Close Enough For Government Work

Whilst preparing a way to work in the word, "whilst" I realize that I should just say "while". But, either is close enough. No, actually I was preparing The Year of the Underdog post and left out this bit. Our friend that suggested this year's sports winners would be influenced by the Chinese calendar forgot that their calendar is different than ours. The year of the dog started yesterday, so actually the Eagles won the Super Bowl in the Year of the Rooster.


Unfortunately, this is the only avian member of the Chinese calendar, so Eagle=Rooster makes just as much if not more sense since neither is Gematria based on words. And for the record MONKEY and ROOSTER have the same gematria in reverse, so as the closest representative to humans on the Chinese calendar, once you hit Rooster you might as well just shoehorn in any year since the narratives are about people.


So other than the math heavy post which was about how indirectly the implication is that every non-underdog year is predicting the favorites to win every time., we've got a little creative Tindering going on. At least the wrong calendar year is acknowledged here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180216084732/https://extra-capsa.com/2018/02/11/year-of-the-underdog-the-twins-trick-sacrifice-of-johannsson-cathey/
The joke about it being close enough for government work is appreciated. Some much needed levity in the world of instant hoax proclamation with no actual evidence/death to the Jews/gematria on Jigaboos/etc.... Probably not the best thought out joke, though considering the follow up and the rest of the content.


Now to get to 2,525 close enough isn't good enough for gematria and this number is exact. Ouch. Brother Berg's style is like this all the time. Anything with a 5 and a 2 in it is now exactly equal to each other thing with a five and a 2. 205/25,205/25/52/25,250 all tied together and essentially considered to be equal. Don't bother checking, I'll save you the time. 2,525 is still not equal to 205.


I suppose that based on volume of pattern recognition numbers Durped in this makes it cooler looking than some of the other gematria out there. But when the infinite number of Chinese calendar typing monkeys or an impatient cheating Chinese calendar rat have no defined starting and ending points for dates and 4,823,092,711 elisions to work with it's going to happen. I could do this for any topic, but choose not to.


I must object to the 161 and 191. Sixes and nines are similar if you are Durping. However, you are not entitled to your own facts. 161 and 191 are not equal. Johannson's name is not spelled with null values. The letter o and nothing are not the same. Although his name as the solution to a rigged Wheel of Fortune show would be fun when it comes time for people to try and pronounce a jh or nnsn diphthong.


You can't shoehorn in your definition of exact by golden hammering it in by blanket statements such as, "This is how gematria works.". You need a precedent. Rules to actually follow. Once you make a list of exactly which numbers do not have a connection to which other numbers we can start there and talk about it more. Don't forget to include prime numbers, dropping digits, rearranging, AND anything else you think should be allowed that your lot hasn't already suggested fits the gematria definition of equal.