Thyme For The Sage’s Thoughts On Rosemary’s Baby

https://web.archive.org/web/20180504050632/https://extra-capsa.com/2018/04/30/kate-louis-rosemarys-baby-and-the-royal-illuminati-coven/

The sage being Brother Berg of Extra Capsa.  Or me.  Take your pick.  It depends on if you want to gullibly believe in misinformation.

With the slow down at FTFM I popped over to Berg’s video on Stoneman Douglas to check on its remarkable status as being one of the few Parkland hoax videos to survive the concentrated Google purge and I found a bit of an argument in the comments.

This is an example of why this video survives and why Brother Berg is not a recurring topic here.  He’s much kinder and gentler.  However, sports champs predictions.  No.  This Cyborg person has nailed the weakness of non predictably and pulling the “you’re too stupid to understand gematria” reverse psychology ploy isn’t Bergie’s style. What is his style is an overwhelming rearrangement and dropping of digits claiming matches that aren’t really matches.  And a suspicious apparent ulterior motive.  I’ll get to that.

But this lead me to check his blog to make sure the 9081=189 style nonsense was still in play.  I’m not sure what I planned to do with it from there.  Creating a sock puppet account and trolling is not my style, preferring to be a bit more direct here.  But what I did find was the most recent post which I’ve shared the link to at the start of this post.

No big secret I’m a film buff and so it’s no surprise that I own a copy of Rosemary’s Baby.  I was not in time for the monthly awards and this post could have been adequate for the winner.  I’m not waiting for May’s awards.  Because June is a special month, per the film, so I’ll be busy.

A minor objection was avoided when I discovered the release date listed in the post is 6/21 when actually it’s 6/12.  However this is merely a typo on his part and the subsequent numerology is correct.  A more serious objection is the claim that Farrow’s dress is “nearly identical” to Kate’s dress.

Well sure.  If identical means completely different shade of red and different lace pattern.  I would have gone with “similar”, but this selective lack of visual acuity usually applied to golf courses and spotting trannies is a common gematria sage trait.  It would be interesting to see side by side pictures of the full dresses instead of cropped photos of just from midsection up.

But this isn’t the real problem.  The reason for my review of the movie, if it’s in the movie I missed it. This post implies that the target due date for Rosemary’s devil spawn is 6/6/66.  Or as he says, certainly at least June 1966, 6/66.  It’s not.

The movie’s numerology IS important to the plot.  And the real answer is researchable.  And if you’re going to elevate this as proof of Illuminati covens you should have gotten this right.  It looks like the answer is in the novel.  I read it about 28 years ago.  And distilling a big book into a couple hours of movie some bits have to be cut.  Overall the movie is pretty faithful to the book.



Now let’s start with the often misquoted medical mistake that could help with this misfire.  From the time of ➡️conception⬅️ to the expected delivery date of baby is 10 months, not 9.  A lot of medical texts use 9 1/2 months for pregnancy which is accurate, but the due date is calculated as two weeks after the gal’s last period, adding up to 10 months from the cause of the missed period.  Here’s one of many references I could cite.
https://www.babycenter.com/400_is-pregnancy-nine-months-or-ten-months_1475315_484.bc

The October 4th and 5th dates for planning the baby in the movie would work out to June 6th-ish with the incorrect 9 months.  Now keep in mind this is the big guy, Satan his-self we’re dealing with. And though the Antichrist has a human mama, we should expect a bit more accuracy from the big S.  There’s a lot of leeway in human birthing and only about 4% of babies pop out on the expected due date.  So later in June is still believable, but we’re building up to the missing point, here.  The reason for the tangent here is to build tension, like a movie.  And to suggest that INCUBUS=149 is a silly PhraseShopped inclusion as an incubus is a lower level demon more concerned with the sex act than a child to rule the world.

The tension in the film also cranks up a notch at the New Year’s party where the proclamation is that 1966 will be Year One.  This being important to establishing that this is the birth of the Antichrist as a reflection of Christ’s birth.  So.  What day is the birth of Christ?  December 25th.  What day of the year is as far away from December 25th as you can get?

June 25th.

http://www.kimmillerconcernedchristians.com/Unsealings/1523.pdf

The perfect date from the actual literature should be and was June 25th.

Now apply this knowledge to the various dates in the post.  Don’t you think, even if the dress is close enough, that something as important as the date of birth of the Antichrist would hit more like, oh say, June 25th.  Hey, let’s throw Verne Troyer in there.  Obviously something Satanic going on there!

Once you start throwing as many irrelevant dates as you think you can justify into the mix you have more options to play with.  The date numerologist like the gematria always allow you to ignore what you don’t like and accept what you do, not only calling it “close enough” but damn near magical.  While in reality for every hit there are bazillions of misses when you ignore all the extra elisions, end date inclusion/exclusion, throwing in a second release date for a foreign country, etc....

How generous of you to limit your database to everything.  I could find equally meaningful connections in Blacks on Blondes Number 66, intended to be a joke name, but it’s probably been actually used.

Now look at that this.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180504063440/https://extra-capsa.com/personalnumerology/

Personal readings at the low, low cost of 33 euros.  Maybe if I throw out a bunch of meaningless numbers somebody will actually be stupid enough to pay me for it!

All the while forgetting that 33 is a hoax number.  Or at least to some of your cronies.  Because you guys never can agree on anything other than denial of gematria not working.