Undeniable Evidence Of Sports Rigging?

Chapter 21 of Hubbard's Letters & Numbers


Undeniable Evidence of Rigged Professional and Collegiate Sports


I'd like to complain about the use of undeniable, but I really can't. Anything can be, it's a matter of if your denial has any foundation in reality. Choosing to deny the existence of oxygen doesn't change the fact that it exists. Or that we need it.


Buried near the end of the book. I suppose that you can operate under the 'saving the best for last' philosophy. Ultimately, this is the chapter that will doom the entire vanity project. I'll explain.


You're obligated to include the chapter. Too many blog posts, too many videos addressing the subject. You've admitted that the majority of your blog traffic is sports related.


Sports are a huge source of raw data. As long as you can get away with being allowed to pick and choose which numbers mean something and discard the vast majority that don't support you, then you're golden. Once it comes to light how wrong so many numbers are then credibility quickly reaches 0. Which is why predictions are almost non existent and the rigging complaints only rear their heads when the box score is completed.


Just like the Venus Williams Wimbledon Finals misfire that would have matched a fictitious number in regards to planetary temperature, she lost and that match never came to be, we have an actual prediction for a major event. McGregor to beat Mayweather since he record will then be 22-3 and the name Conor (without the last name) equals 223 in the infrequently used Jewish elision.


Good luck with that prediction. From an objective viewpoint this seems unlikely. Mayweather is heavily favored. Then we can expect the old standby defense of a McGregor loss by - ignoring it and hoping nobody notices. In some respects a McGregor win could be worse. Now tho guy picked tho upset, let's check his other work. Our expectations are raised. And we find out things like, "I picked Green Bay instead of the Falcons not realizing that Wisconsin and Georgia both equal 44 in the reduced elision." What kind of defense is that? They ALWAYS equal 44, regardless of which year, which sport, or whether it's even a sport. You can never predictably separate the two. And with 64,982,427 different elisions the overlaps and lack of distinction are overwhelming.


You've also inherited virtually everything into the sports equation. The children were named long before a sports career was picked. Life is just a script. Try explaining to a hardcore gambling addict that your version of events happened starting all the way back to Stephen Curry's parents getting frisky one night and some super powerful cosmic force decided that to enhance his talent magnetic fields helped aim the ball into the hoop. After they lose money based on the numerology. Of course there's always a Wisconsin/Georgia style ambiguity to explain that away. After the fact.


Undeniable isn't the problem word in the chapter title. It's evidence. Enhanced by the adjective, but it's the evidence that's lacking. Remember, the sentences:


Gematria narratives are rigged, not sports.
and
Sports are rigged, not gematria narratives.


have the exact same numerology. It's really just that easy.


There's actual undeniable evidence we need to breathe oxygen to survive. Some people just make better use of it than others.