http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/42-58-113-youtube-star-kian-lawley.html
Here's a great example of what happens with the repetitive content and how truly meaningless it is. Because Hubbard is so prolific (and apparently still ignoring finishing the book) the same two and three digit numbers keep showing up.
Most things tie into recent history. Super Bowl this and Super Bowl that. Maybe by the time the NBA finals roll around the magical synchronicity will start to mean basketball. For an undetermined amount of time, the Super Bowl is THE event that the tiny little numbers absolutely MUST be related to. It's so obvious that it's amazing the shape don't see why 42 means Super Bowl in some way instead of 42 meaning August 2017 eclipse or whatever.
The main point of this is not to bring up that Rasual Butler a basketball player and Oscar Gamble a baseball player were sacrificed for a football game. That's part of the problem. In the big picture, children shouldn't be allowed access to loaded guns and truthers should not have access to databases, written notes or a memory beyond a couple of days. It's too easy to come up with a tiny number like 42 and check for recent matches, then proclaim that the two without any doubt are related. Since the word of the month is shoehorn, then we'll throw that in here. For now 42, 52, 62, 77 and others are shoehorn bait to instant mean event totally unrelated to the Super Bowl now means Super Bowl.
So let's pretend that Oscar Gamble's death was really caused by this evil nearly infinitely powered not-so-secret-after-all cabal, but it was really related to the previous sacrifice of Roy Halladay. Both Philadelphia Phillies baseball players. Both died in relatively recent history. If the elites are still milking the Hurricane Harvey aftermath then Halladay's death doesn't seem too distant in the past. OSCAR GAMBLE =66 (rev. reduced) and ROY HALLADAY=66 (ALW). Now you lose part of this narrative about Kian Lawley. Is it really that important to add in how many video views to the story? Because:
1). Over 42,000 does not equal 42.
2). A number that wasn't derived from a word isn't really gematria.
3). 42 isn't even right in the first place.
The problem is that the name of the YouTuber that leaked the video is not JUSTIN TRASH, but simply JUST TRASH. Which on a quick check without playing around with prime numbers or whatever doesn't have an immediate elision generated 42.
This happens occasionally. I saw it immediately, but I don't really count, not because I'm looking for trouble (which I am) but more so because I have vastly better powers of observation than most people. And here in the comments, nobody mentions it. The video output of the day did have someone else spot it, but without mention that the gematria is just wrong. We certainly don't have a correction here on the morning after. Additional video commentary remarks that it's related to Justin Timberlake without recognition that he's not just Just Timberlake.
And in addition to the 42 we have a 159 and 93 connection in the narrative also based on the wrong name. I don't think the name was intentionally misspelled, merely Justin on the brain after the Super Bowl halftime show.
More to the point is not that there was a mistake made and saying nanner nanner boo boo! It's that an alternative story could easily be made based off JUST TRASH. Get the correct numbers, scan your blog conveniently organized by what tiny numbers are there. Try and force the 42k views into it if it's not too much of a stretch.
The one thing that continually mystifies me is why anyone would continue to read the FTFM blog regularly when you know what's coming up.
<NEWS>
Tiny numbers
Numbers=evil.
Over and over again with just some slight variation of exactly what the tiny numbers are. Here's a comparison of what this boils down to.
Unedited:
JUSTIN TRASH
42, 93, 159
Look at database
Those are evil numbers
Corrected:
JUST TRASH
pick through for some tiny numbers you like
Look at database
Those are evil numbers.
When the Chinese calendar rolls over to the year of the typing monkey they could easily duplicate this trashy analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment