I've been too science heavy lately, so let's turn this to the world of entertainment.
The Dark Side of the Rainbow. If you play Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon while watching The Wizard of Oz it magically synchs up. Can't say I'm surprised that this was brought up. The myth of this synchronicity is perfectly suited towards the mindset of those that are willing to accept that 15 cool moments of magic overrides the 5 million things that mean nothing. Let's call this the Dark Side of the Confirmation Bias. For the most part those that believe this are huge Pink Floyd fans. There ain't a whole lot of die hard Oz fans that light up a doobie and think the movie was actually predictive programming for the album. At least the timeline is right.
For all the places that you can find those that swear how real this is you can find the other side that says it's outright bullshit or more commonly that "it has its moments, but it's just coincidence". Here's a quickie blog post:
http://kmuw.org/post/musical-space-dark-side-rainbow
The full blown urban legend states the album was purposefully made as a soundtrack for the movie. This is blown out of the water immediately by the fact that the album and the movie aren't even the same length. They aren't even that close, 43 minutes vs. 102 minutes. The defense to that sounds just like a numerologist trying to justify bizarre number generating gyrations, but I'm getting ahead of myself.
The real experience has to be shared in a manner similar to what I have. You need at least two people that are hard core believers, one person that never heard of it before they are trying to convince, and one devil's advocate to point out the flaws.
Mostly the information out there points to starting the album at exactly the right moment, usually the MGM lion's third roar. There's another strike to the theory. That's not 100% in agreement. If you're talking about it without actually doing it you have an escape hatch. You didn't do it just right. That's why you missed the full experience.
And what about the extra 60 minutes? Some say you need to start the album over. But exactly when without the lion roaring cue? This is why the test has two believers. We're building up points that they probably can't come in to total agreement on. Like gematria wizards not being able to agree on if the entire language is encoded or just the phrases that they make up. The skeptic devil's advocate can help point this out.
For an example, the good witch shows up in a bubble just as Money lyricizes "Don't give me all that do goody good bullshit". That's all fine, but it's gematria style thinking just because the word "good" was sung. The believers will point this out to the newbie. The newbie might be awestruck. Or (maybe with a little skeptical help) have it pointed out that it would probably make a helluva lot more sense if she was being whisked away in a bubble instead of arriving to match with "Don't give me..."
In the gematria narrative I saw about this somebody suggested that the album was actually made to synch with The Sound of Music. Apparently completely missing that the Pink Floyd band member that said that was clearly joking. Another band member said something like this synching myth was created by someone with way too much free time on their hands. You betcha. Other synch tests have been tried with mixed results. You can find matches in lots of long concept albums and movies as long as you're willing to let your confirmation bias be your guide.
I haven't heard of anyone that decided to dedicate their life to the Dark Side of the Rainbow being the most meaningful thing to their existence, but I suppose it's happened. Probably not the best way to spend your time. I prefer not to waste my time on manufactured reality. And being told that actual reality is manufactured while the manufactured reality is instead real. Which means this also serves as the Psychological Projection award for February.
Dedicated to exposing the conspiracy grifters that practice the not even high enough on the crank food chain to qualify as "pseudoscience" of gematria. GEMATRIA DECODING =135 COGNITIVE BIAS = 135
Wednesday, February 28, 2018
More Convincing Cipher Creation
If you're going to create new elisions it's easy to make up any complete bullshit way. A gross is 144 of something. Create g=100, r=30, o=10, s=2. Now GROSS=144. That's not very convincing since it's obviously forcing the elision to create the result. It would be downright sad except that apparently it's allowed to be done (reference lack of rules throughout material here) and that compared to some other ways numbers are forced is entirely believable that this would appear.
There is a way to use real math to create believable sounding elisions just to force a word to make a point. This happens but in reverse. A new cipher is made, then there is a whole bunch of "research" on the new toy. Since you're allowed to ignore misses, any new hit created from, say, reverse ordinal is now a brand new gematria value for a word.
So, let's turn to my old friend 113 for this. The process can be duplicated in a similar manner for any word with a lot of synonyms, or if you want to end at just forcing a single word. Single word forcing would be sad, or rather is sad because it's true that this has happened.g Let's make some words meaning "honest" equal 113.
HONESTY has an ordinal value of 106. Note that it's seven letters long and falls seven short of 113. You could take the Satanic approach and make a system where everything is +1 instead of +35. 9+16+15+6+20+21+26=113. If you want another one, this one is a bit more camouflaged. Let's call it the Z Focus elision. Z=1, A=2, B=3, C=4, D=5, E=6...Y=26. Starting the numbering at Z instead of A yields the same mathematical result as long as the word doesn't contain a z, which isn't too common.
SINCERITY=122, 9 letters. Start with A=0 instead of 1. 122-9=113.
REALITY, 99 in reverse. Seven letters. Reverse +2 system will do the trick. 99+(2*7)=113.
FACTUAL, 125 in reverse. Seven letters long and 125-(6x2)=113. Here Z=-1 and Y=0. That's not too much of a problem unless you have a short word with Lots of Z's. And you can always ignore negative values you don't like. 19+24+22+5+4+24+13=111. Declare A to be special to make up for the negative value for the Z's. A=25. FACTUAL =113. The reverse minus two a exception elision. Or Sylvest Stalloneer elision or whatever else you want to call it. (The second name is in honor of Mr. T and his love of Francis Bacon).
The last one got a little weird, but on purpose. Any new creation will generate a new number that can be ignored if you don't like. So let me put it this way.
If you have a math equation that
A=1 or A=2 or A=3. B=19 or B=43 or B=55.
What's A+B? A+B can't be solved. You don't have an equation. Claiming you do just makes you look stupid. The whole business of multiple ciphers and throwing "or" into it ruins any kind of equality that you could avoid with just one numbering system.
There is a way to use real math to create believable sounding elisions just to force a word to make a point. This happens but in reverse. A new cipher is made, then there is a whole bunch of "research" on the new toy. Since you're allowed to ignore misses, any new hit created from, say, reverse ordinal is now a brand new gematria value for a word.
So, let's turn to my old friend 113 for this. The process can be duplicated in a similar manner for any word with a lot of synonyms, or if you want to end at just forcing a single word. Single word forcing would be sad, or rather is sad because it's true that this has happened.g Let's make some words meaning "honest" equal 113.
HONESTY has an ordinal value of 106. Note that it's seven letters long and falls seven short of 113. You could take the Satanic approach and make a system where everything is +1 instead of +35. 9+16+15+6+20+21+26=113. If you want another one, this one is a bit more camouflaged. Let's call it the Z Focus elision. Z=1, A=2, B=3, C=4, D=5, E=6...Y=26. Starting the numbering at Z instead of A yields the same mathematical result as long as the word doesn't contain a z, which isn't too common.
SINCERITY=122, 9 letters. Start with A=0 instead of 1. 122-9=113.
REALITY, 99 in reverse. Seven letters. Reverse +2 system will do the trick. 99+(2*7)=113.
FACTUAL, 125 in reverse. Seven letters long and 125-(6x2)=113. Here Z=-1 and Y=0. That's not too much of a problem unless you have a short word with Lots of Z's. And you can always ignore negative values you don't like. 19+24+22+5+4+24+13=111. Declare A to be special to make up for the negative value for the Z's. A=25. FACTUAL =113. The reverse minus two a exception elision. Or Sylvest Stalloneer elision or whatever else you want to call it. (The second name is in honor of Mr. T and his love of Francis Bacon).
The last one got a little weird, but on purpose. Any new creation will generate a new number that can be ignored if you don't like. So let me put it this way.
If you have a math equation that
A=1 or A=2 or A=3. B=19 or B=43 or B=55.
What's A+B? A+B can't be solved. You don't have an equation. Claiming you do just makes you look stupid. The whole business of multiple ciphers and throwing "or" into it ruins any kind of equality that you could avoid with just one numbering system.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Gematria Debunked By Volcanoes
. Beginning with a question that shouldn't be asked:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180227085252/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/75-papua-new-guinea-earthquake.html?m=1
Why are there so many earthquakes in the Ring of Fire?
Why indeed. Let's try to keep this simple. Got it.
There are a lot of earthquakes in the Ring of Fire because there are a lot of earthquakes in the Ring of Fire.
Now considering the source of the question, I think we can guess that the problematic word is "fire". It could go further than one word depending on the last time Dan watched Return of the King. This is not about hairy footed midgets dropping an object of power into a fictional forge. That forge did have a big ass Eye of Illuminati watching over it, but this is a story. And that author chose to call his eye something different, which I shouldn't mention because now the same people that equate Google deleting videos with Orwell's 1984 will now think volcanoes always mean dinosaurs. Especially after some of the next stuff. If Tolkien meant to have Sauron mean dinosaur I think he could have cooked up a chapter or two with some velociraptors or a T. Rex.
What can be frustrating for those more scientifically aware is that the answer is the question. Why is the Sun called the Sun? Because it's the Sun. I suppose someone could have pushed for an alternate name, yet somehow Ring of Shifting Dirt just doesn't sound as catchy. So, lots of seismic activities, lots of earthquakes, lots of volcanoes blowing up. Ring of Fire, we're stuck with it. I'm partial to calling it Joe, just so Joe vs. The Volcano could actually be Joe vs. Joe. But that's just me.
Continuing with the frustration. Shortly after this post we have the death of Emma Chambers being discussed. Of course her birthday which can be changed into a ton of different things is important. The source of the birthday? Wikipedia. It would have been immensely easy to Google "Ring of Fire" and read Wikipedia or other articles and avoid asking, "Why are there so many earthquakes in a place with so many earthquakes?"
And I doubt it's a serious question. The standards of actual review of internet information is all screwed up. "No, honey. We don't use Wikipedia for the distance to the moon. That's only for movie release dates and celebrity birthdays. You'll understand when you don't get into college.". Don't ask for answers from sources that might not agree with your preconceptions.
Before getting on to more volcanic activity. If I wanted to explain to someone genuinely interested that had just a rudimentary grasp of science but a decent grasp on reality.
The Ring of Fire is pretty big. If you went around the edge in your magic boat you would travel more than 14 times the distance of Los Angeles to New York City. We'll tell you about plate tectonics in high school and college. Just enjoy watching your Lord of the Rings and Jurassic Park movies for now. Especially the crossover scenes where the goat is sacrificed to Sauron at Mount Doom.
Earthquake this, earthquake that. Blah, blah, blah. How convenient that the scale has decimal places so 4.4 can now be declared to be 44. And so on. Our friends that alternate between near omnipotent power and complete and utter incompetence don't seem to care too much about volcanoes. They couldn't even make a scale to measure them beyond 1-8 with no decimal points. If they're manufacturing hurricanes with an even more mundane scale of 1-5 it's not too big a stretch to guess that a volcano would be a much nicer display of power than an earthquake.
Because numerologists are saddled in an inconvenient world where other than Tommy Lee Jones putting up with a volcano in an unlikely spot in fiction they have to put up with the inevitable earthquake accompanying a volcanic eruption. The actual volcano is far more energetic. Like, life threatening when you get to the upper end of the scale. All the crap thrown in the air has killed off lots of species including.....wait for it....dinosaurs, by effectively duplicating nuclear winter. Try using that in your death toll numerology instead of 216 people dying in an earthquake.
The refusal to accept the world we live in knows no boundaries for these guys. Instead of learning about how earthquakes, volcanoes and hurricanes work it's so much easier to say how smart you are and complain if Wikipedia gets updated and changes the death toll to 217 people after they find an additional body the next day.
Instead of a vague prediction of "a major false flag" on March 1st let's see you predict the next 7 or 8 volcano to show up in an unlikely spot.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180227085252/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/75-papua-new-guinea-earthquake.html?m=1
Why are there so many earthquakes in the Ring of Fire?
Why indeed. Let's try to keep this simple. Got it.
There are a lot of earthquakes in the Ring of Fire because there are a lot of earthquakes in the Ring of Fire.
Now considering the source of the question, I think we can guess that the problematic word is "fire". It could go further than one word depending on the last time Dan watched Return of the King. This is not about hairy footed midgets dropping an object of power into a fictional forge. That forge did have a big ass Eye of Illuminati watching over it, but this is a story. And that author chose to call his eye something different, which I shouldn't mention because now the same people that equate Google deleting videos with Orwell's 1984 will now think volcanoes always mean dinosaurs. Especially after some of the next stuff. If Tolkien meant to have Sauron mean dinosaur I think he could have cooked up a chapter or two with some velociraptors or a T. Rex.
What can be frustrating for those more scientifically aware is that the answer is the question. Why is the Sun called the Sun? Because it's the Sun. I suppose someone could have pushed for an alternate name, yet somehow Ring of Shifting Dirt just doesn't sound as catchy. So, lots of seismic activities, lots of earthquakes, lots of volcanoes blowing up. Ring of Fire, we're stuck with it. I'm partial to calling it Joe, just so Joe vs. The Volcano could actually be Joe vs. Joe. But that's just me.
Continuing with the frustration. Shortly after this post we have the death of Emma Chambers being discussed. Of course her birthday which can be changed into a ton of different things is important. The source of the birthday? Wikipedia. It would have been immensely easy to Google "Ring of Fire" and read Wikipedia or other articles and avoid asking, "Why are there so many earthquakes in a place with so many earthquakes?"
And I doubt it's a serious question. The standards of actual review of internet information is all screwed up. "No, honey. We don't use Wikipedia for the distance to the moon. That's only for movie release dates and celebrity birthdays. You'll understand when you don't get into college.". Don't ask for answers from sources that might not agree with your preconceptions.
Before getting on to more volcanic activity. If I wanted to explain to someone genuinely interested that had just a rudimentary grasp of science but a decent grasp on reality.
The Ring of Fire is pretty big. If you went around the edge in your magic boat you would travel more than 14 times the distance of Los Angeles to New York City. We'll tell you about plate tectonics in high school and college. Just enjoy watching your Lord of the Rings and Jurassic Park movies for now. Especially the crossover scenes where the goat is sacrificed to Sauron at Mount Doom.
Earthquake this, earthquake that. Blah, blah, blah. How convenient that the scale has decimal places so 4.4 can now be declared to be 44. And so on. Our friends that alternate between near omnipotent power and complete and utter incompetence don't seem to care too much about volcanoes. They couldn't even make a scale to measure them beyond 1-8 with no decimal points. If they're manufacturing hurricanes with an even more mundane scale of 1-5 it's not too big a stretch to guess that a volcano would be a much nicer display of power than an earthquake.
Because numerologists are saddled in an inconvenient world where other than Tommy Lee Jones putting up with a volcano in an unlikely spot in fiction they have to put up with the inevitable earthquake accompanying a volcanic eruption. The actual volcano is far more energetic. Like, life threatening when you get to the upper end of the scale. All the crap thrown in the air has killed off lots of species including.....wait for it....dinosaurs, by effectively duplicating nuclear winter. Try using that in your death toll numerology instead of 216 people dying in an earthquake.
The refusal to accept the world we live in knows no boundaries for these guys. Instead of learning about how earthquakes, volcanoes and hurricanes work it's so much easier to say how smart you are and complain if Wikipedia gets updated and changes the death toll to 217 people after they find an additional body the next day.
Instead of a vague prediction of "a major false flag" on March 1st let's see you predict the next 7 or 8 volcano to show up in an unlikely spot.
Monday, February 26, 2018
Another Test Of Predictability
I'll have to bring this up since there was a short lived video offering $1,000,000 to anyone that can provide proof of "an intelligent flat earther". Similarly there was a $250,000 (I think) challenge months ago offered for proof that any of various mass shootings were not false flags. In short, unwinnable prizes because shifting the burden of proof to your own version of what the requirements of proof are is an easy counter. The likelihood the prize money actually exists is somewhere between zero and zero. And zero doesn't count.
James Randi is a skeptic world hero that is famous for his million dollar challenge. Prove that you have the ability, the money is yours. And the money actually exists, tucked away in a trust fund earmarked for payment under the extremely unlikely possibility of someone claiming it. A winnable prize.
http://www.skepdic.com/randi.html
Note that there were two major rule changes that seem to give our gematria friends an "out" to the challenge of whether gematria can actually predict anything. How can I meet these requirements when everybody's out to get me?
They, or at least Hubbard, has painted himself into a bit of a corner by waffling around looking super cool with false claims of actual predictions and at times trying to show he's a kind and compassionate person.
The sports crowd is extremely active and there are also a substantial number of detractors pointing out the numerous predictive failures. I've said this myself and others have pointed out that all monetary problems would be solved by simple application of gematria predictive powers to sports gambling. The paint brush moves closer to the corner with the overused counterargument:
"It's not about the money, it's the message."
Yeah, right.
The "I'm really a nice, compassionate guy" content almost always comes out after slamming a group of people. My favorite is the "my personal definition of nigger" blog post deleted shortly after posting. Other things happen like put up a video, the loyal minions oh and ahh about what a great person is. Then within days to weeks the my normal rhetoric like, "All Christians are stupid" appears.
Since somebody brought up how crisis actors could be faking crying, "Did you know crying can be faked? I can do that!". Yes, I did know. I know how to do it, too. It's exactly what I was thinking watching the video where he got all choked up about finding his long lost student was still practicing gematria. To be fair, it was either real or a VERY convincing performance. Pro tip on fake crying- what most fakers forget is the sniffling. You actually need to work up a genuine sadness to get fluid playing havoc with your nasal cavities. Regardless, the video was clearly a "I'm a nice guy" presentation. The loyal minions oh'ed and aah'ed.
And the paint brush moves closer to the corner.
There's a simple solution to proving that you're both a nice guy and not in it for personal gain. It's called C-H-A-R-I-T-Y. The Randi Foundation has encountered that old it's not about the money idea and suggested that you can easily just take the million dollars and donate it. I really don't think the American Cancer Society gives a fuck about where the money came from or how it was obtained. It doesn't even have to be Randi's money. Get a group of the sports "decoders" together. Use the seed money gathered to place some bets in Vegas with the magical power of gematria. Donate a butt load of cash to a real charity (hint, not the Gematria Is Cool Facebook Group) and they will sing your praises to no end. Most legit charities have some kind of levels that have proof of how much was donated, even if the exact number isn't revealed. Being able to point to the Gematria Sports Decoder Group is a Silver Star Supporter is verifiable proof that the outside world can see that the money was raised SOMEHOW. Since gematria comes off as just a way to look like a bad ass instead of actually doing any good this is probably also an unwinnable challenge with that large donation never happening.
I haven't seen any content yet claiming that all charities are stupid. Perhaps it's time to start proving that 501c charities are owned by the mainstream media and therefore dishonest. With the magic power of gematria I could probably do that in short order. I'm going to guess any attempted defense would play out like, "the evil empire is out to get us and thought we were going to keep the money instead of donating it". Which would be like a video with crying and no sniffles. If they know exactly what the intended use of the winnings are there's no reason to bother trying to figure out gambling on sports or even simply guessing the winner of a single game.
James Randi is a skeptic world hero that is famous for his million dollar challenge. Prove that you have the ability, the money is yours. And the money actually exists, tucked away in a trust fund earmarked for payment under the extremely unlikely possibility of someone claiming it. A winnable prize.
http://www.skepdic.com/randi.html
Note that there were two major rule changes that seem to give our gematria friends an "out" to the challenge of whether gematria can actually predict anything. How can I meet these requirements when everybody's out to get me?
They, or at least Hubbard, has painted himself into a bit of a corner by waffling around looking super cool with false claims of actual predictions and at times trying to show he's a kind and compassionate person.
The sports crowd is extremely active and there are also a substantial number of detractors pointing out the numerous predictive failures. I've said this myself and others have pointed out that all monetary problems would be solved by simple application of gematria predictive powers to sports gambling. The paint brush moves closer to the corner with the overused counterargument:
"It's not about the money, it's the message."
Yeah, right.
The "I'm really a nice, compassionate guy" content almost always comes out after slamming a group of people. My favorite is the "my personal definition of nigger" blog post deleted shortly after posting. Other things happen like put up a video, the loyal minions oh and ahh about what a great person is. Then within days to weeks the my normal rhetoric like, "All Christians are stupid" appears.
Since somebody brought up how crisis actors could be faking crying, "Did you know crying can be faked? I can do that!". Yes, I did know. I know how to do it, too. It's exactly what I was thinking watching the video where he got all choked up about finding his long lost student was still practicing gematria. To be fair, it was either real or a VERY convincing performance. Pro tip on fake crying- what most fakers forget is the sniffling. You actually need to work up a genuine sadness to get fluid playing havoc with your nasal cavities. Regardless, the video was clearly a "I'm a nice guy" presentation. The loyal minions oh'ed and aah'ed.
And the paint brush moves closer to the corner.
There's a simple solution to proving that you're both a nice guy and not in it for personal gain. It's called C-H-A-R-I-T-Y. The Randi Foundation has encountered that old it's not about the money idea and suggested that you can easily just take the million dollars and donate it. I really don't think the American Cancer Society gives a fuck about where the money came from or how it was obtained. It doesn't even have to be Randi's money. Get a group of the sports "decoders" together. Use the seed money gathered to place some bets in Vegas with the magical power of gematria. Donate a butt load of cash to a real charity (hint, not the Gematria Is Cool Facebook Group) and they will sing your praises to no end. Most legit charities have some kind of levels that have proof of how much was donated, even if the exact number isn't revealed. Being able to point to the Gematria Sports Decoder Group is a Silver Star Supporter is verifiable proof that the outside world can see that the money was raised SOMEHOW. Since gematria comes off as just a way to look like a bad ass instead of actually doing any good this is probably also an unwinnable challenge with that large donation never happening.
I haven't seen any content yet claiming that all charities are stupid. Perhaps it's time to start proving that 501c charities are owned by the mainstream media and therefore dishonest. With the magic power of gematria I could probably do that in short order. I'm going to guess any attempted defense would play out like, "the evil empire is out to get us and thought we were going to keep the money instead of donating it". Which would be like a video with crying and no sniffles. If they know exactly what the intended use of the winnings are there's no reason to bother trying to figure out gambling on sports or even simply guessing the winner of a single game.
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Take Your Prime Numbers And..., Part 1
Which should be Take Your Prime Numbers And..., Part 2. But 2 is the first prime number and it's actually been quoted that the NWO really gets excited by coding things with prime numbers.
No, they don't. Gematria/numerology loves prime numbers because it's way too easy to find more matches when you start cross matching reduction elisions with non-reduction generated values. Which in actual use is how the prime numbers come into play.
If they say, "Ah ha! But 137 is the 33rd prime number!", what they really mean is, "Ah ha! I got a number I didn't like, so let me change it into another number!"
Why yes, of course you're right. That's so obvious. 33 couldn't possibly mean anything except some kind of vague Judeo Masonic evil figure. And 33 is so uncommon that it's so difficult to produce. Surely everyone except the stupidest retarded troll knows it's not being shoehorned in, but REALLY IS PROOF.
Pffftt.
How about that? I can do things like boldfaced text and insert pictures now. But it's a huge pain in the ass since I can't use shortcuts and have to type the coding in by hand. I'm not going back and editing old posts except maybe putting in some pictures instead of links to pictures.
So the bright idea was to declare that Pi things must mean circles. Which it doesn't since it's really any nonlinear shape, but circles are pretty. So circle. The additional bright idea was to declare that production of 227 means Pi just as much as 314. Some of them don't realize it, but 227 means Pi more than 314 since it's a smaller number and appears more often. That's why it will be defended to the bitter end. It's had too much time invested in it to just say, "Oh, we were wrong".
So add the other bright idea that prime numbers have had so much time investment that those can't be abandoned. 227 is the 49th prime number. 49 is just another tiny number that like 33 has a billion different things it could be equal.
Now cut the cameras away from the home team dugout to my visitors' dugout. I'm fully aware of the reliance on dismissal of things that don't match when they are widely disparate. If I were to suggest that 227=49 means circle and TREE BRANCH=49 I would be ignored.
I've already pointed out that 360 degrees are in a square a long time ago. Not content with stealing away some of their fun, being somewhat bored at times and being am evil prick I continue to build up data supporting that Pi is related to triangles. Because it's not and triangles, like circles, are all over the place. Do you think I can find any triangle words that equal 49?
Here's my list so far:
TRIANGLE
TRIANGULAR
PYTHAGORAS (much more famous for triangles)
HYPOTENUSE
TRIGONOMETRY
Any system that allows so much confusion is useless for getting any real meaning.
No, they don't. Gematria/numerology loves prime numbers because it's way too easy to find more matches when you start cross matching reduction elisions with non-reduction generated values. Which in actual use is how the prime numbers come into play.
If they say, "Ah ha! But 137 is the 33rd prime number!", what they really mean is, "Ah ha! I got a number I didn't like, so let me change it into another number!"
Why yes, of course you're right. That's so obvious. 33 couldn't possibly mean anything except some kind of vague Judeo Masonic evil figure. And 33 is so uncommon that it's so difficult to produce. Surely everyone except the stupidest retarded troll knows it's not being shoehorned in, but REALLY IS PROOF.
Pffftt.
How about that? I can do things like boldfaced text and insert pictures now. But it's a huge pain in the ass since I can't use shortcuts and have to type the coding in by hand. I'm not going back and editing old posts except maybe putting in some pictures instead of links to pictures.
So the bright idea was to declare that Pi things must mean circles. Which it doesn't since it's really any nonlinear shape, but circles are pretty. So circle. The additional bright idea was to declare that production of 227 means Pi just as much as 314. Some of them don't realize it, but 227 means Pi more than 314 since it's a smaller number and appears more often. That's why it will be defended to the bitter end. It's had too much time invested in it to just say, "Oh, we were wrong".
So add the other bright idea that prime numbers have had so much time investment that those can't be abandoned. 227 is the 49th prime number. 49 is just another tiny number that like 33 has a billion different things it could be equal.
Now cut the cameras away from the home team dugout to my visitors' dugout. I'm fully aware of the reliance on dismissal of things that don't match when they are widely disparate. If I were to suggest that 227=49 means circle and TREE BRANCH=49 I would be ignored.
I've already pointed out that 360 degrees are in a square a long time ago. Not content with stealing away some of their fun, being somewhat bored at times and being am evil prick I continue to build up data supporting that Pi is related to triangles. Because it's not and triangles, like circles, are all over the place. Do you think I can find any triangle words that equal 49?
Here's my list so far:
TRIANGLE
TRIANGULAR
PYTHAGORAS (much more famous for triangles)
HYPOTENUSE
TRIGONOMETRY
Any system that allows so much confusion is useless for getting any real meaning.
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Gematria Pro Projects
Let's list some of the projects these guys are undertaking.
The 666 Zip Code Judeo-Masonic Territories
The inspiration for this post; just saw this an hour ago. I'm not sure about the number in the name since it's 33 that makes Parkland hit the list. 33 is much easier to hit than 666 and other than it's more fun to present 33's and whatever other numbers count to win cookies individually, there's really not much reason to not list them all now. I'll give you a clue. Every zip code can be in some way altered or subdivided to make it to the list.
Write A Book
It seems to be closer than ever but progress reports don't include any tangible evidence. I'm still sticking to unsigned testimonials on an unfinished book as not being tangible progress. It certainly looks like my prediction that it would be at least delayed until March is correct. Beyond that, who knows what's in store and when.
The aspect I'm most curious about the book is what I've called the Mainstream Paradox. It's admittedly going to be available for sale through normal channels, like eBook and actual physical pieces of paper between a cover, sold on Amazon and wherever. Which instantly makes it mainstream. Which instantly makes it dishonest. Which apparently is going to include content about the mainstream media being dishonest. Which means that the content about mainstream publications being dishonest is in itself dishonest. Which means that it really is honest...and...forever around the loop. Think Star Trek where they make Nomad go crazy or the Mudd episode with the robots they get stuck in the logic loop.
The Class Action Lawsuit
Really? We're back to this, again? It was many months ago I watched a video about some gal being all fired up about a deleted video or twenty and was fed up and, you know, Justice! Damn Google. Well, good luck. It doesn't matter if you're right in principal once lawyers get involved. In practicality this has a teeny weeny chance of success other than a moral victory.
Class action suits are typically Corporation screwed up-> people harmed->people seek monetary damages->lawyers hired->lawyers get paid a butt load of cash (lawyers love class actions)->maybe each person gets a check for $2.73. Here it seems like it's "we this group of people don't want money, we want Google to stop deleting our videos because, you know, Justice! So, Google's lawyers get paid a butt load of cash and don't even have to work because -->>they've seen this complaint a zillion..no wait..a googleplex times before <<-- and there's no reason for the courts to decide differently this time. It sucks, but that's real life, you know, Justice!
Phone Calls
I think this will run its course soon and drop by the wayside. Lately politicians and others have been getting calls asking if they are freemasons and how they can live with themselves for being part of the scam. Because, you know, Justice! Like if they actually were a part of the evil empire they would outright admit it to someone on the phone. The videos about these calls get a lot of positive feedback and seem quite popular with the masses, because everyone wants, you know, Justice! Cheaper and less time consuming than a class action suit. And without willing to actually meet live and in person to talk to people about, you know, Justice!, has even less chance of success. Looks like a way to come off as a bad ass for harassing people. Surely nothing can go wrong with this idea.
Rage Quitting
By definition rage quitting is a project that can only be started. As soon as you stop quitting there's the end of the quit. If you're fed up by your videos getting deleted because, you know, Justice!, then you don't need to announce it. Just stop making videos.
The 666 Zip Code Judeo-Masonic Territories
The inspiration for this post; just saw this an hour ago. I'm not sure about the number in the name since it's 33 that makes Parkland hit the list. 33 is much easier to hit than 666 and other than it's more fun to present 33's and whatever other numbers count to win cookies individually, there's really not much reason to not list them all now. I'll give you a clue. Every zip code can be in some way altered or subdivided to make it to the list.
Write A Book
It seems to be closer than ever but progress reports don't include any tangible evidence. I'm still sticking to unsigned testimonials on an unfinished book as not being tangible progress. It certainly looks like my prediction that it would be at least delayed until March is correct. Beyond that, who knows what's in store and when.
The aspect I'm most curious about the book is what I've called the Mainstream Paradox. It's admittedly going to be available for sale through normal channels, like eBook and actual physical pieces of paper between a cover, sold on Amazon and wherever. Which instantly makes it mainstream. Which instantly makes it dishonest. Which apparently is going to include content about the mainstream media being dishonest. Which means that the content about mainstream publications being dishonest is in itself dishonest. Which means that it really is honest...and...forever around the loop. Think Star Trek where they make Nomad go crazy or the Mudd episode with the robots they get stuck in the logic loop.
The Class Action Lawsuit
Really? We're back to this, again? It was many months ago I watched a video about some gal being all fired up about a deleted video or twenty and was fed up and, you know, Justice! Damn Google. Well, good luck. It doesn't matter if you're right in principal once lawyers get involved. In practicality this has a teeny weeny chance of success other than a moral victory.
Class action suits are typically Corporation screwed up-> people harmed->people seek monetary damages->lawyers hired->lawyers get paid a butt load of cash (lawyers love class actions)->maybe each person gets a check for $2.73. Here it seems like it's "we this group of people don't want money, we want Google to stop deleting our videos because, you know, Justice! So, Google's lawyers get paid a butt load of cash and don't even have to work because -->>they've seen this complaint a zillion..no wait..a googleplex times before <<-- and there's no reason for the courts to decide differently this time. It sucks, but that's real life, you know, Justice!
Phone Calls
I think this will run its course soon and drop by the wayside. Lately politicians and others have been getting calls asking if they are freemasons and how they can live with themselves for being part of the scam. Because, you know, Justice! Like if they actually were a part of the evil empire they would outright admit it to someone on the phone. The videos about these calls get a lot of positive feedback and seem quite popular with the masses, because everyone wants, you know, Justice! Cheaper and less time consuming than a class action suit. And without willing to actually meet live and in person to talk to people about, you know, Justice!, has even less chance of success. Looks like a way to come off as a bad ass for harassing people. Surely nothing can go wrong with this idea.
Rage Quitting
By definition rage quitting is a project that can only be started. As soon as you stop quitting there's the end of the quit. If you're fed up by your videos getting deleted because, you know, Justice!, then you don't need to announce it. Just stop making videos.
Friday, February 23, 2018
The Link Between Science And Pseudoscience
An ongoing problem I have here is discussion of the main topic which is decidedly unscientific beyond a quick orientation of basic math and a veneer of scientific respectability ensconced in some heavy vocabulary (even what would be called technobabble). I do not particularly enjoy trying to find ways to say, for example, "concatenate", without actually using the word "concatenate". The same goes for every math post. Do people really care about the details of trigonometry? Unlikely.
So when I see things like discussions of "heliocentrism and the impact on flat earth and lunar eclipse mechanics like here:
https://thebeastbelowus-helio-eclipses.blogspor.com
I cringe. I'm not averse to being juvenile, but I've toned that down. The way to go about things is to be better than they are. To have the facts to back you up. So that is why....
Ok. Are they gone yet? The numerologists and maybe your parents? To hell with science for now. I just did that yesterday.
That link was bullcrap. Here's another that does work. Because I'm so not averse to being juvenile (or worried about being discovered). Maybe I had you going for a minute there.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/33-42-47-141-142-211-ty-thompson.html
Dropped on your head?!?? What? Why on Earth would you even admit that??!
Hmm, let me think. I want to share a personal story relating how corrupt the public school system is and people keep calling me a lunatic. I know. Dropped on the head. Surely nothing can go wrong with presenting one of the oldest jokes about brain damage.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/afr3/blogs/siowfa12/2012/10/were-you-dropped-on-your-head-or-something-does-that-even-make-sense.html
Ok time out. In the unlikely event that this is the first post you've ever viewed on this blog. I am not totally insensitive. There is some truth to the being juvenile versus scientific bit. Considering the actual subject matter and constantly getting indications of how they really hate the sarcasm I indulge. I do fully realize how serious being dropped on your head as a child can be, which is why I picked the link I did instead of a more jokey link.
Anyway.
Pick your favorite conspiracy. It's probably been covered in the Fee To Find Misinformation blog. Search for that conspiracy. Think about how the conversation might go.
"So 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists with airplanes? And I see in the comments that it's a weird jumble of conflicting theories on what really happened. Lasers, thermite, holograms,...You really believe that?"
"Why, yes. Yes, I do."
"What? Were you dropped on your head as a child?"
"Why, yes. Yes, I was?"
"<snicker>"
Way, way, way too easy. It saves a lot of trouble trying to create a story of my own. I'd probably try something like the parents left the fetus to gestate in a cardboard box for the third trimester, but that runs the risk of insulting anyone who actually did gestate in a cardboard box, so I can stick with this.
Couldn't you have at least lied and create another back story? Like played football and the coach was also the school's vice principal? Post concussive syndrome is big. Or maybe you used to put the gloves on and box? These are also no laughing matter these days, but at least they bypass the "What? Are you stupid?" question. I don't think I've ever heard somebody say, "Did you ever get whacked in the head a lot as a kid playing football? That would explain a LOT." (Boxing doesn't have quite the same impact because inevitably it will remind Dan of a cardboard box.)
