The history beginning this is part of my interest in the topic if gematria. I was presented with a theory I knew possibly couldn't be right. And they included science. I quickly learned that just like is typical of pseudoscience actual science is missing. Throw some words around like "geometry" and "phyllotaxis" and it sounds super cool like you must know what you're talking about, when really the opposite holds true. If there's a Murphy's Law for science misuse it applies to gematria. It's wrong.
One of my first discoveries was the overuse of 93 meaning Sun. Not because it has gematria of 93, but because of the high school science book quote of the Sun being 93 million miles away. That's fine for high school (or home schooling if that's your thing) but when you start throwing around Pi, GPS coordinates and other science concepts that require more precision it starts to look insipid.
Shortly after my first aphelion post last year the narratives started having the wording "average distance to the Sun is 93 million miles". Also, more emphasis on SATURN=93 which has some astrological death angle (I think). Whatever the reason for the switch, I'm still not convinced that Sun = 93 even if we talk about averages.
First, a post where the Sun is 93 million miles away.
http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2017/04/47-96-119-john-glenns-funeral-at.html
With lots of science narrative and gematria of the word SCIENCE.
Now here's a chart of actual Sun distances for this year.
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/sun/sun2018.html
If you look for more digits to represent the distance to the Sun, instead of 93 million it's usually the distance of one Astronomical Unit (AU on the chart) which is 92,955,807 miles. This varies by a completely insignificant amount on a yearly basis. So, 2018 or similar charts for other years are all representative.
Now this "average" distance is the average of the two extremes. In 2018 the closest and farthest distances between the Sun are 91,401,983 miles and 94,507,803 miles. Add those together, divide by two that's your one AU.
A reasonable person can assume that the average is weighted. If you dieted before your annual physical so the doctor doesn't bust on you for being a fatty and you weigh 180 pounds, you immediately chow down and blimp up to 210, then drop back down to 180 for the next physical you might have spent 10 months at 210. You're cheating yourself and your doctor by claiming you averaged weighing 195, much less faking it that the doctor wouldn't know that you weighed anything but the same amount as the year before. So, how many days a year is the Sun 93 million miles away?
A reasonable person (i.e., not a numerologist) would also assume that with anything close to normal rounding would include 92,500,000 miles through 93,500,000 miles. If you go to the astropixels.com chart you can calculate the AU coefficient x the standard AU and see on a day to day basis what the distance is from the Earth to the Sun. Any coefficient less than .995096 is less than 92,500,000 miles. Any more than 1.005854 is greater than 93,500,000 miles.
Since it's an elliptical orbit there are two times per year the distance is between the range of 92,500,000-93,500,000 miles. March 17th-April 24th and Sept. 15th-Oct. 23rd. That's 77 days of the year. 77/365=21%. The Sun is only 93 about a fifth of a year.
I'm not suggesting that the nearly infinitely powered elites should have changed our language to clarify how astronomical unit, aphelion and perihelion came into our language. It's a lot simpler than that. How about that since Sun means 93 because of this and not gematria is just plain stupid.
Now is a good time to defend it. Just say that Google, Wikipedia and everyone with real science knowledge is wrong. They're out to get you by changing the numbers from what was a reasonable approximation in high school to the real numbers to make you look bad. After what they did to the Pentagon I'm sure that argument will get a lot of traction.
No comments:
Post a Comment