http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/australia-is-not-real?full=1
Turns out that not just Wollongong, but the entire country of Australia does not exist.
The original Facebook post and more is just a Google Of ‘Australia does not exist’ away.
Monday, June 11, 2018
An Example Of Cognitive Bias/Critical Thinking In Gematria
Taking a break from the original planned order of events to give an example from recent events. There are a lot of elements to point out here.
The original video in question is supposedly about the Triple Crown winner, Justify.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVtxO-60nA&t=581s
First of all I have to torment anyone that may have followed me here from the TED Talks experiment and mention that at the Whittington Downs race last year Justify only placed. The horse that showed was The Means, the winner was The Ends and the post race board showed:
THE ENDS
JUSTIFY
THE MEANS
I said “supposedly” since this is a Dan video. And although a purpose of gematria is ostensibly to show magical connections between events, there is a lot of disparate information thrown in merely because they have the same numbers. The Pope, British Royalty, basketball, kneeling during the National Anthem, blah, blah, blah. The matches are supposedly evidence that gematria works. In other words, the end results justify the means with which the results are derived. I’m not changing my style.
Point #1:
Timely humor can spice up an otherwise dry read. My posts that are more humorous have traditionally gotten more views than babbling about censorship or what not.
Point#2:
YouTube can really suck at times. This was recommended viewing for me, probably since I searched for the Dannel (Dan’s Channel) in recent history. I would have gotten around to it eventually, thank you very much. But we also have a newbie that found it. Through the magic of Google’s Photo Assistant I’m using a collage to save space.
Taking things at face value we have roomforthefixiiins indicating that somehow he found gematria and this video.
Maybe he was watching a lot of horse racing videos. More likely gematria videos based on the wording. I can’t really tell based on the limited information available. He had to find out about gematria somehow and it looks like he/she is leaning towards it working and has a valid question. The proper answer to his question is that sports aren’t rigged and their crazy explanations of Manchurian Candidate athletes or finding a way to put magnets into horse racing somehow to justify what happened with Justify are nonsense. If nobody points that out to him his limited point of reference is the links in the description of this video. All pro gematria. The video as they always do shows screens from Dan’s blog post on this. Everything is going to be some form of gematria being the greatest thing since the use of Lasix to improve horse racing performance. YouTube has helped him on the way towards establishing a cognitive bias.
Point#3
I’m convinced that trolling to try and point him in the right direction as I long ago established my own cognitive biases on dealing with these gematria mooks. If they’re too lazy to use Google to search “Gematria Debunked” or some form of why it wouldn’t work instead of asking the question at a pro gematria source then they have a good chance of a preestablished confirmation bias. A core value of this blog is to present the other side and let people do the research on their own and then make up their mind. You know, researching like a scientist would. A reply of “You’re an idiot if you think gematria works.” won’t have the same impact as if he/she finds out on their own that Dan insists 52 equals NIGGER when REDNECK also equals 52. Because I do indeed present a lot of specifics here on what doesn’t work in gematria and there’s also the Skepdic website, the Duck Of Truth video that is a top hit on “gematria debunked” and other sites.
Point#4
Not willing to take things at face value and using critical thinking I investigated the origins of this roomforthefiiixins character. Based on my limited point of reference I have mixed results. The same way an oncologist can’t tell if someone has leukemia without doing a blood test I can’t make a snap judgment on my information.
All cognitive biases are not bad. Some are necessary. Feces is supposed to be gross. We’ve evolved to learn that “eat shit and die” has actual meaning. Shit=Bad. Don’t Eat. But a little healthy skepticism instead of taking things at face value can be a good thing. Don’t engage in the jumping on the bandwagon bias without getting as much information as you need for an informed decision. Roomforthefiixins is not actually the screen name. My powers of observation noticed that the first character after the second f is not actually an i. It’s a vertical line that I can’t easily duplicate on my phone. A lower case i without the tittle. This in itself means little and with my limitedtittle point of reference can’t make a decision on the motivations for this. I am certainly allowed to tittle point out that it’s odd. It’s unlikely that the name with two consecutive i’s was already taken. Can I know that for sure?? Heck no. It could be a way to bypass a search for the names. These things I don’t care to spend the time worrying over.
Also, Roomie has 27 subscribers with no channel content. To me this screams out sock puppet, but I can’t prove anything and can’t make a snap judgment. I also have to be honest with myself andtittlepoint out that often these maybe fake accounts are created on the fly instead of having existed since 2014 like their “About” channel page shows. I have a point of reference slightly beyond the limited information here. And the word tittle makes me giggle, while my phone plan limit of the number of f-bombs I can use in a month is dangerously depleted. So I get to use it another time. But now I’ve established to my readers a reference...point that they might not have had before. Further suspicious content from Roomie might have this point towards it being a Trojan Horse designed to draw out critic sock puppet accounts or whatever. There may be an ulterior motive other than just asking how you make a Manchurian Horse Candidate.
To wrap it up, yes I could have produced a much tamer example than the feces and should have. Like bitter tasting food. (And to a lesser extent the tittle business). But it fits with the additional frame of reference presented yesterday. Context. My own cognitive bias makes me judge that people in general don’t use critical thinking as much as they should. I’m well beyond giving the users of gematria any benefit of the doubt in regards to that as my frame of reference has overwhelming shown critical thinking to be completely lacking. Keep that in mind when you judge the content of this blog in its entirety.
The original video in question is supposedly about the Triple Crown winner, Justify.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVtxO-60nA&t=581s
First of all I have to torment anyone that may have followed me here from the TED Talks experiment and mention that at the Whittington Downs race last year Justify only placed. The horse that showed was The Means, the winner was The Ends and the post race board showed:
THE ENDS
JUSTIFY
THE MEANS
I said “supposedly” since this is a Dan video. And although a purpose of gematria is ostensibly to show magical connections between events, there is a lot of disparate information thrown in merely because they have the same numbers. The Pope, British Royalty, basketball, kneeling during the National Anthem, blah, blah, blah. The matches are supposedly evidence that gematria works. In other words, the end results justify the means with which the results are derived. I’m not changing my style.
Point #1:
Timely humor can spice up an otherwise dry read. My posts that are more humorous have traditionally gotten more views than babbling about censorship or what not.
Point#2:
YouTube can really suck at times. This was recommended viewing for me, probably since I searched for the Dannel (Dan’s Channel) in recent history. I would have gotten around to it eventually, thank you very much. But we also have a newbie that found it. Through the magic of Google’s Photo Assistant I’m using a collage to save space.
Maybe he was watching a lot of horse racing videos. More likely gematria videos based on the wording. I can’t really tell based on the limited information available. He had to find out about gematria somehow and it looks like he/she is leaning towards it working and has a valid question. The proper answer to his question is that sports aren’t rigged and their crazy explanations of Manchurian Candidate athletes or finding a way to put magnets into horse racing somehow to justify what happened with Justify are nonsense. If nobody points that out to him his limited point of reference is the links in the description of this video. All pro gematria. The video as they always do shows screens from Dan’s blog post on this. Everything is going to be some form of gematria being the greatest thing since the use of Lasix to improve horse racing performance. YouTube has helped him on the way towards establishing a cognitive bias.
Point#3
I’m convinced that trolling to try and point him in the right direction as I long ago established my own cognitive biases on dealing with these gematria mooks. If they’re too lazy to use Google to search “Gematria Debunked” or some form of why it wouldn’t work instead of asking the question at a pro gematria source then they have a good chance of a preestablished confirmation bias. A core value of this blog is to present the other side and let people do the research on their own and then make up their mind. You know, researching like a scientist would. A reply of “You’re an idiot if you think gematria works.” won’t have the same impact as if he/she finds out on their own that Dan insists 52 equals NIGGER when REDNECK also equals 52. Because I do indeed present a lot of specifics here on what doesn’t work in gematria and there’s also the Skepdic website, the Duck Of Truth video that is a top hit on “gematria debunked” and other sites.
Point#4
Not willing to take things at face value and using critical thinking I investigated the origins of this roomforthefiiixins character. Based on my limited point of reference I have mixed results. The same way an oncologist can’t tell if someone has leukemia without doing a blood test I can’t make a snap judgment on my information.
All cognitive biases are not bad. Some are necessary. Feces is supposed to be gross. We’ve evolved to learn that “eat shit and die” has actual meaning. Shit=Bad. Don’t Eat. But a little healthy skepticism instead of taking things at face value can be a good thing. Don’t engage in the jumping on the bandwagon bias without getting as much information as you need for an informed decision. Roomforthefiixins is not actually the screen name. My powers of observation noticed that the first character after the second f is not actually an i. It’s a vertical line that I can’t easily duplicate on my phone. A lower case i without the tittle. This in itself means little and with my limited
Also, Roomie has 27 subscribers with no channel content. To me this screams out sock puppet, but I can’t prove anything and can’t make a snap judgment. I also have to be honest with myself and
To wrap it up, yes I could have produced a much tamer example than the feces and should have. Like bitter tasting food. (And to a lesser extent the tittle business). But it fits with the additional frame of reference presented yesterday. Context. My own cognitive bias makes me judge that people in general don’t use critical thinking as much as they should. I’m well beyond giving the users of gematria any benefit of the doubt in regards to that as my frame of reference has overwhelming shown critical thinking to be completely lacking. Keep that in mind when you judge the content of this blog in its entirety.
Sunday, June 10, 2018
TED Talks Experiment - How To Ruin Your Reputation
One of the ways I’m going to go wrong is getting these out of the best order available. I did get more information than I expected. So I’m going to jump right in to the big one and get it over with. This screenshot shows the juvenile pun that got me in hot water. In the first day among a generous number of 👍 the complaints were limited to the format of the pun.
Then somebody broke the ice. After that it was exclusively about the content of the pun.
I do have to take a minute to point out what amuses me. I wasn’t going to and I considered redacting names. But this being information that is “out there” is part of what this is all about. Our empathic soul writer here may have a different dictionary than mine, as empathy requires a frame of reference of understanding others. The irony of her not knowing my frame of reference amuses me.
Now, keep in mind that I’m as they say, asking for trouble. So being called juvenile is to be expected. considering the limited information available. The comments that translate to a variation of “not funny” are par for the course. The waters get muddied with Diane’s comment that seems to suggest I’m a misogynist based on one string of lowbrow puns.
This happens all the time on social media. People jumping to conclusions without all the facts. Which sounds a lot like the conspiracy theorist way of thinking.
If I was truly motivated in to arguing with Diane I could begin by suggesting she doesn’t look for deep meaning in the comments section of social media, call her an obvious feminist Nazi, and make up all kinds of other unfounded claims that I also do not have a reference point for her motivations for her comment.
An immediate return on investment in the gematria world is that these are words and they do equal numbers. And there’s no way of telling what the context is. A pun told intentionally to be juvenile and intended to be rude should have a different value than one intended just to amuse your equally juvenile friends in the men’s locker room. A pun told by a psychologist as an example to his patient should have a different value than either of those.
Now, I did annoying jokes for about two weeks over mostly seven different and quite varied websites. On purpose TED was the one that was most likely to be considered something other than pure entertainment. People seem to expect the comments to be a little more deep. I propose to you that gematria videos are made by people that think the content is deep (which it’s not) and that they are purposefully juvenile and offensive because that’s where the majority of the entertainment value is. Sure some of them may tone it down better than others, but the comments are riddled with tranny suggestions and brutal character assassination (a lot of which are dead people that can’t find back). I also propose that gematria existing in its current form for over five years-
Has already totally worn out it’s welcome and will never be taken seriously. This may all be confirmation bias on my part, finding the answer I wanted and expected. But I do have some small evidence instead of just saying, “I imagine if you act like jackass long enough that....”. Been there. Done that. Yes, I have more examples than just this.
Again, I don’t make a habit of watching a bunch of non-gematria conspiracy videos so I have no frame of reference. I have seen tons of comments and a lot of gematria material and there is little chance that the past information festering out there is going to gain new recruits other than people that already believe it because it’s cool to be alternative. They’ve thoroughly ruined their reputations.
Saturday, June 9, 2018
The YouTube Alarm Bell
A very common and rather annoying theme of conspiracy videos is the comments sections are loaded with the most ridiculous excuses for meaningful content. I’m not talking about, “Great vid, as always bro!” These are to be expected. The same way it’s inappropriate to deny someone their grief over loss of a loved one (assuming it wasn’t a hoax) allowing them the opportunity to announce to the video producer that they indeed are one of the 👍 ‘s is quite all right. I’m talking about the comments that I’ve called the attempts to win a cookie. “That’s a Pi tribute with it being 3rd down and 14! See 3-14!!!”
Why yes, congratulations. I suppose that 3rd and 14 never happened before in a football game. And I hardly had my pattern recognition skills going and I needed you to point out that to me (still wishing I had a sarcasm font). Now maybe nobody pointed that out before you did and that makes it newsworthy. But explain why this comment deserves to be liked 20 times and be embellished with additional comments, like “good point!” which themselves may be liked a bunch of times.
There is a point of overstating the obvious. And the gematria videos have no balance at all. It’s our old friend the low operating standard of you agree with me today, therefore you must be right.
Now turning back to the TED experiment. My jokes do not add any value to the topic at hand. From the complaints I constantly see that their content has taken a sharp downturn recently people seem to expect something pithy and meaningful. Heaven forbid a music video gets put up just for a change of pace. Yet, mostly I garner at least a few likes. I’ve noticed that it could be that the dislike button might be disabled. More research is required for a final assessment on that. If somebody thinks you’re wrong the only real option is to offer a comment that states that. Announcing 3rd down and 14 yards to go = 314 = Pi seems innocent enough. Yet, do these people realize that they just insinuated that based on the video topic that they suggested that football is an elite class method of propagating a race war between the whities and the niggers because of Pi? This goes beyond the social media system of simply enjoying to be praised for a nice/funny/meaningful comment.
There has to be a reason for this. And as this is all highly speculative I offer my opinion on what is going on. It’s the YouTube Alarm system. When you comment the default setting is to have an email notification that somebody has replied to your comment. The two main advantages:
1). Ego massage seeing that somebody does think you are providing meaningful input.
2). Troll alert.
My experience shows that getting the channel ❤️ is worth about 116.7 ordinary likes (119.3 in Europe if you have an adapter) and is an immediate signal to the rest of the hive that your comment is worthy. This isn’t from TED, that’s from the chess jokes. Truther videos mostly don’t discriminate that way. Nobody gets a distinctive ⭐️ on their vocabulary test or everybody does. So the biggest distinguishing feature for worthiness is the amount of 👍 and comments. My experience also indicates that once the ball gets rolling then others feel free to chime in. The cognitive bias that everyone says it’s true, so it must be, even if it’s just a vocal minority.
There’s an Emperor’s New Clothes bias to not be the first to take a chance on offering an opinion unless you can hide behind the keyboard via just 👍 or sock puppetry. Once that alarm goes off though, the hive takes over and the stingers are brandished. Now instead of just 314 meaning whities vs. niggers a photograph taken on February 27th of players with jerseys 21 and 27 that has the “1” partially obscured also takes on cosmic significance. Somebody said Pi, well 227 also means Pi. I’m sure glad that they commented about that or I might have missed my chance to provide this tidbit of misinformation! Where’s my cookie?
Providing additional information like that 227 actually requires some effort. The troll alert doesn’t. I swear it seems like people comment on every single video just so that if the unlikely critic pops by they can drop the beneficial honeybee persona and bring out the Africanized killer bees. Trolls are dealt with IMMEDIATELY. There’s no such thing as a day later somebody is accused of being a troll. While a TED video might go by weeks before even being viewed the hive looks at every single video (and blog post) scanning for the slightest hint of contrary content.
I haven’t been stung by an entire hive, yet. I’ve tried and so far the most attention has been three comments on my sex joke test. Three. On a video viewed tens of thousands of times. For a comment that also has more than two hundred 👍. A gematria video viewed a couple thousand times where somebody says, “You never predict winners in the NFL correctly” gets stung at least three times within a few hours. The point being this. The retaliation is based on the cognitive bias and not the content of the comment. You exist, you offend me, you don’t agree with me today. Die heretic! Even if the commenter doesn’t necassirly believe that the Illuminati is trying to start a race war and just wants to use gematria pretending he can make predictions to win money gambling.
Everybody’s doing it. Well, at least the 50 or so regulars here. They must be right and the millions of other people must be wrong.
Why yes, congratulations. I suppose that 3rd and 14 never happened before in a football game. And I hardly had my pattern recognition skills going and I needed you to point out that to me (still wishing I had a sarcasm font). Now maybe nobody pointed that out before you did and that makes it newsworthy. But explain why this comment deserves to be liked 20 times and be embellished with additional comments, like “good point!” which themselves may be liked a bunch of times.
There is a point of overstating the obvious. And the gematria videos have no balance at all. It’s our old friend the low operating standard of you agree with me today, therefore you must be right.
Now turning back to the TED experiment. My jokes do not add any value to the topic at hand. From the complaints I constantly see that their content has taken a sharp downturn recently people seem to expect something pithy and meaningful. Heaven forbid a music video gets put up just for a change of pace. Yet, mostly I garner at least a few likes. I’ve noticed that it could be that the dislike button might be disabled. More research is required for a final assessment on that. If somebody thinks you’re wrong the only real option is to offer a comment that states that. Announcing 3rd down and 14 yards to go = 314 = Pi seems innocent enough. Yet, do these people realize that they just insinuated that based on the video topic that they suggested that football is an elite class method of propagating a race war between the whities and the niggers because of Pi? This goes beyond the social media system of simply enjoying to be praised for a nice/funny/meaningful comment.
There has to be a reason for this. And as this is all highly speculative I offer my opinion on what is going on. It’s the YouTube Alarm system. When you comment the default setting is to have an email notification that somebody has replied to your comment. The two main advantages:
1). Ego massage seeing that somebody does think you are providing meaningful input.
2). Troll alert.
My experience shows that getting the channel ❤️ is worth about 116.7 ordinary likes (119.3 in Europe if you have an adapter) and is an immediate signal to the rest of the hive that your comment is worthy. This isn’t from TED, that’s from the chess jokes. Truther videos mostly don’t discriminate that way. Nobody gets a distinctive ⭐️ on their vocabulary test or everybody does. So the biggest distinguishing feature for worthiness is the amount of 👍 and comments. My experience also indicates that once the ball gets rolling then others feel free to chime in. The cognitive bias that everyone says it’s true, so it must be, even if it’s just a vocal minority.
There’s an Emperor’s New Clothes bias to not be the first to take a chance on offering an opinion unless you can hide behind the keyboard via just 👍 or sock puppetry. Once that alarm goes off though, the hive takes over and the stingers are brandished. Now instead of just 314 meaning whities vs. niggers a photograph taken on February 27th of players with jerseys 21 and 27 that has the “1” partially obscured also takes on cosmic significance. Somebody said Pi, well 227 also means Pi. I’m sure glad that they commented about that or I might have missed my chance to provide this tidbit of misinformation! Where’s my cookie?
Providing additional information like that 227 actually requires some effort. The troll alert doesn’t. I swear it seems like people comment on every single video just so that if the unlikely critic pops by they can drop the beneficial honeybee persona and bring out the Africanized killer bees. Trolls are dealt with IMMEDIATELY. There’s no such thing as a day later somebody is accused of being a troll. While a TED video might go by weeks before even being viewed the hive looks at every single video (and blog post) scanning for the slightest hint of contrary content.
I haven’t been stung by an entire hive, yet. I’ve tried and so far the most attention has been three comments on my sex joke test. Three. On a video viewed tens of thousands of times. For a comment that also has more than two hundred 👍. A gematria video viewed a couple thousand times where somebody says, “You never predict winners in the NFL correctly” gets stung at least three times within a few hours. The point being this. The retaliation is based on the cognitive bias and not the content of the comment. You exist, you offend me, you don’t agree with me today. Die heretic! Even if the commenter doesn’t necassirly believe that the Illuminati is trying to start a race war and just wants to use gematria pretending he can make predictions to win money gambling.
Everybody’s doing it. Well, at least the 50 or so regulars here. They must be right and the millions of other people must be wrong.
The TED Talks Cognitive Bias Experiment
With intent I have engaged in a probably ill advised experiment on YouTube. Bad idea or not I have had some pretty remarkable results. There is a link to the world of gematria so it’s on topic, just not the normal XXX=59, the shoehorned Freemasons, blah, blah, blah. A case on the side of bad idea is that very unscientifically I didn’t plan out exactly what I wanted to accomplish and set rigid standards. So as it is constantly morphing I have no idea what course I’m going to take. I’ve already modified my plans a zillion times, which shouldn’t surprise me since there’s a wide variety of personalities that I’m dealing with.
As I tend to keep individual posts limited to what I judge to be a tolerable length these are getting split up into several. Immediately after this intro I’ll put up one about a specific bias and then as time goes on just go with the flow as I intersperse it with what current logical fallacies are happenings in the gematria world. I’m not trying to write the definitive work on cognitive bias, which is actually part of the whole experiment. People have already judged me on extremely limited information with no idea on exactly what my motivation is or anything about me. So instead of getting too far ahead of myself. How I started.
YouTube, being somewhat broken and that being part of the experiment, suggested that after researching spam for Dan’s latest Organic Matrix story, decided I might want to watch some James Veitch videos on spam at the TED TALKS channel. That was fine by me because they were hilarious. Now that I watched those YouTube said, “Aha! You just watched two TED TALKS videos! Here’s some more you might like!”
Ok, some of these are science oriented and certainly a great change of pace compared to Anthony Bourdain being sacrificed to synch up to Batman kind of nonsense (yes, that is out there). So I subscribed to the channel and exercised my right to simply not watch if the daily video(s) didn’t suit me.
During this time I had been experiencing some success with putting up some well received jokes on various chess video channels. This is where my brain started kicking around the odd idea. The most popular chess channel is more like a tight knit friendly gathering than a place to discuss serious implications of playing 27. Nxd5 instead of Ke8. Pressing the 👍 is a given for almost anything not openly antagonistic and everybody pals around. If nothing else, the gematria community is a close knit group of friends that will like ANY comment, no matter how ridiculous it is. The difference is that in the chess videos saying, “I think Magnus Carlsen is the best!” doesn’t harm anyone. Compared to “That little faggot David Hogg should be killed!” that you can find on conspiracy videos.
So what would happen if I started putting up jokes on TED? Where they seem a bit out of place like the James Veitch videos? Can I get to the point where without any actual information about me other than a couple dozen words that people can act like the know all about me?
You betcha.
All it took was one “toilet humor” joke that I wasn’t even proud of, that I only put up for purposes of the experiment, and the floodgates opened and the wolves descended with people trying to correct me. I’m wrong about EVERYTHING for just one set of sex puns, which considering the topic of the video was not totally off base. But that’s another post.
Some of the basics in my limited scientific approach.
1). These people do not know and likely will never know that I’m researching cognitive biases. I have been accused of being an attention whore. Far from it. I’m not trying to recruit readers from their fan base. They hopefully don’t give a damn about gematria one way or the other.
2). Most of my jokes are purposefully not antagonistic. Like, the lesbian father video, if I truly was looking to just be the king of toilet humor a comment about “having a gay time” watching it is an easy pun. And, sadly as part of the experiment’s results so far probably would have gotten some “likes” on top of the proper reaction of telling me to shut the f up. They range from somewhat thoughtful, which don’t go over to well (again, sadly) to mostly innocuous.
3). The jokes do relate to the current video only. No trying to bring up the past, except one comment I deleted when I realized I was misstating my point.
So next up, the YouTube Alarm.
As I tend to keep individual posts limited to what I judge to be a tolerable length these are getting split up into several. Immediately after this intro I’ll put up one about a specific bias and then as time goes on just go with the flow as I intersperse it with what current logical fallacies are happenings in the gematria world. I’m not trying to write the definitive work on cognitive bias, which is actually part of the whole experiment. People have already judged me on extremely limited information with no idea on exactly what my motivation is or anything about me. So instead of getting too far ahead of myself. How I started.
YouTube, being somewhat broken and that being part of the experiment, suggested that after researching spam for Dan’s latest Organic Matrix story, decided I might want to watch some James Veitch videos on spam at the TED TALKS channel. That was fine by me because they were hilarious. Now that I watched those YouTube said, “Aha! You just watched two TED TALKS videos! Here’s some more you might like!”
Ok, some of these are science oriented and certainly a great change of pace compared to Anthony Bourdain being sacrificed to synch up to Batman kind of nonsense (yes, that is out there). So I subscribed to the channel and exercised my right to simply not watch if the daily video(s) didn’t suit me.
During this time I had been experiencing some success with putting up some well received jokes on various chess video channels. This is where my brain started kicking around the odd idea. The most popular chess channel is more like a tight knit friendly gathering than a place to discuss serious implications of playing 27. Nxd5 instead of Ke8. Pressing the 👍 is a given for almost anything not openly antagonistic and everybody pals around. If nothing else, the gematria community is a close knit group of friends that will like ANY comment, no matter how ridiculous it is. The difference is that in the chess videos saying, “I think Magnus Carlsen is the best!” doesn’t harm anyone. Compared to “That little faggot David Hogg should be killed!” that you can find on conspiracy videos.
So what would happen if I started putting up jokes on TED? Where they seem a bit out of place like the James Veitch videos? Can I get to the point where without any actual information about me other than a couple dozen words that people can act like the know all about me?
You betcha.
All it took was one “toilet humor” joke that I wasn’t even proud of, that I only put up for purposes of the experiment, and the floodgates opened and the wolves descended with people trying to correct me. I’m wrong about EVERYTHING for just one set of sex puns, which considering the topic of the video was not totally off base. But that’s another post.
Some of the basics in my limited scientific approach.
1). These people do not know and likely will never know that I’m researching cognitive biases. I have been accused of being an attention whore. Far from it. I’m not trying to recruit readers from their fan base. They hopefully don’t give a damn about gematria one way or the other.
2). Most of my jokes are purposefully not antagonistic. Like, the lesbian father video, if I truly was looking to just be the king of toilet humor a comment about “having a gay time” watching it is an easy pun. And, sadly as part of the experiment’s results so far probably would have gotten some “likes” on top of the proper reaction of telling me to shut the f up. They range from somewhat thoughtful, which don’t go over to well (again, sadly) to mostly innocuous.
3). The jokes do relate to the current video only. No trying to bring up the past, except one comment I deleted when I realized I was misstating my point.
So next up, the YouTube Alarm.
Friday, June 8, 2018
Selective Ignorance
https://web.archive.org/web/20180608042029/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/06/07/uber-driver-shoots-and-kills-passenger/
I don’t want to pass up the opportunity to create a new Sniglet, so let’s bring up BIGNORANCE. Ignoring a large number in favor of a smaller number. Here we’ve got another post with prime numbers with an odd twist. Normally our 113’s are found straight up through elision conversion instead of being more creatively manufactured. It’s time to bignore the number we got, 617, in favor of 113 that we’ve already been bignoring the weakness in that number.
It’s that time again when based on country locations in the stats and some of the old material being reviewed that we go over some of the basics of what’s wrong with the original post. Get you up to speed on some of the tricks that are consciously being used when manufacturing these fables.
Since this evolves into an eventual evil mainstream media condemnation with the overused list of 113’s it’s already self-destructed by inclusion of gematria on MATHEMATICS OF THE CIRCLE, just because that conveniently worked out to the confirmation bias number. I don’t remember ever seeing a mainstream media article ever mentioning MATHEMATICS OF THE CIRCLE and unless something with the steering wheel or tires happens it’s completely out of place here.
Then there’s the wishy washy way that the names are presented as both Michael Hancock - Hyun Kim and Michael Hancock AND Hyun Kim. The “-“ being a null value on the calculator versus the additional three letters=different results. Notice that their names are never used conjunctively like this in the evil ABC news article.
Then we get to the part of 617 is the 113th prime number. Selectively ignoring the variation of the names that has the AND we get to the target number of 113. Yeah! Exposure of the evil empire!
Except that based on contradictory kettle logic we’ve selectively ignored that prime numbers and 113 don’t really belong together in the same narrative. Based on prime numbers 113 doesn’t belong by itself in a narrative. Covered before in “Take your prime numbers and...”- 113 is the 30th prime number. If you had to pick a single word that should be most important to a truth seeker there’s a strong case that this word is TRUTH. TRUTH=30 in Reverse Reduced, declared to be one of the four primary ciphers. Truth=Dishonesty, except that you are allowed to selectively ignore that.
Your also allowed to selectively ignore the Francis Bacon method. “Truth”=113. That’s what confirmation bias is all about. Everything is selective, including selectively ignoring the fact that these flaws in their system have been brought to their attention and they just keep yapping away.
I don’t want to pass up the opportunity to create a new Sniglet, so let’s bring up BIGNORANCE. Ignoring a large number in favor of a smaller number. Here we’ve got another post with prime numbers with an odd twist. Normally our 113’s are found straight up through elision conversion instead of being more creatively manufactured. It’s time to bignore the number we got, 617, in favor of 113 that we’ve already been bignoring the weakness in that number.
It’s that time again when based on country locations in the stats and some of the old material being reviewed that we go over some of the basics of what’s wrong with the original post. Get you up to speed on some of the tricks that are consciously being used when manufacturing these fables.
Since this evolves into an eventual evil mainstream media condemnation with the overused list of 113’s it’s already self-destructed by inclusion of gematria on MATHEMATICS OF THE CIRCLE, just because that conveniently worked out to the confirmation bias number. I don’t remember ever seeing a mainstream media article ever mentioning MATHEMATICS OF THE CIRCLE and unless something with the steering wheel or tires happens it’s completely out of place here.
Then there’s the wishy washy way that the names are presented as both Michael Hancock - Hyun Kim and Michael Hancock AND Hyun Kim. The “-“ being a null value on the calculator versus the additional three letters=different results. Notice that their names are never used conjunctively like this in the evil ABC news article.
Then we get to the part of 617 is the 113th prime number. Selectively ignoring the variation of the names that has the AND we get to the target number of 113. Yeah! Exposure of the evil empire!
Except that based on contradictory kettle logic we’ve selectively ignored that prime numbers and 113 don’t really belong together in the same narrative. Based on prime numbers 113 doesn’t belong by itself in a narrative. Covered before in “Take your prime numbers and...”- 113 is the 30th prime number. If you had to pick a single word that should be most important to a truth seeker there’s a strong case that this word is TRUTH. TRUTH=30 in Reverse Reduced, declared to be one of the four primary ciphers. Truth=Dishonesty, except that you are allowed to selectively ignore that.
Your also allowed to selectively ignore the Francis Bacon method. “Truth”=113. That’s what confirmation bias is all about. Everything is selective, including selectively ignoring the fact that these flaws in their system have been brought to their attention and they just keep yapping away.
Thursday, June 7, 2018
Retro Thursday
https://web.archive.org/web/20180607043821/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2015/08/74-todays-date-numerology-august-31-2015.html?m=0
Instead of just talking about the Golden State versus Cleveland game and limited other new material available I thought it would be fun to remind them that there’s lots of old misinformation out there that needs to be edited, deleted or ignored. Since I found this early on and date numerology which isn’t even gematria is so abundant this seemingly simple post works.
August 31, 2015 is the first date in 2015 with 74 for date numerology. It most certainly is not. Maybe back in 2015 before the Gematrinator calculator it was, but things always change to make it easier to find matches.
So let’s start with what in practical usage doesn’t count but could. This may have been used and slips by, but I can’t be everywhere and so it might happen. It’s certainly not common. Invoking the mirror image rule of numbers in gematria 47=74 makes January 11, 2015 the first date in 2015 with 74 numerology.
Now let’s turn to what would be less illogically defined as 74 date numerology that does appear. Now with the oh so handy calculator on the screen anytime the date duration tool shows 74 that is officially date numerology of 74.
That makes March 15th the first 74 of the year. The 74th day of the year. Very convenient that historically this date bears significance as it’s the Ides of March and impossible to bring up as date numerology. The original August 31, 2015 story is just wrong. It probably should have been known ahead of time that this 74th day has been used. This isn’t a big deal by itself so much as it is a building block towards the ultimate problem with gematria date numerology.
The next building block in the chain is the real purpose of this web page, the easy access to date durations. This didn’t really start in earnest until 2017 so the original post didn’t utilize that info. Spans don’t need to be limited to the number of days and the generally accepted calendar demarcations are all used. Days, weeks, months and years including combinations. And dropping zeroes. And the occasional rounding because close enough always counts in a pinch, especially if you went out of your way to try and predict that an upcoming date is significant because of such a span. So if the goal is to find a 7 and a 4 next to each other, and we’re looking for the first date in 2015 we need to see 7 weeks, 4 days.
This makes you think that the first date in 2015 is February 23rd. That dismisses the first big cheat. There’s the Include End Date? checkbox that defaults to no. Every day automatically is a span of two days, or even four since at times the start date has been “close enough”. But mostly just the end date, so by common usage the first date in 2015 with 74 numerology is February 22nd.
But that’s just a building block. The real problem is the START DATE. When you first look at an August 31st END DATE it’s natural to assume that January 1st, 2015 is the start date. Nothing stops them from using any other date. There’s no such thing as a story that says, “This looks like it’s a hoax, but the date numerology doesn’t work and that suggests it’s for real.” The first thing you do when January 1st doesn’t work, with or without the end date inclusion, is to futz around with other dates. You already know the end date, the ball game was played yesterday or today. The porn actress died yesterday. There’s absolutely nothing stopping anyone from insisting that this is a tribute to some event in the past with a date other than January 1st. The most common is birthdays and I’m pretty sure that’s the first thing to check. Then after that compare similar events to each other, Parkland=Dunblane or Grenfell fire=California wildfires.
And there we have the start of lamprey argument chain. Parkland/Dunblane seems logical. Are wildfires really close enough to building fires? Why not wildfires=Guy Fieri homophobia and a tribute to the death of the creator of the gay pride flag?
Because of the goal is to find a match in dates somehow, history doesn’t forget. Every number is evil. Every day of the year is evil somehow. Trust me on this one without doing research. There are 365 or 366 days in a year and I promise you something bad happened on every date. Sure there’s synchronicity. If you can’t find date synchronicity out of a start date of every day of the year you’re an idiot.
Instead of just talking about the Golden State versus Cleveland game and limited other new material available I thought it would be fun to remind them that there’s lots of old misinformation out there that needs to be edited, deleted or ignored. Since I found this early on and date numerology which isn’t even gematria is so abundant this seemingly simple post works.
August 31, 2015 is the first date in 2015 with 74 for date numerology. It most certainly is not. Maybe back in 2015 before the Gematrinator calculator it was, but things always change to make it easier to find matches.
So let’s start with what in practical usage doesn’t count but could. This may have been used and slips by, but I can’t be everywhere and so it might happen. It’s certainly not common. Invoking the mirror image rule of numbers in gematria 47=74 makes January 11, 2015 the first date in 2015 with 74 numerology.
Now let’s turn to what would be less illogically defined as 74 date numerology that does appear. Now with the oh so handy calculator on the screen anytime the date duration tool shows 74 that is officially date numerology of 74.
The next building block in the chain is the real purpose of this web page, the easy access to date durations. This didn’t really start in earnest until 2017 so the original post didn’t utilize that info. Spans don’t need to be limited to the number of days and the generally accepted calendar demarcations are all used. Days, weeks, months and years including combinations. And dropping zeroes. And the occasional rounding because close enough always counts in a pinch, especially if you went out of your way to try and predict that an upcoming date is significant because of such a span. So if the goal is to find a 7 and a 4 next to each other, and we’re looking for the first date in 2015 we need to see 7 weeks, 4 days.
But that’s just a building block. The real problem is the START DATE. When you first look at an August 31st END DATE it’s natural to assume that January 1st, 2015 is the start date. Nothing stops them from using any other date. There’s no such thing as a story that says, “This looks like it’s a hoax, but the date numerology doesn’t work and that suggests it’s for real.” The first thing you do when January 1st doesn’t work, with or without the end date inclusion, is to futz around with other dates. You already know the end date, the ball game was played yesterday or today. The porn actress died yesterday. There’s absolutely nothing stopping anyone from insisting that this is a tribute to some event in the past with a date other than January 1st. The most common is birthdays and I’m pretty sure that’s the first thing to check. Then after that compare similar events to each other, Parkland=Dunblane or Grenfell fire=California wildfires.
And there we have the start of lamprey argument chain. Parkland/Dunblane seems logical. Are wildfires really close enough to building fires? Why not wildfires=Guy Fieri homophobia and a tribute to the death of the creator of the gay pride flag?
Because of the goal is to find a match in dates somehow, history doesn’t forget. Every number is evil. Every day of the year is evil somehow. Trust me on this one without doing research. There are 365 or 366 days in a year and I promise you something bad happened on every date. Sure there’s synchronicity. If you can’t find date synchronicity out of a start date of every day of the year you’re an idiot.
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
Eclipsehorning
https://web.archive.org/save/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/06/05/fashion-designer-kate-spade-hangs-herself-55/
So like most recent content even the current celebrity death in the news is transformed into an eclipse sacrifice.
I see what we’re doing here. It can be forgiven that the once tireless reports on what was going on with The Mark of the Beast have disappeared. I did, after all, collect a lot of triangular material to counter the onslaught of circle this, circle that, circle the other thing. Lots of circular logic. Like kettle tops are circular. The header of the blog does blather on about this terrifying number cult hell bent on scaring us into submission, and the Freemasons aren’t really cutting edge scary. And we’re easing our way into Organic Matrix topics. Some vague entity that the devious cult stole the numbers from to mock us with sports rigging is much more terrifying. Terrifying that they care about how the Brewers are doing this year when the Antichrist issue is still up in the air. Now by just dropping any pretext of the Freemason cult being involved, it’s the Matrix screwing around with our lives.
Waxing into phasing the moon into this has its advantages and disadvantages.
Freemasons:
1). Not really that scary, somewhere between utility meter readers and ninjas on the fright inducement scale.
2). Not supremely powerful. HR is still looking for a good replacement for Bob the Hitman.
3). A rich history of premade shoehorned in phrases.
The Devil:
1). Much scarier than a mason. Either 616 or 666 times scarier depending on what source material you read. Vomited pea soup from a young girl whose head can turn around 180 degrees is way creepier than a misquoted angle of the Freemasonry compass.
2). Much more powerful than a mason. The D&D Monster Manual doesn’t even list Freemasons. The Dungeonsapedia talk page shot down the suggestion by comparing the power level as “the Devil is like the combined nuclear arsenals of the world to that of a newborn duckling”.
3). Some history of shoehornable phrases with potential to make new material that by its nature is much cooler, namely sacrifices. If you can’t shoehorn in Devil=Sacrifice your truther skills are pretty bad. And an eclipse sacrifice is way cooler than just picking a random unlucky goat and slaughtering it like some pagan that doesn’t care what phase of the moon it is. Die Kate Spade! So my crops will grow! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
The Moon and Sun
1). Scary? Well, I guess so. At least I’m supposed to think so. Something made the Sun about 150 million kilometers away and I’m sure it could kick my ass. (A duckling probably could, too. The cute big baby animal eyes are an unfair advantage. I just don’t have the heart.)
2). The Devil is the Organic Matrix’s bitch. Power- no contest.
3). Until recent history a virtually untapped source of shoehorned phrases.
So now “eclipsehorning” your own set of words counts as valid gematria.
Some problems with this eclipsehorning business. If you want to suggest that 33 means FALSE FLAG instead of BANANA, you have a fallback position of always having used FALSE FLAG =33. A logically fallacious position, but a fallback position nonetheless. USB PORT=666 in Sumerian. Some overweight video gamer collapses and dies of a heart attack we’ve already established that 666 is the activity of at least devil worshippers. Now every single word related to the Sun and Moon and eclipses is virgin (sacrifice) territory. You’ve started your own PhraseShopped dictionary. Which will probably not even sell as well as Hubbard’s book.
Once you introduce the Matrix as the supreme power ruling over us you lose the “it’s what the dishonest media says”. When was the last time you saw ECLIPSE SACRIFICE” in a news headline?? MOON will show up in regards to genuine Moon activity but not shoehorned directly into the media report. And by golly I can make up more words than most everybody for any given number. I’d like to start by suggesting that the Organic Matrix means PLUTO=51 in Reverse instead of MOON=51 since then I get a form of Devil with the god of the Underworld and a dwarf planet instead of a moon. And I get to play with the science of our Moon maybe being a dwarf planet and like gematria pick and chose when I want it to be a dwarf planet or not. (Look it up). Organic Matrix=entire language coded. Freemasons=news and sports only.
Now if the Organic Matrix does indeed rule over all, doesn’t that mean that all the past work on this Freemasonry bullshit is wrong? Wouldn’t an astute researcher go back and at least check to see and time permitting update the old material? Or at least acknowledge it??
The chances of that happening are somewhere between 0% and 0% and 0% doesn’t count. Because contradictory kettle logic shows that it doesn’t matter other than just providing misinformation for whatever outlandish, unfounded claim is being made today.
So like most recent content even the current celebrity death in the news is transformed into an eclipse sacrifice.
I see what we’re doing here. It can be forgiven that the once tireless reports on what was going on with The Mark of the Beast have disappeared. I did, after all, collect a lot of triangular material to counter the onslaught of circle this, circle that, circle the other thing. Lots of circular logic. Like kettle tops are circular. The header of the blog does blather on about this terrifying number cult hell bent on scaring us into submission, and the Freemasons aren’t really cutting edge scary. And we’re easing our way into Organic Matrix topics. Some vague entity that the devious cult stole the numbers from to mock us with sports rigging is much more terrifying. Terrifying that they care about how the Brewers are doing this year when the Antichrist issue is still up in the air. Now by just dropping any pretext of the Freemason cult being involved, it’s the Matrix screwing around with our lives.
Waxing into phasing the moon into this has its advantages and disadvantages.
Freemasons:
1). Not really that scary, somewhere between utility meter readers and ninjas on the fright inducement scale.
2). Not supremely powerful. HR is still looking for a good replacement for Bob the Hitman.
3). A rich history of premade shoehorned in phrases.
The Devil:
1). Much scarier than a mason. Either 616 or 666 times scarier depending on what source material you read. Vomited pea soup from a young girl whose head can turn around 180 degrees is way creepier than a misquoted angle of the Freemasonry compass.
2). Much more powerful than a mason. The D&D Monster Manual doesn’t even list Freemasons. The Dungeonsapedia talk page shot down the suggestion by comparing the power level as “the Devil is like the combined nuclear arsenals of the world to that of a newborn duckling”.
3). Some history of shoehornable phrases with potential to make new material that by its nature is much cooler, namely sacrifices. If you can’t shoehorn in Devil=Sacrifice your truther skills are pretty bad. And an eclipse sacrifice is way cooler than just picking a random unlucky goat and slaughtering it like some pagan that doesn’t care what phase of the moon it is. Die Kate Spade! So my crops will grow! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
The Moon and Sun
1). Scary? Well, I guess so. At least I’m supposed to think so. Something made the Sun about 150 million kilometers away and I’m sure it could kick my ass. (A duckling probably could, too. The cute big baby animal eyes are an unfair advantage. I just don’t have the heart.)
2). The Devil is the Organic Matrix’s bitch. Power- no contest.
3). Until recent history a virtually untapped source of shoehorned phrases.
So now “eclipsehorning” your own set of words counts as valid gematria.
Some problems with this eclipsehorning business. If you want to suggest that 33 means FALSE FLAG instead of BANANA, you have a fallback position of always having used FALSE FLAG =33. A logically fallacious position, but a fallback position nonetheless. USB PORT=666 in Sumerian. Some overweight video gamer collapses and dies of a heart attack we’ve already established that 666 is the activity of at least devil worshippers. Now every single word related to the Sun and Moon and eclipses is virgin (sacrifice) territory. You’ve started your own PhraseShopped dictionary. Which will probably not even sell as well as Hubbard’s book.