So how about some gematria on this? Because you can always find some connections. This was about 20 minutes work:
ZACHARY KEEFE HUBBARD=118
BRAIN TRAUMA=118
DROPPED ON HIS HEAD AS A BABY=117
PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY=1,017
REPETITIVE CONCUSSIVE TRAUMA=117
And this is without even working in shoehorning unfounded claims like the reason for all the headwear (not just Hubbard) lately and whether or not he shaved his head and wears a toupee when not wearing a hat.
So when I see things like discussions of "heliocentrism and the impact on flat earth and lunar eclipse mechanics like here:
https://thebeastbelowus-helio-eclipses.blogspor.com
I cringe. I'm not averse to being juvenile, but I've toned that down. The way to go about things is to be better than they are. To have the facts to back you up. So that is why....
Ok. Are they gone yet? The numerologists and maybe your parents? To hell with science for now. I just did that yesterday.
That link was bullcrap. Here's another that does work. Because I'm so not averse to being juvenile (or worried about being discovered). Maybe I had you going for a minute there.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/33-42-47-141-142-211-ty-thompson.html
Dropped on your head?!?? What? Why on Earth would you even admit that??!
Hmm, let me think. I want to share a personal story relating how corrupt the public school system is and people keep calling me a lunatic. I know. Dropped on the head. Surely nothing can go wrong with presenting one of the oldest jokes about brain damage.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/afr3/blogs/siowfa12/2012/10/were-you-dropped-on-your-head-or-something-does-that-even-make-sense.html
Ok time out. In the unlikely event that this is the first post you've ever viewed on this blog. I am not totally insensitive. There is some truth to the being juvenile versus scientific bit. Considering the actual subject matter and constantly getting indications of how they really hate the sarcasm I indulge. I do fully realize how serious being dropped on your head as a child can be, which is why I picked the link I did instead of a more jokey link.
Anyway.
Pick your favorite conspiracy. It's probably been covered in the Fee To Find Misinformation blog. Search for that conspiracy. Think about how the conversation might go.
"So 9/11 wasn't done by terrorists with airplanes? And I see in the comments that it's a weird jumble of conflicting theories on what really happened. Lasers, thermite, holograms,...You really believe that?"
"Why, yes. Yes, I do."
"What? Were you dropped on your head as a child?"
"Why, yes. Yes, I was?"
"<snicker>"
Way, way, way too easy. It saves a lot of trouble trying to create a story of my own. I'd probably try something like the parents left the fetus to gestate in a cardboard box for the third trimester, but that runs the risk of insulting anyone who actually did gestate in a cardboard box, so I can stick with this.
Couldn't you have at least lied and create another back story? Like played football and the coach was also the school's vice principal? Post concussive syndrome is big. Or maybe you used to put the gloves on and box? These are also no laughing matter these days, but at least they bypass the "What? Are you stupid?" question. I don't think I've ever heard somebody say, "Did you ever get whacked in the head a lot as a kid playing football? That would explain a LOT." (Boxing doesn't have quite the same impact because inevitably it will remind Dan of a cardboard box.)
So how about some gematria on this? Because you can always find some connections. This was about 20 minutes work:
ZACHARY KEEFE HUBBARD=118
BRAIN TRAUMA=118
DROPPED ON HIS HEAD AS A BABY=117
PSYCHOPATHIC PERSONALITY=1,017
REPETITIVE CONCUSSIVE TRAUMA=117
And this is without even working in shoehorning unfounded claims like the reason for all the headwear (not just Hubbard) lately and whether or not he shaved his head and wears a toupee when not wearing a hat.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Science Proven Wrong Again
Average distance from earth to the moon, 384,400 km, rounded slightly:
https://www.universetoday.com/103206/what-is-the-distance-to-the-moon/
Average diameter of the moon, about 3,474 km:
https://www.universetoday.com/19677/diameter-of-the-moon/
I could have used Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is notoriously unreliable. As soon as a number gets reported the evil empire will change it just enough to make the numerologists look bad. For now, they seem to be in the ballpark to this site.
We've spread seen the distance from the Earth to the Sun is 93 million miles *on average*. Check. Miles could be used for this math without changing the ratio.
384,400/3,474=108 because GEOMETRY=108 in both ordinal and reverse. Even though if you do the actual math it's 110.65.
I'm not sure where or when this started but it's been getting repeated mentions recently. It looks like one of those "somebody said this once on the internet, so it must be true" kind of things.
The diameter of the moon only varies by about 4 meters depending on if you check the equatorial distance or the pole to pole distance. The distance from the Earth, that can be a lot different. There will be a time when the moon is "about 108 diameters of the moon away". If the Sun distance is "average" an ordinary, reasonable person would expect some consistency. But we aren't dealing with ordinary, reasonable people.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180222101410/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-conspiracy-theory-stoneman.html?m=1
To be fair, this isn't just Dan, it's out there in other posts. Let's also be fair and emphasize he didn't freak out and complain that his daughter's homework was in kilometers, which is widely used across the planet.
Straight up 110.65 versus 108 is about a 2.5% difference. If it would be agreed that we truncate...sorry, vocabulary, ...drop the .65 and call it 110 it's still close to 2% off.
In theory, and probably for my own amusement I'll do it later today, some kind of similar calculation on the comparison of Earth size to distance from Earth to Sun can be done. I expect that this will probably be actually 108ish and the Earth to Moon thing was just tacked on to the story.
Censorship topics have reared up again because of deleted videos. Which for now I prefer to not weigh in on in regards to free speech on mass shootings. I remind you that I absolutely do not care if you want your family and friends thinking that of all things the word GEOMETRY has some significance to your system involving a matter of distances which are calculated with math. I also have the right to free speech and will do everything in my power to make sure that Wikipedia continues to report a much better number.
https://www.universetoday.com/103206/what-is-the-distance-to-the-moon/
Average diameter of the moon, about 3,474 km:
https://www.universetoday.com/19677/diameter-of-the-moon/
I could have used Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is notoriously unreliable. As soon as a number gets reported the evil empire will change it just enough to make the numerologists look bad. For now, they seem to be in the ballpark to this site.
We've spread seen the distance from the Earth to the Sun is 93 million miles *on average*. Check. Miles could be used for this math without changing the ratio.
384,400/3,474=108 because GEOMETRY=108 in both ordinal and reverse. Even though if you do the actual math it's 110.65.
I'm not sure where or when this started but it's been getting repeated mentions recently. It looks like one of those "somebody said this once on the internet, so it must be true" kind of things.
The diameter of the moon only varies by about 4 meters depending on if you check the equatorial distance or the pole to pole distance. The distance from the Earth, that can be a lot different. There will be a time when the moon is "about 108 diameters of the moon away". If the Sun distance is "average" an ordinary, reasonable person would expect some consistency. But we aren't dealing with ordinary, reasonable people.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180222101410/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-conspiracy-theory-stoneman.html?m=1
To be fair, this isn't just Dan, it's out there in other posts. Let's also be fair and emphasize he didn't freak out and complain that his daughter's homework was in kilometers, which is widely used across the planet.
Straight up 110.65 versus 108 is about a 2.5% difference. If it would be agreed that we truncate...sorry, vocabulary, ...drop the .65 and call it 110 it's still close to 2% off.
In theory, and probably for my own amusement I'll do it later today, some kind of similar calculation on the comparison of Earth size to distance from Earth to Sun can be done. I expect that this will probably be actually 108ish and the Earth to Moon thing was just tacked on to the story.
Censorship topics have reared up again because of deleted videos. Which for now I prefer to not weigh in on in regards to free speech on mass shootings. I remind you that I absolutely do not care if you want your family and friends thinking that of all things the word GEOMETRY has some significance to your system involving a matter of distances which are calculated with math. I also have the right to free speech and will do everything in my power to make sure that Wikipedia continues to report a much better number.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
For Those Who May Doubt How Bizarre It Gets
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4RX0A0xWdlY
You don't need to watch the video. I didn't. Just take a look at the one comment by walton market. In case you don't feel like scrolling through or can't here's the way it works.
The police car in a photo circulating for the Marjory Stoneman school shooting is car #9407. This is clearly visible on the top.
But this isn't really car #9407. It's car 947 because nothing says scary government controlled by the evil cabal numbering than dropping a zero.
It's been claimed that this type of alteration is justified because it's obvious that they didn't want to be too obvious. If your luggage combination is 947 you don't just put a sticker next to it, "Note to self, luggage combo is 947". However, this is still too obvious.
947 is the 161st prime number. Got it. Things are getting a bit confusing. Let's not forget though that these things are a mockery by displaying near infinite power. You don't just start off with creating a hurricane and have a press release that says, "We rule. Suck it."
This is clearly getting into the super disguised part with the next bit. It's not 161, but 161 written out as words. And in case you forget that 161 is really a number you need to add the word NUMBER, so it's NUMBER ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY ONE. That's the third change already. But since the new number is 1986 in the Sumerian elision it's really the fourth change because Sumerian is just ordinal multiplied by six.
Now I have to question how w.m. figured this out. It almost seems like he had inside information. Like he worked for the evil empire. Is your name really Bob, and did you used to be a hit man? Or maybe the actor Bob Walton listed with a few credits on IMDB? Maybe a bad crisis actor?
Chernobyl accident 1986. Of course nothing else important happened in 1986. But the date gets narrowed down by the time span of 11617 days between Chernobyl and Marjory Stoneman shooting. Which counts because MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS has separate values of 116 and 107 in different elisions. You get to concatenate them together. But never forgetting that dropping zeroes is super duper scary.
And this means that it's not about the shooting. Maybe it's something to do with the Times Up sexual harassment movement.
I'm calling bullshit. Stop changing a number billion times to force the connection, and a very tenuous one at that. I'm also not fooled by the "Just Asking Questions" format. I can do that and say anything I want and have an out for being wrong.
"Where's Hubbard's cute Asian girlfriend? You never see her in the videos. I don't know. I'm just asking."
Now I've insinuated that she doesn't exist.
Since Zenith of the Alpha didn't say this was stupid I must assume he approves of being allowed to change a number as many times as you want. Being a big name in the gematria game I assume that all the players approve up until the time somebody writes down some rules and people stick by them.
As this is long enough you're spared the review of the one comment adding the gematria of seven presidents' names together to get connected to a Bible quote. You're welcome.
You don't need to watch the video. I didn't. Just take a look at the one comment by walton market. In case you don't feel like scrolling through or can't here's the way it works.
The police car in a photo circulating for the Marjory Stoneman school shooting is car #9407. This is clearly visible on the top.
But this isn't really car #9407. It's car 947 because nothing says scary government controlled by the evil cabal numbering than dropping a zero.
It's been claimed that this type of alteration is justified because it's obvious that they didn't want to be too obvious. If your luggage combination is 947 you don't just put a sticker next to it, "Note to self, luggage combo is 947". However, this is still too obvious.
947 is the 161st prime number. Got it. Things are getting a bit confusing. Let's not forget though that these things are a mockery by displaying near infinite power. You don't just start off with creating a hurricane and have a press release that says, "We rule. Suck it."
This is clearly getting into the super disguised part with the next bit. It's not 161, but 161 written out as words. And in case you forget that 161 is really a number you need to add the word NUMBER, so it's NUMBER ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY ONE. That's the third change already. But since the new number is 1986 in the Sumerian elision it's really the fourth change because Sumerian is just ordinal multiplied by six.
Now I have to question how w.m. figured this out. It almost seems like he had inside information. Like he worked for the evil empire. Is your name really Bob, and did you used to be a hit man? Or maybe the actor Bob Walton listed with a few credits on IMDB? Maybe a bad crisis actor?
Chernobyl accident 1986. Of course nothing else important happened in 1986. But the date gets narrowed down by the time span of 11617 days between Chernobyl and Marjory Stoneman shooting. Which counts because MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS has separate values of 116 and 107 in different elisions. You get to concatenate them together. But never forgetting that dropping zeroes is super duper scary.
And this means that it's not about the shooting. Maybe it's something to do with the Times Up sexual harassment movement.
I'm calling bullshit. Stop changing a number billion times to force the connection, and a very tenuous one at that. I'm also not fooled by the "Just Asking Questions" format. I can do that and say anything I want and have an out for being wrong.
"Where's Hubbard's cute Asian girlfriend? You never see her in the videos. I don't know. I'm just asking."
Now I've insinuated that she doesn't exist.
Since Zenith of the Alpha didn't say this was stupid I must assume he approves of being allowed to change a number as many times as you want. Being a big name in the gematria game I assume that all the players approve up until the time somebody writes down some rules and people stick by them.
As this is long enough you're spared the review of the one comment adding the gematria of seven presidents' names together to get connected to a Bible quote. You're welcome.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Manufactured Boogeymen
Seems like they missed the point and that I'm supposed to be embarrassed about having this blog been discovered. On the contrary. I'm purposefully annoying to make sure they have no excuse to deny it.
So the mistake has been made to downplay the number of elisions used and it's been admitted that things like prime numbers are a natural devious method an evil organization, who by appearances to an ordinary rational person, displays selective gross incompetence on their activity.
Oh, I only use four elisions. Well whoop de doo for you. It still increases the number of matches dramatically. Oh, I only use a couple of phrases instead of making up a whole bunch. Double whoop de doo. If you're going to shoehorn in a manufactured boogeyman you need to make the math less obvious on how the deck is stacked in your favor.
Some of my statistics get too deep, like % of population with a given name. This one's not that hard. Somebody that claims to be smart should understand.
Only ordinal, reverse and their reductions. Four systems.
I don't like Freemasons. Maybe it's the 'free' in the name, it just doesn't sound that terrifying. So let's manufacturer the Boogeymen. The BOOGEYMEN are derived from the ancient BOOGATI. They are also called a BOOG and a BOOGER. There's more, like BOOGERHEAD, but I've got standards so I don't use all the names.
They also have some Synagogue type equivalents in the lore. But, standards. I only use two. SUBURBAN BOOGER CULT and they were first created on the CREEPY VEGAN WEBSITE. Because pasta was already taken for creepy manufactured boogeymen stories. Maybe if I have a bad day and need to relax I'll slip in VEGAN WEBSITE or SUBURBAN CULT, but when I'm defending my shoehorning, standards.
A self respecting booger cult would only code one name for itself or at most a select few. So our selectively incompetent boogerheads have just on four elisions these immediate tie ins.
BOOGEYMEN - 47,34,101,142
BOOGATI - 33,39,69,129
BOOGER - 35,28,62,100
BOOG- 21,15,39,69
SUBURBAN BOOGER CULT - 72,108,216,270
CREEPY VEGAN WEBSITE - 87,93,204,282
Instead of just a few that's 22 unique numbers directly attributable (with fallacious logic) to the Boogeymen. At most a self respecting researcher would do is point out the overlapping 39 and 69 and be happy there. There's more "evidence" that when looking at text that those numbers mean something to the Boogeymen.
Looks like all 22 aren't enough. I can't add more elisions or phrases, because standards ya know. Let's go for some primes. Now I've got 22 more numbers. The 33rd prime number is 137. There's be an extra since the original 47 is prime, but it's the 15th and that's already covered.
44 isn't enough. Let's start playing with 0's. Throwing out 0's now I've got 12, 11, 10, 18 and 27. The real windfall is the other end of the spectrum. Every two digit number can add a zero in the middle or at the end. Three digit numbers could be changed an extra way. 216 could be 2160, 2106 or 2016. Those numbers that have a zero in the middle screw things up. Let's just call it an extra 22.
I count another 14 new numbers reversing to the mirror image.
85 different numbers on just four numbering systems on a very generously low number of made up phrases. As the number of phrases and number of elisions increases the duplication increases, so unique number generation slows down. Keep adding new ones you will eventually cover everything. Sadly for your side the actual number of 85 is much bigger than 1.
So the mistake has been made to downplay the number of elisions used and it's been admitted that things like prime numbers are a natural devious method an evil organization, who by appearances to an ordinary rational person, displays selective gross incompetence on their activity.
Oh, I only use four elisions. Well whoop de doo for you. It still increases the number of matches dramatically. Oh, I only use a couple of phrases instead of making up a whole bunch. Double whoop de doo. If you're going to shoehorn in a manufactured boogeyman you need to make the math less obvious on how the deck is stacked in your favor.
Some of my statistics get too deep, like % of population with a given name. This one's not that hard. Somebody that claims to be smart should understand.
Only ordinal, reverse and their reductions. Four systems.
I don't like Freemasons. Maybe it's the 'free' in the name, it just doesn't sound that terrifying. So let's manufacturer the Boogeymen. The BOOGEYMEN are derived from the ancient BOOGATI. They are also called a BOOG and a BOOGER. There's more, like BOOGERHEAD, but I've got standards so I don't use all the names.
They also have some Synagogue type equivalents in the lore. But, standards. I only use two. SUBURBAN BOOGER CULT and they were first created on the CREEPY VEGAN WEBSITE. Because pasta was already taken for creepy manufactured boogeymen stories. Maybe if I have a bad day and need to relax I'll slip in VEGAN WEBSITE or SUBURBAN CULT, but when I'm defending my shoehorning, standards.
A self respecting booger cult would only code one name for itself or at most a select few. So our selectively incompetent boogerheads have just on four elisions these immediate tie ins.
BOOGEYMEN - 47,34,101,142
BOOGATI - 33,39,69,129
BOOGER - 35,28,62,100
BOOG- 21,15,39,69
SUBURBAN BOOGER CULT - 72,108,216,270
CREEPY VEGAN WEBSITE - 87,93,204,282
Instead of just a few that's 22 unique numbers directly attributable (with fallacious logic) to the Boogeymen. At most a self respecting researcher would do is point out the overlapping 39 and 69 and be happy there. There's more "evidence" that when looking at text that those numbers mean something to the Boogeymen.
