Sandy Hook, Line & Sinker

I’m not a big fan of the use of psychological projection.  When the updated story about Sandy Hook first showed up on the Gematrinator blog I dismissed it as another insipid eclipse ritual, but now we’re back to the original story that it never happened.  Strange, is it not, to fake a tragedy for a ritual?

https://web.archive.org/web/20180524064259/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/05/23/pakistani-girl-killed-in-santa-fe-high-school-shooting/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180524065438/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/05/18/sandy-hook-elementary-shooting-2012/

So we’re too stupid to look at the evidence and correctly determine what is true and what isn’t?  You had to mention confirmation bias.  I’m not a big fan of confirmation bias.  Break out your notebooks fans of mine, let’s take him to school.  This is a good one to save up to instantly dismiss anything regarding Sandy Hook and gematria and by logical extension  the entire false flag truther hoax storyline.

In a lot of respects you can identify who is clueless and who is deliberately manufacturing ersatz evidence by the manner in which they defend their arguments.  The hook here, is Sandy Hook.  A trap that is a part of history.  Something the truthers simply will not let rest. The line:  The line we’re being fed that you tried to disprove gematria and found out that in fact it does work.  The sinker:  You just won’t leave it alone.  And as is so often the case with me the repetition Urks me.  So I’ve saved up a 113 for a shooting hoax.

All we need to do is look at the claim is supposedly false, present the gematria already recorded in various blog posts and video comments, put up a couple of screen shots and instantly any rational person with no confirmation bias can understand this.
SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL=113
So we know why that’s in the story.
Now what if we thought that maybe the event was real.  Like maybe if we were an unbiased astute researcher.  Instead of the kind of person that has recently done things like the gematria of FASTEST PITCH EVER when the accompanying news story linked into the blog post doesn’t call it the fastest pitch ever in the headline or story, but instead the FASTEST STRIKE EVER.  In other words, the kind of person that will go PhraseShopping until his confirmation bias finds a number he links.

You’ll have a good chance of finding out that TRUE EVENT=113

One of my greatest sources of amusement was the time Dan accused me of trying to discredit him.  A lot of that is because of the remarkable job he does of discrediting himself.  But pretty much all of them have at least checked here and not given any indication that several extremely clear cut examples like this don’t affect their desire to keep spitting out their hate speech.