Gematria Spelling Out Numbers To Make Other Numbers Debunked

If you Gematriaddicts had a bad day at work, this is not going to help your mood. So before continuing, get yourself a stiff drink, comfort for of your choice. Search out your copy of a favorite old movie. I recommend Come Back To The Five And Nine, Jimmy Dean Jimmy Dean or Five to Five with Dolly Parton. Maybe you TiVod the NBA championship hoping LiBron Jamis went a perfect nine for five from the three point line.


The obligatory and inevitable jokes are out of the way. Although more will surely come. I have to get serious now since this is important. If you are seriously interested in understanding what's really going on with Gematria and why it doesn't work this is an extremely clear cut example. No playing around with synonyms and manufacturing phrases here. No intertwining different numbering systems. At the bare minimum it shows that the overused and extremely annoying trick of spelling out a number to use it to create another number is not reasonable.




Spelling out a number. In the gematriverse 37 is not just 37. It *can* be. It can also be 165. T-H-I-R-T-Y S-E-V-E-N=165. Which doesn't just mean 165. In the manufactured scripting they can now find a word that equals 37 and "synch" it with, for example, something that happened on the 165th day of the year.


Since I am one if those crazy people that thinks 37 equals 37 I grew to detest this as a crime against nature. I thought I was going to find matches in reduction methods going through 0-9 spelling them out. Sure, F-O-U-R, F-I-V-E and N-I-N-E all equal 24 and 21. Same number if letters, bound to have a good chance to reduce to identical values. But what's this? Have the NIPTUCKs let this slip through?


FIVE = 6+9+22+5=42
NINE = 14+9+14+5=42
(66 each in reverse, Satan is calling!)
Well knock me over with a wolverine hair wig. Isn't that interesting.


Sarcasm alert. Let me guess. These invisible forces that have guided or creation of language and numbers have created identical values for two out of the ten digits we use. And we're supposed to ignore that? Know when it's supposed to be used and when we're misinterpreting? Maybe you can get away with telling 'q' to bugger off, (as Jamis Bond often wishes he could) but you aren't going to get too far by getting rid of 'e' and 'i'. Twenty percent of the numbers we use are confusing, two of the letters including the most common one in the English language is confusing. That makes all kinds of fuckeng sinsi.


Needless to say it's not just limited to single digits. Thirty five = Thirty nine. Nine billion Nine hundred = Five billion five hundred.


This will be met with the only response Gematria proponents can possibly have. Ignore it. Too much old material has been put through changing digits into words. There is no room for misinterpretation. You could argue that my example of TRUE=BOGUS means that bogus can't be used as a synonym for false. But there's no way you can get rid of the fifth and ninth letters of the alphabet much less two of the digits.