The easiest way to predict a sports champion is the gematria method. Let's go over some of the detail from my post, How To Predict A Sports Champion.
Simply, don't make an actual prediction. Wait until it's over. There has to be *something*, no matter how lame sounding, to say. GEORGIA =44. Not very convincing, but this was actual Gematria "proof" for Atlanta. The danger is obvious. You get called out for claiming gematria has predictive powers and consistently use your Texas sharpshooting skills to paint the target in hindsight.
So mask the lack of predictability in some way. This doesn't have to wait for the big game, you can jump right in with the playoffs. Or you can even make a preseason prediction and keep your fingers crossed.
1). Since you can always find stupid shit like GEORGIA =44, predict a favorite to win. My isn't that convenient that a lot of non gematria sports predictions think the Patriots are good, and this is the year 98 means something! Now why this doesn't work for Carl Nassib and the winless Browns is a mystery. So hope that there's nobody like me to point that out. I take it from video commentary that yesterday's games Hubbard picked two heavy favorites , a 1 point underdog and turned the recording off before actually making the fourth pick.
2). Pick multiple teams. Now you can show the gematria of Carl Nassib and disregard that the Browns have 0 chance to win the Super Bowl. But really? The Browns? Aren't you suggesting that gematria doesn't work? You still need to pick better teams, but have to make it believable. Steelers got a 98. A rather bizarre 98, but a 98 documented before the playoffs started. Now you have two good teams and if one of them wins you only have to explain why one 98 is better than the other. And still hope that all the complete nonsense 98's like Eli Manning, Sean Lee, Mark Davis and poor old Carl don't get noticed. That's the problem with committing to a tiny number, like what 113 is always supposed to mean. So if you don't want to do that...
3). Be Nostradamus. Be vague. This can be done on a game by game basis. And it is done all the time. "The Patriots have Tom Brady = 98. But Miami has <insert bullshit argument here>, so I really don't know.". You can lean towards suggesting the Patriots, but just in case Jay Cutler plays like he has been possesed by the restless spirit of Johnny Unitas you have the escape hatch. "Hah! I predicted Miami to win! I'm a genius!"
And if that's not a good enough escape hatch.
4). I was wrong, but I wasn't wrong. They flipped the script to make me look bad. The last resort to try and save face when you actually went on record with an ill advised prediction, a genuine pregame prediction.
Now here's where your relying on the persona you manufactured. Now you have to have the loyal minions convinced of your infallibility so much that they believe you can't possibly be wrong. They're out to get me. They're watching me. Every other upset that ever happened was rigged. Or not. Or all games are rigged including the ones I got right. Or why am I making predictions in the first place if everything's rigged and I can't control the outcome like THEY do. It gets very confusing.
In the world of logical arguments this is referred to as the Golden Hammer. Anything that contradicts your view is explained away by "Oh, THEY did it." Insert the infinitely powered being or organization of your choice. If the Earth is flat, why is there gravity? The aliens did it! Why did the Titans win yesterday? The NWO decided that this was the game that they wanted to embarrass you with. They did it.
This is so overused it's been demoted from a golden hammer to a gematria tiny little 2" hammer used for detail work in crafts. It's ineffective for conventional hammer stuff, like building a wooden shed using full sized nails. It should be instantly dismissed, yet sadly after years of abuse this still seems to hold a lot of weight.
This doesn't just apply to sports. It's all over gematria. THEY changed the prince's engagement date. (An example of the type of things said, not necessarily actually said.) And here's a big one from yesterday.
Hubbard says sometimes the "c" word does apply. My isn't that a convenient escape hatch. If it's not the "whole language encoded" argument then the goalposts get switched to, "Oh it's the eeeeevil media and what they say." This was brought up regarding a "fake news" media article written by, you guessed it, Zachary Hubbard. Not him. Oh that's just a coincidence. Like suddenly he's the ultimate authority on what qualifies as a coincidence. Just when his entire system comes crashing down relying on "these things can't be coincidences" now the overused tiny little craft hammer comes out of the tiny little pocket sized fold up tool kit to pronounce. They did it to make me look bad.
I could spend some time estimating how many other Zachary Hubbard's there are. But I don't have to. Of course this can and will be used as the explanation for Zachary Hubbard the disgusting pedophile having the same gematria as Zachary Hubbard the numerologist. They did it to make me look bad. Statistics, probability and the law of shappens dictate these kinds of things do happen, which is why I get great enjoyment of pointing out things like Jeopardy having a two digit number category and 227 pounds of bologna being seized at the US/Mexican border. More interesting is how to decide what is a coincidence for someone named John Smith and when the Conusionati "did it" to make him look bad. And if you want to move the goalposts back to "the entire language", it took me about three minutes to come up with COINCIDENCE ARBITER = 113. And we all know how that works out committing to a number always meaning something. Is it really a coincidence that VERACIOUS=113 and shows up in something like: Every. Fucking. Dictionary. Or at least respectable dictionaries a school teacher would have access to.
The real people that need to wake up are those that fall for the tiny little craft hammer escape logic. How many times does that card need to be played before it sounds as disingenuous as it is?
"A great way to win a debate is to control all the terms and rules."
- Some guy I know who works for the State Attorney General's Office.
Which is exactly why I recommend you don't argue with them directly. You know ahead of time what they're going to say and it will be deliberately confusing. And wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment