Congratulations for introducing yet another concept in the realm of things that weren't terribly well thought out, you chucklenoggins.
As soon as the news alert flashes the reaction is to find out what the numerology proves about what really happened. Even if our ok friend #113 doesn't appear there's a good chance we will be reminded that this is fake news. No, it wasn't an electrical fire. It was the Bavarian Illuminati! Mainstream =113! They are lying! Dishonest=113!
If you think about this for a bit, it makes absolutely no fucking sense. You're trying to offer you narrative as the substitute for the mainstream media report. Gotta wake the sheep up to what's really going down. Eventually, if you're not just being whiny little bitches, the sheep will be wakened. And then your story becomes the mainstream. Which means you're dishonest. Which means your report can't be believed. Which means that what was previously reported as the mainstream is now the alternative and what they would have said is true. Which means.........
Uggh.
It's funny that with how much hatred there is of the mainstream media that there's an awful lot of cutting and pasting of news headlines into the Kelinator's spreadsheet. It's our old friend of reporting after the fact. There's never a viable positive alternative offered, even if the numerology can be used to do so. Remember, VERACIOUS=113 in the simple elision (cipher).
The number 113 by itself is paradoxical, not just contradictory. If the mainstream media is always fake, what's the alternative to get the real story out? The go to outlet is to stink up YouTube with your hoax story.
Once we've reached the point of copying headlines into numerology calculators we're in reduction elision territory. Grease Fire Started In Sorority Kitchen Kills 23' isn't going to get you any matches. (And I object to the PhraseShopping of MAINSTREAM to be 113. Mainstream what? It doesn't have to be the word media that follows. It's like claiming fidget spinners are satanic when only the word 'fidget' equals 666 in the reverse Sumerian elision.)
So a quick exercise in reduction PhraseShopping.
Second try here:
YouTube Numerology videos =113 in the reverse elision.
Just want to complain about a single video?
YouTube Gematria Video =113 in the reverse elision.
Both of those phrases are not extremely awkward and arguably valid narrative for 113 in any elision. The paradox isn't even a real pardox, because as far as explaining the world we live in, numerology is and always will be, completely useless.
Friday, August 4, 2017
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Math Lessons In Gematria
Yeah, this Sacred Geometry stuff is hard. All that tough geometry with its angles and surface areas and Pi and stuff. Or maybe it's supposed to be Scared Geometry. The actual geometry is afraid to show its face.
Twice now I've seen the parenthetical proof of this wonder from the deep theoretical realms of geometry. I'm not making this up.
1+1=2
I think I know why I've been subjected to this insult to my intelligence.
It's not an insult similar to Hubbard treating us to a story about how you stick up son fingers on one hand, stick down some others and basically gives us a lesson that 1+9, 2+8, 3+7, 4+6 and 5+5. It's a ruse because 11 is special. It's super sacred. Super dooper extra sacred. It's a master number.
I have seen this super sacredity (real word) mentioned before. They do love double digits. 11 and 22 are both master numbers. Or one is a master number, the other is a master builder number or something. Maybe all duals are masterful. It's used in narrative as being so special that it doesn't get reduced. Except of course when it's not so masterful that you want to reduce it.
In the old days you would just trot out your KSV exception elision (cipher) which doesn't reduce K=11 and V=22. But now that we're mixing and matching date numerology with word numerology, if I write it out 1+1=2, maybe nobody will notice.
Or maybe I'm just smart and not everybody realizes it. Sure, that could be it. So here's some numbers that might interest these guys. And maybe the critics, too.
Hubbard promised that his post on July 30th would be his last until the book was finished. The book was apparently finished in 2 days.
July 30, last post
July 31, 1 day off
August 1st, 1 day off
August 2nd, new post modestly not mentioning completion of the book
1+1=2
colleen's Youtube channel. Lauded for its novel approach to presenting a video of numbers being typed into the Kelvinator's spreadsheet. Nine videos put up two weeks ago, and nothing since. Total 250 views over those videos.
250/9 =27.77 average # of views per video
The presidential campaign fundraiser. Goal of $100,000. Currently at $711 over 35 days. Last donation two weeks ago.
$711/35 =$20.3/ day
Time to completion of fundraiser at a pace of 13.5 years.
Time to reach fundraising goal at pace of last two weeks = never
Twice now I've seen the parenthetical proof of this wonder from the deep theoretical realms of geometry. I'm not making this up.
1+1=2
I think I know why I've been subjected to this insult to my intelligence.
It's not an insult similar to Hubbard treating us to a story about how you stick up son fingers on one hand, stick down some others and basically gives us a lesson that 1+9, 2+8, 3+7, 4+6 and 5+5. It's a ruse because 11 is special. It's super sacred. Super dooper extra sacred. It's a master number.
I have seen this super sacredity (real word) mentioned before. They do love double digits. 11 and 22 are both master numbers. Or one is a master number, the other is a master builder number or something. Maybe all duals are masterful. It's used in narrative as being so special that it doesn't get reduced. Except of course when it's not so masterful that you want to reduce it.
In the old days you would just trot out your KSV exception elision (cipher) which doesn't reduce K=11 and V=22. But now that we're mixing and matching date numerology with word numerology, if I write it out 1+1=2, maybe nobody will notice.
Or maybe I'm just smart and not everybody realizes it. Sure, that could be it. So here's some numbers that might interest these guys. And maybe the critics, too.
Hubbard promised that his post on July 30th would be his last until the book was finished. The book was apparently finished in 2 days.
July 30, last post
July 31, 1 day off
August 1st, 1 day off
August 2nd, new post modestly not mentioning completion of the book
1+1=2
colleen's Youtube channel. Lauded for its novel approach to presenting a video of numbers being typed into the Kelvinator's spreadsheet. Nine videos put up two weeks ago, and nothing since. Total 250 views over those videos.
250/9 =27.77 average # of views per video
The presidential campaign fundraiser. Goal of $100,000. Currently at $711 over 35 days. Last donation two weeks ago.
$711/35 =$20.3/ day
Time to completion of fundraiser at a pace of 13.5 years.
Time to reach fundraising goal at pace of last two weeks = never
Wednesday, August 2, 2017
So You Want To Get Into Gematria, Eh?
Sadly, there are bound to be those out there that simply can't resist the siren's call. It almost got a hold of me. I read about it on Wikipedia and it sounded really cool. I watched the videos and read the blogs. Astounding mysteries on the synchronicity on life revealed. Mysteries of psyops and false flags unfolded. And....
Geez the history on Wikipedia and what's done currently have little to do with each other.
All the scholarly references to gematria talk about how letters were assigned corresponding numbers. Sections of text, usually religious, are translated into numbers. Matching sections are analyzed.
There's nothing that can be found about many of the goings on now. There are so many differences I know I can't list them all here. I'll forget some, wishing I mentioned it.
Narrative is now always conspiracy theory.
Using multiple systems and cross matching.
Matching date and word numerology together.
Pattern recognition, 74=47. Moore =Moors
Misquoted science and history.
Changing a number directly into another (prime number lists, spelling out "thirty-six", adding divisors together).
Personal and unverifiable data sources (numerology on the dream you had last night)
And constantly repeated subsets of these inconsistencies between scholarly and "modern" gematria. I could spend all August trying to recap the science and history liberties that have been taken to prove a point.
So, you can't help but heed the siren call. Just run with it. If you want to believe that Bill Paxton was a masonic sacrifice for the upcoming solar eclipse, knock yourself out. The lack of rules is what you're attracted to. Actually, now is the perfect time to get into it. You could be the new leader of this leaderless group. It's time for a change and you could be the new top banana.
I'm not suggesting an overhaul ala Dianetics turning into Scientology. Embrace your own set of peccadilloes and stick to them. Some, all of what I mentioned. Add some new material. You have instant credibility since there are no rules.
Now is the right time because there is a bit if a power vacuum. Video channels have been shut down. Books are being pretended to be written. Remaining video channels appear to be walking on eggshells and showing more restraint than just a few months ago. I recommend beginning with a new How To introductory video for you.
Because of the shutdowns some old material has been lost. It's no fun being crazy by yourself, so you need some buddies. To start with, come to a decision on how to pronounce gematria. I've heard three of four possible combinations in regards to whether it's a hard or soft G and whether the first A is long or short. Don't title the video the same as the one option that is currently out there. "How to Gematria and better understand the world we live.". It might be cool to walk into a bar and tell the bartender to "beer" you. You do Google something. But this is a languaged based practice and using a noun as a verb is awkward and pretentious. And you mean, "the world in which we live." Or "the world we live in.". Drop the idea that this has connections to historical gematria other than naming the process and the basics of A=value 1, B=value 2, etc.... Try to be consistent. I know it's hard, but it will make you look less unscholarly. Drop the hate speech. Even if you are a misogynist, nobody needs to see numerology on BITCH (or worse) and what ethnicities and sexual orientations you object too.
After that, well. No rules anywhere to follow. Those are just suggestions. You can get going and make it pretty far. You'll only have to deal with me and my friends after you start to get any traction.
Geez the history on Wikipedia and what's done currently have little to do with each other.
All the scholarly references to gematria talk about how letters were assigned corresponding numbers. Sections of text, usually religious, are translated into numbers. Matching sections are analyzed.
There's nothing that can be found about many of the goings on now. There are so many differences I know I can't list them all here. I'll forget some, wishing I mentioned it.
Narrative is now always conspiracy theory.
Using multiple systems and cross matching.
Matching date and word numerology together.
Pattern recognition, 74=47. Moore =Moors
Misquoted science and history.
Changing a number directly into another (prime number lists, spelling out "thirty-six", adding divisors together).
Personal and unverifiable data sources (numerology on the dream you had last night)
And constantly repeated subsets of these inconsistencies between scholarly and "modern" gematria. I could spend all August trying to recap the science and history liberties that have been taken to prove a point.
So, you can't help but heed the siren call. Just run with it. If you want to believe that Bill Paxton was a masonic sacrifice for the upcoming solar eclipse, knock yourself out. The lack of rules is what you're attracted to. Actually, now is the perfect time to get into it. You could be the new leader of this leaderless group. It's time for a change and you could be the new top banana.
I'm not suggesting an overhaul ala Dianetics turning into Scientology. Embrace your own set of peccadilloes and stick to them. Some, all of what I mentioned. Add some new material. You have instant credibility since there are no rules.
Now is the right time because there is a bit if a power vacuum. Video channels have been shut down. Books are being pretended to be written. Remaining video channels appear to be walking on eggshells and showing more restraint than just a few months ago. I recommend beginning with a new How To introductory video for you.
Because of the shutdowns some old material has been lost. It's no fun being crazy by yourself, so you need some buddies. To start with, come to a decision on how to pronounce gematria. I've heard three of four possible combinations in regards to whether it's a hard or soft G and whether the first A is long or short. Don't title the video the same as the one option that is currently out there. "How to Gematria and better understand the world we live.". It might be cool to walk into a bar and tell the bartender to "beer" you. You do Google something. But this is a languaged based practice and using a noun as a verb is awkward and pretentious. And you mean, "the world in which we live." Or "the world we live in.". Drop the idea that this has connections to historical gematria other than naming the process and the basics of A=value 1, B=value 2, etc.... Try to be consistent. I know it's hard, but it will make you look less unscholarly. Drop the hate speech. Even if you are a misogynist, nobody needs to see numerology on BITCH (or worse) and what ethnicities and sexual orientations you object too.
After that, well. No rules anywhere to follow. Those are just suggestions. You can get going and make it pretty far. You'll only have to deal with me and my friends after you start to get any traction.
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Lucy Furcertain Questions Pi References In Gematria
Lucy has more than a passing interest in Gematria Pi references. During her university days she was required to write a four digit number of pages thesis to pass. (Having flunked the midterm as she was too busy socializing.)
Passing was used in the above reference in its meaning of 'casual', but in this case her collegiate success hinged on this paper. Ordinarily she would have just slept with the TA, but that wasn't her style. She got the nickname Loosey Lucy because she did that for fun, not grades. But four digits for pages? That's way too much for ordinary gematria to handle. So she really needed to buckle down and do what numerologists do best. Not work diligently. Cheat.
Pi references now include digits in regards to the fractional approximations. 22/7 =227. 355/113...hey 113 popped up in my narrative. That means Pi, too. To hell with the numerator. Also, 1117=117 and 707=77 and so forth. Lucy created the master plan to combine these two rules together and flesh out two pages into 3140. By simple multiplication. Here's how she did it.
Start with 355/113. Multiply both numerator and denominator by Pi. 3.14 is close enough. You are going to drop all fractions anyway, it will be 'close enough.' Multiply both numerator and denominator by Pi again. Whoa look at that!
That's a nice juicy numerator of 3500.16. Which rounds to 3500. Drop the zeroes, 35. The denominator rounds to 1114. 114 means Pi, too! 3500/1114=3.14 "and so on."
Now to fill out the thesis to 3140 pages, start with multiplying both fractional parts by two. 70 and 228 mean Pi. And so on page after page after page.
To this day gematria narratives include all kinds of things that equal 227 and lately 113 (355 is beyond the matching range and calling it 35 is either too obvious or would get called out for the rounding to 35 or 36.). Even though the narrative itself has to do nothing with Pi, other than the knee jerk 'it's not 666, but 227 is in my list of cool numbers!'
Lucy questions why 70 isn't used for Pi, when she already proved its validity in the above manner. And it's a lovely number that means SUICIDE, YAHWEH, and DEMONS in the simple elision (cipher). Perhaps this is respect for her work. You wouldn't want to get caught plagiarizing. Unlikely, nobody ever quotes any historical references on using it not using any rule that appears to have been created off the cuff. (Consonants only, 74=47, writing numbers as letters to make new numbers, etc....)
More likely is- One, she might favor you and live up to her college nickname if you respect her. And two, she is a demon. She could force you to commit suicide.
But what a way to go! Because demons and suicide both equal 70 which means Pi!
Passing was used in the above reference in its meaning of 'casual', but in this case her collegiate success hinged on this paper. Ordinarily she would have just slept with the TA, but that wasn't her style. She got the nickname Loosey Lucy because she did that for fun, not grades. But four digits for pages? That's way too much for ordinary gematria to handle. So she really needed to buckle down and do what numerologists do best. Not work diligently. Cheat.
Pi references now include digits in regards to the fractional approximations. 22/7 =227. 355/113...hey 113 popped up in my narrative. That means Pi, too. To hell with the numerator. Also, 1117=117 and 707=77 and so forth. Lucy created the master plan to combine these two rules together and flesh out two pages into 3140. By simple multiplication. Here's how she did it.
Start with 355/113. Multiply both numerator and denominator by Pi. 3.14 is close enough. You are going to drop all fractions anyway, it will be 'close enough.' Multiply both numerator and denominator by Pi again. Whoa look at that!
That's a nice juicy numerator of 3500.16. Which rounds to 3500. Drop the zeroes, 35. The denominator rounds to 1114. 114 means Pi, too! 3500/1114=3.14 "and so on."
Now to fill out the thesis to 3140 pages, start with multiplying both fractional parts by two. 70 and 228 mean Pi. And so on page after page after page.
To this day gematria narratives include all kinds of things that equal 227 and lately 113 (355 is beyond the matching range and calling it 35 is either too obvious or would get called out for the rounding to 35 or 36.). Even though the narrative itself has to do nothing with Pi, other than the knee jerk 'it's not 666, but 227 is in my list of cool numbers!'
Lucy questions why 70 isn't used for Pi, when she already proved its validity in the above manner. And it's a lovely number that means SUICIDE, YAHWEH, and DEMONS in the simple elision (cipher). Perhaps this is respect for her work. You wouldn't want to get caught plagiarizing. Unlikely, nobody ever quotes any historical references on using it not using any rule that appears to have been created off the cuff. (Consonants only, 74=47, writing numbers as letters to make new numbers, etc....)
More likely is- One, she might favor you and live up to her college nickname if you respect her. And two, she is a demon. She could force you to commit suicide.
But what a way to go! Because demons and suicide both equal 70 which means Pi!
Monday, July 31, 2017
New Terminology For This Blog
Just to be clear I'm going to put this out ahead of time. Some long time readers will know. The first of the two, I've already started to avoid "their" terminology. My terminology and the reasons for my use are here.
Ordinal.
Not really just the word ordinal, but their misuse of it when they talk about reverse ordinal. Technically, by definition of ordinal reverse ordinal is really just ordinal. Think of a set of encyclopedias. Every maker of encyclopedias uses the normal English alphabet ordering of the volumes. After volumes devoted to a single letter you end up getting to "j" and "k" which would be really thin just by themselves. So, put them together in one book. Q. Hardly worth an entire volume. Throw that in with P or R. X-Y-Z all together. So you end up with 23 volumes for the letters. Throw in a 24th with appendices and miscellaneous stuff and you have a 24 volume set, a nice multiple of six so you can justify having a volume of the month delivered to you once a month for two years, conveniently billed to your credit card. Order now and you get a tote bag. That's a perfectly good ordinal system based on the alphabet. XYZ is the 23rd volume. Ordinal #23. Maybe some rebel bookmaker wants to do it backwards, start with the end of the alphabet. The Encycopedia Titbrannica? It's still ordinal, just XYZ is now 2nd. What you mean is the 'Standard alphabetical order' and 'reverse standard alphabetical order' because the alphabet doesn't recognize XYZ as a single letter. Now I just need to figure out a way too shorten it since my crack team of acronym makers suggested Standard Alphabetical Numerical Elision and I don't like the idea of referring anything gematria related as being SANE?
Elision?
Did you actually type 'elision?' Do you mean Ellison? Like Harlan Ellison? What's that about?
That's a term I am going to start using. I'm sick of typing "the reverse Sumerian (misnamed) cipher" all the time. Elision is a much better description than cipher to describe what's going on. It means contraction, omission or abridgement. Both ordinal and cipher have been picked for use because they sound cool and scholarly. I can throw around ten dollar words, too. I'll start off slow and begin by referring to a total, say, as being calculated with the Francis Bacon cipher (elision) and eventually drop the word cipher completely. The similarity to the name Ellison is just a happy coincidence since I'm going to use elision on purpose to annoy them. Harlan is considered to be.....kind of a dickhead.
Note:
It has been brought to my attention that the database fields containing the numerical values for the letters in the formerly misnamed ciphers could be referred to as the Elision Fields. Our staff instantly concurred that this was a top notch choice for some upcoming puns. The party bringing this to our attention gets a cookie.
Ordinal.
Not really just the word ordinal, but their misuse of it when they talk about reverse ordinal. Technically, by definition of ordinal reverse ordinal is really just ordinal. Think of a set of encyclopedias. Every maker of encyclopedias uses the normal English alphabet ordering of the volumes. After volumes devoted to a single letter you end up getting to "j" and "k" which would be really thin just by themselves. So, put them together in one book. Q. Hardly worth an entire volume. Throw that in with P or R. X-Y-Z all together. So you end up with 23 volumes for the letters. Throw in a 24th with appendices and miscellaneous stuff and you have a 24 volume set, a nice multiple of six so you can justify having a volume of the month delivered to you once a month for two years, conveniently billed to your credit card. Order now and you get a tote bag. That's a perfectly good ordinal system based on the alphabet. XYZ is the 23rd volume. Ordinal #23. Maybe some rebel bookmaker wants to do it backwards, start with the end of the alphabet. The Encycopedia Titbrannica? It's still ordinal, just XYZ is now 2nd. What you mean is the 'Standard alphabetical order' and 'reverse standard alphabetical order' because the alphabet doesn't recognize XYZ as a single letter. Now I just need to figure out a way too shorten it since my crack team of acronym makers suggested Standard Alphabetical Numerical Elision and I don't like the idea of referring anything gematria related as being SANE?
Elision?
Did you actually type 'elision?' Do you mean Ellison? Like Harlan Ellison? What's that about?
That's a term I am going to start using. I'm sick of typing "the reverse Sumerian (misnamed) cipher" all the time. Elision is a much better description than cipher to describe what's going on. It means contraction, omission or abridgement. Both ordinal and cipher have been picked for use because they sound cool and scholarly. I can throw around ten dollar words, too. I'll start off slow and begin by referring to a total, say, as being calculated with the Francis Bacon cipher (elision) and eventually drop the word cipher completely. The similarity to the name Ellison is just a happy coincidence since I'm going to use elision on purpose to annoy them. Harlan is considered to be.....kind of a dickhead.
Note:
It has been brought to my attention that the database fields containing the numerical values for the letters in the formerly misnamed ciphers could be referred to as the Elision Fields. Our staff instantly concurred that this was a top notch choice for some upcoming puns. The party bringing this to our attention gets a cookie.
The Gematria Critic Comment Of The Month, July 2017
The best part of this is the source instead of the actual comment.
"Numerology is the most harmless activity of the mentally unstable."
I don't agree on the harmless part. You wouldn't be reading this now if I did. I do appreciate the sentiment. Loved seeing a group of people engaging in an intelligent discussion about numerology and giving it the disrespect it deserves.
Some public forum out there has a topic of the day thread. Someone shared a pro gematria post and the insults began flying. Many were harsher (and of course more juvenile) in their assessment. I did say that sarcasm scores points with me when I introduced the awards starting in May. This harmless quote may have been full blown sarcasm. It works well even with general sarcasm.
I found this by researching my daily post and it was on the top page of suggestions for my search phrase. It was a couple of years old. Maybe there are more critics out there than i expected.
"Numerology is the most harmless activity of the mentally unstable."
I don't agree on the harmless part. You wouldn't be reading this now if I did. I do appreciate the sentiment. Loved seeing a group of people engaging in an intelligent discussion about numerology and giving it the disrespect it deserves.
Some public forum out there has a topic of the day thread. Someone shared a pro gematria post and the insults began flying. Many were harsher (and of course more juvenile) in their assessment. I did say that sarcasm scores points with me when I introduced the awards starting in May. This harmless quote may have been full blown sarcasm. It works well even with general sarcasm.
I found this by researching my daily post and it was on the top page of suggestions for my search phrase. It was a couple of years old. Maybe there are more critics out there than i expected.
Sunday, July 30, 2017
The Gematria Factual Error Of The Month, July 2017
This one has been cooking for weeks now. Cooking at a temperature hot enough to melt lead. Maybe the author of the comment thought it was the magic bullet from the smoking gun that proves tennis is rigged. Turns out the bullet was a blob of molten slag.
"The hottest temperature on Venus is 462 degrees. When she (Venus Williams) wins it will be 462 weeks to the day since her last Wimbledon championship."
First, the temperature.
The hottest? Really? How would you know that? I read this and I mentally review what I know about Venus and temperature. It's the hottest planet, not Mercury. It has an elliptical orbit and no tilted axis, so there aren't seasons like on Earth. It's covered in gas that traps heat inside which makes it hotter...Mercury just bounces solar radiation back into space. Now I turn to the Internet to find out if I'm wrong.
Well there's your problems. For one, the top search hit is NASA. Truthers frigging hate NASA. Not just because truthers suck at science in general, but specifically flat Earth and fake moon landing conspiracies. So NASA claiming what I expected, "The AVERAGE temperature is 462 degrees Fahrenheit" can instantly be dismissed as wrong if challenged. They are the enemy, sent by the Prestones (the anti-Freezmasons) to confuse us.
Virtually every other site that gives a number for the temperature is in the ballpark of 462 degrees. And often in the Celsius equivalent in addition to or even instead of the Fahrenheit temperature. Who knows if some yet undiscovered temperature scale will provide the real numerology the Niptucks intended. It might be discovered by Professor Makinschittup. The Makinschittup Scale. Nobody claims to know the hottest temperature ever recorded on Venus. Even if they did, who's to say what the hottest it ever was. We weren't there. I like the one answer I saw the best to the hottest temperature on Venus question. It translates to, "We don't know because it's so fucking hot the probes melt after a couple of hours."
So the hottest comment was a poor choice of words. Average temperature would have been good enough. In this case hotter is 'cooler' than saying 'average.' The number was picked because it conveniently matches the number of weeks between Ms. Williams Wimbledon victories.
If she wins. They also said WHEN she wins.
Uh oh. They usually don't word these things like actual predictions, settling for an if scenario. I ended up watching tennis for the first time in decades. It is a step up the sports entertainment food chain from bowling and golf. I used to play, with some skill. But this one was a must see match for me. Never have I wanted to see someone lose a match so badly in my life. And Venus, in order to keep the fine tradition of numerology being worthless at predictions, curled up into a little tennis ball and got destroyed without much noise. Or racket, if you prefer.
As a former player, I do consider myself qualified to make observations about the match. In regards to a sporting contest between two fine players (as opposed to being rigged to suit numerology needs) it was a classic match up of experience versus youth. Their seeding in the world rankings is about the same. The first set was very competitive. When Venus didn't convert at double set point and ended up losing the first set 5-7 it was pretty much match over. Muguruza broke Williams' serve in the first and third games of the second set and Venus just didn't have the stamina to keep up. Emotional strain of the car crash ordeal didn't help, I'm sure.
Temperature wrong. Prediction wrong. And the author of the comment was proclaimed to be a favorite because he's always coming up with such great ideas. Three strikes, your out. This is why football and basketball are the go to sports for gematria. There aren't enough scores and stats in the others for much numerology.
"The hottest temperature on Venus is 462 degrees. When she (Venus Williams) wins it will be 462 weeks to the day since her last Wimbledon championship."
First, the temperature.
The hottest? Really? How would you know that? I read this and I mentally review what I know about Venus and temperature. It's the hottest planet, not Mercury. It has an elliptical orbit and no tilted axis, so there aren't seasons like on Earth. It's covered in gas that traps heat inside which makes it hotter...Mercury just bounces solar radiation back into space. Now I turn to the Internet to find out if I'm wrong.
Well there's your problems. For one, the top search hit is NASA. Truthers frigging hate NASA. Not just because truthers suck at science in general, but specifically flat Earth and fake moon landing conspiracies. So NASA claiming what I expected, "The AVERAGE temperature is 462 degrees Fahrenheit" can instantly be dismissed as wrong if challenged. They are the enemy, sent by the Prestones (the anti-Freezmasons) to confuse us.
Virtually every other site that gives a number for the temperature is in the ballpark of 462 degrees. And often in the Celsius equivalent in addition to or even instead of the Fahrenheit temperature. Who knows if some yet undiscovered temperature scale will provide the real numerology the Niptucks intended. It might be discovered by Professor Makinschittup. The Makinschittup Scale. Nobody claims to know the hottest temperature ever recorded on Venus. Even if they did, who's to say what the hottest it ever was. We weren't there. I like the one answer I saw the best to the hottest temperature on Venus question. It translates to, "We don't know because it's so fucking hot the probes melt after a couple of hours."
So the hottest comment was a poor choice of words. Average temperature would have been good enough. In this case hotter is 'cooler' than saying 'average.' The number was picked because it conveniently matches the number of weeks between Ms. Williams Wimbledon victories.
If she wins. They also said WHEN she wins.
Uh oh. They usually don't word these things like actual predictions, settling for an if scenario. I ended up watching tennis for the first time in decades. It is a step up the sports entertainment food chain from bowling and golf. I used to play, with some skill. But this one was a must see match for me. Never have I wanted to see someone lose a match so badly in my life. And Venus, in order to keep the fine tradition of numerology being worthless at predictions, curled up into a little tennis ball and got destroyed without much noise. Or racket, if you prefer.
As a former player, I do consider myself qualified to make observations about the match. In regards to a sporting contest between two fine players (as opposed to being rigged to suit numerology needs) it was a classic match up of experience versus youth. Their seeding in the world rankings is about the same. The first set was very competitive. When Venus didn't convert at double set point and ended up losing the first set 5-7 it was pretty much match over. Muguruza broke Williams' serve in the first and third games of the second set and Venus just didn't have the stamina to keep up. Emotional strain of the car crash ordeal didn't help, I'm sure.
Temperature wrong. Prediction wrong. And the author of the comment was proclaimed to be a favorite because he's always coming up with such great ideas. Three strikes, your out. This is why football and basketball are the go to sports for gematria. There aren't enough scores and stats in the others for much numerology.
Saturday, July 29, 2017
The Simpsons Homer The Ingrate (Woodburners Episode)
The Simpsons episode, "Homer The Great" was hugely successful. It had all the elements of classic Simpsons. Pop cultural references, guest voice of Patrick Stewart, a catchy original song that was nominated for two Emmys and, in general, extremely funny.
Most notable about the plot is a biting satire of the 'secret lodge' culture that the current truther community embraces in its narratives. Better parking spaces, free home improvements, free soda and comfy chairs at work, etc.... All if you are part of the right group.
After the financial success of the show, they did what good business folk do. They made a sequel to capitalize on the first one. Not everyone got to see this. Not because it was far below the quality of the original like so many sequels are, but internal squabbles over royalties, residuals and top billing. It only aired twice before the estate of Patrick McGoohan forced it to be pulled off the air. And probably some dark, shadow empire style influence.
The story begins with Marge purchasing a wood burning kit from Ned Flanders at his yard sale. Rod and Todd had used it to make a Ouija Board which was not, according to him, "Bram Stokerly Do-kely". When they open it they find the missing EggMagic piece from the earlier episode, but not the doohickey (planchette) to move over the letters. Naturally Marge notices the oversight as there's no point in wood burning if it can't be used for satanic reasons. Marge wants to give up on it even after much pestering by Bart and Lisa. She ends up throwing it in the trash.
Homer finds it and thinks that the hot etching tool would be a good thing for Maggie to play with. Maggie burns "Call Vincent Price For Planchette" into Homer's forehead. Backwards. Despite the obvious demonic nature Homer calls when he reads it in the bathroom mirror. While waiting for Vincent Price he says, "Well at least she didn't right REDRUM. Everyone knows white rum is the only good rum."
Vincent explains that even he isn't demonically connected enough to find the planchette. Homer will need the Organization of Woodburning Lodgers. The wise OWLs. He transfers the call to the lodge. Homer chugs white rum while on hold.
Reverend Lovejoy knocks on the door with the planchette explaining a lot of the details of the Woodburners community including the requirements, rules and perks. The wood burning kit is only to be used for gematria related requests. Homer realizes that Lovejoy is a high ranking Woodburner and asks if he's number 1. Lovejoy dismisses this as silly, and all are forbidden to talk to number 1 unless he communicates to them first.
Homer sits down for a long session with the wood burned Ouija. After unsuccessfully trying to get beer, a new bowling ball and a demonic TV he grumbles how useless it is and he can't even get a "lousy piece of bubblegum" from the thing. The giant bubble from The Prisoner appears, voiced by McGoohan. After a comical variation of the famous Who's On First? skit with who is number 1 and 2 and 666, McGoohan/Bubble explains that Homer shouldn't be such an ingrate, the wood burned Ouija is for providing misinformation and useless information.
It can't predict anything, but it can let you know what celebrities are already dead. It is a huge source of detailed scientific and historical misinformation. It's previous owner was a museum curator who was too busy for it because he's taking time off to write a book.
Homer is engulfed by the McGoohan/Bubble and is taken back to The Community, now renamed the Truther Community. The We Do song from Homer the Great is reprised with updated lyrics:
Who's satanic toys are fidgets?
Who can count to just two digits?
We do. We do.
Who misquotes distance to the stars,
Keeps arsenic peach in mason jars?
We do. We do.
Who gives cartographers the fits,
By rounding map coordinates?
We do. We do.
Who thinks if Jenna Coleman died,
That she committed Jenna-cide?
We Do! WEEEE DOOOOO!!!!!
The episode ends with Homer dressing up a group of wolverines to reenact the French Indian War.
-------------------------------------
The most notable reason for the lack of air time is that McGoohan stubbornly refused to return from the dead and wouldn't finalize remuneration details.
That, and of course that this does not really exist. I'd like to think it could. There are at least three truther videos out there that acknowledge the original, real episode and despite the mockery of the show and in the comments sections they love the attention. It's like when I spritz water on my dog. He hates it, but even though it's not high quality attention, it's some attention. So here's some more satire for you to embrace. Kudos to you for picking up any of the other Simpsons references I threw in without explanation. The reason the Simpsons has been on so long is because the writers' use of pop culture and humor is entertaining. Not because they are trying to bury numerology in the details.
Most notable about the plot is a biting satire of the 'secret lodge' culture that the current truther community embraces in its narratives. Better parking spaces, free home improvements, free soda and comfy chairs at work, etc.... All if you are part of the right group.
After the financial success of the show, they did what good business folk do. They made a sequel to capitalize on the first one. Not everyone got to see this. Not because it was far below the quality of the original like so many sequels are, but internal squabbles over royalties, residuals and top billing. It only aired twice before the estate of Patrick McGoohan forced it to be pulled off the air. And probably some dark, shadow empire style influence.
The story begins with Marge purchasing a wood burning kit from Ned Flanders at his yard sale. Rod and Todd had used it to make a Ouija Board which was not, according to him, "Bram Stokerly Do-kely". When they open it they find the missing EggMagic piece from the earlier episode, but not the doohickey (planchette) to move over the letters. Naturally Marge notices the oversight as there's no point in wood burning if it can't be used for satanic reasons. Marge wants to give up on it even after much pestering by Bart and Lisa. She ends up throwing it in the trash.
Homer finds it and thinks that the hot etching tool would be a good thing for Maggie to play with. Maggie burns "Call Vincent Price For Planchette" into Homer's forehead. Backwards. Despite the obvious demonic nature Homer calls when he reads it in the bathroom mirror. While waiting for Vincent Price he says, "Well at least she didn't right REDRUM. Everyone knows white rum is the only good rum."
Vincent explains that even he isn't demonically connected enough to find the planchette. Homer will need the Organization of Woodburning Lodgers. The wise OWLs. He transfers the call to the lodge. Homer chugs white rum while on hold.
Reverend Lovejoy knocks on the door with the planchette explaining a lot of the details of the Woodburners community including the requirements, rules and perks. The wood burning kit is only to be used for gematria related requests. Homer realizes that Lovejoy is a high ranking Woodburner and asks if he's number 1. Lovejoy dismisses this as silly, and all are forbidden to talk to number 1 unless he communicates to them first.
Homer sits down for a long session with the wood burned Ouija. After unsuccessfully trying to get beer, a new bowling ball and a demonic TV he grumbles how useless it is and he can't even get a "lousy piece of bubblegum" from the thing. The giant bubble from The Prisoner appears, voiced by McGoohan. After a comical variation of the famous Who's On First? skit with who is number 1 and 2 and 666, McGoohan/Bubble explains that Homer shouldn't be such an ingrate, the wood burned Ouija is for providing misinformation and useless information.
It can't predict anything, but it can let you know what celebrities are already dead. It is a huge source of detailed scientific and historical misinformation. It's previous owner was a museum curator who was too busy for it because he's taking time off to write a book.
Homer is engulfed by the McGoohan/Bubble and is taken back to The Community, now renamed the Truther Community. The We Do song from Homer the Great is reprised with updated lyrics:
Who's satanic toys are fidgets?
Who can count to just two digits?
We do. We do.
Who misquotes distance to the stars,
Keeps arsenic peach in mason jars?
We do. We do.
Who gives cartographers the fits,
By rounding map coordinates?
We do. We do.
Who thinks if Jenna Coleman died,
That she committed Jenna-cide?
We Do! WEEEE DOOOOO!!!!!
The episode ends with Homer dressing up a group of wolverines to reenact the French Indian War.
-------------------------------------
The most notable reason for the lack of air time is that McGoohan stubbornly refused to return from the dead and wouldn't finalize remuneration details.
That, and of course that this does not really exist. I'd like to think it could. There are at least three truther videos out there that acknowledge the original, real episode and despite the mockery of the show and in the comments sections they love the attention. It's like when I spritz water on my dog. He hates it, but even though it's not high quality attention, it's some attention. So here's some more satire for you to embrace. Kudos to you for picking up any of the other Simpsons references I threw in without explanation. The reason the Simpsons has been on so long is because the writers' use of pop culture and humor is entertaining. Not because they are trying to bury numerology in the details.
Friday, July 28, 2017
The Masonic Name Club - Who Is Lucy Allowed To Date?
We've covered the limited opportunities of finding a 666 match in Satanic gematria. Now it's time to bust on reduction methods.
I've gone on record many times that when I hunt for antonyms I limit myself to ordinal and reverse ordinal. If you refuse to acknowledge that WOUND/UNWOUND and GROUP/UNGROUP are clearly opposites and have the same simple system gematria, you're just a closed minded manipulator.
It's time to give satanism a break and go to freemasonry for a reduction review. In some respects being listed here is worse than being a potential dark lord. Masonic concepts are treated with some of the same occult wonder that 666 is regarded. But you don't get the full benefits package. No fire breathing nightmare steed chariot and parking spot close to the Gates of Hell. You're just some shadow empire underling.
Thinking of Miranda Kerr from yesterday, I think the reason she and Orlando Bloom parted ways was not some selfish desire to destroy the coolest celebrity couple name ever - Kerrbloom. The marriage......yes I'll say it, exploded, because they both had celebrity lives and couldn't spend time in both marriage and celebritying (real word). So if things are going to work out long term, even if not marriage, Lucy Furcertain is going to need someone more minionish (another real word) to date. Of course the name Mason comes to mind right away. But being a demonness, she is awfully hot. Blazing hot. So I found a list of names for her to date.
By accident, or not, because who can know exactly what the shadow realm has planned with all the Niptuck confusion going on, there is a movie, D.E.B.S, starring Jordana Brewster (The Faculty). If it's not enough proof of significance that her character name is Lucy in DEBS, I also offer that she was Kim Kardashian in the OJ trial dramatization. Pure evil. Anyway, her DEBS character is a lesbian. So I have a convenient excuse to include girl names in my list.
Not all inclusive. My data generation is from:
FREEMASON (42,48)
FREEMASONRY (58,59)
MASONIC (29,43)
That's the reduction numbers in regular and reversed. MASONIC doesn't seem to be used on the blogs. But these are masonic words. I'd also like to think that Mason's family has some sway in the invisible empire. In charge of the Gates of Hell parking lot or shift manager at the mason jar manufacturing plant. As a gesture of respect, I'll leave him and his 17/28 cronies out if this. I also could have pluralized and used other weird methods. But my patience, although far above average, is not unlimited. This list is long enough. The only other allowance I made is the first few in each of these lists are Jewish Gematria totals. No cross matching between systems other than that. As a concession I'll leave out some of the more soap opera style names I could have included.
29
Diana, Aidan( her twin brother. Threesome? COOL!) Ann, Nadia (foursome?) Ted, Alana, Jen
42
Meg, Bella, Maria, Alex, Dawn, Tim, Joel, Damian, Karl, Janice, Cedric, Cecilia
43
Mark, Andrea, Barbara, Rafael, Todd, Derek, Chloe, Brick, Karla, Wanda, Mona, Annie
48
Bella, Demi, James (Ha! Told you I was dating her!), Tom, Levi, Pamela, Donna, Ethan, Graham, Ellen, Jonah, Rita, Adrianna, Claire, Brandi, Amos
58
Danica, Mabel, Lilah, Ryan, Jesse, Nathan, Nicole, Robin, Danny, Albert, Lily, Roy, Oprah (so Ellen has someone to go to the bathroom with on double dates), Pedro, Daisy, Miles, Joyce, Melinda, Harold, Toni, Natalia
59
Diane, Aiden, Fabian, Maggie, Andie, Jason, Leonid, Joann, Darlene, Brent, Herman, Bonnie, Sherri
There you go self described astute researchers! Get cracking! By your logic these people are obviously freemasons just based on their first name. Just working out all the details of everyone named Mark alone should keep you busy enough to shut the hell up for awhile. You don't want to miss the boat and wait until they die, do you?
I've gone on record many times that when I hunt for antonyms I limit myself to ordinal and reverse ordinal. If you refuse to acknowledge that WOUND/UNWOUND and GROUP/UNGROUP are clearly opposites and have the same simple system gematria, you're just a closed minded manipulator.
It's time to give satanism a break and go to freemasonry for a reduction review. In some respects being listed here is worse than being a potential dark lord. Masonic concepts are treated with some of the same occult wonder that 666 is regarded. But you don't get the full benefits package. No fire breathing nightmare steed chariot and parking spot close to the Gates of Hell. You're just some shadow empire underling.
Thinking of Miranda Kerr from yesterday, I think the reason she and Orlando Bloom parted ways was not some selfish desire to destroy the coolest celebrity couple name ever - Kerrbloom. The marriage......yes I'll say it, exploded, because they both had celebrity lives and couldn't spend time in both marriage and celebritying (real word). So if things are going to work out long term, even if not marriage, Lucy Furcertain is going to need someone more minionish (another real word) to date. Of course the name Mason comes to mind right away. But being a demonness, she is awfully hot. Blazing hot. So I found a list of names for her to date.
By accident, or not, because who can know exactly what the shadow realm has planned with all the Niptuck confusion going on, there is a movie, D.E.B.S, starring Jordana Brewster (The Faculty). If it's not enough proof of significance that her character name is Lucy in DEBS, I also offer that she was Kim Kardashian in the OJ trial dramatization. Pure evil. Anyway, her DEBS character is a lesbian. So I have a convenient excuse to include girl names in my list.
Not all inclusive. My data generation is from:
FREEMASON (42,48)
FREEMASONRY (58,59)
MASONIC (29,43)
That's the reduction numbers in regular and reversed. MASONIC doesn't seem to be used on the blogs. But these are masonic words. I'd also like to think that Mason's family has some sway in the invisible empire. In charge of the Gates of Hell parking lot or shift manager at the mason jar manufacturing plant. As a gesture of respect, I'll leave him and his 17/28 cronies out if this. I also could have pluralized and used other weird methods. But my patience, although far above average, is not unlimited. This list is long enough. The only other allowance I made is the first few in each of these lists are Jewish Gematria totals. No cross matching between systems other than that. As a concession I'll leave out some of the more soap opera style names I could have included.
29
Diana, Aidan( her twin brother. Threesome? COOL!) Ann, Nadia (foursome?) Ted, Alana, Jen
42
Meg, Bella, Maria, Alex, Dawn, Tim, Joel, Damian, Karl, Janice, Cedric, Cecilia
43
Mark, Andrea, Barbara, Rafael, Todd, Derek, Chloe, Brick, Karla, Wanda, Mona, Annie
48
Bella, Demi, James (Ha! Told you I was dating her!), Tom, Levi, Pamela, Donna, Ethan, Graham, Ellen, Jonah, Rita, Adrianna, Claire, Brandi, Amos
58
Danica, Mabel, Lilah, Ryan, Jesse, Nathan, Nicole, Robin, Danny, Albert, Lily, Roy, Oprah (so Ellen has someone to go to the bathroom with on double dates), Pedro, Daisy, Miles, Joyce, Melinda, Harold, Toni, Natalia
59
Diane, Aiden, Fabian, Maggie, Andie, Jason, Leonid, Joann, Darlene, Brent, Herman, Bonnie, Sherri
There you go self described astute researchers! Get cracking! By your logic these people are obviously freemasons just based on their first name. Just working out all the details of everyone named Mark alone should keep you busy enough to shut the hell up for awhile. You don't want to miss the boat and wait until they die, do you?
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Decoding Squared Satan - Lucy's Test Drive
Lucy Furcertain, queen of research of the damned, wanted a test drive in her new Mystery Mobile. Since she was born in the hellfire of '666' gematria it seemed appropriate to look at a blog with a satanic name. Never checked Decoding Satan before. Challenge accepted.
The post title is in honor of PhraseShopping. Ordinarily I would have said Decoding Decoding Satan. But here's another abuser forcing things to make different numbers.
One of Lucy's biggest concerns is where exactly this particular researcher got his start. Was there a model to follow? He has taken some liberties I've never seen before. In the most recent post we have an unusual combination of Tindering dates and Phraseshopping.
Two hundred thirty one days LATER (Caps mine). Oh really? Not content to just use 'two hundred thirty one days' you tacked a 'later' on to the end. To spell it out to get a different number. Why not 'after'? The span has a beginning and an end, why not 'before'? More? Extra? Did you buy stock in a laterhosen company and have a vested interest in how many laters are used?
He does this a lot with the laters. Lucy doesn't care about the consistency as much as a precedent that says 'gematria says you always phrase spelling out spans of days by adding the word 'later'.
Not everyone knows this, but the truther community got into an argument over flat earth gematria. One side claims the numerology is good. The other side claims the numerology is bad and (I'm not making this up) was placed by the enemy to confuse us. The world is a globe. Don't be a flat earth retard. I find the entire conflict to be silly. It's like arguing over whether the moon landing is a hoax because cats have longer whiskers than dogs vs. Satan killed all the unicorns to cover up a masonic ritual. I guess one side is supposed to be less wrong than the other.
Shouldn't other researchers be checking on this guy? What if he's supposed to after things instead of latering things. He was linked in another blog, so he's not some hermit holed up in a cave eating juniper berries and totally crazy from the solitude. If he's wrong, shouldn't someone throw a bucket of water on him and warn everyone else?
That has happened. Inaugural post, no introduction. Just a profile comment that he blogs about gematria. Just goes right into the story of the Israeli oil field. Lots of stuff we've seen before. Gematria is done to get 732. Oh! 237 is 732 backwards! With no precedent let's just add those together because 969 is the number I'm looking for. And the most recent post has a list of 711 numbers. Victoria's Secret, Seattle False Flag, Powder Blue Dress. Where's the Satan connection? How exactly are you decoding Satan with this? I'm not sure about the color of the dress in Devil In A Blue Dress, looks like royal blue in the Denzel movie. Victoria's Secret has Angels. Is that Satanic? Is Miranda Kerr really the antichrist and we're all wrong about Jenna Coleman?
You're way short on details of how this all ties together. The only thing remotely satanic in the current post is.
REVELATION CHAPTER THREE VERSE NINE =717 in Francis Bacon. Which it doesn't. And this is a narrative about 711, not 717. Misspellings and pattern recognition 'close enough' arguments are old hat to Lucy. Must be a powder blue hat.
The bible quote gematria is way off. His research is faulty. Peer review nonexistent. They aren't looking at the work of other researchers. No indication on how he decided to use what excuse for logic he has presented. Just another site out to win some cookies, starting with the conclusion and working backwards.
At least I started this blog with an explanation of my interest in the topic. My arguments are way more factual and logical than any pro-gematria site. That's why I'm dating Lucy, not them. And you should be jealous.
She's a demon in the sack.
The post title is in honor of PhraseShopping. Ordinarily I would have said Decoding Decoding Satan. But here's another abuser forcing things to make different numbers.
One of Lucy's biggest concerns is where exactly this particular researcher got his start. Was there a model to follow? He has taken some liberties I've never seen before. In the most recent post we have an unusual combination of Tindering dates and Phraseshopping.
Two hundred thirty one days LATER (Caps mine). Oh really? Not content to just use 'two hundred thirty one days' you tacked a 'later' on to the end. To spell it out to get a different number. Why not 'after'? The span has a beginning and an end, why not 'before'? More? Extra? Did you buy stock in a laterhosen company and have a vested interest in how many laters are used?
He does this a lot with the laters. Lucy doesn't care about the consistency as much as a precedent that says 'gematria says you always phrase spelling out spans of days by adding the word 'later'.
Not everyone knows this, but the truther community got into an argument over flat earth gematria. One side claims the numerology is good. The other side claims the numerology is bad and (I'm not making this up) was placed by the enemy to confuse us. The world is a globe. Don't be a flat earth retard. I find the entire conflict to be silly. It's like arguing over whether the moon landing is a hoax because cats have longer whiskers than dogs vs. Satan killed all the unicorns to cover up a masonic ritual. I guess one side is supposed to be less wrong than the other.
Shouldn't other researchers be checking on this guy? What if he's supposed to after things instead of latering things. He was linked in another blog, so he's not some hermit holed up in a cave eating juniper berries and totally crazy from the solitude. If he's wrong, shouldn't someone throw a bucket of water on him and warn everyone else?
That has happened. Inaugural post, no introduction. Just a profile comment that he blogs about gematria. Just goes right into the story of the Israeli oil field. Lots of stuff we've seen before. Gematria is done to get 732. Oh! 237 is 732 backwards! With no precedent let's just add those together because 969 is the number I'm looking for. And the most recent post has a list of 711 numbers. Victoria's Secret, Seattle False Flag, Powder Blue Dress. Where's the Satan connection? How exactly are you decoding Satan with this? I'm not sure about the color of the dress in Devil In A Blue Dress, looks like royal blue in the Denzel movie. Victoria's Secret has Angels. Is that Satanic? Is Miranda Kerr really the antichrist and we're all wrong about Jenna Coleman?
You're way short on details of how this all ties together. The only thing remotely satanic in the current post is.
REVELATION CHAPTER THREE VERSE NINE =717 in Francis Bacon. Which it doesn't. And this is a narrative about 711, not 717. Misspellings and pattern recognition 'close enough' arguments are old hat to Lucy. Must be a powder blue hat.
The bible quote gematria is way off. His research is faulty. Peer review nonexistent. They aren't looking at the work of other researchers. No indication on how he decided to use what excuse for logic he has presented. Just another site out to win some cookies, starting with the conclusion and working backwards.
At least I started this blog with an explanation of my interest in the topic. My arguments are way more factual and logical than any pro-gematria site. That's why I'm dating Lucy, not them. And you should be jealous.
She's a demon in the sack.
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
More Lack Of Critical Thinkng
Don't want Dan to think I'll ever forget about him. Here's a three part story.
After my post, "The Master of Lack of Critical Thinking" I wondered that Dan would react in typical fashion if he ever saw it. Specifically would he do numerology on it. When I type in the post title I see that in the full reduction method that yields a total awfully close, but less than 166, his magic number. Since I have critical thinking it was easy for me to connect the dots and take the next step. I understand the way the numbering systems work. The post clearly addresses Dan although not mentioned by name in the title.
Dan, the master of lack of critical thinking = 166
All he needs to to avoid the numerology is substitute Daniel for Dan. But he doesn't think that way.
---------------------------
A fair amount of time ago Dan shared a story of how Ben Gleib, host of Idiotest, was a follower of his Twitter account. This was proven. No doubt about it, the screenshot he provided is solid evidence. Twitter tells you when someone is following you. The next step wasn't taken. The real story is Ben Gleib WAS following him. He commented that among his 114 followers Ben Gleib was among them. Well I checked and he wasn't there.
A perfectly logical explanation would be that Dan, being a fan, followed Ben's Twitter account. Then the account (notice, account...not Ben himself) did an auto follow return of the favor. That account is probably controlled by a publicist. After not seeing any signs of selling merchandise or other profit they simply stopped following Dan. But, for Dan this was a big deal and we get treated to some Idiotest themed YouTube numerology analysis. This isn't too bad, but...
---------------------------
Dan's Bart To The Future video does get more attention than it deserves. Well over 100,000 views. I see this in the comments all the time. I was the 42nd person to watch it! And you talked about 42! Like it means something. In the case of Dan's video here he provides a screenshot showing 155 dislikes. It also shows that he gave it the 👍 himself. It's shaded in blue. And the number 155 means something because of the numerology. To finish the insanity of that plot point,"YouTube kept my dislikes at 155." As if actual people liking or disliking the video had anything to do with it. A number that you have some control over if it changes means something. The possibility for abuse is obvious.
This is an old video of Dan's. It's the Simpsons with Lisa becoming President and Homer looking for Lincoln's gold. When I first found out about it because if his mystery over the Indian tapestry comment left, I checked the comments before my post. To see if I had any more info posted between Dan's post and mine. As a gesture of good faith I disliked it just based on the content without watching it. My dislike was one of the 155. As a further gesture of good faith, I removed my dislike last week. Just to be a dickhead and change the dislikes to 154.
Somewhere between then and yesterday it was back to 155 dislikes. Odds are that Dan or one of his friends noticed the discrepancy and since 155 is magical,changed it back. As a further gesture of good faith I changed the dislikes total to 156 yesterday morning. I'll keep changing it every day just to prove the point. Partial totals, no matter how distantly separated are meaningless. And knowing that it probably drives him crazy...scratch that...crazier is just a happy bonus. Probably the only solution he has is to change the dislikes to 155 and then change the setting to Private. But where's the fun in locking people out from commenting and you getting a clue to look for more numerology?
After my post, "The Master of Lack of Critical Thinking" I wondered that Dan would react in typical fashion if he ever saw it. Specifically would he do numerology on it. When I type in the post title I see that in the full reduction method that yields a total awfully close, but less than 166, his magic number. Since I have critical thinking it was easy for me to connect the dots and take the next step. I understand the way the numbering systems work. The post clearly addresses Dan although not mentioned by name in the title.
Dan, the master of lack of critical thinking = 166
All he needs to to avoid the numerology is substitute Daniel for Dan. But he doesn't think that way.
---------------------------
A fair amount of time ago Dan shared a story of how Ben Gleib, host of Idiotest, was a follower of his Twitter account. This was proven. No doubt about it, the screenshot he provided is solid evidence. Twitter tells you when someone is following you. The next step wasn't taken. The real story is Ben Gleib WAS following him. He commented that among his 114 followers Ben Gleib was among them. Well I checked and he wasn't there.
A perfectly logical explanation would be that Dan, being a fan, followed Ben's Twitter account. Then the account (notice, account...not Ben himself) did an auto follow return of the favor. That account is probably controlled by a publicist. After not seeing any signs of selling merchandise or other profit they simply stopped following Dan. But, for Dan this was a big deal and we get treated to some Idiotest themed YouTube numerology analysis. This isn't too bad, but...
---------------------------
Dan's Bart To The Future video does get more attention than it deserves. Well over 100,000 views. I see this in the comments all the time. I was the 42nd person to watch it! And you talked about 42! Like it means something. In the case of Dan's video here he provides a screenshot showing 155 dislikes. It also shows that he gave it the 👍 himself. It's shaded in blue. And the number 155 means something because of the numerology. To finish the insanity of that plot point,"YouTube kept my dislikes at 155." As if actual people liking or disliking the video had anything to do with it. A number that you have some control over if it changes means something. The possibility for abuse is obvious.
This is an old video of Dan's. It's the Simpsons with Lisa becoming President and Homer looking for Lincoln's gold. When I first found out about it because if his mystery over the Indian tapestry comment left, I checked the comments before my post. To see if I had any more info posted between Dan's post and mine. As a gesture of good faith I disliked it just based on the content without watching it. My dislike was one of the 155. As a further gesture of good faith, I removed my dislike last week. Just to be a dickhead and change the dislikes to 154.
Somewhere between then and yesterday it was back to 155 dislikes. Odds are that Dan or one of his friends noticed the discrepancy and since 155 is magical,changed it back. As a further gesture of good faith I changed the dislikes total to 156 yesterday morning. I'll keep changing it every day just to prove the point. Partial totals, no matter how distantly separated are meaningless. And knowing that it probably drives him crazy...scratch that...crazier is just a happy bonus. Probably the only solution he has is to change the dislikes to 155 and then change the setting to Private. But where's the fun in locking people out from commenting and you getting a clue to look for more numerology?
Sandy Hook Wheel Of Fortune - I'd Like To Sell A Vowel
Once again, a concept introduced that really wasn't terribly well thought out before it was posted.
Friday, January 3, 2014. Free To Find Truth blog
33: Sandy Hook Exposed and the proof is in the numerology.
Yeah. Right.
This predates my blog by about three years, so it was not until someone specifically mentioned it to me. There is something suggested in this post that jumped out at me as being a little bit odd, different, post worthy for me.
Did you know that there's a form of gematria that you drop all the vowels? Now that you mention it, no. But I'm not surprised. I'm not surprised that it was used to force a total to be what you wanted it to be.
The name used, Lanza, also happens to remove one possible escape hatch. Oh, I didn't mean all vowels, just the letter "a". If there's one vowel to pick, that's the one that shouldn't be removed. So let's turn to linguistics and the way language really works.
Think of our Latin. Pterodactyl. The ptero- prefix relates to flight/wings. The flea is from the insect order SiphonAptera. The ptera still means flight. But the 'a' means without. Literally a siphon without wings. That's why fleas jump; they are one of the few adult insects without wings.
There are lots of words that use the a- prefix to mean without. Atypical. Amoral. Anucleate. If you need one without a second 'a' try agnostic. The powers that shouldn't be decided that gnostic and agnostic have the same numerology? I call abullshit.
Keep in mind the post title regarding proof. All of a sudden a particular type of gematria that 'proves' your point. My isn't that convenient.
Sandy Hook was a terrible tragedy. To implicate numerology having anything to show otherwise is just stupid. In this particular case it's a script so the government can take away our guns. Add that to the list. Gun control. A drill. Corporate advertising. Masonic ritual. You can use numerology for any of those, as well as proving the SPCA trying to get homeless kittens adopted. Especially when you get to make up new systems as you go along.
I thought I might be running out of material in the near future. Looks like I'll just have to check old posts if I'm without a new topic. I doubt he has the time to edit all of the mistakes.
Friday, January 3, 2014. Free To Find Truth blog
33: Sandy Hook Exposed and the proof is in the numerology.
Yeah. Right.
This predates my blog by about three years, so it was not until someone specifically mentioned it to me. There is something suggested in this post that jumped out at me as being a little bit odd, different, post worthy for me.
Did you know that there's a form of gematria that you drop all the vowels? Now that you mention it, no. But I'm not surprised. I'm not surprised that it was used to force a total to be what you wanted it to be.
The name used, Lanza, also happens to remove one possible escape hatch. Oh, I didn't mean all vowels, just the letter "a". If there's one vowel to pick, that's the one that shouldn't be removed. So let's turn to linguistics and the way language really works.
Think of our Latin. Pterodactyl. The ptero- prefix relates to flight/wings. The flea is from the insect order SiphonAptera. The ptera still means flight. But the 'a' means without. Literally a siphon without wings. That's why fleas jump; they are one of the few adult insects without wings.
There are lots of words that use the a- prefix to mean without. Atypical. Amoral. Anucleate. If you need one without a second 'a' try agnostic. The powers that shouldn't be decided that gnostic and agnostic have the same numerology? I call abullshit.
Keep in mind the post title regarding proof. All of a sudden a particular type of gematria that 'proves' your point. My isn't that convenient.
Sandy Hook was a terrible tragedy. To implicate numerology having anything to show otherwise is just stupid. In this particular case it's a script so the government can take away our guns. Add that to the list. Gun control. A drill. Corporate advertising. Masonic ritual. You can use numerology for any of those, as well as proving the SPCA trying to get homeless kittens adopted. Especially when you get to make up new systems as you go along.
I thought I might be running out of material in the near future. Looks like I'll just have to check old posts if I'm without a new topic. I doubt he has the time to edit all of the mistakes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)