Which should be Take Your Prime Numbers And..., Part 2. But 2 is the first prime number and it's actually been quoted that the NWO really gets excited by coding things with prime numbers.
No, they don't. Gematria/numerology loves prime numbers because it's way too easy to find more matches when you start cross matching reduction elisions with non-reduction generated values. Which in actual use is how the prime numbers come into play.
If they say, "Ah ha! But 137 is the 33rd prime number!", what they really mean is, "Ah ha! I got a number I didn't like, so let me change it into another number!"
Why yes, of course you're right. That's so obvious. 33 couldn't possibly mean anything except some kind of vague Judeo Masonic evil figure. And 33 is so uncommon that it's so difficult to produce. Surely everyone except the stupidest retarded troll knows it's not being shoehorned in, but REALLY IS PROOF.
Pffftt.
How about that? I can do things like boldfaced text and insert pictures now. But it's a huge pain in the ass since I can't use shortcuts and have to type the coding in by hand. I'm not going back and editing old posts except maybe putting in some pictures instead of links to pictures.
So the bright idea was to declare that Pi things must mean circles. Which it doesn't since it's really any nonlinear shape, but circles are pretty. So circle. The additional bright idea was to declare that production of 227 means Pi just as much as 314. Some of them don't realize it, but 227 means Pi more than 314 since it's a smaller number and appears more often. That's why it will be defended to the bitter end. It's had too much time invested in it to just say, "Oh, we were wrong".
So add the other bright idea that prime numbers have had so much time investment that those can't be abandoned. 227 is the 49th prime number. 49 is just another tiny number that like 33 has a billion different things it could be equal.
Now cut the cameras away from the home team dugout to my visitors' dugout. I'm fully aware of the reliance on dismissal of things that don't match when they are widely disparate. If I were to suggest that 227=49 means circle and TREE BRANCH=49 I would be ignored.
I've already pointed out that 360 degrees are in a square a long time ago. Not content with stealing away some of their fun, being somewhat bored at times and being am evil prick I continue to build up data supporting that Pi is related to triangles. Because it's not and triangles, like circles, are all over the place. Do you think I can find any triangle words that equal 49?
Here's my list so far:
TRIANGLE
TRIANGULAR
PYTHAGORAS (much more famous for triangles)
HYPOTENUSE
TRIGONOMETRY
Any system that allows so much confusion is useless for getting any real meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment