  And it was EZ to include Martinez as the Hispanic equivalent of -son is -ez.  So Lopez, Hernandez, Martinez, etc... are all Sons Of Gematria.


My patience to go through the Mongabay list of 1000 names was tested for just sons, but I expect adding up all the -man, -ram, and -son names should top 5%.  One in 20 people is a hoax character just based on those names, and of course there are some 33’s 3’s, 13’s and EE’s thrown in there, too.  My challenge remains the same.  List all the names that AREN'T a hoax name and we’ll go from there.  Because it sure looks like there’s not many real people left by the time the conversion process of trivial information is finished.

*. This story comes from Australia, so it must be true.
**. Citing references.  Astute researchers do that.  You should learn it.  More about this tomorrow.