Looks like all 22 aren't enough. I can't add more elisions or phrases, because standards ya know. Let's go for some primes. Now I've got 22 more numbers. The 33rd prime number is 137. There's be an extra since the original 47 is prime, but it's the 15th and that's already covered.
44 isn't enough. Let's start playing with 0's. Throwing out 0's now I've got 12, 11, 10, 18 and 27. The real windfall is the other end of the spectrum. Every two digit number can add a zero in the middle or at the end. Three digit numbers could be changed an extra way. 216 could be 2160, 2106 or 2016. Those numbers that have a zero in the middle screw things up. Let's just call it an extra 22.
I count another 14 new numbers reversing to the mirror image.
85 different numbers on just four numbering systems on a very generously low number of made up phrases. As the number of phrases and number of elisions increases the duplication increases, so unique number generation slows down. Keep adding new ones you will eventually cover everything. Sadly for your side the actual number of 85 is much bigger than 1.
Monday, February 19, 2018
The Zombie Apocalypse, Gematria And Donuts
It may help if you have had the misfortune of viewing Attack of the Killer Donuts for this. You don't need to, but understand this is a real movie. I give it about a five on a 1-10 scale, so realize first off that your mathematical reference point is based on that instead of 0-10. In case you rate movies with Vortex Math. Most people, I imagine this translates into a solid 2 on 1-10, it is a comedy and not a terribly funny one at that.
So our intrepid band of heroes is stuck in an actual zombie apocalypse. The whole deal, the rotting flesh, eating people, have to disable the brain to stop them. These are the slow moving variety.
After a lull in the action of stabbing zombies through the eye socket with ice picks and splintered boards and whatever makeshift weapons are available, as well as expending far too much of their precious irreplaceable ammo supply, the band decides to powwow on what they know about zombies. Much like the scene in From Dusk Til Dawn where those intrepid band members discuss vampires.
Rock Grimy, who believes that 9/11 was proven a conspiracy because jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, thinks these are like the zombies in the Walking Dead or George Romero movies. Most everything that's happened so far points to this. So some consensus is reached because Rock is obviously the leader. If you have a name like Rock you obviously are a studly leader type. You don't find somebody named Myron Jones lasting long in a zombie apocalypse.
In addition to the basic facts already related, they do agree that they don't understand how this can be happening. The science of zombie existence is all fucked up. There's no way to tell exactly how much of the zombie brain needs to be turned into zombie brain mush to disable them. Why do they eat if they don't get nutrition, or even have stomachs? How much flesh falls off from the being a rotting corpse thing before they stop moving? You don't see any reanimated skeletons rattling about. Other such tidbits show they don't understand what's going on.
Ferd, who thinks 9/11 was a conspiracy because the planes were holograms and buildings were destroyed by planted explosives, thinks that there's some good points to be made from the 28 Days Later zombies. Notably, those were definitely some kind of medical reason like an airborne pathogen generated zombies.
Rock proceeds to tell Ferd he's a moron because these are obviously slow zombies and in the Walking Dead canon the pathogen thing is touched on. Ferd counters with how the Walking Dead zombies still heavily rely on biting to zombify more people.
Lots of others start chiming in on the merits of what movies have some possible meaning to the situation. Everything from the disease angle in the mutants in Omega Man, voodoo ritual zombies, the poison gas in Return of the Living Dead, ad nauseam. All these people by a remarkable plot device have differing opinions on the 9/11 story. The only commonality to 9/11 is that they clearly don't understand what happened.
Now, up to this point we haven't talked about semi-randomly picked designated hot babe who can kick ass, Karen Gillan. Who by another remarkable plot device looks exactly like actress Karen Gillan and can do karate like her in Jumanji. She's the only one that thinks 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy, and she points out that none of this debate helps a bit regarding survival in this situation that all agree they don't understand fully. But she's willing to accept what actual information they do know, gleaned from practical observation, on what works. Whack 'em in the head. Find food, ammo, and other supplies. Just keep surviving. Hopefully if any of these morons wises up she'll consider helping repopulating the planet with him, but later. Much longer than 28 days later.
Now, Puck, who believes in gematria, chimes in about how Attack of the Killer Donuts proves that reanimated donuts could exist.
In perfect unison, everyone else says,
"Dude. They're fucking DONUTS."
Puck continues to explain that some kind of donut animating serum could have animated donuts.
"Dude...they're fucking DONUTS."
Puck brings up that the donuts had teeth, so when animated they could be quite dangerous.
"Dude. Shut the fuck up. They're FUCKING DONUTS!!"
As if on cue, the zombies, totally fed up with being ignored as the immediate problem, bust down the door and slaughter everyone except Karen who gave up as soon as Puck opened his mouth the first time. She high tailed it out of there, found another group that accepted the tragic situation for what it was and had 33 babies.
If there's any moral to this story it can be found in the dying words of Rock who pointed out to Ferd that these were like the zombies in Land of the Dead that started to learn. They did, after all, wait until things got totally out of hand before breaking down the door. Fortunately they were not the Return of the Living Dead zombies who feasted on brains, or they would have starved, here.
And that Puck died never realizing the holes in his donut theory.
So our intrepid band of heroes is stuck in an actual zombie apocalypse. The whole deal, the rotting flesh, eating people, have to disable the brain to stop them. These are the slow moving variety.
After a lull in the action of stabbing zombies through the eye socket with ice picks and splintered boards and whatever makeshift weapons are available, as well as expending far too much of their precious irreplaceable ammo supply, the band decides to powwow on what they know about zombies. Much like the scene in From Dusk Til Dawn where those intrepid band members discuss vampires.
Rock Grimy, who believes that 9/11 was proven a conspiracy because jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel, thinks these are like the zombies in the Walking Dead or George Romero movies. Most everything that's happened so far points to this. So some consensus is reached because Rock is obviously the leader. If you have a name like Rock you obviously are a studly leader type. You don't find somebody named Myron Jones lasting long in a zombie apocalypse.
In addition to the basic facts already related, they do agree that they don't understand how this can be happening. The science of zombie existence is all fucked up. There's no way to tell exactly how much of the zombie brain needs to be turned into zombie brain mush to disable them. Why do they eat if they don't get nutrition, or even have stomachs? How much flesh falls off from the being a rotting corpse thing before they stop moving? You don't see any reanimated skeletons rattling about. Other such tidbits show they don't understand what's going on.
Ferd, who thinks 9/11 was a conspiracy because the planes were holograms and buildings were destroyed by planted explosives, thinks that there's some good points to be made from the 28 Days Later zombies. Notably, those were definitely some kind of medical reason like an airborne pathogen generated zombies.
Rock proceeds to tell Ferd he's a moron because these are obviously slow zombies and in the Walking Dead canon the pathogen thing is touched on. Ferd counters with how the Walking Dead zombies still heavily rely on biting to zombify more people.
Lots of others start chiming in on the merits of what movies have some possible meaning to the situation. Everything from the disease angle in the mutants in Omega Man, voodoo ritual zombies, the poison gas in Return of the Living Dead, ad nauseam. All these people by a remarkable plot device have differing opinions on the 9/11 story. The only commonality to 9/11 is that they clearly don't understand what happened.
Now, up to this point we haven't talked about semi-randomly picked designated hot babe who can kick ass, Karen Gillan. Who by another remarkable plot device looks exactly like actress Karen Gillan and can do karate like her in Jumanji. She's the only one that thinks 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy, and she points out that none of this debate helps a bit regarding survival in this situation that all agree they don't understand fully. But she's willing to accept what actual information they do know, gleaned from practical observation, on what works. Whack 'em in the head. Find food, ammo, and other supplies. Just keep surviving. Hopefully if any of these morons wises up she'll consider helping repopulating the planet with him, but later. Much longer than 28 days later.
Now, Puck, who believes in gematria, chimes in about how Attack of the Killer Donuts proves that reanimated donuts could exist.
In perfect unison, everyone else says,
"Dude. They're fucking DONUTS."
Puck continues to explain that some kind of donut animating serum could have animated donuts.
"Dude...they're fucking DONUTS."
Puck brings up that the donuts had teeth, so when animated they could be quite dangerous.
"Dude. Shut the fuck up. They're FUCKING DONUTS!!"
As if on cue, the zombies, totally fed up with being ignored as the immediate problem, bust down the door and slaughter everyone except Karen who gave up as soon as Puck opened his mouth the first time. She high tailed it out of there, found another group that accepted the tragic situation for what it was and had 33 babies.
If there's any moral to this story it can be found in the dying words of Rock who pointed out to Ferd that these were like the zombies in Land of the Dead that started to learn. They did, after all, wait until things got totally out of hand before breaking down the door. Fortunately they were not the Return of the Living Dead zombies who feasted on brains, or they would have starved, here.
And that Puck died never realizing the holes in his donut theory.
A Linking Log
Happy belated birthday, Abe Lincoln. A log recording links for you.
I think that the problem in debating animal rights is not arguing about the rights, but more so a starting point needs to be agreed on exactly which animals. Similarly, even if debating conspiracies and gematria involvement in "proof" exactly which conspiracies? Or is it truly a grand punyfied umbrella.
Currently the FTFM blog has 44 links to other material.
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/
Before even checking among them to see who can agree on what or all conspiracies are covered by gematria there's a huge housekeeping problem. About a third of them don't work or are outdated. From top of the list down issues can be found with the following:
Hubbard's own YouTube - terminated
Tony Telling It - Last I knew they were not on good terms and the who's a shill argument was raging.
Number Matrix (1 and 2) - Nothing found message, both Wordpress and blogger. This was Glass Wizzard's blog.
Bernie Trump Perspective - Last post July 2017
Supreme Commander John - Absolutely no content and 14 subscribers. Yeah. Right.
Out of The Maze - I'll give youth is one, but this relatively inactive blog, you picked a link to a post that doesn't exist anymore.
Out of the Maze - Two posts? Three? Certainly not a lot, but looks like only a few ever made last of which was Oct 15, 2017.
New Black World Order - I don't see any gematria. If we're going to talk just percent, you can score this one, but I'm curious why it's here and not cooking videos.
NASA Numerology - removed. Presumably by the blog creator.
Gematria Forum - Dead as they promised.
Fields of White - Last post 5/17
Dream Warrior Youtube - gone
colleen YouTube - nothing new in ages
Chigozie Truth - pretty sure he's still active, but this channel is terminated.
all4truth - Locks up without loading. This could be my shitty phone browser.
9/11 Tish B'av - One video with only 214 views.
That's an indication of not a serious unified community that has any impact, even not agreeing on what individual topics or all conspiracies are covered. Which isn't really the main point.
There's a lot of overuse of the "they're out to get me" defense, lately. So somebody is going to ask, why would the evil powers that be allow 9 million page views of the blog when they can make hurricanes? Why change the speed of Saturn from 9.69 to 9.68 instead of getting rid of ALL the content? Who's deciding these things?
You're just bouncing around between different logical fallacies on a case by case basis. Gematria is a handy excuse to bypass the other more serious issues that have been refuted time and again since they're all overused.
I like this video because it explains the producer's stance on being sick of an invalid argument, and it mirrors my own thoughts on not really caring if it actually is a conspiracy. You still need to produce a better argument. This is about the melting point of steel and burning jet fuel temperature that's been overused for more than a decade.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?ebc=ANyPxKoIMCVql9NWc4k9p5A4n3-VJV8S9oLExPEJxxK3oQkDm2Gmhv4TfiQ_ZEJ0sT_QOmXXNNotvhmsROa-3SJQ-PQYChMcIg&v=FzF1KySHmUA
So even if you get to the point of "proving" it's a conspiracy through gematria you still have to provide the details of how instead of selecting when these evil powers can alternate between near god-like capability and gross incompetence.
Or you could just give up like it looks some of those links show. The kind of people that made that jet fuel video have heard all the arguments before and everything is covered.
I think that the problem in debating animal rights is not arguing about the rights, but more so a starting point needs to be agreed on exactly which animals. Similarly, even if debating conspiracies and gematria involvement in "proof" exactly which conspiracies? Or is it truly a grand punyfied umbrella.
Currently the FTFM blog has 44 links to other material.
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/
Before even checking among them to see who can agree on what or all conspiracies are covered by gematria there's a huge housekeeping problem. About a third of them don't work or are outdated. From top of the list down issues can be found with the following:
Hubbard's own YouTube - terminated
Tony Telling It - Last I knew they were not on good terms and the who's a shill argument was raging.
Number Matrix (1 and 2) - Nothing found message, both Wordpress and blogger. This was Glass Wizzard's blog.
Bernie Trump Perspective - Last post July 2017
Supreme Commander John - Absolutely no content and 14 subscribers. Yeah. Right.
Out of The Maze - I'll give youth is one, but this relatively inactive blog, you picked a link to a post that doesn't exist anymore.
Out of the Maze - Two posts? Three? Certainly not a lot, but looks like only a few ever made last of which was Oct 15, 2017.
New Black World Order - I don't see any gematria. If we're going to talk just percent, you can score this one, but I'm curious why it's here and not cooking videos.
NASA Numerology - removed. Presumably by the blog creator.
Gematria Forum - Dead as they promised.
Fields of White - Last post 5/17
Dream Warrior Youtube - gone
colleen YouTube - nothing new in ages
Chigozie Truth - pretty sure he's still active, but this channel is terminated.
all4truth - Locks up without loading. This could be my shitty phone browser.
9/11 Tish B'av - One video with only 214 views.
That's an indication of not a serious unified community that has any impact, even not agreeing on what individual topics or all conspiracies are covered. Which isn't really the main point.
There's a lot of overuse of the "they're out to get me" defense, lately. So somebody is going to ask, why would the evil powers that be allow 9 million page views of the blog when they can make hurricanes? Why change the speed of Saturn from 9.69 to 9.68 instead of getting rid of ALL the content? Who's deciding these things?
You're just bouncing around between different logical fallacies on a case by case basis. Gematria is a handy excuse to bypass the other more serious issues that have been refuted time and again since they're all overused.
I like this video because it explains the producer's stance on being sick of an invalid argument, and it mirrors my own thoughts on not really caring if it actually is a conspiracy. You still need to produce a better argument. This is about the melting point of steel and burning jet fuel temperature that's been overused for more than a decade.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?ebc=ANyPxKoIMCVql9NWc4k9p5A4n3-VJV8S9oLExPEJxxK3oQkDm2Gmhv4TfiQ_ZEJ0sT_QOmXXNNotvhmsROa-3SJQ-PQYChMcIg&v=FzF1KySHmUA
So even if you get to the point of "proving" it's a conspiracy through gematria you still have to provide the details of how instead of selecting when these evil powers can alternate between near god-like capability and gross incompetence.
Or you could just give up like it looks some of those links show. The kind of people that made that jet fuel video have heard all the arguments before and everything is covered.
Sunday, February 18, 2018
How About An Actual Test
The ball is not in the anti gematria's court on this one. I'm just suggesting a possible solution to answer if there's any predictve power to name numerology. Here's some background on good scientific testing:
http://m.wisegeek.org/what-is-a-double-blind-test.htm
In the quack world there are people that claim that they can talk to dead people which is the origin of the phrase "dead duck". Actually not, so don't waste your time looking it up. Because wasting time is what these people do by claiming they can use their psychic powers to waste the time of the grieving family. And money.
The talking to dead people thing has been going around for ages and a good starting point is Googling Houdini psychic challenge, James Randi, or watch Penn and Teller's inaugural episode of Bullshit! regarding how there's never been an actual documented case of somebody proving under controlled conditions that they have any psychic powers. YouTube videos about psychic screw ups including helping people locate missing people, bending spoons, etc...failing are a lot more entertaining than a gematria video.
I've seen gematria claimed to be used for prediction on death. I've seen gematria used to identify freemasonry membership. I've seen gematria used to identify race just based on name and be spectacularly off the mark.
So in theory a collection of a random sample could be obtained to test whether some of these things are actual predictable.
If you have large enough sample size a collection of, say, 1000 random 30-40 year old people will have some parents that have passed away and some that haven't. It's too much to ask to predict when someone is going to die. So how about our sample group writes down the names and birthdates of both parents. All the tested group needs to do is figure out based on the numerology if the list of 2000 named people are dead or not. There are two groups trying to identify the dead people, one that believes in gematria and one that doesn't.
The immediate reaction will be, "Gematria doesn't work that way". Which is why the control group is important. Any further information the numerology group being tested "needs" to solve the problem are given to both groups. Were they in a car accident yesterday? Were they ever diagnosed with cancer? What was their first pet's name? What city were they born in? - all manner of things whether directly correlated to life expectancy or outside what an ordinary person would care about regarding if a named person is dead or alive.
If the pro numerology side isn't really waiting until after someone dies to predict it they should have an observable increase in success rate. Or they can shut up about claiming that when it fails like it will. Now if the first claim is made that the elites only care about celebrities then just like what the magnitude of earthquake has been decided to be significant the bar of celebrity status has been established to include female porn stars. With the use of stage names and the significant size of the herd it should be easy to find some that the numerologists haven't researched ahead of time. Hey, if Isaiah Thomas's sister being in a car crash is gematria newsworthy, a porn star's parents should be. Beyond that, burden of proof is on your side. The ball's in your court. I'm just throwing out a starting point for discussion. The details of the experiment are up to you as long as an unbiased group agrees to the parameters. However, and this is really important. Although I don't want to waste my time on this.
I will personally get involved in the name list compilation of female porn star parents. It's a sucky job, but SOMEBODY has to talk to these people.
Testing whether somebody has a masonic name or is a particular race would operate the same way. I'm not working out the details here as the ball isn't in my court. However, if it gets to the point of testing if a female porn star is Asian based on name I'm willing to invest my time.
http://m.wisegeek.org/what-is-a-double-blind-test.htm
In the quack world there are people that claim that they can talk to dead people which is the origin of the phrase "dead duck". Actually not, so don't waste your time looking it up. Because wasting time is what these people do by claiming they can use their psychic powers to waste the time of the grieving family. And money.
The talking to dead people thing has been going around for ages and a good starting point is Googling Houdini psychic challenge, James Randi, or watch Penn and Teller's inaugural episode of Bullshit! regarding how there's never been an actual documented case of somebody proving under controlled conditions that they have any psychic powers. YouTube videos about psychic screw ups including helping people locate missing people, bending spoons, etc...failing are a lot more entertaining than a gematria video.
I've seen gematria claimed to be used for prediction on death. I've seen gematria used to identify freemasonry membership. I've seen gematria used to identify race just based on name and be spectacularly off the mark.
So in theory a collection of a random sample could be obtained to test whether some of these things are actual predictable.
If you have large enough sample size a collection of, say, 1000 random 30-40 year old people will have some parents that have passed away and some that haven't. It's too much to ask to predict when someone is going to die. So how about our sample group writes down the names and birthdates of both parents. All the tested group needs to do is figure out based on the numerology if the list of 2000 named people are dead or not. There are two groups trying to identify the dead people, one that believes in gematria and one that doesn't.
The immediate reaction will be, "Gematria doesn't work that way". Which is why the control group is important. Any further information the numerology group being tested "needs" to solve the problem are given to both groups. Were they in a car accident yesterday? Were they ever diagnosed with cancer? What was their first pet's name? What city were they born in? - all manner of things whether directly correlated to life expectancy or outside what an ordinary person would care about regarding if a named person is dead or alive.
If the pro numerology side isn't really waiting until after someone dies to predict it they should have an observable increase in success rate. Or they can shut up about claiming that when it fails like it will. Now if the first claim is made that the elites only care about celebrities then just like what the magnitude of earthquake has been decided to be significant the bar of celebrity status has been established to include female porn stars. With the use of stage names and the significant size of the herd it should be easy to find some that the numerologists haven't researched ahead of time. Hey, if Isaiah Thomas's sister being in a car crash is gematria newsworthy, a porn star's parents should be. Beyond that, burden of proof is on your side. The ball's in your court. I'm just throwing out a starting point for discussion. The details of the experiment are up to you as long as an unbiased group agrees to the parameters. However, and this is really important. Although I don't want to waste my time on this.
I will personally get involved in the name list compilation of female porn star parents. It's a sucky job, but SOMEBODY has to talk to these people.
Testing whether somebody has a masonic name or is a particular race would operate the same way. I'm not working out the details here as the ball isn't in my court. However, if it gets to the point of testing if a female porn star is Asian based on name I'm willing to invest my time.
Saturday, February 17, 2018
Vortex Math
I got to learmed me sumthing news today! I never heard of Vortex Math before and I thought this was something totally nonexistent like Satanic math and it's real!!!!!!!
Real as in the sense that it's been created, not real in the sense that it works or truly means anything.
http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2013/11/12/vortex-math-returns/
For those of you who hate the math so much you absolutely refuse to look at that link, Vortex Math is a bunch of nonsense extrapolated out of the fact that we typically use a base 10 numbering system since our reptoid alien robot clone masters(don't ask) chopped off two of our twelve fingers leaving behind ten and it just got real handy to use that number.
Actually, I'll take an unplanned side break about how magical base 10 is. It's really about the number 9. There are lots of variations, but here's an old "magic" trick you've probably been amused by when you were a young 'un. Mystify your friends:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/1089.html
The math has to work. IF you use base 10. Before our reptoid slave masters (really, don't ask, you really, really don't want to know) did the hack job on our hands we would have probably used base 12, thereby making the magic math be related to eleven instead of nine.
Now, the funny thing about math, which is mentioned in the first link, is that it's really just a structured way to view PATTERN RECOGNITION. I believe I mentioned that for the umpteenth time yesterday. Why Vortex Math doesn't really add value is that just like gematria picking arbitrary reference points the perspective changes. Nine versus eleven. Talking about Vortex math is a wonderful way to look sciency and ermm...the creator suggested that some of the patterns were an obvious signature of God. That's a lovely combination of disparate concepts that worked well for Scientology. For awhile.
Here's some arbitrary gematria math reference points.
1). The Mexico earthquake yesterday was related to mileage from Mexico City. The world is a big place. Kilometer fanboys are pissed. Interesting that the accompanying screenshot of the news article didn't mention the distance of the quake in miles from Mexico City. (Edit - my bad, it is.)
2). The date for Super Bowl 52 is used still, and was weeks to months in advance. Who knows when it will stop being about SB 52 and start being SB 53. (I'm guessing after the NBA finals is over).
3). Anything about Pi.
4). Whether a date span includes the end date or not. Or both.
Again, there's no playbook that says what's legal and what's stupid. On the extreme, let's go back to our reptoid overlords. These tyrannical bastards, alien T. Wrecks, chopped off fingers. They could have used their superior Jim Carrey cloning technology (really, don't ask) and added fingers. Base 13 would be a lovely start because 13 gets a bad rap and needs a little bit of love. Or how about 14? Or how about keeping adding one until your brain explodes? Math covers different reference points, but acknowledges that base 10 is the king. And if you've been following it's now obvious how Tyrannosaurus Rex got it's name. The base 10 lizard.
The video comment I saw this Vortex math business specifically tells Hubbard to check out the magic relation between 2 and 7. Guess what 2+7 equals. If the reference point changes away from base 10 - the magic is gone. He does proudly proclaim knowledge of Vortex math, which isn't really anything to brag about. If you understand the math then you know it's no big deal, which kind of spoils the mystery of choosing arbitrary reference points. This is lumped in with the Mexican earthquake video commentary.
If we're allowed to change to other numbering systems (octal has been used) you literally have an infinite number of reference points to choose from. Therefore literally infinite gematria values. Better stick to just base 10 and keep the mystique alive a little bit longer. That way our reptoid overlords will not rise up from the bowels of the Earth to smite us. They still haven't gotten over the Attunic wars fomented by how many claws a turtle has and what numbering system reptiles use. (For the record, Attu the Wonder Turtle loves base 10).
Real as in the sense that it's been created, not real in the sense that it works or truly means anything.
http://goodmath.scientopia.org/2013/11/12/vortex-math-returns/
For those of you who hate the math so much you absolutely refuse to look at that link, Vortex Math is a bunch of nonsense extrapolated out of the fact that we typically use a base 10 numbering system since our reptoid alien robot clone masters(don't ask) chopped off two of our twelve fingers leaving behind ten and it just got real handy to use that number.
Actually, I'll take an unplanned side break about how magical base 10 is. It's really about the number 9. There are lots of variations, but here's an old "magic" trick you've probably been amused by when you were a young 'un. Mystify your friends:
https://www.mathsisfun.com/1089.html
The math has to work. IF you use base 10. Before our reptoid slave masters (really, don't ask, you really, really don't want to know) did the hack job on our hands we would have probably used base 12, thereby making the magic math be related to eleven instead of nine.
Now, the funny thing about math, which is mentioned in the first link, is that it's really just a structured way to view PATTERN RECOGNITION. I believe I mentioned that for the umpteenth time yesterday. Why Vortex Math doesn't really add value is that just like gematria picking arbitrary reference points the perspective changes. Nine versus eleven. Talking about Vortex math is a wonderful way to look sciency and ermm...the creator suggested that some of the patterns were an obvious signature of God. That's a lovely combination of disparate concepts that worked well for Scientology. For awhile.
Here's some arbitrary gematria math reference points.
1). The Mexico earthquake yesterday was related to mileage from Mexico City. The world is a big place. Kilometer fanboys are pissed. Interesting that the accompanying screenshot of the news article didn't mention the distance of the quake in miles from Mexico City. (Edit - my bad, it is.)
2). The date for Super Bowl 52 is used still, and was weeks to months in advance. Who knows when it will stop being about SB 52 and start being SB 53. (I'm guessing after the NBA finals is over).
3). Anything about Pi.
4). Whether a date span includes the end date or not. Or both.
Again, there's no playbook that says what's legal and what's stupid. On the extreme, let's go back to our reptoid overlords. These tyrannical bastards, alien T. Wrecks, chopped off fingers. They could have used their superior Jim Carrey cloning technology (really, don't ask) and added fingers. Base 13 would be a lovely start because 13 gets a bad rap and needs a little bit of love. Or how about 14? Or how about keeping adding one until your brain explodes? Math covers different reference points, but acknowledges that base 10 is the king. And if you've been following it's now obvious how Tyrannosaurus Rex got it's name. The base 10 lizard.
The video comment I saw this Vortex math business specifically tells Hubbard to check out the magic relation between 2 and 7. Guess what 2+7 equals. If the reference point changes away from base 10 - the magic is gone. He does proudly proclaim knowledge of Vortex math, which isn't really anything to brag about. If you understand the math then you know it's no big deal, which kind of spoils the mystery of choosing arbitrary reference points. This is lumped in with the Mexican earthquake video commentary.
If we're allowed to change to other numbering systems (octal has been used) you literally have an infinite number of reference points to choose from. Therefore literally infinite gematria values. Better stick to just base 10 and keep the mystique alive a little bit longer. That way our reptoid overlords will not rise up from the bowels of the Earth to smite us. They still haven't gotten over the Attunic wars fomented by how many claws a turtle has and what numbering system reptiles use. (For the record, Attu the Wonder Turtle loves base 10).
Friday, February 16, 2018
Close Enough For Government Work
Whilst preparing a way to work in the word, "whilst" I realize that I should just say "while". But, either is close enough. No, actually I was preparing The Year of the Underdog post and left out this bit. Our friend that suggested this year's sports winners would be influenced by the Chinese calendar forgot that their calendar is different than ours. The year of the dog started yesterday, so actually the Eagles won the Super Bowl in the Year of the Rooster.
Unfortunately, this is the only avian member of the Chinese calendar, so Eagle=Rooster makes just as much if not more sense since neither is Gematria based on words. And for the record MONKEY and ROOSTER have the same gematria in reverse, so as the closest representative to humans on the Chinese calendar, once you hit Rooster you might as well just shoehorn in any year since the narratives are about people.
So other than the math heavy post which was about how indirectly the implication is that every non-underdog year is predicting the favorites to win every time., we've got a little creative Tindering going on. At least the wrong calendar year is acknowledged here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180216084732/https://extra-capsa.com/2018/02/11/year-of-the-underdog-the-twins-trick-sacrifice-of-johannsson-cathey/
The joke about it being close enough for government work is appreciated. Some much needed levity in the world of instant hoax proclamation with no actual evidence/death to the Jews/gematria on Jigaboos/etc.... Probably not the best thought out joke, though considering the follow up and the rest of the content.
Now to get to 2,525 close enough isn't good enough for gematria and this number is exact. Ouch. Brother Berg's style is like this all the time. Anything with a 5 and a 2 in it is now exactly equal to each other thing with a five and a 2. 205/25,205/25/52/25,250 all tied together and essentially considered to be equal. Don't bother checking, I'll save you the time. 2,525 is still not equal to 205.
I suppose that based on volume of pattern recognition numbers Durped in this makes it cooler looking than some of the other gematria out there. But when the infinite number of Chinese calendar typing monkeys or an impatient cheating Chinese calendar rat have no defined starting and ending points for dates and 4,823,092,711 elisions to work with it's going to happen. I could do this for any topic, but choose not to.
I must object to the 161 and 191. Sixes and nines are similar if you are Durping. However, you are not entitled to your own facts. 161 and 191 are not equal. Johannson's name is not spelled with null values. The letter o and nothing are not the same. Although his name as the solution to a rigged Wheel of Fortune show would be fun when it comes time for people to try and pronounce a jh or nnsn diphthong.
You can't shoehorn in your definition of exact by golden hammering it in by blanket statements such as, "This is how gematria works.". You need a precedent. Rules to actually follow. Once you make a list of exactly which numbers do not have a connection to which other numbers we can start there and talk about it more. Don't forget to include prime numbers, dropping digits, rearranging, AND anything else you think should be allowed that your lot hasn't already suggested fits the gematria definition of equal.
Unfortunately, this is the only avian member of the Chinese calendar, so Eagle=Rooster makes just as much if not more sense since neither is Gematria based on words. And for the record MONKEY and ROOSTER have the same gematria in reverse, so as the closest representative to humans on the Chinese calendar, once you hit Rooster you might as well just shoehorn in any year since the narratives are about people.
So other than the math heavy post which was about how indirectly the implication is that every non-underdog year is predicting the favorites to win every time., we've got a little creative Tindering going on. At least the wrong calendar year is acknowledged here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180216084732/https://extra-capsa.com/2018/02/11/year-of-the-underdog-the-twins-trick-sacrifice-of-johannsson-cathey/
The joke about it being close enough for government work is appreciated. Some much needed levity in the world of instant hoax proclamation with no actual evidence/death to the Jews/gematria on Jigaboos/etc.... Probably not the best thought out joke, though considering the follow up and the rest of the content.
Now to get to 2,525 close enough isn't good enough for gematria and this number is exact. Ouch. Brother Berg's style is like this all the time. Anything with a 5 and a 2 in it is now exactly equal to each other thing with a five and a 2. 205/25,205/25/52/25,250 all tied together and essentially considered to be equal. Don't bother checking, I'll save you the time. 2,525 is still not equal to 205.
I suppose that based on volume of pattern recognition numbers Durped in this makes it cooler looking than some of the other gematria out there. But when the infinite number of Chinese calendar typing monkeys or an impatient cheating Chinese calendar rat have no defined starting and ending points for dates and 4,823,092,711 elisions to work with it's going to happen. I could do this for any topic, but choose not to.
I must object to the 161 and 191. Sixes and nines are similar if you are Durping. However, you are not entitled to your own facts. 161 and 191 are not equal. Johannson's name is not spelled with null values. The letter o and nothing are not the same. Although his name as the solution to a rigged Wheel of Fortune show would be fun when it comes time for people to try and pronounce a jh or nnsn diphthong.
You can't shoehorn in your definition of exact by golden hammering it in by blanket statements such as, "This is how gematria works.". You need a precedent. Rules to actually follow. Once you make a list of exactly which numbers do not have a connection to which other numbers we can start there and talk about it more. Don't forget to include prime numbers, dropping digits, rearranging, AND anything else you think should be allowed that your lot hasn't already suggested fits the gematria definition of equal.
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Gromk and Gromk Jr. Play Chess
Remember, Gromk is the caveman with superior pattern recognition skills. Durp, on the other hand, used chess pieces as food and died of intestinal blockages. So it's unfair to call the recent chess match between Carlsen and Nakamura Gromk vs. Durp. Carlsen is the current champion and Nakamura is consistently in the top rated player list.
One of the complaints about current top level chess is that the game can go 10-20+ moves before the actual game starts. Players analyze previous games knowing the favorites of their opponent. Although chess has a wide variety of options available, after some practice you begin to recognize patterns and what makes sense and what doesn't. Don't worry. I'm not talking any deep strategy here.
Durp gave up on chess before his I'll fated snack because he always played this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fool%27s_mate
The shortest way to lose a game. (Technically, it's a tie because you can lose the same way playing 1. f4, 1....e3 or interchange which pawn white moves first. But, two moves.)
Needless to say the top grandmasters know this pattern and avoid it. Success in chess is a continued battle for combining what patterns make sense with the ingenuity of doing something that might look like it breaks the tried and true pattern with something that may have an immediate gain. TV and movies will often use the queen sacrifice as the exhibit of this. Normally you don't give up the powerful queen without an immediate benefit.
So, yes, after throwing away nonsense moves, things get replayed and with so many games old waters are tread upon. One of the ways to break this is speed up the game. If you only have two minutes to play all your moves or forfeit the game you don't have time to remember all the possibilities of what you previously memorized.
You can also really change things up like go Star Trekkin' and play 3D chess, or have the match that Carlsen and Nakamura played with Fischer Random Chess aka Chess 960.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess960
The pieces, other than the pawns, are set up in any of one of 960 possible positions.
Carlsen is also reigning blitz champion while Nakamura is well regarded as a blitz expert. With the board randomized all the opening preparation is flushed down the toilet and it's brain vs. brain. The match was covered live as well as videos published for each game. And those that analyzed the games talked about...
Pattern recognition. Central control, king safety, develop your pieces, etc.... Although the opening has been crazified (real word) the same principals of successful chess apply.
Pattern recognition is not something just invented a couple years ago and we do it without thinking about it. That stove burner is bright red. That time I touched it and got burned (or listened to my parents' advice and never touched it) let's me know bright red instead of black means HOT= PAIN! While a bright red sweater vs. a black sweater is merely a fashion statement.
So in gematria we have a false sense of the New World Order manufacturing their coding with patterns. It's not to hard to see that 94 and 49 have the same digits. Close enough! 1403 and 143. Close enough! Etc.... A year ago these seemed to be more like suggesting that you foul make one special move to break the rules once or twice in a chess game. As time marches on, not content to spend effort on the foregone conclusion it's now more like whoever gets to move first instantly wins the chess game. It's ok to let your five year old win by cheating because he doesn't know a bishop doesn't know it doesn't move like a rook, but he's never going to learn to not touch a hot burner with that kind of thinking. All the different methods of forcing a number into another number in gematria have either been documented here or will be easy to see through if some new way is created.
Carlsen won the match and still remain firmly #3 on my list of people I most want to meet. As long as he doesn't decide that he gets to break the rules for no good reason (like, "Hey, I'm the champion! I'm allowed to move my knights to any square I want!") he stays there.
