Gematria Reduction Methods Debunked By Some Numbers In The Mid 200s

Today's exercise demonstrates the reason for the existence of the reduction methods. It combines elements of the Jenna Coleman game and my previous work on adding prefixes to words to change the meaning, especially a meaning that is in direct contradiction in some way.


Why numbers in the 200s? Because as you will see, mathematically to create a long, meaningful phrase that doesn't sound like a socially awkward teenager (read as "gematria believer") asking a member of the opposite sex for a date it becomes impossible to get a matching value to a phrase of near equal length.


If you review the material that these socially awkward date seekers throw out, names are naturally quite important. Notice you don't see a lot of matches for <really long phrase> = <really long phrase> in a non-reduction system? Your not going to find a lot of matches for Arnold Schwarzenegger. Unless you do something to alter the phrasing like compare Arnold Schwarzenegger to something that has the approximate same number of letters. It's simple math. Schwarzie's last name is so long you most likely will be presented with "matches" to <first name last name> somebody else. In a reduction method.


These phrases are not awkward sounding. And they present a lot direct statement that is clearly not true. Just like group/ungroup certain key words are added to a root word. And I suppose I should have added that this is also a bust on why we are supposed to ignore the 100 mismatches in multiple systems just because one does match. These phrases have one clear, undeniable mismatch. And it's also a bust on this cringe worthy practice of changing the value of a number into another number by spelling it out.


"Two hundred forty five does not equal two hundred forty five."


Yes, it does. It most certainly does in reverse reduction. In addition to 245 this also works with 259 and 273.


Intuition tells me that this will apply to other numbers. Not by changing the number. The core phrase of "does not equal" added to doubling up the spelling out of the number puts you in the ballpark of 250. But changing the core to "is not equal to" or something else of similar meaning should work. But that's enough for now.


They are just words. Not some mystical vessels created by unknown forces to do an apparently half-assed job of hiding a conspiracy.


And while you stagnate and continue to keep reporting on the same overused two digit numbers I continue to find new ways to go about presenting reality with inarguable, solid evidence.