Hubbard (again) has claimed that his work is not conspiracy theory related. There's one thing we can agree on. It's more appropriate to call it conspiracy fantasy. His boast is that he set out to prove his postulates in 2013, and his evidence shows it. I've countered virtually every argument and recorded it all here.
But since I got a well received fun post with more sniglets yesterday, it's time for a more serious missive. It's a repeat of previous info, but so newcomers don't have to dig through the blog I'll put it up now, with a different angle so as not to sound like a ciphorg.
There's another debate video out there. If debate can be the right word for trying to have a conversation with close minded confirmation bias nut sacks. A commenter replied to the non-gematria utility side of the argument about using multiple ciphers with something about, "you don't have just one password, password123, it's too easy to guess." Which is true. But your analogy blows chunks.
A better analogy would be, you have a lottery with 90 balls numbered 10-99. The payoff is only if your ticket number matches the number on the ball. But, this is the gematria lottery, so you can change the number on your ticket to whatever other two digit number you want. After the ball has been picked. You can't lose.
But it does get more ridiculous in gematria. And another analogy puts it into a more appropriate scientific setting. That turns into conspiracy fantasy.
Little Johnny got a bad skin rash. Mumsy had him recap what he did that day. What he touched, ate, looked at cross eyed, trying to figure out what it was to avoid the rash in the future.
With too many variables, she wised up and took Johnny to the dermatologist. They decided to test some of the candidates for the rash cause by placing a small amount of several on his skin. They could have just tried just one. (One cipher). But this is a gematria dermatologist. So they applied many. Pet turtle dung, peanut butter, wheat gluten, raspberries, the New York Times (late edition, large sized print for the visually impaired, extra advertisement insert), water, etc..., etc.... (A boatload of ciphers.). Sure enough. More rash. Something he was in contact with caused the rash. Better avoid them all to be safe, poor Attu the pet turtle won't be petted ever again.
Then gematria adds further stupidity to the analogy. Not only have you not decoded cause and effect in a one to one relationship, there's the idiot dermatologist that's heard about this kind of skin condition being caused by Woodcutter Ivy. Which doesn't really exist, but she always thought it sounded like a really cool thing. Harvested from unicorn droppings after grazing under the Harvest Moon. She hates unicorns(freemasons) so suggests this is the cause of the rash. Hey, you can't prove it isn't, right?
With no historical precedent on what exactly is the difference between unicorn rash and normal rash now Johnny has to watch out for it. When if they stuck to science and actual evidence they could have found the one single thing that was the cause. (It was the raspberries, btw.)
You, the narrative writers, have decided that number XX must mean word YY. When there's so many different ways to get the number and could mean so many different ways to interpret it that bunches of different things could be the word. "I said 58 means freemasonry because I told you so." is NOT evidence. I don't give a fuck how long you've been doing it. Four years of bullshit is still bullshit.
So if you are going to invoke science because it's supposedly part of the basis of your system other than a convenient excuse to add more numbers to the database (Sun distance, atomic numbers, etc....) you'd better learn about the scientific method and evidence. But of course, evidence can disprove a hypothesis and the overwhelming evidence shows you are just dead wrong.
For actual evidence of gematria not working check my June 8th post regarding Reverse ordinal, grammar - specifically the prefix UN and WAS vs. WERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment