This is a companion piece to Gematria Debunked By Screwing Up the Concept of Ritual Sacrifice. Don't worry. No need to go back, I'll catch you up to speed here.
What we had was numerous sacrifices to the solar eclipse. A lot of them well in advance of the August 21st date of the actual event. Weeks or even months in advance.
I'm sticking by my assessment that this is not logical. A more classical example of a sacrifice would be to kill an animal or person in hopes that the higher power in question favors you for an upcoming event that has not happened. (Hint to Sacrificers: Use a baby goat. They're called 'kids' and if the higher power in question isn't paying attention you might get credit for a human. You probably would rather have PETA mad at you than Dexter or Interpol.). Here deity type thingie- I'll trade you this calf, two boxes of peas and an autographed Don Mattingly rookie card if we can PLEASE just have a nice corn crop this one time. The desired corn crop is not a "given". If it happens, then you can assume that at least parts of the sacrifice were spot on. If it sucks ass, well, don't blame the higher power. You screwed up the sacrifice. It's also confusing that you are sacrificing to an unspecified higher power. Not sure what the bankers/freemasons/government/whatever conglomerate you've vaguely chosen for the membership of your evil empire wants with dead celebrities.
The difference here is that we knew through solid science (which tells us humans can't manufacture hurricanes, much less direct them at a target) exactly when the eclipse was going to happen. What you probably mean is that a sacrificial OFFERING was appropriate. Thank you mighty higher unspecified power for that glorious retina destroying solar eclipse. Here's 10% of my last paycheck. Celebrate the successful event after it happens. You can do both.
But, having the attention span of two year olds and not really thinking about the crap that they are spewing out they've pretty much missed their window of opportunity on this one.
Glen Campbell was purposefully mentioned in my previous post. The span of days of his death before the solar eclipse is roughly equivalent to September 3rd is after the eclipse. It is the same when you can consider the arbitrary use of including an end date or not. September 3rd is important. 9/3. 93 million miles meaning the Sun (which it's not). And this date was used in reference to the Sun in gematria narratives. I even waited a couple of extra days. Nobody got the idea that celebrity deaths after the 22nd or so were a sacrificial offering. September 3rd being 93 would have been a logical choice - eclipse and sun being ok school chums. Yet the deaths were all attributed to Harvey.
Now just a tiny bit of numerology.
A SLAUGHTER OFFERING=93.
That's not a completely made up phrase. They do use Wikipedia. It's in there.
Celebrities kick the bucket all the time. Tone Hooper died between the eclipse and 9/3. Just as close to the eclipse as Campbell. But he's Harvey material because one famous movie has Texas in the title.
Out of sight, out of mind. Eclipse is no longer in the headlines. Don't ever expect anything resembling actual research from these guys. It's all reactive narrative.
No comments:
Post a Comment