What do you do in gematria decodes when you get a number that’s too big to be useful? Shave that puppy down into a manageable size. Or maybe even parse it into tiny parcels out of the whole package.
Gematria weirdos work mostly within a huge set of data points to pick and choose from. So list A is yesterday’s bad news = keyword = two or three digit number. List B = scapegoat = keyword = two or three digit number. Anything other than matching two words via their values isn’t even really gematria.
It’s been a long time since I’ve seen World War Z so I’ll just assume that this scene makes sense for what it presents. A realistic password or number passcode will have strength in numbers. Choosing the letter A would be just plain stupid. If the keypad to enter the code is showing to enter one single letter, most criminals realizing that they only need to guess 25 times will just fly through the alphabet and in that case get it right on the first try. If it’s a passcode of a single number, I’d wager 1 would be the first guess. A five digit passcode, unlike gematria, that actually makes sense.
But that’s not the way the grifter mind operates. The grifter sees five digits as a burden, usually best to be ignored. Unless you want to make up complete gematrix.org gibberish for your phrase it’s not going to be taken seriously. Single words and short phrases are more psychologically appealing. While Gematrix gibberish such as Fred Illuminati bingo open architecture 2day = xxx makes you look more stupid than Marjorie Taylor Greene.
So by golly, what does one do to a number like 56964? There’s a perfectly disgusting anti science trend going on where FEMA and meteorologists are receiving death threats:
I’ve got numbers in a movie that has another organization (WHO) that I’d like to get harassed. But that number is toooooooo fucking big. Let’s shave that baby down to three separate numbers! Because nothing says gematria credibility like not actually doing gematria.
The filmmakers did us a favor by not having 0 as one of the digits in the code. That would have instantly shaved the number down to four digits. Even though gematria critics noted long ago that dropping zeroes is optional instead of a requirement we know that it would be dropped in this case. Four digits parsed down into two separate two digit components. Having a remainder of that stray fifth digit and arbitrarily declaring 4 to be a number associated with death - classic not even really gematria fake decoding bullshit. Using 4 here is the same as a weak password of the single letter A or numerical passcode of 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment