You should be asking who she is. And that's really kind of the point. I've known about her since the first few months of blogging. Hubbard links her YouTube channel on the Free To Find Misinformation blog and she is linked on the Gematria forum, a site devoted to emphasizing the more prolific gematria composers out there.
Rita has a distinctive style. She only decodes the bible, which makes her unique. Gematria being used for the historic purpose you can find if you Google "gematria". She doesn't use a calculator, preferring pen and paper. Usually puts out a couple videos a week. They hardly ever hit 200 views, but every time I check there are a group of names I see that comment. Loyal followers.
The gematria itself. Well, it is gematria. So it's by nature "wrong". She has a weird system, I imagine of her own creation, where she gets a three digit number, reverses the digits and adds them together. (More numbers = more hits"). And there is some reduction of everything to a single digit which is pretty awesome frivolous.
But that's about it. No hate speech. No celebrity deaths, no sports are rigged commentary, no bold faced lying. No GPS coordinates, prime numbers, searching for ridiculous ways to produce Pi. In short, little immediate searching for ways to manufacture a predetermined target number. And certainly no "faggot troll" comments or sportswriter death threats. The comments are more like, "What an inspiring, uplifting message to begin my day, Rita."
And therefore, no reason for me to ever bother mentioning her before now. If all gematria was like this the world would be a better place; someone looking for spiritual fulfillment instead of victim shaming or relentless sensationalizing to get attention.
The Wikipedia page goal (Zachary Keefe Hubbard Wikipedia page=113, already posted on the colleen video last night) and Sean Newell bodily harm video from yesterday are timely. I was planning on the contrasts in style and this gave me the opportunity.
Just like the Kelvinator picking on Hawaiian death, the Hubbard hate video on Newell's piece looks like a chance to look like an opportunity to look like a bad ass for the sake of the loyal minions. Nothing will come of it, and you get the joy of self proclamation of winning the debate when the other side simply lets the issue drop, because your illogical arguments aren't worth their time.
It's in pretty poor taste to suggest that you are randomly show up at Newell's office (and Ryan Phillips of USA Today) and film beating him up, personally. I doubt you're serious, but what would it prove? Coming from the same person that just a few days ago suggested that there's good in everyone and that if you personally are not Jesus, you are at least the prophet destined to be the one to show the world this magic code? That's a mixed message, and typical of the Hubbard style where one day he talks about what a good Samaritan he is and the next he tells us the kikes must die.
Another timely thing is the Harvey bit in the World Series narrative. Look at my post yesterday. I semi randomly picked Alexa Davalos and mentioned The Man in the High Castle. Last night on Jeopardy, a category for Phillip K Dick. Including a correct response of The Man in the High Castle. Coincidence, or proof that I'm the prophet destined to be the person that finally proves gematria is wrong and settle it once in for all? If you read my post just a bit earlier than that on Quantum Gematria, that's exactly what I jokingly imply!
Shappens.
Not convinced yet? Bob Brown openly admits he's a mason. You make a video, and were so nice to him. I just made a post about Bob The demoted evil cabal hit man. You didn't do numerology on him. Bob. Can't be a coincidence. People you like are treated with kid gloves, but as soon as someone crosses you, the narrative gets ugly. And often the defense team can't respond because they're dead, or you simply wait until after the game is over to make a prediction.
Now, I think it would be interesting if myself, Newell, Phillips, Hubbard and Rita sat down for a taped debate. Rita probably wouldn't go for it. This isn't the gematria she uses, despite her FTFT link and forum pedigree. And she would probably be uncomfortable discussing the finer points of PhraseShopping, Tindering, linguistics and actual math and science knowing that it's part of a "kill the long noses" agenda. I could do that.
Or I can simply continue to make an example of you here so that the people who think you're a wacko have a reference point on exactly why gematria doesn't work.
I COULD debate, but I'm using my superior gematria predictive abilities to say it's not going to happen. Not like the prediction I'm making that there will never be a Hubbard Wikipedia page acknowledging what a wonderful bit of work he's done. That will resolve itself by just not happening. But I'm in control of an actual live debate and I choose to decide that you're not significant enough for that. Mock your celebrity deaths, whine about sports and keep forcing the numbers. Get your page views and continue to wonder why nobody takes you seriously.
No comments:
Post a Comment