WokeStool Sports has changed the name to the less questionable name Of StayWoke Sports!
Rather unnecessary as nobody had been complaining, except me. Sure hope you didn’t change it just for my benefit. Nobody in your clique of people pretending that they can get any significant meaning from reporting numbers on a game after it’s been finished cares. On the offhand chance you have been using this blog for error correction reference like others, here’s a tip. Your avatar still shows as WokeStool. You should change that, too. You wouldn’t want anyone to be lead astray by misinformation, right?
On a more serious note. We’re back to some technology mumbo jumbo over in Denim land. It turns out that Mookie Betts hit for the cycle, a rare feat. And of course anytime any record is broken of any kind that means that some form of rigging must be involved. The first time a pitch was thrown in the first baseball game. That’s rigged. The first pitch had to produce some kind of record. First walk, first grand slam, first stolen base, first player to reach 20 doubles in a season, breaking the record for getting hit by pitch, and so on. These all have tiny numbers associated to them that can be tied into the evil empire.
Please don’t use the word “Phrase” to precede soethijg like “Mookie Betts Cycle=59” as it only highlights that you’re PhraseShopping. If you don’t have enough date numerology that isn’t really gematria or pitch counts, jersey numbers, game times and other silly stats and you are compelled you are supposed to stick strictly to what the evil media had to say. In the unlikely event that the reporters actually worded something “Mookie Betts Cycle” you should include that in your screen grab instead of the clip you did.
More importantly, you bring up this vague technology issue. What technology? Why is this technology being used on sports instead of trying to mine adamantium from distant asteroids or curing (or in the case of you mooks, causing) cancer? You know, something practical instead of mockery? Even more, morely(real word) importantly, if you don’t have any evidence of this technology how does it support your story? 9/11? Holograms! Of course you can say literally anything without any real evidence. I have just as much proof that 9/11 building collapse was caused by a pack of rabid groundhogs tunneling underneath the foundations. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. At least try to say magnets or come up with some other existing actual technology that can be easily debunked. The scientist in me is getting bored.
No comments:
Post a Comment