Gematria Debunked By Anagrams

This one is instructive in regards to the uselessness of gematria, and fun. At least for me it's fun.


During my "Fidget Spinners Are Satanic" post I related that the Satanic portion of fidget spinners came about because FIDGET = 666 in Reverse Sumerian, 111 in Reverse regular x 6, and had nothing to do gematriacally with the spinner portion of the item. GIFTED is an anagram of FIDGET, therefore the same gematria. Grammatically difficult to directly substitute, not direct antonyms yet vastly different in meaning. "A gifted student does not fidget." Not really true. Sometimes gifted youngsters fidget excessively because they aren't challenged. "A gifted student might fidget.". Ok, that covers all the bases. But, "A fidget student might sometimes gifted." like gematria makes no sense.


You get a bit closer with UNTIES and UNITES although these are also not direct, interchangeable antonyms. I believe grammarians would call them near antonyms.


I'm not sure any direct antonym anagrams exist. That's not a problem for debunking now that entire sentences have become so prevalent. News headlines are reported on daily by Hubbard. The Kelvinator pops one into his Sesame Tweets every so often. As if there is some more significance to a larger volume of characters to indicating that the numerology can't be a coincidence. The dark forces of the shadow empire created the language to communicate the numbers more so than the words.


Most single word anagrams are short, like UNITES/UNTIES. The longest single word anagrams are:


CONVERSATIONALISTS and CONSERVATIONALISTS


unless you include scientific/medical words then you get:


HYDROXYDEOXYCORTICOSTERONES and HYDROXYDESOXYCORTICONE at 27 letters, but just switching placement one letter. And words that are better mixed than either of the last two:


BASIPARACHROMATIN and MARSIPOBRANCHIATA


At 14 letters the more common words:


UNIDENTIFIABLY and UNDEFINABILITY.


These can be found on the site anagrammy.com as well as a slew of others both scientific and more ordinary. (I can't provide links from my phone browser, sorry.)


That should be enough to convince open minded people that some large words with identical gematria in all systems, except the cheating of Francis Bacon, mean completely different things in real language.


Also on anagrammy.com are the contest winners. The site name is a play on the Grammy awards. Check out the longest anagram ever at 42,177 characters. It's based off the Jonathon Swift work, Battle of the Books. It was checked by a computer for true anagram accuracy. That's about 8000 *words* long, which puts any newspaper headline to shame in length. And it's a poem. That rhymes and has accurate meter. And it makes sense, no Dr. Seuss or Lewis Carroll made up words (or at least limited; I didn't read the whole work.) Needless to say the end product is 42,177 characters of matching gematria that means something completely different from the original work.


Because that's the way language works. Words are words, not mystical vessels harboring secret numbers. anagrammy.com also includes a complete list of anagrams over 2000 characters. Some also have 10s of thousands. They continue to hold contests.


What remains for me is to decide on what to call similar anagramming problems here. A "fidget" would be an homage to my first notice. If I want to get Seussian I could call it a SHILTLUB.