——————————————————————————————
Numberphile is a great little channel for people that love farting around with numerical oddities. I could use lots of their material as examples for gematria related issues in the manner of Gematria Math vs Real Math. This one will do as an example.
I found this video three days ago. I’ve been subscribed to the channel for quite some time and to some it might seem odd that this video was recommended to me by YouTube just minutes after I was back to researching cognitive biases and the Dunning Kruger Effect. I’m open to the idea that I’m not as funny as I think I am. I have the majority of evidence that suggests I am funny. How to I further test this? I go back to YouTube after a Google session and this six year old video shows up with the proud “Recommended For You” logo. Amidst all the hundreds of other videos on Numberphile.
This could be a coincidence, but I don’t think so. I think it’s because my search history influenced my video recommendations. The point is, instead of just declaring this to be not a coincidence because of the Freemasons or Organic Matrix messing with my mind, or declaring it to be a strange coincidence, I have the option to test the idea further which is something I’ve started but haven’t gotten enough evidence to come to any conclusions, yet. I can go to a search engine and Google something I think is totally random, the same subject for half an hour or so, then go back to YouTube and see if all of a sudden a National Geographic video on turtles shows up after checking on what’s going on with Attu the Wonder Turtle.
Gematria never tests hypotheses, you can’t test something that doesn’t exist. Whether it’s Dunning-Kruger effect assuming you are always right or being manipulative they just keep making the same mistakes over and over again. I have seen an not genuine prediction here or there been admitted to being wrong, but never anything major like, “Hey guys, I just found this weird thing in Reverse where SUICIDE and NOT SUICIDE are the same value. Shouldn’t we go back and check for other words that are the same pattern?”
It won’t happen because the ones who are bright enough to do the math aren’t going to share about how gematria doesn’t work.
Now for the video itself (finally). This is just for fun instead of any high level proof of deep concept. Narcisstic numbers remind me of Satanic Gematria because the manner they are created is somewhat arbitrary. There aren’t that many. Take a number. However many digits the number has is the power the individual digits are raised to. The smallest is 153, 1^3+5^3^3=1+125+27=153. The number loves itself, only because the manner it’s arrived at justifies the end result. The same way SATANIC GEMATRIA=666 instead of just the word SATANIC.
At one time I was cautious of providing info like this for fear it would be used as a good idea for future misuse. In this case NARCISST=1153 in the Trigonal elision. Trigonal—>3, cubing, drop the extra 1. That might sound cool, but overall the pattern doesn’t work well since the next narcissistic number is 8,208 and they literally increase exponentially from there. You’re not going to get much use out of 8,208=the 2nd narcisstic number. And only Jake “King of PhraseShopping” Lebowski would ever bother making meaningless phrases up to force it. Maybe something ridiculous like he normally puts up “NWO Narcissist Signal Code Alert”=xxx. So at most it has one somewhat cool match and then after that, if the evil powers that shouldn’t be cared they took a long break for lunch and haven’t gotten back to it yet.
I found this video three days ago. I’ve been subscribed to the channel for quite some time and to some it might seem odd that this video was recommended to me by YouTube just minutes after I was back to researching cognitive biases and the Dunning Kruger Effect. I’m open to the idea that I’m not as funny as I think I am. I have the majority of evidence that suggests I am funny. How to I further test this? I go back to YouTube after a Google session and this six year old video shows up with the proud “Recommended For You” logo. Amidst all the hundreds of other videos on Numberphile.
This could be a coincidence, but I don’t think so. I think it’s because my search history influenced my video recommendations. The point is, instead of just declaring this to be not a coincidence because of the Freemasons or Organic Matrix messing with my mind, or declaring it to be a strange coincidence, I have the option to test the idea further which is something I’ve started but haven’t gotten enough evidence to come to any conclusions, yet. I can go to a search engine and Google something I think is totally random, the same subject for half an hour or so, then go back to YouTube and see if all of a sudden a National Geographic video on turtles shows up after checking on what’s going on with Attu the Wonder Turtle.
Gematria never tests hypotheses, you can’t test something that doesn’t exist. Whether it’s Dunning-Kruger effect assuming you are always right or being manipulative they just keep making the same mistakes over and over again. I have seen an not genuine prediction here or there been admitted to being wrong, but never anything major like, “Hey guys, I just found this weird thing in Reverse where SUICIDE and NOT SUICIDE are the same value. Shouldn’t we go back and check for other words that are the same pattern?”
It won’t happen because the ones who are bright enough to do the math aren’t going to share about how gematria doesn’t work.
Now for the video itself (finally). This is just for fun instead of any high level proof of deep concept. Narcisstic numbers remind me of Satanic Gematria because the manner they are created is somewhat arbitrary. There aren’t that many. Take a number. However many digits the number has is the power the individual digits are raised to. The smallest is 153, 1^3+5^3^3=1+125+27=153. The number loves itself, only because the manner it’s arrived at justifies the end result. The same way SATANIC GEMATRIA=666 instead of just the word SATANIC.
At one time I was cautious of providing info like this for fear it would be used as a good idea for future misuse. In this case NARCISST=1153 in the Trigonal elision. Trigonal—>3, cubing, drop the extra 1. That might sound cool, but overall the pattern doesn’t work well since the next narcissistic number is 8,208 and they literally increase exponentially from there. You’re not going to get much use out of 8,208=the 2nd narcisstic number. And only Jake “King of PhraseShopping” Lebowski would ever bother making meaningless phrases up to force it. Maybe something ridiculous like he normally puts up “NWO Narcissist Signal Code Alert”=xxx. So at most it has one somewhat cool match and then after that, if the evil powers that shouldn’t be cared they took a long break for lunch and haven’t gotten back to it yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment