The Hubbard book might be here as now there is an Etsy listing that makes a limited quantity available for download. Don’t know how that works, but whatever. It’s proudly advertised on the Gematrinator home page, so close enough.
And in honor of this eventuality I’ve saved up a nice little bit of ammunition, which if not for my recent work on the questionable respect for the word mook implied indirectly through GEOMETRY=108/108 would easily be the highlight of recent material here. It has a relationship, so nicely adds into kicking a person when they’re done, and while they are struggling to get back on their feet.
This book idea is ancient, and the addition of isopsephy and the Greeks led to what some would say dubious, others would say outright bullshit, attribution of Pythagoras to being the Father of Gematria.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180405063446/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2016/04/chapter-1-2-drafts-introduction-to.html?m=1
Which got the mocking it deserved here by creation of “Pythonyms“.
So the current book chapter list still mentions Greeks and isopsephy. The 2016 blog post mentions our friend Pythagoras and in particular the Pythagorean Theorem, among other details. Gematria—>Geometry—>Pythagorean Theorem. If I wanted to create a sham link to give faux authenticity and I saw that I’d probably be thankful I didn’t have to do much homework and run with it, too.
The problem arises from the also included in the book references to the evil mainstream media. And we all know by now that supposedly the number 113 means nothing but dishonest mainstream media, excepting of course if biased “researchers” find an occasional alternate use for it. The list of 113 = DISHONEST words used to be just three or four. Baited by me into merely proving that lots of words =113 they began to add to the list, as if quantity of words exceeds quality of derivation. Here’s the most recent list, again:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180320062805/http://www.gematrinator.com/images/113Lies.PNG
What a waste of time. In a logic based debate you’ve simply proven that lots of words=113. Many are definitely DISHONEST in meaning. Some stand out as being out of place, MAINSTREAM and POLITICS. As much as we all might have issues with fake mainstream news and crooked politicians the words hardly mean dishonest by themselves.
Now focus on the word ILLUSIONS. That may evoke an unsettling senseesaurus of dishonesty, but at best it’s a near antonym of honest or true. And ILLUSION, the singular form, does not make the list. Duly noted, pluralization counts for the evil empire.
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/theorem
There are several meanings for theorem. Which means there are lots of synonyms. Which means there are lots of antonyms. Under the main entry for axiom or principle in the thesaurus theorem means truism or TRUTH.
THEOREMS=113 in reverse ordinal.
And for the record CONCEPT=113 which is just as close to honest as illusions is to dishonest.
If you’re going to claim undue credit to Pythagoras being historically involved just for bringing up GEOMETRY, between this and MOOK it really doesn’t look good for your case. Instead of browsing through this blog or the other critical information on the web, all anyone needs to do is find this post and an entire 773 page waste of time is easily, logically countered. Does it really need to come to that? It would be a good time to give up bragging about how meaningful this book is, because it’s not. Just keep it among your close minded little crowd. And drop the 113=DISHONEST nonsense, just like Pi as soon as it’s mentioned you instantly lose the debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment