Subjective- noun. Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes or opinions.
And why it doesn’t work is because they insist it is objective while simultaneously embracing the kettle logic that personal synchronicity and opinion is allowed. A year ago it was more cut and dry, every time 58 or 59 showed up no embellishment was necessary to claim this must be beyond a shadow of a doubt FREEMASONRY = 58,59. I could go through the blog posts, the scant number of videos offered these days, and the comments to both of those and find personal opinion not just allowed, but encouraged. It seems like the monotonous boredom of the same two digit numbers has created an atmosphere of trying to spice things up. You don’t win a cookie anymore for pointing out that 58 nobody else mentioned. They all know what 58 means.
Here’s some recent examples already reported in recent posts here.
Use of % Breakdowns By Denim Davis
He’s done it several times now. Incorrectly picking the Rockets to be champs, he’s changed to the Cavs to win the first two games of the NBA finals, now he’s stuck with trying to create narrative for Cleveland vs Golden State and like hockey has taken to the audacious and rather idiotic use of breaking down a percentage chance on the outcome of an individual game. Without the courage to stick to his convictions the posts have been edited to take out the %’s. Supposedly he gave the Cavaliers a 70 to 30 percent edge for last night’s game, without realizing that these %’s being used in the first place admits that he doesn’t know who the gematria shows the winner will be. There has to be an influence outside gematria to choose 70% instead of any other %, and if it’s not personal opinion I have no idea what it could possibly be. Turning the story into faux objectivity he does a decent job of narrating the post game statistics into the typical “obviously scripted” yarn, but still loaded with things like Golden State scored 122 points and they’re on the 122nd meridian which doesn’t explain why GS doesn’t score 122 points every single game. The Texas Sharpshooter fallacy is best friends with gematria, still.
The Organic Matrix
Yeah, I’ve been picking on this a lot lately, more than the volume of usage it’s being mentioned deserves. Or maybe they know I’m mocking them about this and are down playing it, who knows. Let’s try to restate this again. The Organic Matrix is the substitute author of a synchronous event that is beyond the abilities of the New World Order to manufacture. This covers a lot of ground because every single personalized event has to have a source and in practice it’s not possible to identify if it’s the NWO or the OM. Dan’s floods and TV shows, the Gematrinator’s solar eclipses, Hubbard’s occasional “I’m really a nice guy.” stories about his giving gas money to a homeless man or him being Jesus. I doubt the NWO hijacked the code for that last one. It is impossible to tell the source of these without an opinion being offered.
Antonyms
If sharpshooting in hindsight is best friends with gematria, then kettle logic is a high ranking member in the clique. An important subset of the problems with the Organic Matrix. If you get to the point where you insist the source is the Organic Matrix, how do you explain the language being loaded with so many absolute contradictions.? GROUP and UNGROUP have the same value and absolutely cannot be denied that they mean the exact opposite. Kettle logic says that I can use either regular where GROUP=77 or UNGROUP=77 in Reverse. RELIGIOUS and AGNOSTIC both equal 128 in reverse and indicates that the Organic Matrix was selectively omnipotent and decided to ignore that, as well as the Freemasons use of “Sacred” geometry ignoring it. We already know they desperately want to believe that 113 absolutely must mean dishonest when lots of contradictory 113’s exist. That’s their biased, subjective opinion and every single 113=DISHONEST story is rubbish. Unless I suppose they can prove the Organic Matrix exists and doesn’t care or really wanted 113 to be dishonest only, but this leaves all the evil empire stories at the roadside and....hmmm.
That reminds me of...
A bold admission that this is an opinion. It’s no surprise that a lot of the stories deal with visual evidence that offers a shady opinion of the material without any supporting numerology. Gematria isn’t a conspiracy theory by itself so much as it is a tool to produce bogus evidence to support the conspiracy opinion of the narrator. I prefer the guilty until proven innocent approach as soon as I see the words clearly or obviously since their track record on visual observation is pretty bad. Megan Kelly reminds you of Nicole Brown Simpson. Well good for you. I think Nicole looks like a girl in my college Biology class named Darlene Snow. And get this...the class number was Biology 113!*. Most of the time these people do look like each other, but so what? You’re using the similarity as undeniable proof they are the same person. Apparently every single look alike contest winner is a crisis actor or at least a relative. And of course, all the personal stories of words reminding someone of another word are an admission of bias. Snow....that reminds me of a cat named Snowball. Which reminds me of the Simpsons. Now what if my brother thinks Snow means Alaska? The essence of subjectivity.
Every Single Sports Prediction
Hey guys, did you ever notice that you can’t come to any kind of agreement until after the game is over? And that the only real agreement is that it was obviously rigged? Don’t you find that a little bit odd? That happens because you have lots of conflicting opinions.
* For no reason other than my own personal amusement I offer the story of Darlene. Biology classes were set up with hundreds of people in a huge lecture and broken down into smaller lab groups. Darlene was in my lab group and for reasons I’ll never fully understand paid attention to me. I suppose it was just because she was a genuinely nice girl and got along with everyone. But she was smoking hot and could have her pick of any guy. Athletic, tanned, blond hair, blue eyes. Killer smile and wonderful laugh. I was smitten. She was the subject of my second poem ever, at least the second that I was proud of. Everything worked out well and I found her address in the student directory and anonymously mailed her this limerick:
There once was a girl named Darlene,
I know from Bio 113.
Now it’s warm and she’s wearing,
Shorts that surely are baring,
The best legs that I’ve ever seen.
She was supposed to show up at the last lecture for me to admit that I was the source, but she didn’t make the class. Now I can only wonder if when #MeToo started she related her side of that event to the rest of the world. “I got this creepy limerick, I think it was the pervy guy in my lab group. No way was I showing up for the last lecture after that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment