My main theme starting late last year and still ongoing is how media, especially entertainment media sneaking in naughty ideas, does show us a lot of stuff that simply doesn’t work long term. We’ve seen this movie before. Human nature prefers the protagonist to emerge triumphant, but there’s never a short supply of old, historical material to refer to. What exactly drove that chap to join The Running Man game show? Why are those adorable yet dirty street urchins stealing people’s money? Don’t they know pickpocketing is illegal and wrong? The wealthy at the times these events are recorded, whether totally fictional or based on actual history, don’t really enjoy the idea of being pointed at and mocked.
At times, it’s a thankless job being an actual journalist. Objectively reporting facts WILL get you harassment. The fictional setting is so much safer. You can use plausible deniability to claim that you didn’t realize Lex Luthor in the new Superman movie is a stand in for Musk at this time in history. Viewed decades later there will be another Musk like persona that can be substituted in a review. Somewhere though, someone, actually a lot of someone’s, have crossed paths with Musk and despite the I’m rich and can do whatever exploitation I want have raised the middle finger and pointed out the many objectively things wrong with him.
Psychologically, a huge warning sign for someone dabbling in to being up to no good is the excessive and narcissistic need for attention. And lacking the long term qualities of being admired for the right reasons, the artificial intelligence of money is the primary substitute.
Technological progress dictates some necessary changes in the journalism. In movies there was a phase where the hillbilly serial killers picked off the sexy teens at the remote location that of course didn’t have a landline phone. And there was always a convenient excuse for having no operational cellphone. In real life, it’s amazing how alien abduction based on shitty anecdotal evidence stopped being so prolific when confronted with the fact finding query, “So, do you have pictures of that UFO on your cell? Yeah, didn’t think so.” Sure seemed like a cry for attention, you look at me whore.
Now the bad news. Not so much a plan as normal reaction based on a lifetime of mental problems. And normal doesn’t mean good or even innocuous, in this case means can reasonably be expected based on patterns that can be predicted. The world is watching as the U.S. administration is dealing with a massive pushback. And Trump’s signature move is to break useful stuff. And this go to move is likely going to be on a speed run before the midterms. And with that on the table it means that everyone loses in the short term, regardless of if the U.S. and the global followers get their shit together or not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_the_Decline_and_Fall_of_the_Roman_Empire
Scholarly research gives a lot of well deserved credit to Edward Gibbons and his massive analysis of the Fall of the Roman Empire. The gematria clowns would approve of this work. It was centuries later and nothing helps with reporting like the luxury of being able to wait until all the facts are in. Lions 17, Christian’s 3 final in the second to last game of the season. The gematria clowns, as fake as fake can get regarding historical accuracy and journalism, would also hate having to do actual research instead of speed run ragebait.
So Gibbons did compile a lot of good material. But the actual knowledge of the events was live at some point. Spread out over a crumbling empire, bits and pieces of information written on scrolls and passed on by word of mouth. And there was a Greek historian who got a front row seat for a part of the end of it, and his name was Zosimus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zosimus_(historian)
Oh no! Two Wikipedia references in one post!!! Paying attention to actual historical references with a well sourced document! Well, the monetization for this post is dead.
Yes, Zosimus did also report after the fact. But considering the tools he had to work with it’s impressive. It’s a lot closer to actual events than Gibbons. And he had contact with other people who were far closer in time than Gibbons. And now the new breed of conspiracy theorists have a new name I coined while trying to come up with something appropriate. The fake plural of Zosimus. The Zosimi. And they have cell phones with cameras, knowledge of the difference between actual conspiracies vs. fake news smoke and mirrors hoax conspiracy bullshit, economic problems, and a giant chip on their shoulders.
We’ve come far since Alex Jones heyday. Astroturfing dumbass content like crisis actors vs. what’s going on with those Epstein files. Chemtrails making frogs gay vs. so is there really fentanyl on boats from a country that deals in cocaine instead of fentanyl. Why aren’t there any actual photos of litter boxes in elementary school classrooms? Explain to me again why Trump’s ballroom means something gematria related to the game winning touchdown by the Rams. I’m intrigued and future Zosimi are going to want to know why excessive attention grabbing ragebait matters more than facts. There are millions of them out there, and shooting people in the head getting put on video serves the breaking shit on purpose angle quite well, it doesn’t win over friends.
I’m still expecting a lot of entertainment media this year and early next year to specifically attack the core issues. Filmmakers inspired by the middle finger South Park put up. Or Vietnam War vet trauma upgraded to current times Or dystopian scarcity of resources based on data center water usage for scams versus crop irrigation. Whatever it may be there’s a lot of source material for the Zosimi. And some of it hasn’t even happened yet.