One of the complaints about current top level chess is that the game can go 10-20+ moves before the actual game starts. Players analyze previous games knowing the favorites of their opponent. Although chess has a wide variety of options available, after some practice you begin to recognize patterns and what makes sense and what doesn't. Don't worry. I'm not talking any deep strategy here.
Durp gave up on chess before his I'll fated snack because he always played this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fool%27s_mate
The shortest way to lose a game. (Technically, it's a tie because you can lose the same way playing 1. f4, 1....e3 or interchange which pawn white moves first. But, two moves.)
Needless to say the top grandmasters know this pattern and avoid it. Success in chess is a continued battle for combining what patterns make sense with the ingenuity of doing something that might look like it breaks the tried and true pattern with something that may have an immediate gain. TV and movies will often use the queen sacrifice as the exhibit of this. Normally you don't give up the powerful queen without an immediate benefit.
So, yes, after throwing away nonsense moves, things get replayed and with so many games old waters are tread upon. One of the ways to break this is speed up the game. If you only have two minutes to play all your moves or forfeit the game you don't have time to remember all the possibilities of what you previously memorized.
You can also really change things up like go Star Trekkin' and play 3D chess, or have the match that Carlsen and Nakamura played with Fischer Random Chess aka Chess 960.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess960
The pieces, other than the pawns, are set up in any of one of 960 possible positions.
Carlsen is also reigning blitz champion while Nakamura is well regarded as a blitz expert. With the board randomized all the opening preparation is flushed down the toilet and it's brain vs. brain. The match was covered live as well as videos published for each game. And those that analyzed the games talked about...
Pattern recognition. Central control, king safety, develop your pieces, etc.... Although the opening has been crazified (real word) the same principals of successful chess apply.
Pattern recognition is not something just invented a couple years ago and we do it without thinking about it. That stove burner is bright red. That time I touched it and got burned (or listened to my parents' advice and never touched it) let's me know bright red instead of black means HOT= PAIN! While a bright red sweater vs. a black sweater is merely a fashion statement.
So in gematria we have a false sense of the New World Order manufacturing their coding with patterns. It's not to hard to see that 94 and 49 have the same digits. Close enough! 1403 and 143. Close enough! Etc.... A year ago these seemed to be more like suggesting that you foul make one special move to break the rules once or twice in a chess game. As time marches on, not content to spend effort on the foregone conclusion it's now more like whoever gets to move first instantly wins the chess game. It's ok to let your five year old win by cheating because he doesn't know a bishop doesn't know it doesn't move like a rook, but he's never going to learn to not touch a hot burner with that kind of thinking. All the different methods of forcing a number into another number in gematria have either been documented here or will be easy to see through if some new way is created.
Carlsen won the match and still remain firmly #3 on my list of people I most want to meet. As long as he doesn't decide that he gets to break the rules for no good reason (like, "Hey, I'm the champion! I'm allowed to move my knights to any square I want!") he stays there.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
One For The Rednecks
Let's keep this out of the subject of racism as much as possible and just focus that the "proof" consists of a lot of words that equal the tiny little number 42.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180214075209/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/boston-police-tweet-black-history.html?m=1
It works both ways. Just like there are a lot of words used to designate black people there are hordes for the whiteys. I feel obligated to warn you that some of these are filthy, so if you are sensitive to that, don't continue. Here's a website dedicated to racial slurs and their list of 348 phrases. The point is, I didn't make these up.
http://rsdb.org/race/whites
Based on the date, the 42nd day of the year, 42 is important to Black History month which is February. Well garsh. Something happened to a black person somewhere on that day. At last count there were quite a few. Out of 348 phrases to pick from I should be able to make a white list (starring Megan Spader and James Boone) of 42 in short order. So after starting alphabetically, as expected I gave up any ideas of a complete list and started picking and choosing. However, these are presented mostly in alphabetic order.
Abe Lincoln - Well, that's on Dan's list for Black History month. Somewhat ironic that it's been used as a slur. Goes nicely with MASTER
and SLAVE equaling 76.
Afro Saxons - Plurals count. Dan's list has BLACKS=42, not BLACK.
Bird Turd - The first one I really like.
Blackrobe, Briar - Aw bird turds! I'm not even out of the B's and I've already got five! Time to start hunting instead of going through them all.
Eggshell- Technically not in the database, but EGG does not equal 42. However, by the egg definition that's a subset. Just the shell is white. And presumably the NIPTUCKS foresaw my use of it and instantly added it to the lexicon like all additions to the dictionary each year. (For example, see Sniglets material, especially the first post).
Honkey - In case there's any objection to Honky/Honkie as the head word and honkey only in the definition, don't worry. Porch Honkey further down the list also equals 42.
Milky - 420. No real list is complete without dropping a zero somewhere.
Mupp - Another favorite of mine. Mupp has the benefit of being
in a non reduction elision. And although it's definition related to "mop" is weak it evokes the next entry, Muppetfucker. Why say Jigaboo when you can say Jig? I'd not be surprised to find out people use mupp as an abbreviation.
Nilla, Pastyface - Getting tedious now. Time to kick the searching only into high gear and looking only for the more, <ahem>, colorful phrases.
Pigmently challenged - Ok, this doesn't equal 42. But it does equal 93 and would be great in a Sun story.
Redneck - You have got to be joking. This one is so common. Between this and honkey you really don't need a full list.
Sheethead - Is it O.KKK. if I call you that, Fred?
Wigger - Just the same as NIGGER appears ironically on this list and is part of the black list (the original Megan Boone and James Spader along with Abe Lincoln Nigger seems out of place for white trash. Problem solved. N and W have the same reduced value and Wigger makes the cut.
In some ways I was hoping that Cancer would have bern 42. But we'll settle for 44. I'll use my superior predictive powers to guess that some white person will die of cancer on a date that means 44. I'm also going to suggest that we have about 0% chance of hearing about it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180214075209/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/boston-police-tweet-black-history.html?m=1
It works both ways. Just like there are a lot of words used to designate black people there are hordes for the whiteys. I feel obligated to warn you that some of these are filthy, so if you are sensitive to that, don't continue. Here's a website dedicated to racial slurs and their list of 348 phrases. The point is, I didn't make these up.
http://rsdb.org/race/whites
Based on the date, the 42nd day of the year, 42 is important to Black History month which is February. Well garsh. Something happened to a black person somewhere on that day. At last count there were quite a few. Out of 348 phrases to pick from I should be able to make a white list (starring Megan Spader and James Boone) of 42 in short order. So after starting alphabetically, as expected I gave up any ideas of a complete list and started picking and choosing. However, these are presented mostly in alphabetic order.
Abe Lincoln - Well, that's on Dan's list for Black History month. Somewhat ironic that it's been used as a slur. Goes nicely with MASTER
and SLAVE equaling 76.
Afro Saxons - Plurals count. Dan's list has BLACKS=42, not BLACK.
Bird Turd - The first one I really like.
Blackrobe, Briar - Aw bird turds! I'm not even out of the B's and I've already got five! Time to start hunting instead of going through them all.
Eggshell- Technically not in the database, but EGG does not equal 42. However, by the egg definition that's a subset. Just the shell is white. And presumably the NIPTUCKS foresaw my use of it and instantly added it to the lexicon like all additions to the dictionary each year. (For example, see Sniglets material, especially the first post).
Honkey - In case there's any objection to Honky/Honkie as the head word and honkey only in the definition, don't worry. Porch Honkey further down the list also equals 42.
Milky - 420. No real list is complete without dropping a zero somewhere.
Mupp - Another favorite of mine. Mupp has the benefit of being
in a non reduction elision. And although it's definition related to "mop" is weak it evokes the next entry, Muppetfucker. Why say Jigaboo when you can say Jig? I'd not be surprised to find out people use mupp as an abbreviation.
Nilla, Pastyface - Getting tedious now. Time to kick the searching only into high gear and looking only for the more, <ahem>, colorful phrases.
Pigmently challenged - Ok, this doesn't equal 42. But it does equal 93 and would be great in a Sun story.
Redneck - You have got to be joking. This one is so common. Between this and honkey you really don't need a full list.
Sheethead - Is it O.KKK. if I call you that, Fred?
Wigger - Just the same as NIGGER appears ironically on this list and is part of the black list (the original Megan Boone and James Spader along with Abe Lincoln Nigger seems out of place for white trash. Problem solved. N and W have the same reduced value and Wigger makes the cut.
In some ways I was hoping that Cancer would have bern 42. But we'll settle for 44. I'll use my superior predictive powers to guess that some white person will die of cancer on a date that means 44. I'm also going to suggest that we have about 0% chance of hearing about it.
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Laser Enhanced Woo
This is going to be a bit off topic. I'll try to relate some on topic insight as I go.
The relentless uptick in activity regarding my copyright violation post is curious and continued through the night. Once or twice per hour there's a page view from Poland. It almost seems like spam where the spammer has yet to figure out how to leave a spam message. So I got the bright, or not so bright, idea to Google "Gematria copyright violation".
Which shouldn't and did not bring up this blog. The post title was mocking attempts to avoid copyright violation by substituting symbols for letters. What I did find is this:
http://www.gematria.com/
Just looking at the URL you wouldn't know exactly what it is. Looks like it should be a calculator for gematria values or a blog or something numerology related.
One of the last things I expected was vitamin/nutrition supplements. I have to be careful here, since there is a connection between "gematria" and "copyright issues". So I'm playing it safe. If I say, "it seems like" or "I don't think so" it's my opinion. If I don't, there's still a pretty good chance that it's my opinion. Consider it to be like a product review on Yelp (which has a connection to my research).
Strangely, the main URL does not take you to the home page on the website, it goes right to the product list. The URL changes by redirection to /default. This looks like supreme confidence or arrogance. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. Let's see what HOME says about these guys.
Laser enhanced. I never heard of such a thing. My opinion, it sounds like classic woo. For those not familiar with "Woo" it's a pejorative term that you might be more familiar with when called "snake oil". Woo, maybe or maybe not, is also a pejorative term for John Woo movies which early on were great and then proceeded into major suckage as time marched on. I doubt that beaming light rays, even from a laser, has any effect on the effectiveness of a nutritional supplement. I'm still stinging from the page redirect; I want my extraordinary claims to have proof. Now you have to prove to me how this works.
And I could probably stop right there. Because I know what's coming up. Just like if I see 59 in a numerology narrative it means freemason. It's going to be a secret process, of course there's something that makes your product the best. If some government agency tries to duplicate the process it wont be done "just right" to duplicate your process, thereby failing to release the full value. The wrong type of laser. The wrong time. It wasn't during the full moon, the laser wasn't operated by a virgin, blah, blah,blah. That's the way woo works. But benefit of the doubt. So back to the products page.
We have third party verification. SCS Global Services was paid to go through the GMP checklist of FDA standards. I'm of the opinion that these standards are "Congratulations, you do not have toxic levels of mercury in your product that will outright kill anyone ingesting them. The facilities have a bathroom and are operated by people instead of diseased capuchin monkeys". And nowhere is there any claim to how the product is proven to be more effective. But hey, Standards! Note at the bottom they admit that the FDA has not offered an opinion on their claims. It's my understanding that the FDA requires such a disclaimer to allow such material to be presented. Also, it doesn't cure disease. That's something we'll get back to.
While we're here, let's check the testimonials link. There's nothing too outrageous here. Like, I used to have a third eye that disappeared after taking the product for two weeks. Score a point now, but I'll take it away later. At least these people didn't write a review without (presumably) taking the supplements. Which would be like providing testimonial on an unfinished book.
Dr. Todd Oyoksomething You wouldn't get far with promoting something without any credentials at all. These look impressive. Up until the end when the dreaded phrase, "alternative medicine" is used like it's a good thing. It's my belief that "alternative medicine" is synonymous with "woo". So I'm dying to see how L.A.S.E.R worked out to such a nice acronym after reading Dr. Oyo's story. My acronym team is more excited than me.
What in the seven levels of turtle hell?!? There's no explanation of LASER other than using the word laser, which is an acronym. I want something like, Lovely Assed Radiation Enhanced Supplement. So keeping the process secret still, we just get info on how lasers are beamed in vitro (outside the body) and have to take it on faith that the Dr. Todd research on HIV in school proves he found how this makes the altered supplements work better in the body (in vivo)!
I really don't think so. Let's check some internet reviews.
https://m.yelp.com/biz/gematria-products-inc-carlsbad-2
Now I don't put much faith in these reviews, pro or con. I've talked about this before. People tend to only give one star for pissed off or five for best thing ever to get rid of that troublesome third eye. One person from 2009 who's dog died. And three that were written this month. When I retrieved that link the one review was only 11 hours old! Looks to me like it could be a push to generate positive reviews which may or may not be completely genuine.
This could also explain the recent interest in this blog. Gematria numerology has a tie in to the nonmainstream world (which they embrace). The company name has the word gematria in it. Who knows what kind of ads have been linked into blogs and videos out there on the internet. I've had traffic come from an agricultural tips blog that only had two posts from six-seven years ago, just this month. People get lost on the internet pretty easy (Dan) and this is a woo thing to do for who will do the woo. I was looking at that false flag video after checking for pet vitamins and gosh darn, you had me hooked on laser!
Now let's wrap this up with their twitter feed. Upper right for that link. And now let's see this January tweet about vibrations.
http://archive.aweber.com/awlist4897635/G.HsC/h/The_Scientific_Art_of_Raising.htm
Scientifically raising planetary vibrations, the entire goal of Gematria all along. With supplements that have lasers beamed at them. Which now, apparently when you go to the seminar you're about to hear about curing HIV that the FDA put a kibosh to on the website.
I really, really don't think so. You got the wrong blog to associate with if you're looking for people interested in alternative medicine associated with numerological gematria.
The relentless uptick in activity regarding my copyright violation post is curious and continued through the night. Once or twice per hour there's a page view from Poland. It almost seems like spam where the spammer has yet to figure out how to leave a spam message. So I got the bright, or not so bright, idea to Google "Gematria copyright violation".
Which shouldn't and did not bring up this blog. The post title was mocking attempts to avoid copyright violation by substituting symbols for letters. What I did find is this:
http://www.gematria.com/
Just looking at the URL you wouldn't know exactly what it is. Looks like it should be a calculator for gematria values or a blog or something numerology related.
One of the last things I expected was vitamin/nutrition supplements. I have to be careful here, since there is a connection between "gematria" and "copyright issues". So I'm playing it safe. If I say, "it seems like" or "I don't think so" it's my opinion. If I don't, there's still a pretty good chance that it's my opinion. Consider it to be like a product review on Yelp (which has a connection to my research).
Strangely, the main URL does not take you to the home page on the website, it goes right to the product list. The URL changes by redirection to /default. This looks like supreme confidence or arrogance. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. Let's see what HOME says about these guys.
Laser enhanced. I never heard of such a thing. My opinion, it sounds like classic woo. For those not familiar with "Woo" it's a pejorative term that you might be more familiar with when called "snake oil". Woo, maybe or maybe not, is also a pejorative term for John Woo movies which early on were great and then proceeded into major suckage as time marched on. I doubt that beaming light rays, even from a laser, has any effect on the effectiveness of a nutritional supplement. I'm still stinging from the page redirect; I want my extraordinary claims to have proof. Now you have to prove to me how this works.
And I could probably stop right there. Because I know what's coming up. Just like if I see 59 in a numerology narrative it means freemason. It's going to be a secret process, of course there's something that makes your product the best. If some government agency tries to duplicate the process it wont be done "just right" to duplicate your process, thereby failing to release the full value. The wrong type of laser. The wrong time. It wasn't during the full moon, the laser wasn't operated by a virgin, blah, blah,blah. That's the way woo works. But benefit of the doubt. So back to the products page.
We have third party verification. SCS Global Services was paid to go through the GMP checklist of FDA standards. I'm of the opinion that these standards are "Congratulations, you do not have toxic levels of mercury in your product that will outright kill anyone ingesting them. The facilities have a bathroom and are operated by people instead of diseased capuchin monkeys". And nowhere is there any claim to how the product is proven to be more effective. But hey, Standards! Note at the bottom they admit that the FDA has not offered an opinion on their claims. It's my understanding that the FDA requires such a disclaimer to allow such material to be presented. Also, it doesn't cure disease. That's something we'll get back to.
While we're here, let's check the testimonials link. There's nothing too outrageous here. Like, I used to have a third eye that disappeared after taking the product for two weeks. Score a point now, but I'll take it away later. At least these people didn't write a review without (presumably) taking the supplements. Which would be like providing testimonial on an unfinished book.
Dr. Todd Oyoksomething You wouldn't get far with promoting something without any credentials at all. These look impressive. Up until the end when the dreaded phrase, "alternative medicine" is used like it's a good thing. It's my belief that "alternative medicine" is synonymous with "woo". So I'm dying to see how L.A.S.E.R worked out to such a nice acronym after reading Dr. Oyo's story. My acronym team is more excited than me.
What in the seven levels of turtle hell?!? There's no explanation of LASER other than using the word laser, which is an acronym. I want something like, Lovely Assed Radiation Enhanced Supplement. So keeping the process secret still, we just get info on how lasers are beamed in vitro (outside the body) and have to take it on faith that the Dr. Todd research on HIV in school proves he found how this makes the altered supplements work better in the body (in vivo)!
I really don't think so. Let's check some internet reviews.
https://m.yelp.com/biz/gematria-products-inc-carlsbad-2
Now I don't put much faith in these reviews, pro or con. I've talked about this before. People tend to only give one star for pissed off or five for best thing ever to get rid of that troublesome third eye. One person from 2009 who's dog died. And three that were written this month. When I retrieved that link the one review was only 11 hours old! Looks to me like it could be a push to generate positive reviews which may or may not be completely genuine.
This could also explain the recent interest in this blog. Gematria numerology has a tie in to the nonmainstream world (which they embrace). The company name has the word gematria in it. Who knows what kind of ads have been linked into blogs and videos out there on the internet. I've had traffic come from an agricultural tips blog that only had two posts from six-seven years ago, just this month. People get lost on the internet pretty easy (Dan) and this is a woo thing to do for who will do the woo. I was looking at that false flag video after checking for pet vitamins and gosh darn, you had me hooked on laser!
Now let's wrap this up with their twitter feed. Upper right for that link. And now let's see this January tweet about vibrations.
http://archive.aweber.com/awlist4897635/G.HsC/h/The_Scientific_Art_of_Raising.htm
Scientifically raising planetary vibrations, the entire goal of Gematria all along. With supplements that have lasers beamed at them. Which now, apparently when you go to the seminar you're about to hear about curing HIV that the FDA put a kibosh to on the website.
I really, really don't think so. You got the wrong blog to associate with if you're looking for people interested in alternative medicine associated with numerological gematria.
Monday, February 12, 2018
My New Project
Before we begin, there's been a remarkable influx on activity and my copyright violation post has received more page views than any other in a two day span. It's not my concern on which side of the fence the views are on. Either pissed off conspiracy theorists hating the mockery or those that enjoy the mockery. Whichever, I thought you should know my predictive powers of gematria matters correctly called this in regards to recent Holocaust activity:
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/youtube-strikes-videos-exposing-talmud.html
_______________________________________
Having mentioned how putting all conspiracy theories being placed under the gematria umbrella actually weakens them it's time for a more pointed example of what you're getting yourselves into, namely the constant dissatisfaction with settling on a single way or at least just a few ways to arrive at a number. The gematria umbrella for arriving at its numerical values is huge.
Often I'll just say, "I can play that reduction game all day" and leave it at that. So it's time to back that up. Normally with generating antonyms I settle for the simple ciphers. This project will be huge and will only be done in small pieces at a time. If I can rely on multiple ciphers, prime numbers and mirror images (and some less often used tricks) there are bound to be a lot of antonyms just based on the actual way language works and mathematical probability. I already gave a taste of this by pointing out that 30 is the prime number list position of 113. TRUTH=30, DISHONESTY=113. You made your bed, you sleep in it. Now instead of just 113=113, 30=113 and TRUTH=DISHONESTY.
I used my superior powers of predictability regarding gematria to correctly guess I would in short order prove a numerical link between various words related to TRUTH or TRUE and their opposites. I correctly guessed I wrote down more words than I researched before taking a break. I scored 100% success so far on these.
VALID=48, HOAX=48
REAL=40, FALSEHOOD=40, UNTRUTH=40
ACTUAL=41, AUTHENTIC=41, FALSEHOOD=41, DISHONEST=41, SHAM=41
HONEST=81, LIES=18
*FACT =30, the 113th prime number. NOT TRUE 30
And of course about a year ago I found out that TRUE=BOGUS.
There are convenient words to focus on when taking on a project like this. Some words have more synonyms than others, therefore more antonyms than others. Here's the entry for SINISTER:
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/sinister
I'm not even going to begin to count how many synonyms there are. Two hundred-ish? And SINISTER has been used in a gematria story equalling 113. What are the odds that I won't find a 30 in that list or cross matching reduction elision values between all the synonyms and antonyms? Somewhere between 0% and 0%, and 0% doesn't count. When Duck of Truth put out his gematria video (called "nonsense for idiots" by Hubbard) he didn't even use reductions. If the program he wrote was upgraded for reductions, primes and mirror images it would yield quite an interesting thesaurus. Certainly enough contradiction that any reasonable, unbiased observer being exposed to gematria for the first time would be convinced.
I think I'm going to finish up the "truth" portion of this project and find another word to go through. I'm leaning towards "cranky/irascible/irked" since I'm cranky dealing with cranks.
* Forget this one the first time around. Got to work those primes in there.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/youtube-strikes-videos-exposing-talmud.html
_______________________________________
Having mentioned how putting all conspiracy theories being placed under the gematria umbrella actually weakens them it's time for a more pointed example of what you're getting yourselves into, namely the constant dissatisfaction with settling on a single way or at least just a few ways to arrive at a number. The gematria umbrella for arriving at its numerical values is huge.
Often I'll just say, "I can play that reduction game all day" and leave it at that. So it's time to back that up. Normally with generating antonyms I settle for the simple ciphers. This project will be huge and will only be done in small pieces at a time. If I can rely on multiple ciphers, prime numbers and mirror images (and some less often used tricks) there are bound to be a lot of antonyms just based on the actual way language works and mathematical probability. I already gave a taste of this by pointing out that 30 is the prime number list position of 113. TRUTH=30, DISHONESTY=113. You made your bed, you sleep in it. Now instead of just 113=113, 30=113 and TRUTH=DISHONESTY.
I used my superior powers of predictability regarding gematria to correctly guess I would in short order prove a numerical link between various words related to TRUTH or TRUE and their opposites. I correctly guessed I wrote down more words than I researched before taking a break. I scored 100% success so far on these.
VALID=48, HOAX=48
REAL=40, FALSEHOOD=40, UNTRUTH=40
ACTUAL=41, AUTHENTIC=41, FALSEHOOD=41, DISHONEST=41, SHAM=41
HONEST=81, LIES=18
*FACT =30, the 113th prime number. NOT TRUE 30
And of course about a year ago I found out that TRUE=BOGUS.
There are convenient words to focus on when taking on a project like this. Some words have more synonyms than others, therefore more antonyms than others. Here's the entry for SINISTER:
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/sinister
I'm not even going to begin to count how many synonyms there are. Two hundred-ish? And SINISTER has been used in a gematria story equalling 113. What are the odds that I won't find a 30 in that list or cross matching reduction elision values between all the synonyms and antonyms? Somewhere between 0% and 0%, and 0% doesn't count. When Duck of Truth put out his gematria video (called "nonsense for idiots" by Hubbard) he didn't even use reductions. If the program he wrote was upgraded for reductions, primes and mirror images it would yield quite an interesting thesaurus. Certainly enough contradiction that any reasonable, unbiased observer being exposed to gematria for the first time would be convinced.
I think I'm going to finish up the "truth" portion of this project and find another word to go through. I'm leaning towards "cranky/irascible/irked" since I'm cranky dealing with cranks.
* Forget this one the first time around. Got to work those primes in there.
Sunday, February 11, 2018
How To Predict A Celebrity Death
The short answer:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Shoehorn-800.jpg
I guess I have to give a shout out to Zom for this since he commented about Bob Dylan, here. And I owe him for pointing out that Satanic gematria is based on 666 being a triangular number. I'm reluctant to, since I'm a merciless attention whore and I'm in fear of losing my sweet gig that pays oh so well. Perhaps I can placate him with a cookie and he'll stop giving up any attempts to usurp control. If you are not Zom, DO NOT LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING IMAGE. Zom,
https://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/5433381/il_fullxfull.239905755.jpg
Now, to this day the single old post that gets the most attention here is How To Predict A Sports Champion. There must be a lot of Googling "Sports Champion Gematria" or such going on and accidental views before finding out I'm being a sarcastic prick. Since this post is also inspired by those viewers, you get a cookie, too.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/31/09/40F5670200000578-4557832-image-a-9_1496219320864.jpg
Which are less sharply defined and look more like tiny little balls and dorks. Seems appropriate.
In addition to being limited to a certain amount of f-bombs during my phone plan billing cycle, I'm also limited to how many images I'm allowed to put in a post. Translation, I'm too lazy to look it up right now. There is an entire post on the FTFM (still not a typo) blog dedicated to the topic of predicting Bob Dylan's death. This is a pretty old topic and shows up in the oddest spots. But mostly seems to be a product of predicting a sports champion. Because Bobby was born in Minnesota= Super Bowl! Specifically Duluth. I can just picture the video that's already been started: "Hey Duluth seeker, Zach here. Welcome back...."
It's like some sort of dead pool where the winner gets a pat on the ass and a cupcake shaped like the number 1 with a candle blowing in the wind. Dead pools are not a new idea. Dirty Harry did it. Marvel Comics did it better. Well, not the theme, but the movie was a lot funnier. I could be influenced by my distaste for Sondra Locke, who although was not in The Dead Pool always comes to mind when I hear Clint Eastwood.
Last year was a banner year for this site:
https://deathlist.net/
Slightly more than 1/3rd of the fifty picks predicted before 2017 even started cooperated by kicking the farm and buying the bucket. Scratch that. Reverse it. However, they kind of, let's not say cheat, but "hedge their bets". Everybody is really old, really sick or both.
The easy way out is to predict this way - Every celebrity that's alive today will die within the next 5000 years. Shoehorn in freemasons. Texas Sharpshooter in some date numerology. After they cooperate by actually ghosting up the give. Scratch that. Reverse it.
The Bob Dylan pool had lots of other suggestions although these didn't have the Minnesota connection Dylan has. Stan Lee was mentioned and I'm sure whoever said that was actually hoping his recent hospitalization was the end, had them chomping at the bit to pronounce how they predicted it. Even yesterday we had some lovely Tindering of a date where this guy's death is related to still alive and rolling Stephen Hawking's birthday.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/33-48-143-144-170-241-johan-johannsson.html
The same low standards on reporting on copyright violations carry over into what qualifies as a significant date.
So in practice it's awfully similar to predicting a sports champion when the two finalists are known. Predict one or the other, or both. If you're right, declare victory. Capital letters help. I PREDICTED THE EAGLES WOULD WIN BECAUSE SONDRA LOCKE MEANS "LOCK" AND THE COWBOYS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE A LOCK FOR THE SUPER BOWL AND THE EAGLES ARE IN THE SAME DIVISION AS THE COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!". Or whatever other bullshit you have available to work with like the color green or Year of the Dog on the Chinese calendar. Ignore having made a prediction if wrong and hope nobody notices.
They usually don't come right out and make predictions on celebrities croaking. However I like Dan's approach from yesterday to solve the being incorrect part of the problem, like here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180211084229/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/starmanfilm-starring-jeff-bridges-death.html?m=1
Could we see Steve Miller's death this year or COULD IT MEAN SOMETHING ELSE? Like Steve Miller not dying this year.
Because nothing says scary predictive powers like choosing both options between dying and not dying. Have a cookie. The second image variety.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Shoehorn-800.jpg
I guess I have to give a shout out to Zom for this since he commented about Bob Dylan, here. And I owe him for pointing out that Satanic gematria is based on 666 being a triangular number. I'm reluctant to, since I'm a merciless attention whore and I'm in fear of losing my sweet gig that pays oh so well. Perhaps I can placate him with a cookie and he'll stop giving up any attempts to usurp control. If you are not Zom, DO NOT LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING IMAGE. Zom,
https://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/5433381/il_fullxfull.239905755.jpg
Now, to this day the single old post that gets the most attention here is How To Predict A Sports Champion. There must be a lot of Googling "Sports Champion Gematria" or such going on and accidental views before finding out I'm being a sarcastic prick. Since this post is also inspired by those viewers, you get a cookie, too.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/05/31/09/40F5670200000578-4557832-image-a-9_1496219320864.jpg
Which are less sharply defined and look more like tiny little balls and dorks. Seems appropriate.
In addition to being limited to a certain amount of f-bombs during my phone plan billing cycle, I'm also limited to how many images I'm allowed to put in a post. Translation, I'm too lazy to look it up right now. There is an entire post on the FTFM (still not a typo) blog dedicated to the topic of predicting Bob Dylan's death. This is a pretty old topic and shows up in the oddest spots. But mostly seems to be a product of predicting a sports champion. Because Bobby was born in Minnesota= Super Bowl! Specifically Duluth. I can just picture the video that's already been started: "Hey Duluth seeker, Zach here. Welcome back...."
It's like some sort of dead pool where the winner gets a pat on the ass and a cupcake shaped like the number 1 with a candle blowing in the wind. Dead pools are not a new idea. Dirty Harry did it. Marvel Comics did it better. Well, not the theme, but the movie was a lot funnier. I could be influenced by my distaste for Sondra Locke, who although was not in The Dead Pool always comes to mind when I hear Clint Eastwood.
Last year was a banner year for this site:
https://deathlist.net/
Slightly more than 1/3rd of the fifty picks predicted before 2017 even started cooperated by kicking the farm and buying the bucket. Scratch that. Reverse it. However, they kind of, let's not say cheat, but "hedge their bets". Everybody is really old, really sick or both.
The easy way out is to predict this way - Every celebrity that's alive today will die within the next 5000 years. Shoehorn in freemasons. Texas Sharpshooter in some date numerology. After they cooperate by actually ghosting up the give. Scratch that. Reverse it.
The Bob Dylan pool had lots of other suggestions although these didn't have the Minnesota connection Dylan has. Stan Lee was mentioned and I'm sure whoever said that was actually hoping his recent hospitalization was the end, had them chomping at the bit to pronounce how they predicted it. Even yesterday we had some lovely Tindering of a date where this guy's death is related to still alive and rolling Stephen Hawking's birthday.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/33-48-143-144-170-241-johan-johannsson.html
The same low standards on reporting on copyright violations carry over into what qualifies as a significant date.
So in practice it's awfully similar to predicting a sports champion when the two finalists are known. Predict one or the other, or both. If you're right, declare victory. Capital letters help. I PREDICTED THE EAGLES WOULD WIN BECAUSE SONDRA LOCKE MEANS "LOCK" AND THE COWBOYS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE A LOCK FOR THE SUPER BOWL AND THE EAGLES ARE IN THE SAME DIVISION AS THE COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!". Or whatever other bullshit you have available to work with like the color green or Year of the Dog on the Chinese calendar. Ignore having made a prediction if wrong and hope nobody notices.
They usually don't come right out and make predictions on celebrities croaking. However I like Dan's approach from yesterday to solve the being incorrect part of the problem, like here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180211084229/http://themindlessfreaks.blogspot.com/2018/02/starmanfilm-starring-jeff-bridges-death.html?m=1
Could we see Steve Miller's death this year or COULD IT MEAN SOMETHING ELSE? Like Steve Miller not dying this year.
Because nothing says scary predictive powers like choosing both options between dying and not dying. Have a cookie. The second image variety.
Saturday, February 10, 2018
C0P¥R1GHT V!0£AT|0NS
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=L3aYaM2ZpWc
So yesterday I said to myself, "Hey self, the video about the Holocaust Hoax has the comments disabled. The alternate link on the sock puppet channel was deleted by YouTube. I want insane comments about the Holocaust! Let's check the video put up just before the Holocaust video. Usually these guys let it spill over into the next best option."
So, good news for me, I don't have to scroll through for bizarro landers - first one. Gene Simmons of Kiss owns the © for the dollar sign. I said to myself, "Why yes, not only does that sound perfectly reasonable, I actually heard that before." Then I stopped being sarcastic, gagged on my swallow of spit and the dog got excited because he heard one of the phrases he is familiar with and thinks is his name:
No. Fucking. Way.
This could be a candidate for the monthly award, but with the imminent strike on the account I'm not sure how long the channel will last. It could be an addition to the misused terms list. Which it is, but the whole concept is wrong. Eventually, here we are posting today since this deserves a picture of a badger and is a timely example of why truthers aren't taken seriously.
OK, now first Mr. DeWeaver is from Australia. So we can already guess his exposure to Wollongong gematria ambiguity is at a higher dosage than most people. And his avatar proves it - a triangle shape. The actual mark of the Beast, not the circle.
A copyright violation is for rights of authorship to something that was produced by an individual. Like a song or book. The individual pieces that make that up like the words in the book are not copyrighted, it's the book as a whole. If you could copyright the pieces, then somebody is sitting on a butt load of cash for copyrighting the word "the". If anything, this would be a trademark ™ violation. A symbol commonly designated as significantly representing something. Like the McDonalds Golden Arches. Or the smiley face which WalMart decided it was entitled to.
And lost the ensuing legal battle because it was 😊 too common and not their property.*
At times I have a hard time grasping the kind of mindset that thinks this kind of thing is true without any fact checking. That's not to say that you can instantly dismiss it, but IF SOMETHING SOUNDS TOO GOOD (or weird) TO BE TRUE IT PROBABLY IS. A quick check of the internet reveals absolutely zero connection between Gene Simmons and the dollar symbol. There is a months old deal about trying to get the rights to the "devil's horns" hand gesture that looks like the ASL "I love you" hand sign or Spidey shooting his webs. But zippo on the dollar sign.
That's about strange concepts in general not being thought out terribly well. But you believe in gematria, so you're looking for easy answers instead of <insert badger picture here> actual truth. Like 59 couldn't possibly mean anything but freemason. So let me explain to you why the dollar sign story is completely wrong.
Now I've been typing out the words "dollar sign" instead of actually using it. In case you think I'm afraid of using it because of imminent litigation:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
KI$$ My A$$ Gene Simmon$. Every computer keyboard and typewriter has a dollar sign. Copyright infringement! (Henceforth abbreviated CI). Every time it's typed - CI! Every game show that displays $ amounts - CI! Jeopardy is rigged AND a breeding ground for litigation. The receipt from Dan's Wendy's lunch-CI! Every invoice, tv commercial, IOU note handwritten in crayon -CI! If Gene TRIED to get a copyright for this I imagine the response would be a simple two word, "Pi$$ off".
And with the use of symbols in gematria it would also work this way. If somebody is trying to bypass a naughty word filter or are forced to make a password that includes at least one symbol, like me your cleverness is usually to make your password something like P@$$word123 so you can still remember it as a word. Everyone knows when you type a$$hole you mean asshole. A copyright violation in practicality doesn't happen for identical content. Like Robin Thicke's song, Blurred Lines, it was close enough to Marvin Gaye's song. CI! So you guys have already shown that S=5 and similar stuff because they LOOK alike. Every 5, S and yes even Z - CI! (I'm not making that up. I've seen Z is a backwards five numerous times.) Oh Je, er....Attu flipperx how many of that letter before the letter t have I typed thux far- CI!
If there was ever a post that begged for being chided for nonsensicality this is it. Instead of "That's just plain fucking stupid" we get a "Really?" And a bunch of likes including the channel ❤ symbol. That all started off with a post about the $ symbol being copyrighted, using that $ in the text.
CI!!!!!!!!!! (Dumba$$)
* If there was any truth to this the best Simmons could hope for is the use of something like $ in KI$$. WalMart might have a variation of a smiley they think is unique, but the courts rightfully didn't want to open up a lamprey argument. If the courts have a change of heart about copyright type issues I'm working on the paperwork to get a patent, copyright and trademark on dust. Not the word, the actual dust. You may want to stop sloughing off dead skin cells now to be on the safe side.
So yesterday I said to myself, "Hey self, the video about the Holocaust Hoax has the comments disabled. The alternate link on the sock puppet channel was deleted by YouTube. I want insane comments about the Holocaust! Let's check the video put up just before the Holocaust video. Usually these guys let it spill over into the next best option."
So, good news for me, I don't have to scroll through for bizarro landers - first one. Gene Simmons of Kiss owns the © for the dollar sign. I said to myself, "Why yes, not only does that sound perfectly reasonable, I actually heard that before." Then I stopped being sarcastic, gagged on my swallow of spit and the dog got excited because he heard one of the phrases he is familiar with and thinks is his name:
No. Fucking. Way.
This could be a candidate for the monthly award, but with the imminent strike on the account I'm not sure how long the channel will last. It could be an addition to the misused terms list. Which it is, but the whole concept is wrong. Eventually, here we are posting today since this deserves a picture of a badger and is a timely example of why truthers aren't taken seriously.
OK, now first Mr. DeWeaver is from Australia. So we can already guess his exposure to Wollongong gematria ambiguity is at a higher dosage than most people. And his avatar proves it - a triangle shape. The actual mark of the Beast, not the circle.
A copyright violation is for rights of authorship to something that was produced by an individual. Like a song or book. The individual pieces that make that up like the words in the book are not copyrighted, it's the book as a whole. If you could copyright the pieces, then somebody is sitting on a butt load of cash for copyrighting the word "the". If anything, this would be a trademark ™ violation. A symbol commonly designated as significantly representing something. Like the McDonalds Golden Arches. Or the smiley face which WalMart decided it was entitled to.
And lost the ensuing legal battle because it was 😊 too common and not their property.*
At times I have a hard time grasping the kind of mindset that thinks this kind of thing is true without any fact checking. That's not to say that you can instantly dismiss it, but IF SOMETHING SOUNDS TOO GOOD (or weird) TO BE TRUE IT PROBABLY IS. A quick check of the internet reveals absolutely zero connection between Gene Simmons and the dollar symbol. There is a months old deal about trying to get the rights to the "devil's horns" hand gesture that looks like the ASL "I love you" hand sign or Spidey shooting his webs. But zippo on the dollar sign.
That's about strange concepts in general not being thought out terribly well. But you believe in gematria, so you're looking for easy answers instead of <insert badger picture here> actual truth. Like 59 couldn't possibly mean anything but freemason. So let me explain to you why the dollar sign story is completely wrong.
Now I've been typing out the words "dollar sign" instead of actually using it. In case you think I'm afraid of using it because of imminent litigation:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
KI$$ My A$$ Gene Simmon$. Every computer keyboard and typewriter has a dollar sign. Copyright infringement! (Henceforth abbreviated CI). Every time it's typed - CI! Every game show that displays $ amounts - CI! Jeopardy is rigged AND a breeding ground for litigation. The receipt from Dan's Wendy's lunch-CI! Every invoice, tv commercial, IOU note handwritten in crayon -CI! If Gene TRIED to get a copyright for this I imagine the response would be a simple two word, "Pi$$ off".
And with the use of symbols in gematria it would also work this way. If somebody is trying to bypass a naughty word filter or are forced to make a password that includes at least one symbol, like me your cleverness is usually to make your password something like P@$$word123 so you can still remember it as a word. Everyone knows when you type a$$hole you mean asshole. A copyright violation in practicality doesn't happen for identical content. Like Robin Thicke's song, Blurred Lines, it was close enough to Marvin Gaye's song. CI! So you guys have already shown that S=5 and similar stuff because they LOOK alike. Every 5, S and yes even Z - CI! (I'm not making that up. I've seen Z is a backwards five numerous times.) Oh Je, er....Attu flipperx how many of that letter before the letter t have I typed thux far- CI!
If there was ever a post that begged for being chided for nonsensicality this is it. Instead of "That's just plain fucking stupid" we get a "Really?" And a bunch of likes including the channel ❤ symbol. That all started off with a post about the $ symbol being copyrighted, using that $ in the text.
CI!!!!!!!!!! (Dumba$$)
* If there was any truth to this the best Simmons could hope for is the use of something like $ in KI$$. WalMart might have a variation of a smiley they think is unique, but the courts rightfully didn't want to open up a lamprey argument. If the courts have a change of heart about copyright type issues I'm working on the paperwork to get a patent, copyright and trademark on dust. Not the word, the actual dust. You may want to stop sloughing off dead skin cells now to be on the safe side.
Friday, February 9, 2018
The Punyfied Conspiracy Theory
A feature of gematria is something that is proudly proclaimed by some abusers - it's not a conspiracy theory. The difference of opinion is about what it actually is if it's not a conspiracy theory. Their implication is that the opposite of theory is fact.
The comments to the blogs and videos get rather bizarre at times. Some of the most entertaining reading I did last year was during the hurricane season which bumped up against the World Series. Because instead of a conspiracy theory in and of itself gematria is an excuse for crank magnetism where multiple or even every single conspiracy can be lumped into one grand, unified conspiracy. This laziness leads to weakening the overall case, making it actually punier. A punyfied conspiracy .
The one that stood out most to me during Hurricane Harvey time was that the same chemtrails used to poison our water supply, depending on who you were reading from at the time, were weather warfare, mind control, killing, or sickening the population to force into FEMA death camps, and probably others I missed. Some of those don't mix well. Mind control drugs that kill. Nothing, absolutely nothing, says scary like a mind controlled corpse. There's a lovely series on AMC about this, or even better Return of the Living Dead.
Here's a link for crank magnetism:
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2009/05/06/melanie-phillips-crank-magnetism-in-acti/
And here's the unified theory. Do take time to look at the comments. Between the actual article and those we've got a lot of crank bases covered, reptoid aliens, illuminati, Scientology, flat earth, etc....
https://illuminatiwatcher.com/a-grand-unified-conspiracy-theory-the-illuminati-ancient-aliens-and-pop-culture/
The classic example of using gematria as proof for whatever individual conspiracy you want is flat Earth. At one time it wasn't necessarily embraced, but at least tolerated. Then it looks like abandoned because it was incompatible with use of GPS coordinates in gematria, which I've covered numerous times and is the reason I keep mentioning Wollongong. GPS coordinates are not compatible with certain other scientific facts. Dragging too many theories under the umbrella means something is left out in the rain.
Now you could wait until an actual individual theory is brought up. Currently there's a Hubbard video that has been flagged after less than two hours about Holocaust denial. I suppose the intent is to have a ready made defense to argue that this is obviously true because of the numbers and avoid the other critiques of why it doesn't make sense. But dragging it into the gematria punyfied umbrella makes it easy.
PUNY=14, SMALL=14, LARGE=14, GIANT=14, BIG=14 and while we're at it HUGE=41, the mirror of 14. Congratulations, you've just cheapened the case for any individual conspiracy because gematria doesn't work. You're still left with arguing the other points as you have no real evidence. In the case of this video, 48. That's it. A puny, small number vs. history. That's why the 9/11 truther forum laughed off the lengthy numerology analysis immediately, nobody takes you seriously even your own friends.
Outside the truther community you're experiencing Badger's Law.
https://rationalwiki.org/w/images/5/59/Badger%27s_Law.jpg
And the direct refutation like this blog.
The comments to the blogs and videos get rather bizarre at times. Some of the most entertaining reading I did last year was during the hurricane season which bumped up against the World Series. Because instead of a conspiracy theory in and of itself gematria is an excuse for crank magnetism where multiple or even every single conspiracy can be lumped into one grand, unified conspiracy. This laziness leads to weakening the overall case, making it actually punier. A punyfied conspiracy .
The one that stood out most to me during Hurricane Harvey time was that the same chemtrails used to poison our water supply, depending on who you were reading from at the time, were weather warfare, mind control, killing, or sickening the population to force into FEMA death camps, and probably others I missed. Some of those don't mix well. Mind control drugs that kill. Nothing, absolutely nothing, says scary like a mind controlled corpse. There's a lovely series on AMC about this, or even better Return of the Living Dead.
Here's a link for crank magnetism:
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2009/05/06/melanie-phillips-crank-magnetism-in-acti/
And here's the unified theory. Do take time to look at the comments. Between the actual article and those we've got a lot of crank bases covered, reptoid aliens, illuminati, Scientology, flat earth, etc....
https://illuminatiwatcher.com/a-grand-unified-conspiracy-theory-the-illuminati-ancient-aliens-and-pop-culture/
The classic example of using gematria as proof for whatever individual conspiracy you want is flat Earth. At one time it wasn't necessarily embraced, but at least tolerated. Then it looks like abandoned because it was incompatible with use of GPS coordinates in gematria, which I've covered numerous times and is the reason I keep mentioning Wollongong. GPS coordinates are not compatible with certain other scientific facts. Dragging too many theories under the umbrella means something is left out in the rain.
Now you could wait until an actual individual theory is brought up. Currently there's a Hubbard video that has been flagged after less than two hours about Holocaust denial. I suppose the intent is to have a ready made defense to argue that this is obviously true because of the numbers and avoid the other critiques of why it doesn't make sense. But dragging it into the gematria punyfied umbrella makes it easy.
PUNY=14, SMALL=14, LARGE=14, GIANT=14, BIG=14 and while we're at it HUGE=41, the mirror of 14. Congratulations, you've just cheapened the case for any individual conspiracy because gematria doesn't work. You're still left with arguing the other points as you have no real evidence. In the case of this video, 48. That's it. A puny, small number vs. history. That's why the 9/11 truther forum laughed off the lengthy numerology analysis immediately, nobody takes you seriously even your own friends.
Outside the truther community you're experiencing Badger's Law.
https://rationalwiki.org/w/images/5/59/Badger%27s_Law.jpg
And the direct refutation like this blog.
Thursday, February 8, 2018
A Trashy Analysis
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2018/02/42-58-113-youtube-star-kian-lawley.html
Here's a great example of what happens with the repetitive content and how truly meaningless it is. Because Hubbard is so prolific (and apparently still ignoring finishing the book) the same two and three digit numbers keep showing up.
Most things tie into recent history. Super Bowl this and Super Bowl that. Maybe by the time the NBA finals roll around the magical synchronicity will start to mean basketball. For an undetermined amount of time, the Super Bowl is THE event that the tiny little numbers absolutely MUST be related to. It's so obvious that it's amazing the shape don't see why 42 means Super Bowl in some way instead of 42 meaning August 2017 eclipse or whatever.
The main point of this is not to bring up that Rasual Butler a basketball player and Oscar Gamble a baseball player were sacrificed for a football game. That's part of the problem. In the big picture, children shouldn't be allowed access to loaded guns and truthers should not have access to databases, written notes or a memory beyond a couple of days. It's too easy to come up with a tiny number like 42 and check for recent matches, then proclaim that the two without any doubt are related. Since the word of the month is shoehorn, then we'll throw that in here. For now 42, 52, 62, 77 and others are shoehorn bait to instant mean event totally unrelated to the Super Bowl now means Super Bowl.
So let's pretend that Oscar Gamble's death was really caused by this evil nearly infinitely powered not-so-secret-after-all cabal, but it was really related to the previous sacrifice of Roy Halladay. Both Philadelphia Phillies baseball players. Both died in relatively recent history. If the elites are still milking the Hurricane Harvey aftermath then Halladay's death doesn't seem too distant in the past. OSCAR GAMBLE =66 (rev. reduced) and ROY HALLADAY=66 (ALW). Now you lose part of this narrative about Kian Lawley. Is it really that important to add in how many video views to the story? Because:
1). Over 42,000 does not equal 42.
2). A number that wasn't derived from a word isn't really gematria.
3). 42 isn't even right in the first place.
The problem is that the name of the YouTuber that leaked the video is not JUSTIN TRASH, but simply JUST TRASH. Which on a quick check without playing around with prime numbers or whatever doesn't have an immediate elision generated 42.
This happens occasionally. I saw it immediately, but I don't really count, not because I'm looking for trouble (which I am) but more so because I have vastly better powers of observation than most people. And here in the comments, nobody mentions it. The video output of the day did have someone else spot it, but without mention that the gematria is just wrong. We certainly don't have a correction here on the morning after. Additional video commentary remarks that it's related to Justin Timberlake without recognition that he's not just Just Timberlake.
And in addition to the 42 we have a 159 and 93 connection in the narrative also based on the wrong name. I don't think the name was intentionally misspelled, merely Justin on the brain after the Super Bowl halftime show.
More to the point is not that there was a mistake made and saying nanner nanner boo boo! It's that an alternative story could easily be made based off JUST TRASH. Get the correct numbers, scan your blog conveniently organized by what tiny numbers are there. Try and force the 42k views into it if it's not too much of a stretch.
The one thing that continually mystifies me is why anyone would continue to read the FTFM blog regularly when you know what's coming up.
<NEWS>
Tiny numbers
Numbers=evil.
Over and over again with just some slight variation of exactly what the tiny numbers are. Here's a comparison of what this boils down to.
Unedited:
JUSTIN TRASH
42, 93, 159
Look at database
Those are evil numbers
Corrected:
JUST TRASH
pick through for some tiny numbers you like
Look at database
Those are evil numbers.
When the Chinese calendar rolls over to the year of the typing monkey they could easily duplicate this trashy analysis.
Here's a great example of what happens with the repetitive content and how truly meaningless it is. Because Hubbard is so prolific (and apparently still ignoring finishing the book) the same two and three digit numbers keep showing up.
Most things tie into recent history. Super Bowl this and Super Bowl that. Maybe by the time the NBA finals roll around the magical synchronicity will start to mean basketball. For an undetermined amount of time, the Super Bowl is THE event that the tiny little numbers absolutely MUST be related to. It's so obvious that it's amazing the shape don't see why 42 means Super Bowl in some way instead of 42 meaning August 2017 eclipse or whatever.
The main point of this is not to bring up that Rasual Butler a basketball player and Oscar Gamble a baseball player were sacrificed for a football game. That's part of the problem. In the big picture, children shouldn't be allowed access to loaded guns and truthers should not have access to databases, written notes or a memory beyond a couple of days. It's too easy to come up with a tiny number like 42 and check for recent matches, then proclaim that the two without any doubt are related. Since the word of the month is shoehorn, then we'll throw that in here. For now 42, 52, 62, 77 and others are shoehorn bait to instant mean event totally unrelated to the Super Bowl now means Super Bowl.
So let's pretend that Oscar Gamble's death was really caused by this evil nearly infinitely powered not-so-secret-after-all cabal, but it was really related to the previous sacrifice of Roy Halladay. Both Philadelphia Phillies baseball players. Both died in relatively recent history. If the elites are still milking the Hurricane Harvey aftermath then Halladay's death doesn't seem too distant in the past. OSCAR GAMBLE =66 (rev. reduced) and ROY HALLADAY=66 (ALW). Now you lose part of this narrative about Kian Lawley. Is it really that important to add in how many video views to the story? Because:
1). Over 42,000 does not equal 42.
2). A number that wasn't derived from a word isn't really gematria.
3). 42 isn't even right in the first place.
The problem is that the name of the YouTuber that leaked the video is not JUSTIN TRASH, but simply JUST TRASH. Which on a quick check without playing around with prime numbers or whatever doesn't have an immediate elision generated 42.
This happens occasionally. I saw it immediately, but I don't really count, not because I'm looking for trouble (which I am) but more so because I have vastly better powers of observation than most people. And here in the comments, nobody mentions it. The video output of the day did have someone else spot it, but without mention that the gematria is just wrong. We certainly don't have a correction here on the morning after. Additional video commentary remarks that it's related to Justin Timberlake without recognition that he's not just Just Timberlake.
And in addition to the 42 we have a 159 and 93 connection in the narrative also based on the wrong name. I don't think the name was intentionally misspelled, merely Justin on the brain after the Super Bowl halftime show.
More to the point is not that there was a mistake made and saying nanner nanner boo boo! It's that an alternative story could easily be made based off JUST TRASH. Get the correct numbers, scan your blog conveniently organized by what tiny numbers are there. Try and force the 42k views into it if it's not too much of a stretch.
The one thing that continually mystifies me is why anyone would continue to read the FTFM blog regularly when you know what's coming up.
<NEWS>
Tiny numbers
Numbers=evil.
Over and over again with just some slight variation of exactly what the tiny numbers are. Here's a comparison of what this boils down to.
Unedited:
JUSTIN TRASH
42, 93, 159
Look at database
Those are evil numbers
Corrected:
JUST TRASH
pick through for some tiny numbers you like
Look at database
Those are evil numbers.
When the Chinese calendar rolls over to the year of the typing monkey they could easily duplicate this trashy analysis.