Changing The Rules

One of the great strengths of Gematria and how it fits into the cyber political landscape is its extreme lack of rules.  Sure there are some basic concepts, but by strengths I really mean weaknesses as just like it’s a real challenge to not find matching gematria for any story you want to concoct it’s nearly impossible for a post of any significant length to not contain some kind of contradiction.  You just used the A=26, Z=1 cipher instead of the more usual order.  You find 2107, which is close enough to the year 2017 for your purposes, AND you dropped the zero last week and didn’t drop the zero this week.  And HUBBARD=56, SOCIETY OF JESUS=56 doesn’t mean he’s a member of the evil empire because…reasons.

Hardcore gematria users that fall into the category of what could be called a true believer as opposed to a grifter stirring up trouble are cognitively incapable of processing the simple fact that just based on the gematria alone every person living now, that lived previously, and will live in the future is a member of the evil empire.

Sports are a good example of something familiar that has a clearly defined set of rules.  And as the games evolve, changes are made.  To increase excitement, the rules for illegal contact on the quarterback changed since games where Tom Brady passes for 300+ yards are more exciting than the Ravens winning 10-6.  And the end result was it was a penalty to look cross-eyed at Tom.

But changes are made during the off season.  Since the rule is that there is generally one winner and one loser, supporters of the loser are required to take the L.  Liberal amounts of complaining about the bad calls are expected. Major rule changes are discussed and if common sense prevails necessary updates are made for the upcoming set of games, but now…

…losers try to avoid taking the L and getting it retroactively declared a W.  A hardcore gematria true believer is the kind of person that won’t take no for an answer and refuses to take the L.  Which since gematria is so ridiculously easy to retroactively declare everything a W makes it a perfect tool to recruit cognitively impaired losers.  There’s a reason Hubbard has the nickname, “After the Fact, Zach”. 

Let’s turn to a non gematria example.  Vaccine ingredients.  You may have heard the old chestnut about mercury in vaccines.  I am also worried about mercury.  It’s extremely toxic and a big problem if your diet consists of a lot of dolphin meat.  But real scientists made a compound that was comparatively safe.  If you were super serious about ingredients, you would never be able to eat anything now, anything that previously existed or anything that exists in the future.  If you get lured into an insincere debate about vaccine ingredients, just point out how table salt is sodium and chlorine.  Both are super reactive and dangerous by themselves.  Chlorine gas being used as a weapon kind of proves that point.  Tell them to take the L and find a real argument.  Because there’s no going back and retroactively declaring victory on how sodium didn’t play fair and gave you severe burns.

Effective governments try to at least at times make an effective set of rules.  And effective government documents have language about changing the rules in the off season.  (To the conspiracy knuckleheads out there, these are something like Amendments to the US Constitution.)  You are allowed to change the rules if we find out that chlorine doesn’t kill people.  Unlikely, but whatever.  We are allowed to change the rules if, oh for a wild example, we think there might be something with our outdated gun laws.  We The People includes people getting the shaft because of those who won’t take NO for an answer and take the L.