Gematria Debunked By The Pythagorean Theorem

While not taking pot shots at little girls getting creamed by foul balls at a baseball game Dan took time to put out a North Korea video. In the limited commentary, The Kelvinator himself offered this observation. Bear in mind, this is coming from a gematria"expert":


"I would feel better if there was are a rule, though. Like "S" only counts as 10 if it's a plural..."


This response was regarding Dan's gematria work on John Stafford Smith, apparently quoted multiple times in the video as being 88. And this was wrong because it should have been 97 since there are two S's in his name. It's beside the point that 88 in the S Exception elision is just dead wrong, it would be 87. What's curious is that instead of saying, "Dan, you're dead wrong.", we now bring up discussion of rules.


Isn't it a little late to be making up rules at this point? It's an admission of guilt. "All these ciphers except for simple ordinal and Jewish have been created in the past decade, so since we have no historical precedent for doing 99.9% of the things we do, let's make up some rules now."




So this is Sacred Geometry. Without any math other than simple addition. Pythagoras is revered as some kind of god and mentioned in in some blog posts and Hubbard's phantom book. Pythagoras, who more than likely never turned a single word into a number in his life would most likely have handled the mixture of letters and numbers in a completely different way. The Pythagorean Theorem. A squared x B squared = C squared. We know that the Greeks did understand that A squared = AxA, not A+A. Certainly not reducing the value of one letter A and not the other.


I'm not saying that multiplication is the only valid approach to numerology. Yet if there was any serious research on cipher creation, don't you think it would have been mentioned, especially if your system includes Pythagoras and geometry?


The answer is simple. It hasn't been bothered with because the numbers get too big. Which is what a properly encrypting cipher would do, not turning everything into 33.


Instead of large properly encrypted results with zero matches they've substituted a near infinite number of ways to create a near infinite number of matches then pick and choose claiming remarkable synchronicity. Everything could b puppies, rainbows and unicorns but their true nature is exposed by choosing conspiracy, death and hatred.