Once you introduce the Matrix as the supreme power ruling over us you lose the “it’s what the dishonest media says”. When was the last time you saw ECLIPSE SACRIFICE” in a news headline?? MOON will show up in regards to genuine Moon activity but not shoehorned directly into the media report. And by golly I can make up more words than most everybody for any given number. I’d like to start by suggesting that the Organic Matrix means PLUTO=51 in Reverse instead of MOON=51 since then I get a form of Devil with the god of the Underworld and a dwarf planet instead of a moon. And I get to play with the science of our Moon maybe being a dwarf planet and like gematria pick and chose when I want it to be a dwarf planet or not. (Look it up). Organic Matrix=entire language coded. Freemasons=news and sports only.
Now if the Organic Matrix does indeed rule over all, doesn’t that mean that all the past work on this Freemasonry bullshit is wrong? Wouldn’t an astute researcher go back and at least check to see and time permitting update the old material? Or at least acknowledge it??
The chances of that happening are somewhere between 0% and 0% and 0% doesn’t count. Because contradictory kettle logic shows that it doesn’t matter other than just providing misinformation for whatever outlandish, unfounded claim is being made today.
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
More Kettle Logic Malfunction
Not being ready to tackle the new proposal that the moon is the origin of our holographic reality I sought solace in what was going on in sports.
Now first up, an addition to what should have been said yesterday:
Pregame our ridiculous % breakdown is projected to be 60-40 in favor of the Golden Knights. This represents picking an upset compared to a more reliable reality based source, the Las Vegas Sports Book odds. Again, you can’t directly translate the way the bookie odds are worded into a winning % since their goal is to split the bets evenly between the two teams. I did find a source that pre-series start translated the money odds on a $115 bet to win $100 on the Knights to “roughly 58%”. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/alexkay/2018/05/24/nhl-stanley-cup-playoffs-2018-golden-knights-vs-capitals-finals-schedule-odds-tv-stream-picks/amp/
What’s important is that the Capitals did win, after the game the %’s were edited out and most important, a 60-40% breakdown is pretty much always in line with a home teams advantage for two teams fairly equally matched. Either team winning one individual game is no big surprise here. This is not the Golden State Warriors versus the Phoenix Suns circa this year. In all, rather pointless if you don’t have the pucks or balls to at least pop the % up to something closer to 100% with your “decodes”.
___________________________________________________
I managed to get this screen shot 5 minutes after the blog post went up on the Fee To Find Misinformation blog while looking for the sports threads.
The kettle logic here has been amply covered in the past. Somehow the same evil empire that has ruined his life by deleting his YouTube channels because he’s too close to the truth has allowed 10,000,000+ page views on identical sheep wakening material. This made even more unlikely since each video over the years links the same blog in the description. Because nothing says frightening cadre of cacodaemons like not being able to find something flaunted right in front of their faces.
Additionally his friends will acknowledge “the master” by linking the blog to their blogs and videos and simultaneously whine about their own copyright strikes and deleted channels. And the FTFM blog is operated by Google with their Blogger platform, the same organization that brings us YouTube.
Yeah. Right.
Now first up, an addition to what should have been said yesterday:
What’s important is that the Capitals did win, after the game the %’s were edited out and most important, a 60-40% breakdown is pretty much always in line with a home teams advantage for two teams fairly equally matched. Either team winning one individual game is no big surprise here. This is not the Golden State Warriors versus the Phoenix Suns circa this year. In all, rather pointless if you don’t have the pucks or balls to at least pop the % up to something closer to 100% with your “decodes”.
___________________________________________________
I managed to get this screen shot 5 minutes after the blog post went up on the Fee To Find Misinformation blog while looking for the sports threads.
Additionally his friends will acknowledge “the master” by linking the blog to their blogs and videos and simultaneously whine about their own copyright strikes and deleted channels. And the FTFM blog is operated by Google with their Blogger platform, the same organization that brings us YouTube.
Yeah. Right.
Monday, June 4, 2018
Gematria Is Subjective, Not Objective
Subjective- noun. Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes or opinions.
And why it doesn’t work is because they insist it is objective while simultaneously embracing the kettle logic that personal synchronicity and opinion is allowed. A year ago it was more cut and dry, every time 58 or 59 showed up no embellishment was necessary to claim this must be beyond a shadow of a doubt FREEMASONRY = 58,59. I could go through the blog posts, the scant number of videos offered these days, and the comments to both of those and find personal opinion not just allowed, but encouraged. It seems like the monotonous boredom of the same two digit numbers has created an atmosphere of trying to spice things up. You don’t win a cookie anymore for pointing out that 58 nobody else mentioned. They all know what 58 means.
Here’s some recent examples already reported in recent posts here.
Use of % Breakdowns By Denim Davis
He’s done it several times now. Incorrectly picking the Rockets to be champs, he’s changed to the Cavs to win the first two games of the NBA finals, now he’s stuck with trying to create narrative for Cleveland vs Golden State and like hockey has taken to the audacious and rather idiotic use of breaking down a percentage chance on the outcome of an individual game. Without the courage to stick to his convictions the posts have been edited to take out the %’s. Supposedly he gave the Cavaliers a 70 to 30 percent edge for last night’s game, without realizing that these %’s being used in the first place admits that he doesn’t know who the gematria shows the winner will be. There has to be an influence outside gematria to choose 70% instead of any other %, and if it’s not personal opinion I have no idea what it could possibly be. Turning the story into faux objectivity he does a decent job of narrating the post game statistics into the typical “obviously scripted” yarn, but still loaded with things like Golden State scored 122 points and they’re on the 122nd meridian which doesn’t explain why GS doesn’t score 122 points every single game. The Texas Sharpshooter fallacy is best friends with gematria, still.
The Organic Matrix
Yeah, I’ve been picking on this a lot lately, more than the volume of usage it’s being mentioned deserves. Or maybe they know I’m mocking them about this and are down playing it, who knows. Let’s try to restate this again. The Organic Matrix is the substitute author of a synchronous event that is beyond the abilities of the New World Order to manufacture. This covers a lot of ground because every single personalized event has to have a source and in practice it’s not possible to identify if it’s the NWO or the OM. Dan’s floods and TV shows, the Gematrinator’s solar eclipses, Hubbard’s occasional “I’m really a nice guy.” stories about his giving gas money to a homeless man or him being Jesus. I doubt the NWO hijacked the code for that last one. It is impossible to tell the source of these without an opinion being offered.
Antonyms
If sharpshooting in hindsight is best friends with gematria, then kettle logic is a high ranking member in the clique. An important subset of the problems with the Organic Matrix. If you get to the point where you insist the source is the Organic Matrix, how do you explain the language being loaded with so many absolute contradictions.? GROUP and UNGROUP have the same value and absolutely cannot be denied that they mean the exact opposite. Kettle logic says that I can use either regular where GROUP=77 or UNGROUP=77 in Reverse. RELIGIOUS and AGNOSTIC both equal 128 in reverse and indicates that the Organic Matrix was selectively omnipotent and decided to ignore that, as well as the Freemasons use of “Sacred” geometry ignoring it. We already know they desperately want to believe that 113 absolutely must mean dishonest when lots of contradictory 113’s exist. That’s their biased, subjective opinion and every single 113=DISHONEST story is rubbish. Unless I suppose they can prove the Organic Matrix exists and doesn’t care or really wanted 113 to be dishonest only, but this leaves all the evil empire stories at the roadside and....hmmm.
That reminds me of...
A bold admission that this is an opinion. It’s no surprise that a lot of the stories deal with visual evidence that offers a shady opinion of the material without any supporting numerology. Gematria isn’t a conspiracy theory by itself so much as it is a tool to produce bogus evidence to support the conspiracy opinion of the narrator. I prefer the guilty until proven innocent approach as soon as I see the words clearly or obviously since their track record on visual observation is pretty bad. Megan Kelly reminds you of Nicole Brown Simpson. Well good for you. I think Nicole looks like a girl in my college Biology class named Darlene Snow. And get this...the class number was Biology 113!*. Most of the time these people do look like each other, but so what? You’re using the similarity as undeniable proof they are the same person. Apparently every single look alike contest winner is a crisis actor or at least a relative. And of course, all the personal stories of words reminding someone of another word are an admission of bias. Snow....that reminds me of a cat named Snowball. Which reminds me of the Simpsons. Now what if my brother thinks Snow means Alaska? The essence of subjectivity.
Every Single Sports Prediction
Hey guys, did you ever notice that you can’t come to any kind of agreement until after the game is over? And that the only real agreement is that it was obviously rigged? Don’t you find that a little bit odd? That happens because you have lots of conflicting opinions.
* For no reason other than my own personal amusement I offer the story of Darlene. Biology classes were set up with hundreds of people in a huge lecture and broken down into smaller lab groups. Darlene was in my lab group and for reasons I’ll never fully understand paid attention to me. I suppose it was just because she was a genuinely nice girl and got along with everyone. But she was smoking hot and could have her pick of any guy. Athletic, tanned, blond hair, blue eyes. Killer smile and wonderful laugh. I was smitten. She was the subject of my second poem ever, at least the second that I was proud of. Everything worked out well and I found her address in the student directory and anonymously mailed her this limerick:
There once was a girl named Darlene,
I know from Bio 113.
Now it’s warm and she’s wearing,
Shorts that surely are baring,
The best legs that I’ve ever seen.
She was supposed to show up at the last lecture for me to admit that I was the source, but she didn’t make the class. Now I can only wonder if when #MeToo started she related her side of that event to the rest of the world. “I got this creepy limerick, I think it was the pervy guy in my lab group. No way was I showing up for the last lecture after that.”
And why it doesn’t work is because they insist it is objective while simultaneously embracing the kettle logic that personal synchronicity and opinion is allowed. A year ago it was more cut and dry, every time 58 or 59 showed up no embellishment was necessary to claim this must be beyond a shadow of a doubt FREEMASONRY = 58,59. I could go through the blog posts, the scant number of videos offered these days, and the comments to both of those and find personal opinion not just allowed, but encouraged. It seems like the monotonous boredom of the same two digit numbers has created an atmosphere of trying to spice things up. You don’t win a cookie anymore for pointing out that 58 nobody else mentioned. They all know what 58 means.
Here’s some recent examples already reported in recent posts here.
Use of % Breakdowns By Denim Davis
He’s done it several times now. Incorrectly picking the Rockets to be champs, he’s changed to the Cavs to win the first two games of the NBA finals, now he’s stuck with trying to create narrative for Cleveland vs Golden State and like hockey has taken to the audacious and rather idiotic use of breaking down a percentage chance on the outcome of an individual game. Without the courage to stick to his convictions the posts have been edited to take out the %’s. Supposedly he gave the Cavaliers a 70 to 30 percent edge for last night’s game, without realizing that these %’s being used in the first place admits that he doesn’t know who the gematria shows the winner will be. There has to be an influence outside gematria to choose 70% instead of any other %, and if it’s not personal opinion I have no idea what it could possibly be. Turning the story into faux objectivity he does a decent job of narrating the post game statistics into the typical “obviously scripted” yarn, but still loaded with things like Golden State scored 122 points and they’re on the 122nd meridian which doesn’t explain why GS doesn’t score 122 points every single game. The Texas Sharpshooter fallacy is best friends with gematria, still.
The Organic Matrix
Yeah, I’ve been picking on this a lot lately, more than the volume of usage it’s being mentioned deserves. Or maybe they know I’m mocking them about this and are down playing it, who knows. Let’s try to restate this again. The Organic Matrix is the substitute author of a synchronous event that is beyond the abilities of the New World Order to manufacture. This covers a lot of ground because every single personalized event has to have a source and in practice it’s not possible to identify if it’s the NWO or the OM. Dan’s floods and TV shows, the Gematrinator’s solar eclipses, Hubbard’s occasional “I’m really a nice guy.” stories about his giving gas money to a homeless man or him being Jesus. I doubt the NWO hijacked the code for that last one. It is impossible to tell the source of these without an opinion being offered.
Antonyms
If sharpshooting in hindsight is best friends with gematria, then kettle logic is a high ranking member in the clique. An important subset of the problems with the Organic Matrix. If you get to the point where you insist the source is the Organic Matrix, how do you explain the language being loaded with so many absolute contradictions.? GROUP and UNGROUP have the same value and absolutely cannot be denied that they mean the exact opposite. Kettle logic says that I can use either regular where GROUP=77 or UNGROUP=77 in Reverse. RELIGIOUS and AGNOSTIC both equal 128 in reverse and indicates that the Organic Matrix was selectively omnipotent and decided to ignore that, as well as the Freemasons use of “Sacred” geometry ignoring it. We already know they desperately want to believe that 113 absolutely must mean dishonest when lots of contradictory 113’s exist. That’s their biased, subjective opinion and every single 113=DISHONEST story is rubbish. Unless I suppose they can prove the Organic Matrix exists and doesn’t care or really wanted 113 to be dishonest only, but this leaves all the evil empire stories at the roadside and....hmmm.
That reminds me of...
A bold admission that this is an opinion. It’s no surprise that a lot of the stories deal with visual evidence that offers a shady opinion of the material without any supporting numerology. Gematria isn’t a conspiracy theory by itself so much as it is a tool to produce bogus evidence to support the conspiracy opinion of the narrator. I prefer the guilty until proven innocent approach as soon as I see the words clearly or obviously since their track record on visual observation is pretty bad. Megan Kelly reminds you of Nicole Brown Simpson. Well good for you. I think Nicole looks like a girl in my college Biology class named Darlene Snow. And get this...the class number was Biology 113!*. Most of the time these people do look like each other, but so what? You’re using the similarity as undeniable proof they are the same person. Apparently every single look alike contest winner is a crisis actor or at least a relative. And of course, all the personal stories of words reminding someone of another word are an admission of bias. Snow....that reminds me of a cat named Snowball. Which reminds me of the Simpsons. Now what if my brother thinks Snow means Alaska? The essence of subjectivity.
Every Single Sports Prediction
Hey guys, did you ever notice that you can’t come to any kind of agreement until after the game is over? And that the only real agreement is that it was obviously rigged? Don’t you find that a little bit odd? That happens because you have lots of conflicting opinions.
* For no reason other than my own personal amusement I offer the story of Darlene. Biology classes were set up with hundreds of people in a huge lecture and broken down into smaller lab groups. Darlene was in my lab group and for reasons I’ll never fully understand paid attention to me. I suppose it was just because she was a genuinely nice girl and got along with everyone. But she was smoking hot and could have her pick of any guy. Athletic, tanned, blond hair, blue eyes. Killer smile and wonderful laugh. I was smitten. She was the subject of my second poem ever, at least the second that I was proud of. Everything worked out well and I found her address in the student directory and anonymously mailed her this limerick:
There once was a girl named Darlene,
I know from Bio 113.
Now it’s warm and she’s wearing,
Shorts that surely are baring,
The best legs that I’ve ever seen.
She was supposed to show up at the last lecture for me to admit that I was the source, but she didn’t make the class. Now I can only wonder if when #MeToo started she related her side of that event to the rest of the world. “I got this creepy limerick, I think it was the pervy guy in my lab group. No way was I showing up for the last lecture after that.”
Sunday, June 3, 2018
Whoa! Talk About Weather Control!
https://web.archive.org/web/20180603055647/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/06/stephen-means-crown-112263-red-string.html?m=1
To snark or not to snark, that is the question?
Daggone it, your supposed to know that rain=water and there are other warning signs of flooded roads than driving into a flooded road. The cars that WERE IN FRONT OF YOU BLOCKING YOUR VISION, did they have any WATER around them? Was it raining so hard you couldn’t see that, like so hard that maybe you should have pulled over and waited until it subsided? Do you ever check the weather on your phone? Mine has an alert for hazardous conditions. Based on my location, not just my hometown.
And the reaction is in Dan’s case a quite understandable worry about the flood symbolism seen recently.
Now let’s take the story at face value with some logical guesswork added. Let’s assume this is the first time you encountered a flooded road. I can believe that because you don’t know that water killing your battery and getting stranded is one of the main reasons you don’t drive into a big puddle of water. Even if it’s not a really dangerous flash flood like the one that swept away the off duty National Guardsman recently (which I suppose may be a hoax, but whatever) it’s a huge pain in the ass for the policeman that haven’t been killed off from your traffic violation solution and other rescue personnel to deal with. I think that at least SOME tow truck drivers are not also holding down a second job as a policeman.
Now assuming that the point, even it’s just documenting how odd this is, that this is blog worthy because it ties into all the symbolism flooding your other recent blog posts. The first time ever experience with a flood sounds like major Freemason weather control or Organic Matrix in origin.
Do you really, really think that this event was orchestrated just for you? Much of your magical TV viewing synchronicity is when you’re alone or with just family. Or your GF says something odd that’s out of place. Often an event that can’t be proven. Now here, just for the sake for thoroughness I checked and found that indeed there was a flash flood warning in that area. (Complete with a warning about not driving into standing water). It may be the wee hours of the morning, but don’t you think it’s a bit odd that other people saw this event or at least it’s side effects like the water and news reports?
Is the Organic Matrix just for your benefit? Is everything pretend and just for your amusement? I sure as hell wish it was all pretend because my arthritic hip hurts like a mother f’er and there’s some hope for that going away when you stop dreaming of me. Because although I’ve read that rain doesn’t really affect arthritis based on my actual experience it does. So knock it off with the water, flood, rain commentary.
Now let’s assume that you really just wanted to post this lengthy bit and it could have been summarized, “I just drove into flood waters on top of the flood symbolism, lol!” Do you have any sense of the line drawn between what is odd and what is really significant? Because I don’t think so. Take hundreds of random events everyday and compare them you will find things that match once you shave them down into a two or three digit number. You absolutely do gematria on hundreds or maybe even thousands of events.
Every
Single
Day.
And then comment how odd it is on those that match and just dismiss everything that doesn’t match.
This is the essence of the lamprey argument. Puppies, kittens and goldfish are cool. Black widow spiders are icky. Lampreys, well I’m not really sure where to put them on the coolness of animals chain of command. If the flood event is not significant, why even mention it? If it is, well, you kind of didn’t give us the full gematria run down of the story. I think by now I’ve got enough to go on that I could do that, but I’d rather not since I find all of gematria to be insignificant.
Figure out a line of significance (good luck!) and decide ahead of time where it is. You need to, and this is important, first establish some things that are obviously, at least in your own mind, not significant gematrifiable events. You’ll probably find that you are just waiting until after the event is over and letting the gematria decide whether it’s significant or not. Or maybe even just assume it’s gematria related without putting the effort in to find the numbers like your flood. Because now the Organic Matrix can stalk you without a bunch of numbers to back it up since you may find out that this number is supposed to mean Mark of the Beast according to Derek or the points that were scored in last night’s basketball game instead of just your own personal flood.
So, did anything remind you of Heavy Metal music, Mel Gibson or the word Giard yesterday?
To snark or not to snark, that is the question?
Daggone it, your supposed to know that rain=water and there are other warning signs of flooded roads than driving into a flooded road. The cars that WERE IN FRONT OF YOU BLOCKING YOUR VISION, did they have any WATER around them? Was it raining so hard you couldn’t see that, like so hard that maybe you should have pulled over and waited until it subsided? Do you ever check the weather on your phone? Mine has an alert for hazardous conditions. Based on my location, not just my hometown.
And the reaction is in Dan’s case a quite understandable worry about the flood symbolism seen recently.
Now let’s take the story at face value with some logical guesswork added. Let’s assume this is the first time you encountered a flooded road. I can believe that because you don’t know that water killing your battery and getting stranded is one of the main reasons you don’t drive into a big puddle of water. Even if it’s not a really dangerous flash flood like the one that swept away the off duty National Guardsman recently (which I suppose may be a hoax, but whatever) it’s a huge pain in the ass for the policeman that haven’t been killed off from your traffic violation solution and other rescue personnel to deal with. I think that at least SOME tow truck drivers are not also holding down a second job as a policeman.
Now assuming that the point, even it’s just documenting how odd this is, that this is blog worthy because it ties into all the symbolism flooding your other recent blog posts. The first time ever experience with a flood sounds like major Freemason weather control or Organic Matrix in origin.
Do you really, really think that this event was orchestrated just for you? Much of your magical TV viewing synchronicity is when you’re alone or with just family. Or your GF says something odd that’s out of place. Often an event that can’t be proven. Now here, just for the sake for thoroughness I checked and found that indeed there was a flash flood warning in that area. (Complete with a warning about not driving into standing water). It may be the wee hours of the morning, but don’t you think it’s a bit odd that other people saw this event or at least it’s side effects like the water and news reports?
Is the Organic Matrix just for your benefit? Is everything pretend and just for your amusement? I sure as hell wish it was all pretend because my arthritic hip hurts like a mother f’er and there’s some hope for that going away when you stop dreaming of me. Because although I’ve read that rain doesn’t really affect arthritis based on my actual experience it does. So knock it off with the water, flood, rain commentary.
Now let’s assume that you really just wanted to post this lengthy bit and it could have been summarized, “I just drove into flood waters on top of the flood symbolism, lol!” Do you have any sense of the line drawn between what is odd and what is really significant? Because I don’t think so. Take hundreds of random events everyday and compare them you will find things that match once you shave them down into a two or three digit number. You absolutely do gematria on hundreds or maybe even thousands of events.
Every
Single
Day.
And then comment how odd it is on those that match and just dismiss everything that doesn’t match.
This is the essence of the lamprey argument. Puppies, kittens and goldfish are cool. Black widow spiders are icky. Lampreys, well I’m not really sure where to put them on the coolness of animals chain of command. If the flood event is not significant, why even mention it? If it is, well, you kind of didn’t give us the full gematria run down of the story. I think by now I’ve got enough to go on that I could do that, but I’d rather not since I find all of gematria to be insignificant.
Figure out a line of significance (good luck!) and decide ahead of time where it is. You need to, and this is important, first establish some things that are obviously, at least in your own mind, not significant gematrifiable events. You’ll probably find that you are just waiting until after the event is over and letting the gematria decide whether it’s significant or not. Or maybe even just assume it’s gematria related without putting the effort in to find the numbers like your flood. Because now the Organic Matrix can stalk you without a bunch of numbers to back it up since you may find out that this number is supposed to mean Mark of the Beast according to Derek or the points that were scored in last night’s basketball game instead of just your own personal flood.
So, did anything remind you of Heavy Metal music, Mel Gibson or the word Giard yesterday?
Saturday, June 2, 2018
Be On Guard For The Coincidence Of The Month
Speaking of defenestration and the “that reminds me of” game.
There is no set time limit for when something is merely a coincidence and when it is set in stone as a gematria tribute or ritual. So here’s the challenge for those that read this. Try to not be reminded of this post for the rest of this month.
Defenestration is a favorite because it is such an odd event that the chance to use it in everyday conversation other than as a metaphor is rare. So now, is it a coincidence that these associations with defenestration might be the work of the evil empire or Organic Matrix?
Guard
Since the post title is itself a pun I offer the story of the phrase, Gardy Loo! (Or single word gardyloo). Possibly derived from French, this is the phrase in medieval times shouted from up high when the contents of a chamber pot were unsanitarily defenestrated to the ground. The French phrase “garde a l’eau” means “Beware the water”. Be on guard for the water. Be on guard for GUARD, GUARDIAN, GOURD or anything close enough that you are reminded of it. The script is deep, so use your imagination.
Mel Gibson and Patrick McGoohan
There is a scene of a human being defenestrated in Braveheart. Longshanks throws his son’s male lover to his death. Both have been in lots of film. Now you can let yourself go crazy in your own but I do want to nudge you into being reminded that McGoohan was also in The Prisoner where every prisoner is assigned a number in place of a name. And he’s also mistaken for the similarly named Patrick MacNee. Who was in The Avengers tv series. Which may remind you of Infinity War. Etc... And Gibson should remind you of insane racists. ‘Nuff said.
Heavy metal music
There is a metal band named Gardy Loo. If you want to be reminded of anything metal like copper and silver etc... I’m not holding you back. Don’t forget that these have symbols on the periodic table!
Drag Racing And Trannies.
Hey, mirror images. GARD backwards. Not all drag queens are actual trans, but I thought I’d save the mooks some time.
That’s enough of that. There’s a statistical near certainty that just that list will produce a coincidence that otherwise would not have been, just because I have a memory for useless information like the origin of Gardy Loo.
There is no set time limit for when something is merely a coincidence and when it is set in stone as a gematria tribute or ritual. So here’s the challenge for those that read this. Try to not be reminded of this post for the rest of this month.
Defenestration is a favorite because it is such an odd event that the chance to use it in everyday conversation other than as a metaphor is rare. So now, is it a coincidence that these associations with defenestration might be the work of the evil empire or Organic Matrix?
Guard
Since the post title is itself a pun I offer the story of the phrase, Gardy Loo! (Or single word gardyloo). Possibly derived from French, this is the phrase in medieval times shouted from up high when the contents of a chamber pot were unsanitarily defenestrated to the ground. The French phrase “garde a l’eau” means “Beware the water”. Be on guard for the water. Be on guard for GUARD, GUARDIAN, GOURD or anything close enough that you are reminded of it. The script is deep, so use your imagination.
Mel Gibson and Patrick McGoohan
There is a scene of a human being defenestrated in Braveheart. Longshanks throws his son’s male lover to his death. Both have been in lots of film. Now you can let yourself go crazy in your own but I do want to nudge you into being reminded that McGoohan was also in The Prisoner where every prisoner is assigned a number in place of a name. And he’s also mistaken for the similarly named Patrick MacNee. Who was in The Avengers tv series. Which may remind you of Infinity War. Etc... And Gibson should remind you of insane racists. ‘Nuff said.
Heavy metal music
There is a metal band named Gardy Loo. If you want to be reminded of anything metal like copper and silver etc... I’m not holding you back. Don’t forget that these have symbols on the periodic table!
Drag Racing And Trannies.
Hey, mirror images. GARD backwards. Not all drag queens are actual trans, but I thought I’d save the mooks some time.
That’s enough of that. There’s a statistical near certainty that just that list will produce a coincidence that otherwise would not have been, just because I have a memory for useless information like the origin of Gardy Loo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)