The Dangers Of PhraseShopping And Reduction Elisions

I've been over the use of copying and pasting the news headlines into your calculator. In Hubbard's post about Yung Mazi's death this was done. And something else we haven't seen much of lately.


Numerology on a completely contrived phrased not mentioned in the news articles. Bad move. Really bad move.


Mazi was gunned down after surviving previous attempts on his life.


After some numerology regarding Mazi a quick story about his compatriot, Kevin Gates pops up. Possibly suggesting that 128 and 182 are close enough, but more likely that in the simple elision (cipher) Gates real name, Jabril A, and FAKE DEATH both equal 34.


Now it's not clear if this is suggesting that Gates, who is still alive, is trying to escape media attention or if Mazi, who is really dead, faked his death to escape media attention and/or future attempts on his life. The problem is the mere existence of the phrase, "FAKE DEATH". There's no mention in the mainstream articles of any possibility this is a hoax. So it's completely made up.


I can PhraseShop reductions, too. 


In addition to the simple reduction elision, I have reverse reduction elisions to work with. Fake Death =47. Jibril A =56. It's a simple process of substituting antonyms by trial and error once you get a ballpark figure of the number of letters involved.


To be somewhat flippant, HE CROAKED = 47. This has the disadvantage of only working for the male gender. It also sounds silly and forced. But it does equal 47.


DEAD AND GONE=47. That works out really well in this specific case. In addition to a relatively common phrase it's the title of a rap song.


REAL KILLING =56. Just to show that it doesn't have to be the death part of the phrase that can be played with.


MURDERED=47. Simplest and best. It's what really happened and clearly contradicts the faked scenario.


Contradictory information can almost always be manufactured in reduction elisions. The presenter of the narrative wants you to believe that their conclusion is the only valid assertion. And they always pick the most negative story, because that's what the "cool" people do.