Freemasonry Compass - Busted!

When I last visited this topic I had a portion I wanted to talk about that I left out.  Now, thanks to a technology upgrade and a recent circus performer’s death I get to turn it into a full post.

Of course the circus acrobat’s death isn’t simply dying tragically the way that it was reported by the lying, evil media.  It has to be something more than falling from a sufficient height and hitting the ground at the wrong angle to break his skull, like these bastards claim:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/03/cirque-du-soleil-acrobat-autopsy-brain-hemorrhages-skull-fracture-yann-arnaud/amp/

No, we get an entire post about the lurid details of how it was somethinge unearthly.  Something so terrifying that we get a whole blog post.  Oh no, said Carl Denham.  It was not the fall, it was the numbers that killed the man.*
https://web.archive.org/web/20180322065009/http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/03/19/38-year-old-cirque-du-soleil-performer-dies-after-fall/
A link to a video of the fall is embedded.  Note the commentary regarding the fall near the link.  Was it 20-30 feet or less?  Did he fall on his head or neck?  I can’t tell.  The distance is questionable depending on if you measure the height from where his feet would be if perpendicular or parallel to the ground.  I sure can’t tell how he impacted without footage from an acrobatic: dashcam.  As these numbers are not used in the gematria, they are not important.  What is important is that to support your story you are using powers of observation.  So I want an explanation of the 47 degree Freemason compass numerology of 47, because it really looks bad for your side.  Before I just questioned it, whether it was variable.  Now, the same way talking about 8’s being drawn with circles in a font that clearly is ovals and not circles, I have visual evidence.  The picture in question is this image:



My powers of observation are way above average.  I doubt that you need my level to get a good idea that the compass angle is substantially larger than 47 degrees here.  The Freemason square component of that picture is, of course, 90 degrees.  To me it looks like the compass is almost 90 degrees.  So, not having a protractor and being a cheap Scots Irish bastard I did the best I could do.

You could trace the image and compare, or here’s the officially approved cheap Scots Irish method.  I hate the idea of wasting $2.79 on a pair of toenail clippers when I never use the sad excuse for a nail file part.  It doesn’t have gradations on it, but you don’t need an exact measurement for this exercise.  Simply move the file from the body of the clippers into a V shape, then superimpose your cliptractor™️ over the compass until it matches the angle.  Now you can turn your cliptractor™️ upside down and compare it to the known 90 degree angle of the square.  It almost matches.  The compass angle is approaching 90 degrees.  Let’s see...90/2=45.  Holy shit, this bad boy is almost twice as big as it should be.

Because every time the number 47 shows up we’re forced to listen to how it “obviously” is a reference to the damn compass.  And what’s more important, Hubbard himself used this exact same image as his thumbnail (untrimmed by a cliptractor™️) for at least one video:



Which is a video response to an (alleged) actual Freemason.  And nobody noticed.  No other Freemasons, none of the other so called experts,  no loyal minions, no manufacturer of cliptractor™️s said a word about how odd it is that this image doesn’t support that 47 means Freemason compass.  Don’t you think if it was that important that you could have at least used an image that was a better match?  I think I know, the All Seeing Eye part was was just too good to pass up.  It looks ominous.  (Note that there is no eyebrow.  The makers of cliptractor™️ also manufacture eyebrowrazor™️).

There’s still time to edit the book and change all the 47 material!!!  Did I help fix a mistake and do I get a copy?

* This is sort of a quote from King Kong.  So, you’re hot chick of the day is (sorry, purists) not Fay Wray, but Jessica Lange in her first film role.  Hard to believe she won an Academy Award after this?  Maybe not.  She was just eye candy and as far as playing the ultimate ditzy blonde, she nailed it.  She did win a statuette of a cliptractor™️ for nailing this role.  One also must wonder, how did King Kong trim his nails?  It’s pretty unlikely Skull Island villagers had cliptractors™️ large enough to help out.