http://gematrinator.com/blog/index.php/2018/01/27/google-wikipedia-caught-changing-numbers/
The Flight 77 stories is one of those little coincidence that can't be a coincidence chestnuts (not chess nuts, like me) that has been thrown around by the conspiracy crowd for as long as it took someone to recognize that the number 7 is the same as the number 7. Durp even figured that one out.
Like the Lincoln/Ford assassination story, once you get beyond the VP names and Lincoln car/Ford theater and the cool looking "hits" the story breaks down. Why make so many remarkable coincidences and not finish the job? I'll try to find a link to the number rebuttal. This still applies, though:
http://skepdic.com/911conspiracy.html#flight77
Some of the links also mention the key details I emphasize here, even though they talk about the faulty science. As said, the emphasis on the cool and ignoring all the other stuff. Also the burden of proof.
That silly little word "proof" is something missing from many.... Screw it. All gematria narratives. It's not the job of the rational word to prove that Wikipedia intentionally changed the height of the Pentagon to embarrass you. The way it works is:
A donkey is a beast of burden
Donkeys are called jackasses.
If you're going to be a jackass about stuff the burden of proof is on you.
DONKEY=88
TRIANGULAR = 808
The triangle being the mark of the BEAST, like beast of burden. (See how easy that was?)
If you apply Occam's Razor you can take a guess that somebody found that a reputable source discovered that the height of the Pentagon was misreported, made a change on the best known website for collecting information and that was the end of the story. If there is a serious issue with the updated information then it's somebody else's turn to refute it.
I went above and beyond the call of duty and I checked the evil editor's reference. It's the Pentagon. I couldn't find a date that their website was last updated. It's a fair guess that it was not just updated to fuck up the numerology just after a single crank video was put up. If there's any cause and effect relationship involved it's more likely that somebody got sick of the bullshit numerology story and was suspicious about that detail. Maybe they took a tour of the Pentagon recently, that's what that site is for - Pentagon tours. I don't care. I can live with 77 feet or 71 feet. The burden of proof isn't mine and shouldn't be anyone's except those that it doesn't fit into their altered version of reality.
What should happen for those is
1). Find a source for 77 feet.
2). Edit the page on Wikipedia.
3). Have the page peer reviewed (which means millions of people, it's Wikipedia).
4). Then if 77 really the right number it's up to the Pentagon to decide if their records are wrong and what they want to do about it.
When you apply Madman's Razor you get something like, "The government (It's the Pentagon!) conspiracy is so deep that they changed the height listing just to make me look bad."
Other notes:
Google- Search engines find stuff on the Internet. Probably updated off Wikipedia and related searches.
Exactly 777 seconds? Really? EXACTLY? You shaved off 3.5" the first go round. Do you really care if it was 777.0001 seconds?
Oh, another cipher has a value of 71! Why am I not surprised? If it wasn't another cipher a 71 foul have been found by prime numbers, dropping digits or something. What's the big deal?
The Pentagon does not have 7 sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment