My Factual Error of the Month award is a sanity preservation measure on my part. If I did nothing but poke at the gross lack of science in gematria I could still easily make my one post a day self imposed limit. (Often a second post sneaks in, usually comic relief after addressing a more serious topic.)
There are much better scientific minds than mine in place. My degree and scientific experience let me easily identify things that aren't or can't be true based on common sense. Then I might be able to work through a calculation of how much force there is in a 100 mph batted foul ball there is hitting a girl at a Yankees game. Metabunk is a collection of minds that debunks specific claims of conspiracy evidence. Although I'm a member I'm a bit out of place. There's not real science in gematria to debunk.
However, recent events are making me take on a homework project. Let's see what they say about hurricanes. Before I get the expected answer of, "That's impossible to calculate because it just can't be true", let's review why I'm asking.
More Hubbard videos proving the Earth isn't flat. That's at least 10. And they aren't numerology based. They are science based evidence that describe the fact that the Earth is indeed, not flat. Quoting real science and real facts to implicate that because you are wrong, by default, and conveniently forgetting that real science says lots of your claims are just not true.
Hurricanes. Without any mention of the specifics of how it might work, we are supposed to take it on faith that government controlled hurricanes are a deep part of the New World Order agenda. Just a few days ago we heard again about Hurricane Harvey. (Reference life span of a ritual event post.). Lots of throw ins that don't make any sense. The McGregor/Mayweather fight, the World Series, blah, blah, blah.
Do you know how much energy there is in a hurricane? In strict scientific terms, a shit load. More like a shit load of shit loads. And we're supposed to ignore the adage that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence regarding hurricanes because....er,...the Earth isn't flat?!
The wind speed alone releases 1.5 x 1000000000000 watts or 1.3 x 1000000000000000 joules of energy per day. Roughly half the electricity generating capacity of the planet. For one hurricane. For one AVERAGE hurricane. For one day! And these monsters aren't just created, but they're aimed at a specific target, which presumably by laws regarding matter and energy that are scientifically accepted requires even more energy. Then when you start talking about the additional energy for cloud formation and rain the energy output increases the joules to a factor of 10 to the 17th power or 200 times the electricity generating capacity of the planet per day.
The significant energy expended in attacking and defending flat Earth going on now kinda doesn't explain how this excessive use of hurricanes being aimed at specific locations can happen. Because it can't. We're tiny specks and Mother Nature is an awesome force.
What this means to a reader here? There are lots if people like me that don't take kindly to sloppy science. In Dan's foul ball hitting the little girl video he says, "I don't know how they do it." Yeah, of course because they CAN'T. Maybe if you checked out a site like Metabunk you could have gotten a satisfactory explanation. Not that you'd understand it, even without your numerology confirmation biases. But the real info is out there. Don't take anything for granted these chuckleheads say. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
So, being scientifically diligent I'll ask the Metabunk forum if anyone wants to take a stab at calculating how much energy it takes to aim a hurricane. Just so I can say I checked instead of you taking just my word for it. In the meantime, my joke answer is:
Aiming hurricanes was described in detail in the documentary Joule of Denial, narrated by Kathleen Turner and Michael Douglas. Turner went on to narrate Who Framed Roger Rabbit, explaining why The Simpsons has so much gematria significance. Douglas also narrated the documentary on the global financial collapse, Wollongong Street.
I'll share Metabunk's reply, if I get one.
The idea of reintroducing science into the flat Earth flame war is another reason the book will fail. There's no such thing as peer review, a requirement for the scientific method. Metabunk and all good science is appalled.
No comments:
Post a Comment