Nobody can tell what’s really going on in the Zachosphere right now. It’s a crazy hot mess of accusations on who is a shill. Who is a deceiver and fraud. Not so strangely, the proof offered is limited to non empirical evidence of the old, “Here’s what I did right with my gematria” while the counter side is actual screenshots and video clips of utter failure.
For entertainment purposes this has led to some creative nicknames, presented within comment sections of YouTube videos or even bolder is the effort to create an entire sock puppet account to taunt the target. You know you are the king of the hill when you are the one that gets the sock puppet taunting. Lots of people get slammed around in the comments.
Within the wondering of what exactly is going on is an element of actual danger. The legal ramifications of publicly going on record as having accused someone - that’s libel and slander territory. The system has always been rigged so that the wealthy who can afford high powered lawyers can do whatever the fuck they want. Case in point - regardless of how a court case deemed Alex Jones guilty, the actual judgment might be settled for far less.
Social media has always been a disastrous quagmire of insults and false accusations, and the courts don’t want to get involved in small potatoes battles centered on someone calling someone else a poopyhead after the poopyhead went off on a rant from a bad day including a couple too many shots of tequila. It’s those high profile cases that make the news that involve actual damages - crossing that line that’s deemed too far by the court of public opinion. In the short term, until some actual guidance is provided, by the social media companies that spend a lot of time arbitrarily making a decision and rely on vague algorithms for content moderation, you might want to stop before getting too involved in the “I am going to get a lawyer content” I’m seeing now.
Penn And Teller with their show Bullshit! proved that you don’t make a career out of calling someone a poopyhead openly. The court of public opinion may not match the court of actual lawyers sorting out damages.
Unless you make it a joke. Don’t say “Person X is a con man”. Unless you have some actual evidence and Mark Bankston on speed dial. Call them an asshole bullshit merchant (while not having a financial interest yourself) goes a long way towards the possibly necessary defense of, “I was just joking on social media! FREE SPEECH!”
So these sock puppet accounts have been performing some service. And while entertaining, the same grammatical tricks are getting boring. Alliteration, certainly anything that rhymes with the target name, variations of the common truther lingo, etc…. Do not worry, after analyzing the content the past few months, I can help. And ironically, this is gematria related.
When you don’t get the right value for a target number based on a word, use your Phraseshopping skills to substitute synonyms. And there are a bunch of synonyms for fraudster that rarely or never get used:
There’s more that got cut off. That’s how prevalent grifting is in our society. People are assholes so much we have more names for it than there are gematria ciphers. I’m yearning for the day when I see a sock puppet account use illywhacker or schlenter. For starters, those two come up as needing spell checked. Next, some of those words have a specific etymology for their origin. For instance schlenter is particularly related to fake diamonds. So if somebody has a screen name related to precious gems, or card tricks, or carbon atoms, BLAM! Hit ‘em with a schlenter shot. You don’t even want to know what I’m thinking about for using defalcator. Well, you can probably guess.
No comments:
Post a Comment