This should take a surprising turn if you are familiar with the DKE. If you want some “real” source material, then there’s Wikipedia or https://www.verywellmind.com/an-overview-of-the-dunning-kruger-effect-4160740.
Or in short, and incorrectly and antagonisticly put:
Stupid people don’t realize they are stupid.
Quite unfair because the psychologists that like to blather about this insert the more tepid “incompetence” for “stupid”. Just like you don’t need to be mentally ill to have flawed logic you don’t need to be stupid to be incompetent.
The thing about gematria is that it’s not really practiced by exceptionally incompetent people. They mostly know grammar with a few laughable exceptions which I’ve pointed out because my fans like that kind of thing. They certainly know how to use a computer. We can guess that they function well enough in society and may one day have viable offspring. What we have is gematria being rigged for success. After you spend a little bit of time learning that there’s not really any rules the real challenge would be not to find a match between literally, absolutely any two given events.
In the literature the focus is pretty heavy on the incompetence, but there is the other side of the coin. People who are competent overestimate others. I find it brutally obvious that prime numbers don’t work by simply pointing out that via use of them TRUTH matches with DISHONEST. Therefore, I’m the problem, except this presents the opportunity to rehash some of the core values of this blog.
The target audience is not so much the same personalities that keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again. There’s finally a significant amount of material recorded in several spots that an objective, unbiased newcomer can reference. No longer does a sportswriter have to be told that they are an idiot because they don’t understand gematria and how obvious sports is rigged and only bump into a pro gematria illogic festival.
Science and logic are clearly on my side. Probability mathematics, misquoted facts, logical fallacies. It’s not enough to post a comment to a video that says someone is wrong without specifics of exactly what is wrong. The more detailed refutations that I’ve seen get deleted as soon as they are discovered. Those with an agenda (money or admiration) don’t like this material. Because of the Dunning Kruger Effect it is useless to argue directly with the utterly clueless unless you love playing lorikeet chess.
Now an example. I first started looking up Dunning Kruger about a week ago. Yesterday I had a video about it show up in my recommendations on YouTube without me actually searching for it. I can only guess why, but I try to guess why before assuming that the Organic Matrix is stalking me. Or I ignore it and move on with life. This is probably because I used Google to look it up. No big deal. The utterly clueless will use confirmation bias to take care of the guessing and insist it is not just a guess but must be reality. Whatever the cause, I have absolutely no proof and insisting it is reality solely because it tidily fits my view of the world is wrong, hence I pretty much choose to ignore it and move on with life.
———————————————-
How on Earth can you know without any doubt that Event A is the Organic Matrix and Event B is the evil cabal intentionally coding? Now there’s a huge difference between them and me, because they pretty much seem to have near omniscience about everything, while I have to fart around the Internet for an hour looking up “phrase for stupid people not knowing their stupid” but I actually take the time to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment